Archive for February 2013
No One Else Wants To Bring You The Hidden Truth Behind The News Australian Government almost forcibly pushes the HPV vaccines on young boys as well as girls Part 4
Australian Government almost forcibly pushes the HPV vaccines on young boys as well as girls Part 4
Are vaccines harming Australian children?
Are young Australians potentially being sterilized or made infertile
When you look deeper into all the government and pharmaceutical propoganda you begin to realise that historically gross criminal negligence has been carried out against many babies, infants and the young of our society.
This criminal negligence has accelerated out of control up to the current time with the cabal side stepping normal protocol to enforce their hidden Agenda 21 mass depopulation mission.
My past articles have focused more on what experts in the field have revealed and also some aspects from whistle-blowers so now it is time to step it up a notch and provide you with more facts and evidence that could open up a floodgate of investigations and court action against those that not only produce the vaccines but also those that approved the implementation of them.
My question to Presidents, Prime Minister, Senior Ministers, Ministers for Health, Department of Health, UN and World Health Authority would have to be – “Who gives you the authority to vaccinate our young when you knowingly know the risks associated with them and have you yourselves and your families been vaccinated with such things as the annual flu top up (that now secretly includes the swine flue) and have you allowed your daughters and now sons to be vaccinated with the yet to be proven HPV?
In Part 3 I discussed the ingredient Thimerosal which is mercury based and was used extensively worldwide…….fortunately in the west the use of Thimerosal has subsided but is still being used extensively in third world countries……….I would remind you of the following:
In a 1991 memo, Dr. Maurice Hilleman, one of the fathers of Merck’s vaccination programs, warned the president of the company’s vaccination division that 6-month-old children administered the shots on schedule would suffer mercury exposures 87 times the government safety standard (400 times the current U.S. government’s safe level). He recommended that Thimerosal be discontinued, “especially when used on infants and children.”
———————————-
Mommy is this going to cause me problems in later life?
“No son the Prime Minister and the Minister for Health both approved this programme so it must be ok”
Let’s now move on and see what has replaced Thimerosal in the western world and again refresh your memory of the ingredients that are contained in the HPV vaccine for instance:
GARDASIL HPV INGREDIENTS:
Aluminum 225mcg
Animal and human studies have shown aluminum can cause nerve cell death and that vaccine aluminum adjuvants can allow aluminum to enter the brain, as well as cause inflammation at the injection site leading to chronic joint and muscle pain as well as fatigue.
Sodium Borate “Borax” 35mcg
This is the main ingredient in Boric Acid. Powdered Boric Acid is often used to kill cockroaches. Sodium Borate is now listed as a dangerous poison. Symptons of Sodium Borate poisoning are very similar to many of the side effects being reported with the Gardasil vaccine.
“Borax was added to the Substance of Very High Concern (SVHC) candidate list on 16 December 2010. The SVHC candidlate list is part of the EU Regulations on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals 2006 (REACH), and the addition was based on the revised classification of Borax as toxic for reproduction category 1B under the CLP Regulations. Substances and mixtures imported into the EU which contain Borax are now required to be labelled with the warnings “May damage fertility” and “May damage the unborn child”.
Polysorbate 80 50mcg
Although Polysorbate 80 is a food additive that enables solubility of flavouring oils with water, injection is quite different. Polysorbate 80 injected into prepubescent rats caused a rapid growth of reproductive organs, but growth was abnormal and the rats were sterile, unable to have children. When used intravenously with vitamins it has been known to cause anaphylactic shock. According to the Polysorbate 80 MSDS, it may be a carcinogenic, (cause cancer), as well as a mutagenic, (birth defects).
L-histidine 0.78mcg
L-histidine is an essential amino acid which is a precursor to allergic reactions. It stimulates the inflammatory response of skin and mucous membranes (one possible cause of the allergic reactions reported). It is also responsible for forming metal bearing enzymes (such as the toxic metal storage protein metallothionein). Metals such as zinc, copper, and nickel are transported by binding to L-histidine and the binding is essential for excretion of excess heavy metals. Many parents of autistic children are quite familiar with Metallothionein and MT deficiency.
Sodium Chloride 9.56mcg
Common salt
Yeast Protein 7mcg
This is a hidden form of MSG, as it creates synthetic free glutamic acid in the processing, which in simpler terms is MSG. Most vaccines contain some hidden form of MSG (eg hydrolysed gelatin) as this feeds the live virus.
REMEMBER TO TRIPLE THE FOLLOWING AMOUNTS DUE TO THE THREE SHOTS REQUIRED FOR THIS VACCINE
It would now be an opportune time to discuss one modern ingredient – Aluminum – that I am sure after reading this will make you incredibly angry to know what this can do to your baby/child…….this article explains further:
A great deal has been said about mercury in vaccines. What most people did not realize was that aluminum, also found in vaccines, was a known gene mutant and it appeared to be – potentially – just as dangerous as mercury! When combined, the toxicities of aluminum and mercury, together, were “additive” – in other words the dangers associated with the “combo” of aluminum and mercury were much worse than what you would get from either metal alone. Boyd Haley, metals expert, had testified to this fact during government reform hearings looking into matters of the autism-vaccine connection and metal toxicities. From the aluminum transcripts, clearly, this issue of metal synergies had been raised as a concern.
“for many toxic agents, metals in particular, is that of additivity… the response… is much more severe than I would predict from having either one of these agents acting by itself“
“most metals are very reactive“…
It certainly appeared to be true of aluminum also given it was considered “so effective” in initiating an immune system response – but, ask yourself – was that a sign of a “good thing” or perhaps a sign of “a very bad thing”!
Both formaldehyde and aluminum were found in vaccines. Both were known gene mutants.
There could be absolutely no denying that aluminum was a known gene mutant. Indeed, in agribusiness, soil was checked for aluminum content when growing genetically modified foods because it was a well known fact that aluminum altered the genetics of plants… and surely, if it altered the genetics of plants, it stood to reason it also altered the genetics of people, too! Aluminum was known to inhibit root growth and nutrient uptake in plants and this was a major financial burden in agribusiness. As such, in agribusiness, aluminum levels in soil were closely monitored since this was considered a toxin for plants. Thus, if a toxin for plants, one that inhibited nutrient intake and growth, did it not stand to reason that similar effects would be found in humans with exposure to this metal?
Yet, there were those who stated that because aluminum was so abundant in life that it could not possibly be “that dangerous”. Well… as I had stated in the past…salt water was abundant, too, but I certainly did not go around drinking it. But, what else did we know about aluminum. In a study I had found, the following was stated – I quote:
“Exposure to aluminum in laboratory animals results in the development of neurofibrillary tangles and
degeneration of cerebral neurons“
“Perhaps the most important thing that I took away from the last meeting was that those of us who deal with vaccines have really very little applicable background with metals and toxicological research.” [Dr. Martin Myers, Director of the National Vaccine Program Office, Department of Health and Human Services.
and this quote… again, in a meeting to assess the dangers/benefits of aluminum – a known gene mutant – in vaccines…
“Aluminum is not perceived, I believe, by the public as a dangerous metal and, therefore, we are in a much more comfortable wicket in terms of defending its presence in vaccines“ [Dr. John Clement representing World Health Organization at Department of Health and Human Services.
Also very obvious from this two day meeting was the fact that it very much appeared aluminum additives did basically nothing in “booster shots” but, yet, they were added because to remove them and make “special aluminum-free boosters” would prove too inconvenient for the pharmaceutical industry and as such, we preferred to inject more toxins – and known “worthless toxins” or aluminum adjuvants – according to this meeting – than to change our processes/procedures/products. Thus convenience came above safety and “need for this toxin in boosters in the first place.”
And then, there was this comment…
“So, in summary, looking at the historical data, there have been few clinical trials in which a given bath of vaccine with or without adjuvant has been tested in a comparable population so that just has not been done“. [Dr. Baylor, Acting Deputy Director of the Office Of Vaccine Research and Review, and Associate Director for Regulatory Policy at the Center for Biological Evaluation of Research at FDA.
This transcript also very much indicated that aluminum – a known gene mutant – tended to bind to large proteins – and “irreversibly so” and that it could “inhibit the formation of neuronal microtubules.” Also interesting to me was the fact that aluminum tended to accumulate in very specific parts of the body… I quote:
“Bone seems to be the greatest deport followed by kidney and brain and muscle…“
That certainly was very interesting given that leukemia and brain cancer had increased tremendously in recent years in young children… the blood, after all, was produced in the bone marrow… and given aluminum was a known gene mutant, it was not surprising to me that brain cancer was also on the upswing in children. What was cancer, after all, if not “cell mutations”. Note also that according to these same transcripts, aluminum was known to bind to transferrin – the protein in the blood responsible for carrying iron in the blood .
Indeed, if aluminum was known to bind to the protein transferrin that was supposed to transport iron in the blood, and if aluminum was known to accumulate in the bones – where we found the bone marrow – responsible for blood production – would it not make sense that aluminum was somehow interfering with blood production by blocking the iron from going to blood production or somehow interacting with that iron in a way it should not be doing? In my opinion, that certainly appeared to be a very strong possibility.
The blood had two major components to it… heme and globin…
Heme = unconjugated billirubin + iron
Globin = part of the blood having those cells involved in immune system functions.
According to work done by Atamna, et al., the following things were known – again, I quote:
“Heme is the major intracellular functional form of iron. It is synthesized in the mitochondria and the decline in synthesis could explain the loss of iron homeostasis in aging. Heme functions in hemoglobin and in a variety of enzymes as well as promoting the growth of nervous tissue… Heme deficiency was detrimental to normal mitochondrial function, stimulated oxidative stress by activating nitric oxide synthase, altered amyloid proteins, and inhibited zinc and iron homeostasis. The metabolic changes seen during the heme deficiency were similar to those in dysfunction neurons in patients with Alzheimer’s disease… Common reasons for heme deficiency are iron and vitamin B6 deficiencies, aging, and exposure to toxic metals such as aluminum. In addition, degradation of heme by heme oxygenase, which increases with age and in the brains of Alzheimer’s patients, may be a factor in changes in the metabolism of iron and heme with age. Therefore, heme deficiency may be an important and preventable part of the neurodegenerative process, which deserves more research and attention.”
Aluminum was also known to alter the permeability of the blood brain barrier
“… we know that shortly after injection most of the aluminum is inside the cells, into cells… after a few days you have no aluminum outside cells“
So, if aluminum was “inside the cells”, obviously, it certainly had the potential to interfere with mitochondria, and any work going on “inside the cells”… and that would include things like the proper processing of iron by cells, too!
And then this interesting comment regarding another derivative apparently used in some vaccines… saponin…
“Saponin, as you may know, binds to cholesterol. It punches a hole in red cells and, in fact, this may be one of the toxic mechanisms of saponin.”
From reading the “aluminum meeting transcript”, it very much appeared to me that the determination of “safe levels” for metal exposure in humans was, in my opinion, very much a “shot in the dark” – nothing more than – a “guess”!
———————————–
I could extend on many other extractions from the above but I am sure in doing so many of you would fall asleep reading it!!!
However, give some thought to what the above is actually saying ……..in basic language it is the fact that Aluminum is highly toxic and can stop your body from getting its normal nutrients and iron etc and increase the occurrence of many forms of cancer and mental disorders!!
When one considers what happens when Mercury and Aluminum are combined such as what would happen in third world countries (and to some extent in the modern world) the mind boggles as to the potential detriment of your health and mind etc…………..but do not worry folks because your leaders, ministers, health department officials and the pharmaceutical industry will make sure that if you fall sick they will pumps more medicines into your system to make you even sicker or result in your death……..who really cares?
The pharmaceutical industry is one of the most lucrative industries in the world and many specialists, doctors and those in power benefit immensely from allowing such vaccines to go ahead.
I can assure you that the HPV and many other vaccines certainly has many experts in the industry extremely concerned but they are not going to tell you that……..so I guess I will have too………..stay tuned for more evidence in Part 5
Peter Eyre – 1/3/2013
Broadcaster – Investigative Journalist – Middle East Consultant – Political Analysis
Will the British Government formally accept the Kurdish genocide?
The UK, US and many other countries assisted Saddam in carrying out the attack on the Kurds in Halabja
Every lethal Chemical and Biological Agent was given to Iraq including Anthrax and the most deadly of all – VX Gas
———————-
A very important debate takes place in London this week
UK PARLIAMENT DEBATE ON THE KURDISH GENOCIDE
Date: Thursday February 28, 2013
Time: 2.15pm
Place: House of Commons, UK Parliament.
To attend the debate in person: Use the Cromwell Green entrance to Parliament. Arrive at the House of Commons at least one hour before the debate begins and upon entering the building, ask for the House of Commons Public Gallery.
To see the debate live on television: BBC Parliament Live channel
To see the debate live on the internet: http://www.bbc.co.uk/democracylive/bbc_parliament/
It is imperative that all the recipients who received emails regarding this very important debate fully understand the involvement by the British Government in this terrible genocide.
It is also just as important for the Kurdistan Regional Government and for the Kurdish people in general to also understand the hypocrisy of the many governments that were involved in not only this genocide but also that of the Iranians during the Iraq-Iran War when Chemical and Biological Warfare was used by Saddam compliments of the UK, US and many other countries.
I have decided to write this short but factual article in order to add some leverage to the debate on Thursday in the hope that the Kurdish Government and its people will receive the recognition they deserve and that this debate leads to the British Parliament formally recognising the Kurdish genocide.
To add further meaning to this debate I have also copied the following email to the Kurdistan Regional Government and all those that are currently following the progress in Westminster:
Start of email:
From Peter Eyre
To uk@krg.org; hewittph@parliament.uk; patrick.harpur@mobtel.co.yu; patrick_barr21@hotmail.com; p.boes@ondd.be; pbouchebel@agilitylogistics.com; patrick.brazier@ae.britishcouncil.org; info@btwshiells.co.uk; pbrennan@btwshiells.co.uk; patrick.cockburn@attglobal.net; pcordingley.hq@da.mod.uk; cormackp@parliament.uk; patrick.crawford@ecgd.gsi.gov.uk; p.depachtere@wanadoo.fr; p.depachtere@swisswaterpower.ch; patrick.hargreaves@smithsdetection.com; Patrick.Lord@control-risks.com; patrick.mason@earthport.com; pmcguire@britannica.co.uk; patrick.schneider@eujust-lex.eu; patrick.toyne-sewell@uk.g4s.com; p.wissels@onstreamgroup.com; pjbradley@zoo.co.uk; Patson@asiacell.com; paul.abbott@parliament.uk; paul.adams@bbc.co.uk; info@denys.com; pa@heritageoilltd.com; paul.atherton@heritageoilplc.com; RMErbil@control-risks.com; pb@fugro-robertson.com; brennanp@parliament.uk; paulbristol@londonoilclub.com; burstowp@parliament.uk; paul.connew@kpmg.co.uk; paul.duffen@newsdeskmedia.com; paulreynoldslibdem@gmail.com; paul.elberg@mfa.ee; DOUGLASI@parliament.uk; paulflynnmp@talk21.com; foypa@parliament.uk; phil.goddard@the-eic.com; gordon809@hotmail.com; paul.hicks@symbion-power.com; paul.hinks@symbion-power.com; phipkiss@fairelyceramics.com; gaffneyp@parliament.uk; pjames@northernrisks.com; keetchp@parliament.uk; paul.lever3@btinternet.com; macalindin@hotmail.com; pmartin@eicriskconsulting.com; pmartin@eicriskconsulting.com; paul.martin@globalgroup.com; paul.mcgoldrick@bondpearce.com; pmoe@statoil.com; pmoody@nfts.co.uk; paul.radford@ecgd.gsi.gov.uk; paul.rasmussen@bbc.co.uk; ross_paul_j@cat.com; p.salmons@ioe.ac.uk; paul.shea@beechbrookcapital.com; paulsilk@aol.com; silkp@parliament.uk; paulsinger@securewest.com; pauls@rusi.org; pcs@coalitionsupplies.com; paul.speller@libdems.org.uk; paul.stokes@fco.gov.uk; paul.sykes@fco.gov.uk; paul.r.taylor@uktradeinvest.gov.uk; paul.r.taylor@ukti.gsi.gov.uk; office@kingedward.norfolk.sch.uk; paul.tomkins@cobham.com; paul.turner@clyde.co.uk; paul.tweed@johnsonslaw.co.uk; paul.tweedale@tenbroekeco.com; michael.white@guardian.co.uk; whitepm@parliament.uk; paul.whiteaway@independentdiplomat.org; paul.whiteway@independentdiplomat.org; py@eic-uk.com; paul.yaghmourian@the-eic.com; py@eic-uk.com; paulreynolds@email.com; paulmreynolds@gmail.com; paulreynolds@gmail.com; pbalaam@shearman.com; whitepm@parliament.uk; coyles@parliament.uk; pauline.shearman@cbi.org.uk; payman.moayedi@bbc.co.uk; payman.moayedi@bbc.co.uk; peg.mackey@thomsonreuters.com; pmackey@energyintel.com; peg.mackey@thomsonreuters.com; tayp@parliament.uk; pennyhs@tiscali.co.uk; pmordaunt@hanovercomms.com; ambassaden.london@foreign.ministry.se; per.enarsson@foreign.ministry.se; perihankorkmaz@yahoo.com; peronet@yahoo.com; majid_peshawa@yahoo.co.uk; peshraw@falconiraq.com; peshraw57@hotmail.com; peshraw@falconiraq.com; pete.digger@dlapiper.com; pete@vetsforfreedom.org; pete.smallwood@optaglio.com; packerman@rockcap.com; peter.aldous@halesworth.net; PAllsop@seafast.com; p.alm@bactec.com; peter.babb@kermanco.com; peter.beaumont@guardian.co.uk; pbishop@londonchamber.co.uk; bottomleyp@parliament.uk; lordbowness@googlemail.com; peter.brabeck-letmathe@nestle.com; p.brady@napier.ac.uk; peter.bullivant@isothane.com; peter.campbell@maerskoil.com; pdavies12@googlemail.com; pdolan@ophir-energy.com; peter.dunne@petroceltic.ie; peter.eyre7@btinternet.com; Peter.Frankham@scottwilson.com; pwgalb@yahoo.com; peter.gawne-cain@uktinorthwest.co.uk; gillespiep@parliament.uk; editor@reuters.com; peter.hackworth@gs.com; hainp@parliament.uk; peter.hertog@symbion-power.com; pehertog@emirates.net.ae; peter.hilliard@jacuzziuk.com; peter.horvath@hungarytrade.co.uk; peter.hutter@roxcel.com; Peter.jones@fco.gov.uk; peter.katzlberger@austrian.com; peter.kellner@yougove.com; p.kling@arch-kon.de; p.lassey@bradford.ac.uk; info@welshfootballtrust.org.uk; info@tt.dk; luffpj@parliament.uk; pmackenziesmith@protherolimited.com; Peter@frrme.org; peter.melki@ifpiraq.com; cllr.pmole@gateshead.gov.uk; peter.ormerod@promethanqworld.com; peter.rizzi@hsbcpb.com; peter.ryan@crystalpd.com; peter.seib@southsomerset.gov.uk; peter.smith@harpercollins.co.uk; peter.stokes1@virgin.net; pstokes1@live.co.uk; peter.stoke1@virgin.net; ptorday@bloomberg.net; peter.trail@vatechuk.com; oeu.london@embassy.mzv.cz; peter_urbanek@mzv.cz; london@czechtrade.cz; peter-van.leeuwen@minibuza.nl; duggang@parliament.uk; peter.wheeler@standardchartered.com; peterw@pascorisk.com; p.wilson@ukh.ac; peter.j@milton-lloyd.co.uk; pera.preining@trc-international.com; moonlight_culture@yahoo.com; phil.andrews@getenergyevent.com; office@getenergyevent.org; phil.baines@hsbc.com; phil.baines@hsbc.com; phil.baines@hsbc.com; phil.goddard@the-eic.com; media@countrywise.com; media@countrywise.com; media@countrywise.com; phil.paine@qicomm.com; phil@araborient.org; phil.sherwood@control-risks.com; pstocker@soilassociation.org; willisp@parliament.uk; scw@scw.org.uk; philipdew@dewconsult.com; DUNNEP@parliament.uk; PForsyth@bluehackle.com; hammondp@parliament.uk; gkreyen@gwdg.de; Philip.Lambert@lambert-energy.com; nicholsone@parliament.uk; philip.morgan@dfes.gsi.gov.uk; philip.morman@pinsentmasons.com; philip.robins@sant.ox.ac.uk; psheridan@mfglobal.com; P.Spencer@kingston.ac.uk; philipstephenson@daviesturner.co.uk; philipp.freise@kkr.com; pbroom@conservatives.com; philippa.broom@conservatives.com; ind.indus@virgin.net; pforsyth@bluehackle.com; phillip.snape@psauk.com; phil.n.goss@exxonmobil.com; collettp@parliament.uk; dorriesp@parliament.uk; phiroz@ipbd.co.uk; pia.gideon@ericsson.com; piaheikkila@hotmail.com; pia.heikkila@aljazeera.net; piaheikkila@hotmail.com; pia.heikkila@aljazeera.net; Tanzi.piero@yahoo.com; ppirlot@hotmail.com; piers.drysdale@trc-international.com; mail@piersdrysdale.com; piet.ruitjenberg@shell.com; piet.ruijtenberg@gmail.com; pieter@nfialon.co.uk; london@netherlands-embassy.org.uk; pilar.demiguel@invesmediagroup.com; lon@minbuza.nl; p.naart@sismat.com.tr; cpj@cetra.org.tw; info@cmronline.it; krg_switzerland@hotmail.com; pish_hs65@yahoo.com; pishtewan.bazzaz@hawlermu.org; placid.gonzales@sjpp.co.uk; p.murphy@iraqupdates.com; pooya@litv.tv; pcollinson@btconnect.com; mitchellrosep@parliament.uk; poul-joem.jeppesen@flsmidth.com; pradeep.kabra@addaxpetroleum.com; praidon@hotmail.com; prakash.shah@qmul.ac.uk; prakash.shah@qmul.ac.uk; mittalpk@yahoo.com; pacharya@khrp.org; pranvera.shema@thefrontlineclub.com; waow_c@yahoo.co.uk; priya.satia@ft.com; p.mistry@leedsmet.ac.uk; p.mistry@leedsmet.ac.uk; qadamkher_8@yahoo.com; qadamkher_82@yahoo.com; qaish@abcc.org.uk; qais@al-dohan.net; qaoshiwasori@yahoo.com; qerechoghdizayee@yahoo.co.uk; castors@public.yangjang.gd.cn; quentin.peel@ft.com; quillawrence@yahoo.com; quintin@stratagemint.com; midderhoff@in-optimum.de; nick.benge@bdo.ae; eric.swanepoel@scottish.parliament.uk; actonr@parliament.uk; gill@htms.demon.co.uk; ralkadiri@pfcenergy.com; brownrah@halcrow.com; rabun76@hotmail.com; jmancini@khrp.org; whalleyj@parliament.uk; rachel_cowburn@new.labour.org.uk; gardnert@parliament.uk; r.lester@my.westminster.ac.uk; rachellester.krgintern@gmail.com; rschneller@cfr.org; rachel@tsa-uk.org.uk; secretariat@foreign-press.org.uk; radwanbadini@hotmail.com; radwanbadini@hotmail.com; rsnir@ildc.co.il; rgonzales@huntoil.com; rafid197@yahoo.com; rafiq.latta@argusmediagroup.com; rahandraza@yahoo.com; rahim@tcph.org; watco@go.com.jo; raid@zozik.com; admin@iedc-iq.org; info@burosit.com; rbagai@adlershine.com; raj.bhatt@elaracapital.com; rajat.kapoor@essar.com; administration@hcilondon.in; nehrucentre@btconnect.com; nehrucentre@aol.com; 100700.513@compuserve.com; rgonzales@huntoil.com; roz@yoruksut.com; ramesh.valluri@ril.com; r.antaki@naftall.com; rami@sunmark.co.uk; ramingray@royalcourttheatre.com; ramin.lakani@gaffney-cline.com; ramz-dawde@yahoo.com; ranmzi.b.khoury@shell.com; ranzi.maaytah@austrade.gov.au; political@london.mfa.gov.il; political@london.mfa.gov.il; rasabbagh@yahoo.com; ranald.spiers@the-mea.co.uk; jamalr@un.org; rangshawis@msn.com; rania@isl.ae; raniaf@duncanlewis.com; ranj.alaaldin@gmail.com; ranj.alaaldin@guardian.co.uk; ranj.alaaldin@gmail.com; ranj.alaaldin@gmail.com; rang.shawis@sch.nhs.uk; rstwbb@hotmail.com; raqib978978@yahoo.com; eltak4english@yahoo.co.uk; nawroz_company@yahoo.com; rasheed1954@yahoo.com; rasheedtaher@yahoo.com; rasheedtaher@yahoo.com; drrasim@mail.ru; raveesh.kumar@hcilondon.net; rawand.darwesh@krg.org; rayan.bahnan@ifpiraq.com; raye.summers@argos.co.uk; raymondatallah@btconnect.com; raymond.enkiri@hscbrepublic.com; razgar4@hotmail.com; razhan.miran@gmail.com; icpinbritain@hotmail.com; reagrlawyer@yahoo.com; reaglawyer@yahoo.com; business@senkgroup.net; rsankar@cforcgroup.com; rsankar@cforcgroup.com; rebeenb@hotmail.com; rsalehbag@ip.perenco.com; rebinazad@gmail.com; rebwar1983@hotmail.co.uk; raloul@tsginc.com; dattar@ivanhoeenergy.com; djreem@nets.com.jo; Embassy.London@estonia.gov.uk; reginaldfowler@btinternet.com; reginaldfowler@btinternet.com; raychishti@hotmail.com; rehman.chishti.mp@parliament.uk; rekan.salem@austrian.com; rekawtzhena@yahoo.com; Renato.Goodfellow@bt.com; rene.gabriel@tradeandmore.com; london@embassy.mzv.cz; rene@interconexis.com; jefferyr@state.gov; jefferyr@state.gov; ali@aliwarner.freeserve.co.uk; rnadler@interchange.ubc.ca; zagroos2@hotmail.com; rex.cramer@me.weatherford.com; ceo@ogroups.ae; rezan.abdul-kadir@royalfree.nhs.uk; r.billingsley@shu.ac.uk; rhodri.williams@ofcom.org.uk; rhona@methodinternational.com; tmemedia21@gmail.com; evansr9@cardiff.ac.uk; abedrt@btinternet.com; riadh.alkhalisi@btinternet.com; riadh.francis@hotmail.com; ravery@utopiauk.com; rigbym@parliament.uk; richard.barnes@london.gov.uk; richard.beeston@thetimes.co.uk; rbrook@mbiinternational.com; burdenr@parliament.uk; richard.clark@bbc.co.uk; richardcockett@economist.com; richard.collings@bbc.co.uk; richard.collins@bbc.co.uk; london@webuildiraq.org; richard.debelder@dentonwildesapte.com; richard.decaux@bp.com; richard.fitzpatrick758@mod.uk; galustian@aol.com; r.gledhill@matiere.fr; r.gledhill@mabey.co.uk; richard@mcneilrobertson.com; rhobson@alandick.ae; richard.howitt@geo2.poptel.org.uk; Richard.Hubbard@mintakainternational.com; richard.jarvis@dods.co.uk; garynkent@gmail.com; tourismalliance@cbi.org.uk; richard.layfield@exxonmobil.com; enquiries@englishpen.org; richard.norton-taylor@guardian.co.uk; secure@richardpagett.com; parrr@parliament.uk; richard.parry@dti.gsi.gov.uk; Richard.pearce-higginson@fco.gov.uk; rp@britishexpertise.org; richard@edinburghint.com; richard.porter@bbc.co.uk; rrangeley@eicriskconsulting.com; rrangeley@eicriskconsulting.com; r.w.schoch@qmul.ac.uk; richard.schofield@kcl.ac.uk; r.sidery@jaspercapital.co.uk; richardspring@westsuffolkconservatives.com; rstanforth@oxfam.org.uk; richard.thompson@meed.com; richard.tyler@telegraph.co.uk; richard.walters@azurance.co.uk; rw@jeta1.com; export@wagtech.co.uk; richard.wray@guardian.co.uk; yrossr@parliament.uk; hamburgerland@gmail.com; richard.hubbard@orioniog.com; bishop@londin.clara.co.uk; richie@i-r-s.biz; phoenixheli@yahoo.com; “‘rick@conversation-café.net'” <rick@conversation-café.net>; rimamedawar@hotmail.com; rkalai@byblosbankeur.com; rita.dobson@centreforexcellence.org.uk; rita.waleed@almorrell.com; riyadh_investment@yahoo.co.uk; colpolsciences@yahoo.com; info@dabingroup.com; rizkar.amin@nhs.net; rizgarh@hotmail.com; rizgarkh@yahoo.com; R.A.Mageed@qmul.ac.uk; rizgar_zebaree@yahoo.com; rizgar@erbilfair.com; info@erbilfair.com; rizgard@yahoo.com; hana_company@yahoo.com; methodo@methodo.com; rob.arnott@petroceltic.ie; rob.corbidge@scotsman.com; rob.lynes@britishcouncil.org; Robert.Dunn@scotland.gsi.gov.uk; robert.dunn@scotland.gsi.gov.uk; r.fisk@independent.co.uk; robert.fulgenzi@iraq.centcom.mil; halfon4harlow@roberthalfon.com; robert.halfon.mp@parliament.uk; RMHH1066@YAHOO.CO.UK; rmhh1066@yahoo.co.uk; keyr@parliament.uk; bob.lamburne2@fco.gov.uk; boblamburne@hotmail.com; bob.linley@wardpower.co.uk; rlowe@chathamhouse.org.uk; jforsythe@chathamhouse.org.uk; r.eldon@biicl.org; robertmilne53@hotmail.com
Distinguished Ladies and Gentleman
Having spent my entire life in the Middle East both in the Military and as a Middle East Consultant I find it extremely distressing to see that the issue of the Kurdish Genocide have still not been resolved in Parliament i.e. To ask the British Parliament to formally recognise the Kurdish Genocide.
During my many visits to Kurdistan and having met with many Kurds both within the country, the Middle East and in the UK I find it disturbing that the British Government will not (up to the current time) shoulder its responsibility in accepting this worthy cause.
When one mixes with the Kurds, mainstream Iraqi’s and indeed surviving Iranians who have either been tortured, displaced, contaminated by coalition forces weapons, gased or who simply cannot return to their country of origin for fear of being singled out or whatever one begins to see the magnitude of the problem.
I find it so hypocritical that our Government (British) not only played a major role in the mass genocide of the Kurdish people but also in its contribution towards the death of over a million innocent Iraqi civilians during the Gulf War and indeed Iranian civilians in supporting Saddam during Iraq-Iran War……..this mass genocide is ongoing.
The following is a link to the many articles I have written that include hard evidence to support the above:
https://eyreinternational.wordpress.com/2013/01/30/the-hypocrisy-of-the-new-world-order-and-its-assault-on-islamic-nations-part-1/
It was our government, the United States and many other countries who not only helped fund, build and supply Chemical and Biological Warfare (CBW) Technology to Iraq but who also provided the hardware and ingredients to deliver these evil CBW projectiles. Proof of the Brits involvement can be clearly seen in the scandal of “Super Gun” when major components of a new weapon were located at a British Port prior to being shipped out to Iraq and also in that same technology being made available via South Africa where the “Super Howitzers” were built and shipped to Iraq etc.
This aspect was covered in another series I wrote:
It is also fact that the UK and other nations involved in this so called “under the radar deal” where aware of the CBW usage by Saddam (including the United Nations) and did absolutely nothing about it.
When one also looks at the fact that it was the British Government, US Government and other Coalition Governments who knowingly allowed respective forces to be vaccinated with an extremely high risk series of injections one can clearly see that there is certainly a case to answer.
This aspect is covered in my article: https://eyreinternational.wordpress.com/2013/02/08/the-hypocrisy-of-the-new-world-order-and-its-assault-on-islamic-nations-part-6/ with supporting evidence that our government and the Ministry of Defence were clearly aware of the dangers associated with giving troops both the anthrax and pertussis vaccines.
These past and current conflicts and wars are highly illegal and it is the innocent civilians who have suffered at the hands of our respective hypocritical governments and therefore it is time for us all to lower our heads in shame and accept what is done is done.
What happened in Halabja was terrible and our government must now accept its own involvement and act in a responsible way.
The main purpose of this highly sensitive email is to now lay the cards on the table and say to you all that enough is enough and it is time for the British Parliament to formally recognise the Kurdish Genocide.
To the recipients of this email………. I would urge you all discuss the implications and indeed use any of the information provided to assist you in not only debating the Kurdish request but in also reaching a successful conclusion.
I have always held the Kurdish people and Kurdistan close to my heart and will continue to do so.
Unfortunately I am currently overseas and will not be able to attend on Thursday and so wish you all the very best.
Yours Sincerely
Peter Eyre -26/2/2013
—————————————————————
Here is the original message as received from the UK office of the Kurdistan Regional Government (uk@krg.org):
You can attend this historic debate by visiting the public gallery of the House of Commons, or watch it live on television or the internet. Details are below.
UK PARLIAMENT DEBATE ON THE KURDISH GENOCIDE
Date: Thursday February 28, 2013
Time: 2.15pm
Place: House of Commons, UK Parliament.
Nearest station: Westminster
To attend the debate in person: Use the Cromwell Green entrance to Parliament. Arrive at the House of Commons at least one hour before the debate begins and upon entering the building, ask for the House of Commons Public Gallery.
To see the debate live on television: BBC Parliament Live channel
To see the debate live on the internet: http://www.bbc.co.uk/democracylive/bbc_parliament/
Regards,
Australian Government almost forcibly pushes the HPV vaccines on young boys as well as girls Part 3
Australian Government almost forcibly pushes the HPV vaccines on young boys as well as girls Part 3
Are vaccines harming Australian children?
Are young Australians potentially being sterilized or made infertile
Hey Mom could this be a clue towards autism or cause infertility?
Ever asked yourself that if all of these vaccines are so safe how come many of those that created them have not allowed themselves or younger members of their family to be vaccinated?
Would you be shocked to learn that many of the worlds top scientists who have either worked on these programmes or initiated them have themselves met many times in secret to discuss the very same concerns that we all have, namely are the vaccines or their ingredients safe?
I found the following Australian Government statement not only offensive and overemphasized but also grossly inaccurate with no back up data to prove the HPV is a successful vaccine!!
This is an extract from the Minister for Health’s own webpage:
In a world first, Australian schoolboys will be able to get the successful Gardasil® vaccine, which will protect them against developing a range of cancers and bolster the effectiveness of this vaccine in women.
Starting next school year, the Gillard Government will fund the vaccine for 12 and 13-year-old boys through school-based programs under the National Immunisation Programe. Year 9 boys will also be able to get the vaccine at school under a catch-up program for the next two years.
Minister for Health Tanya Plibersek said providing the HPV vaccine to boys would protect them and increase the effectiveness of the vaccination program for girls.
“Every parent wants their child to be healthy and that is why the Australian Government is delivering the best protection we have against HPV related cancer through this vaccine,” said Ms Plibersek.
“By building on Australia’s world-class immunisation program, we’re stopping preventable HPV related disease and cancers, and that makes a difference to the quality of life of our families.
——————————
The purpose of this article is to not only publish the genuine concern by some of the world’s top scientist involved in such research but also prove the fact that the Australian Government, Minister for Health, Department of Health, Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee and those responsible for the National Immunisation Programme clearly have not done their homework or researched into the dangers associated with the HPV Vaccine Programme or indeed many other vaccines that they have previously been used or promoted.
Firstly lets pick up on that bold statement “
In a world first, Australian schoolboys will be able to get the successful Gardasil® vaccine.
Back in 2011 the US Federal Advisory Authority (FDA) voted to recommend that boys aged 11 and 12 be vaccinated against human papillomavirus, or HPV, to protect against anal cancer and cancers of the mouth and neck. The new guidance mirrors that for girls aged 11 and 12, who have been advised since 2006 to receive routine HPV vaccinations.
In actual fact this entire campaign is being driven by the New World Order Cabal otherwise known as the UN/WHO but believe me there are some extremely serious concerns: one such comment came from Dr. Ranit Mishori, a family practice doctor in Washington, D.C., and an assistant professor at the Georgetown University School of Medicine – “Why are you vaccinating my son against anal cancer? He’s not gay! He’s not ever going to be gay.”
Belief me this minor concern was nothing compared to comments raised by world experts at many of their secretive meetings held on an annual basis!!
Before revealing the names of those experts and exactly what was discussed we should look at how the pharmaceutical industry has paid off many political figures and formed a fund to fight any cases against the manufacturers of these deeply flawed vaccines:
Published on Wednesday, April 13, 2005 by Knight Ridder
Playing Politics at Kids’ Expense
Bill would insulate pharmaceutical firms from liability
by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist has buried a provision in the “Protecting America in the War on Terror Act” to insulate the pharmaceutical industry from liability for venal actions that may have poisoned an entire generation of Americans. Mounting evidence suggests that Thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative in children’s vaccines, may be responsible for the exponential growth of autism, attention deficit disorder, speech delays and other childhood neurological disorders now epidemic in the United States.
Prior to 1989, American infants generally received three vaccinations. In the early 1990s, public-health officials dramatically increased the number of Thimerosal-containing vaccinations without considering the cumulative impact of the mercury load on developing brains. Thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative in children’s vaccines, may be responsible for the exponential growth of autism.
Warning Issued
In a 1991 memo, Dr. Maurice Hilleman, one of the fathers of Merck’s vaccination programs, warned the president of the company’s vaccination division that 6-month-old children administered the shots on schedule would suffer mercury exposures 87 times the government safety standard (400 times the current U.S. government’s safe level). He recommended that Thimerosal be discontinued, “especially when used on infants and children.”
Merck ignored Hilleman’s warning and, for eight years, government officials added seven additional shots for children containing Thimerosal.
Mercury is a known brain poison, and autism rates began rising dramatically in children who were administered the new vaccine regimens. A decade ago the American Academy of Pediatrics estimated the autism rate among American children to be 1 in 2,500. Today, the CDC places the autism rate at 1 in 166, or one in 80 boys. Additionally, one in every six children is now diagnosed with a related neurological disorder.
In 1998 the CDC’s lead Thimerosal researcher, Dr. Thomas Verstraeten, complained to his colleagues in a secret memo that, despite rerunning and rethinking the research, the links between Thimerosal and autism “just won’t go away.”
In 2000, CDC, FDA and pharmaceutical companies called a secret meeting to review Verstraeten’s findings. According to transcripts, participants were alarmed about the undeniable link between the mercury preservative and autism. Dr. Bill Weil told the group, “You can play with (the results) all you want. They are statistically significant.”
Dr. Richard Johnston acknowledged he feared his grandchild getting vaccinated. But the group was most concerned with keeping the findings secret. Numerous animal, DNA, epidemiological and other studies point to Thimerosal as the culprit in America’s epidemic of neurological disorders. Autistic children have been shown to have higher mercury loads than nonautistics, and there have been reports of significant improvements in some brain-injured children by removing mercury from their bodies.
Most of the symptoms of autism are similar to the symptoms of mercury poisoning. Recently, scientists have been able to induce autism in certain mice by exposing them to Thimerosal. In a recent study, former FDA scientist Dr. Jill James uncovered a scientific link that helps explain why Thimerosal injures some children and not others. That study found that many autistic children are genetically deficient in their capacity to produce glutathione, an antioxidant generated in the brain that helps remove mercury from the body, a harmless difference until the child is exposed to large quantities of mercury.
Porter Bridges’ experience is typical. In 1993, this healthy 4-month-old slipped into a coma hours after receiving his vaccines. Today, 11-year-old Porter is autistic, hyperactive and severely brain damaged. He requires minute-to-minute supervision, is frequently afflicted with violent seizures and is not yet toilet-trained. After a seven-year legal fight, the U.S. government acknowledged that Porter was damaged by his vaccines. There are now 520,000 autistics in the United States with 40,000 new cases each year.
High Cost of Care
The cost of caring for autistic children is conservatively $40,000 annually. Families with children with autism and other neurological diseases have filed more than 4,200 claims in the special federal “Vaccine Court.” Some plaintiffs have also filed in trial courts.
Some Drug Makers Act
Thimerosal defendants include Merck, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Aventis, Weyeth and Eli Lilly. Frist’s newly proposed “anti-terror” legislation would create insurmountable burdens of proof for plaintiffs in these cases and forbid states from banning Thimerosal. Drug makers wary of liability have reduced Thimerosal in children’s vaccines in recent years, with the exception of Chiron and Aventis’ pediatric flu vaccine. Mercury-laced vaccine stocks were given to children until the end of 2003.
Thimerosal’s inventor, Eli Lilly, donated $226,000 to Frist’s national Republican Senate Campaign Committee in 2002 and bought 5,000 copies of Frist’s book on bioterrorism. Congress will vote on Frist’s bill in the near future. Instead of demanding the immediate removal of Thimerosal from all vaccines, and making the drug industry help defray the public and private costs of caring for injured children, Frist’s bill would give the industry a free ride at public expense.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is the chief prosecuting attorney for Riverkeeper and a senior attorney at the Natural Resources Defense Council.
————————————
Secret Meeting
In June 2000, a group of top government scientists and health officials gathered for a meeting at the isolated Simpsonwood conference center in Norcross, Ga. Convened by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the meeting was held at this Methodist retreat center, nestled in wooded farmland next to the Chattahoochee River, to ensure complete secrecy. The agency had issued no public announcement of the session – only private invitations to 52 attendees. There were high-level officials from the CDC and the Food and Drug Administration, the top vaccine specialist from the World Health Organization in Geneva, and representatives of every major vaccine manufacturer, including Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Merck, Wyeth and Aventis Pasteur. All of the scientific data under discussion, CDC officials repeatedly reminded the participants, was strictly “embargoed.” There would be no making photocopies of documents, no taking papers with them when they left.
The federal officials and industry representatives had assembled to discuss a disturbing new study that raised alarming questions about the safety of a host of common childhood vaccines administered to infants and young children. According to a CDC epidemiologist named Tom Verstraeten, who had analyzed the agency’s massive database containing the medical records of 100,000 children, a mercury-based preservative in the vaccines – thimerosal – appeared to be responsible for a dramatic increase in autism and a host of other neurological disorders among children. “I was actually stunned by what I saw,” Verstraeten told those assembled at Simpsonwood, citing the staggering number of earlier studies that indicate a link between thimerosal and speech delays, attention-deficit disorder, hyperactivity and autism. Since 1991, when the CDC and the FDA had recommended that three additional vaccines laced with the preservative be given to extremely young infants – in one case, within hours of birth – the estimated number of cases of autism had increased fifteenfold, from one in every 2,500 children to one in 166 children.
Even for scientists and doctors accustomed to confronting issues of life and death, the findings were frightening. “You can play with this all you want,” Dr. Bill Weil, a consultant for the American Academy of Pediatrics, told the group. The results “are statistically significant.” Dr. Richard Johnston, an immunologist and pediatrician from the University of Colorado whose grandson had been born early on the morning of the meeting’s first day, was even more alarmed. “My gut feeling?” he said. “Forgive this personal comment – I do not want my grandson to get a thimerosal-containing vaccine until we know better what is going on.”
But instead of taking immediate steps to alert the public and rid the vaccine supply of thimerosal, the officials and executives at Simpsonwood spent most of the next two days discussing how to cover up the damaging data. According to transcripts obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, many at the meeting were concerned about how the damaging revelations about thimerosal would affect the vaccine industry’s bottom line.
“We are in a bad position from the standpoint of defending any lawsuits,” said Dr. Robert Brent, a pediatrician at the Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children in Delaware. “This will be a resource to our very busy plaintiff attorneys in this country.” Dr. Bob Chen, head of vaccine safety for the CDC, expressed relief that “given the sensitivity of the information, we have been able to keep it out of the hands of, let’s say, less responsible hands.” Dr. John Clements, vaccines advisor at the World Health Organization, declared flatly that the study “should not have been done at all” and warned that the results “will be taken by others and will be used in ways beyond the control of this group. The research results have to be handled.”
In fact, the government has proved to be far more adept at handling the damage than at protecting children’s health. The CDC paid the Institute of Medicine to conduct a new study to whitewash the risks of thimerosal, ordering researchers to “rule out” the chemical’s link to autism. It withheld Verstraeten’s findings, even though they had been slated for immediate publication, and told other scientists that his original data had been “lost” and could not be replicated. And to thwart the Freedom of Information Act, it handed its giant database of vaccine records over to a private company, declaring it off-limits to researchers. By the time Verstraeten finally published his study in 2003, he had gone to work for Glaxo-Smith-Kline and reworked his data to bury the link between thimerosal and autism.
Vaccine manufacturers had already begun to phase thimerosal out of injections given to American infants – but they continued to sell off their mercury-based supplies of vaccines until last year. The CDC and FDA gave them a hand, buying up the tainted vaccines for export to developing countries and allowing drug companies to continue using the preservative in some American vaccines – including several pediatric flu shots as well as tetanus boosters routinely given to 11-year-olds.
The drug companies are also getting help from powerful lawmakers in Washington. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, who has received $873,000 in contributions from the pharmaceutical industry, has been working to immunize vaccine makers from liability in 4,200 lawsuits that have been filed by the parents of injured children. On five separate occasions, Frist has tried to seal all of the government’s vaccine-related documents – including the Simpsonwood transcripts – and shield Eli Lilly, the developer of thimerosal, from subpoenas. In 2002, the day after Frist quietly slipped a rider known as the “Eli Lilly Protection Act” into a homeland security bill, the company contributed $10,000 to his campaign and bought 5,000 copies of his book on bioterrorism. Congress repealed the measure in 2003 – but earlier this year, Frist slipped another provision into an anti-terrorism bill that would deny compensation to children suffering from vaccine-related brain disorders. “The lawsuits are of such magnitude that they could put vaccine producers out of business and limit our capacity to deal with a biological attack by terrorists,” says Andy Olsen, a legislative assistant to Frist.
Even many conservatives are shocked by the government’s effort to cover up the dangers of thimerosal. Rep. Dan Burton, a Republican from Indiana, oversaw a three-year investigation of thimerosal after his grandson was diagnosed with autism. “Thimerosal used as a preservative in vaccines is directly related to the autism epidemic,” his House Government Reform Committee concluded in its final report. “This epidemic in all probability may have been prevented or curtailed had the FDA not been asleep at the switch regarding a lack of safety data regarding injected thimerosal, a known neurotoxin.” The FDA and other public-health agencies failed to act, the committee added, out of “institutional malfeasance for self protection” and “misplaced protectionism of the pharmaceutical industry.”
The story of how government health agencies colluded with Big Pharma to hide the risks of thimerosal from the public is a chilling case study of institutional arrogance, power and greed. I was drawn into the controversy only reluctantly. As an attorney and environmentalist who has spent years working on issues of mercury toxicity, I frequently met mothers of autistic children who were absolutely convinced that their kids had been injured by vaccines. Privately, I was skeptical. I doubted that autism could be blamed on a single source, and I certainly understood the government’s need to reassure parents that vaccinations are safe; the eradication of deadly childhood diseases depends on it. I tended to agree with skeptics like Rep. Henry Waxman, a Democrat from California, who criticized his colleagues on the House Government Reform Committee for leaping to conclusions about autism and vaccinations. “Why should we scare people about immunization,” Waxman pointed out at one hearing, “until we know the facts?”
It was only after reading the Simpsonwood transcripts, studying the leading scientific research and talking with many of the nation’s preeminent authorities on mercury that I became convinced that the link between thimerosal and the epidemic of childhood neurological disorders is real. Five of my own children are members of the Thimerosal Generation – those born between 1989 and 2003 – who received heavy doses of mercury from vaccines. “The elementary grades are overwhelmed with children who have symptoms of neurological or immune-system damage,” Patti White, a school nurse, told the House Government Reform Committee in 1999. “Vaccines are supposed to be making us healthier; however, in 25 years of nursing I have never seen so many damaged, sick kids. Something very, very wrong is happening to our children.” More than 500,000 kids currently suffer from autism, and pediatricians diagnose more than 40,000 new cases every year. The disease was unknown until
1943, when it was identified and diagnosed among 11 children born in the months after thimerosal was first added to baby vaccines in 1931.
Some skeptics dispute that the rise in autism is caused by thimerosal-tainted vaccinations. They argue that the increase is a result of better diagnosis – a theory that seems questionable at best, given that most of the new cases of autism are clustered within a single generation of children. “If the epidemic is truly an artifact of poor diagnosis,” scoffs Dr. Boyd Haley, one of the world’s authorities on mercury toxicity, “then where are all the 20-year-old autistics?” Other researchers point out that Americans are exposed to a greater cumulative “load” of mercury than ever before, from contaminated fish to dental fillings, and suggest that thimerosal in vaccines may be only part of a much larger problem. It’s a concern that certainly deserves far more attention than it has received – but it overlooks the fact that the mercury concentrations in vaccines dwarf other sources of exposure to our children.
What is most striking is the lengths to which many of the leading detectives have gone to ignore – and cover up – the evidence against thimerosal. From the very beginning, the scientific case against the mercury additive has been overwhelming. The preservative, which is used to stem fungi and bacterial growth in vaccines, contains ethylmercury, a potent neurotoxin. Truckloads of studies have shown that mercury tends to accumulate in the brains of primates and other animals after they are injected with vaccines – and that the developing brains of infants are particularly susceptible. In 1977, a Russian study found that adults exposed to much lower concentrations of ethylmercury than those given to American children still suffered brain damage years later. Russia banned thimerosal from children’s vaccines 20 years ago, and Denmark, Austria, Japan, Great Britain and all the Scandinavian countries have since followed suit.
“You couldn’t even construct a study that shows thimerosal is safe,” says Haley, who heads the chemistry department at the University of Kentucky. “It’s just too darn toxic. If you inject thimerosal into an animal, its brain will sicken. If you apply it to living tissue, the cells die. If you put it in a petri dish, the culture dies. Knowing these things, it would be shocking if one could inject it into an infant without causing damage.”
Internal documents reveal that Eli Lilly, which first developed thimerosal, knew from the start that its product could cause damage -and even death – in both animals and humans. In 1930, the company tested thimerosal by administering it to 22 patients with terminal meningitis, all of whom died within weeks of being injected – a fact Lilly didn’t bother to report in its study declaring thimerosal safe. In 1935, researchers at another vaccine manufacturer, Pittman-Moore, warned Lilly that its claims about thimerosal’s safety “did not check with ours.” Half the dogs Pittman injected with thimerosal-based vaccines became sick, leading researchers there to declare the preservative “unsatisfactory as a serum intended for use on dogs.”
In the decades that followed, the evidence against thimerosal continued to mount. During the Second World War, when the Department of Defense used the preservative in vaccines on soldiers, it required Lilly to label it “poison.” In 1967, a study in Applied Microbiology found that thimerosal killed mice when added to injected vaccines. Four years later, Lilly’s own studies discerned that thimerosal was “toxic to tissue cells” in concentrations as low as one part per million – 100 times weaker than the concentration in a typical vaccine. Even so, the company continued to promote thimerosal as “nontoxic” and also incorporated it into topical disinfectants. In 1977, 10 babies at a Toronto hospital died when an antiseptic preserved with thimerosal was dabbed onto their umbilical cords.
In 1982, the FDA proposed a ban on over-the-counter products that contained thimerosal, and in 1991 the agency considered banning it from animal vaccines. But tragically, that same year, the CDC recommended that infants be injected with a series of mercury-laced vaccines. Newborns would be vaccinated for hepatitis B within 24 hours of birth, and 2-month-old infants would be immunized for haemophilus influenzae B and diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis. The drug industry knew the additional vaccines posed a danger. The same year that the CDC approved the new vaccines, Dr. Maurice Hilleman, one of the fathers of Merck’s vaccine programs, warned the company that 6-month-olds who were administered the shots would suffer dangerous exposure to mercury. He recommended that thimerosal be discontinued, “especially when used on infants and children,” noting that the industry knew of nontoxic alternatives. “The best way to go,” he added, “is to switch to dispensing the actual vaccines without adding preservatives.”
For Merck and other drug companies, however, the obstacle was money. Thimerosal enables the pharmaceutical industry to package vaccines in vials that contain multiple doses, which require additional protection because they are more easily contaminated by multiple needle entries. The larger vials cost half as much to produce as smaller, single-dose vials, making it cheaper for international agencies to distribute them to impoverished regions at risk of epidemics. Faced with this “cost consideration,” Merck ignored Hilleman’s warnings, and government officials continued to push more and more thimerosal-based vaccines for children. Before 1989, American preschoolers received only three vaccinations – for polio, diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis and measles-mumps-rubella. A decade later, thanks to federal recommendations, children were receiving a total of 22 immunizations by the time they reached first grade.
As the number of vaccines increased, the rate of autism among children exploded. During the 1990s, 40 million children were injected with thimerosal-based vaccines, receiving unprecedented levels of mercury during a period critical for brain development. Despite the well-documented dangers of thimerosal, it appears that no one bothered to add up the cumulative dose of mercury that children would receive from the mandated vaccines. “What took the FDA so long to do the calculations?” Peter Patriarca, director of viral products for the agency, asked in an e-mail to the CDC in 1999. “Why didn’t CDC and the advisory bodies do these calculations when they rapidly expanded the childhood immunization schedule?”
But by that time, the damage was done. Infants who received all their vaccines, plus boosters, by the age of 6 months were being injected with levels of ethylmercury 187 times greater than the EPA’s limit for daily exposure to methylmercury, a related neurotoxin. Although the vaccine industry insists that ethylmercury poses little danger because it breaks down rapidly and is removed by the body, several studies – including one published in April by the National Institutes of Health – suggest that ethylmercury is actually more toxic to developing brains and stays in the brain longer than methylmercury.
Officials responsible for childhood immunizations insist that the additional vaccines were necessary to protect infants from disease and that thimerosal is still essential in developing nations, which, they often claim, cannot afford the single-dose vials that don’t require a preservative. Dr. Paul Offit, one of CDC’s top vaccine advisors, told me, “I think if we really have an influenza pandemic – and certainly we will in the next 20 years, because we always do – there’s no way on God’s earth that we immunize 280 million people with single-dose vials. There has to be multidose vials.”
But while public-health officials may have been well-intentioned, many of those on the CDC advisory committee who backed the additional vaccines had close ties to the industry. Dr. Sam Katz, the committee’s chair, was a paid consultant for most of the major vaccine makers and shares a patent on a measles vaccine with Merck, which also manufactures the hepatitis B vaccine. Dr. Neal Halsey, another committee member, worked as a researcher for the vaccine companies and received honoraria from Abbott Labs for his research on the hepatitis B vaccine. Indeed, in the tight circle of scientists who work on vaccines, such conflicts of interest are common. Rep. Burton says that the CDC “routinely allows scientists with blatant conflicts of interest to serve on intellectual advisory committees that make recommendations on new vaccines,” even though they have “interests in the products and companies for which they are supposed to be providing unbiased oversight.” The House Government Reform Committee discovered that four of the eight CDC advisors who approved guidelines for a rotavirus vaccine laced with thimerosal “had financial ties to the pharmaceutical companies that were developing different versions of the vaccine.”
Offit, who shares a patent on the vaccine, acknowledged to me that he “would make money” if his vote to approve it eventually leads to a marketable product. But he dismissed my suggestion that a scientist’s direct financial stake in CDC approval might bias his judgment. “It provides no conflict for me,” he insists. “I have simply been informed by the process, not corrupted by it. When I sat around that table, my sole intent was trying to make recommendations that best benefited the children in this country. It’s offensive to say that physicians and public-health people are in the pocket of industry and thus are making decisions that they know are unsafe for children. It’s just not the way it works.”
Other vaccine scientists and regulators gave me similar assurances. Like Offit, they view themselves as enlightened guardians of children’s health, proud of their “partnerships” with pharmaceutical companies, immune to the seductions of personal profit, besieged by irrational activists whose anti-vaccine campaigns are endangering children’s health. They are often resentful of questioning. “Science,” says Offit, “is best left to scientists.”
Still, some government officials were alarmed by the apparent conflicts of interest. In his e-mail to CDC administrators in 1999, Paul Patriarca of the FDA blasted federal regulators for failing to adequately scrutinize the danger posed by the added baby vaccines. “I’m not sure there will be an easy way out of the potential perception that the FDA, CDC and immunization-policy bodies may have been asleep at the switch re: thimerosal until now,” Patriarca wrote. The close ties between regulatory officials and the pharmaceutical industry, he added, “will also raise questions about various advisory bodies regarding aggressive recommendations for use” of thimerosal in child vaccines.
If federal regulators and government scientists failed to grasp the potential risks of thimerosal over the years, no one could claim ignorance after the secret meeting at Simpsonwood. But rather than conduct more studies to test the link to autism and other forms of brain damage, the CDC placed politics over science. The agency turned its database on childhood vaccines – which had been developed largely at taxpayer expense – over to a private agency, America’s Health Insurance Plans, ensuring that it could not be used for additional research. It also instructed the Institute of Medicine, an advisory organization that is part of the National Academy of Sciences, to produce a study debunking the link between thimerosal and brain disorders. The CDC “wants us to declare, well, that these things are pretty safe,” Dr. Marie McCormick, who chaired the IOM’s Immunization Safety Review Committee, told her fellow researchers when they first met in January 2001. “We are not ever going to come down that [autism] is a true side effect” of thimerosal exposure. According to transcripts of the meeting, the committee’s chief staffer, Kathleen Stratton, predicted that the IOM would conclude that the evidence was “inadequate to accept or reject a causal relation” between thimerosal and autism. That, she added, was the result “Walt wants” – a reference to Dr. Walter Orenstein, director of the National Immunization Program for the CDC.
For those who had devoted their lives to promoting vaccination, the revelations about thimerosal threatened to undermine everything they had worked for. “We’ve got a dragon by the tail here,” said Dr. Michael Kaback, another committee member. “The more negative that [our] presentation is, the less likely people are to use vaccination, immunization – and we know what the results of that will be. We are kind of caught in a trap. How we work our way out of the trap, I think is the charge.”
Even in public, federal officials made it clear that their primary goal in studying thimerosal was to dispel doubts about vaccines. “Four current studies are taking place to rule out the proposed link between autism and thimerosal,” Dr. Gordon Douglas, then-director of strategic planning for vaccine research at the National Institutes of Health, assured a Princeton University gathering in May 2001. “In order to undo the harmful effects of research claiming to link the [measles] vaccine to an elevated risk of autism, we need to conduct and publicize additional studies to assure parents of safety.” Douglas formerly served as president of vaccinations for Merck, where he ignored warnings about thimerosal’s risks.
In May of last year, the Institute of Medicine issued its final report. Its conclusion: There is no proven link between autism and thimerosal in vaccines. Rather than reviewing the large body of literature describing the toxicity of thimerosal, the report relied on four disastrously flawed epidemiological studies examining European countries, where children received much smaller doses of thimerosal than American kids. It also cited a new version of the Verstraeten study, published in the journal Pediatrics, that had been reworked to reduce the link between thimerosal and autism. The new study included children too young to have been diagnosed with autism and overlooked others who showed signs of the disease. The IOM declared the case closed and – in a startling position for a scientific body – recommended that no further research be conducted.
The report may have satisfied the CDC, but it convinced no one. Rep. David Weldon, a Republican physician from Florida who serves on the House Government Reform Committee, attacked the Institute of Medicine, saying it relied on a handful of studies that were “fatally flawed” by “poor design” and failed to represent “all the available scientific and medical research.” CDC officials are not interested in an honest search for the truth, Weldon told me, because “an association between vaccines and autism would force them to admit that their policies irreparably damaged thousands of children. Who would want to make that conclusion about themselves?”
Under pressure from Congress, parents and a few of its own panel members, the Institute of Medicine reluctantly convened a second panel to review the findings of the first. In February, the new panel, composed of different scientists, criticized the earlier panel for its lack of transparency and urged the CDC to make its vaccine database available to the public.
So far, though, only two scientists have managed to gain access. Dr. Mark Geier, president of the Genetics Center of America, and his son, David, spent a year battling to obtain the medical records from the CDC. Since August 2002, when members of Congress pressured the agency to turn over the data, the Geiers have completed six studies that demonstrate a powerful correlation between thimerosal and neurological damage in children. One study, which compares the cumulative dose of mercury received by children born between 1981 and 1985 with those born between 1990 and 1996, found a “very significant relationship” between autism and vaccines. Another study of educational performance found that kids who received higher doses of thimerosal in vaccines were nearly three times as likely to be diagnosed with autism and more than three times as likely to suffer from speech disorders and mental retardation. Another soon-to-be-published study shows that autism rates are in decline following the recent elimination of thimerosal from most vaccines.
As the federal government worked to prevent scientists from studying vaccines, others have stepped in to study the link to autism. In April, reporter Dan Olmsted of UPI undertook one of the more interesting studies himself. Searching for children who had not been exposed to mercury in vaccines – the kind of population that scientists typically use as a “control” in experiments – Olmsted scoured the Amish of Lancaster County, Penn., who refuse to immunize their infants. Given the national rate of autism, Olmsted calculated that there should be 130 autistics among the Amish. He found only four. One had been exposed to high levels of mercury from a power plant. The other three – including one child adopted from outside the Amish community – had received their vaccines.
At the state level, many officials have also conducted in-depth reviews of thimerosal. While the Institute of Medicine was busy whitewashing the risks, the Iowa Legislature was carefully combing through all of the available scientific and biological data. “After three years of review, I became convinced there was sufficient credible research to show a link between mercury and the increased incidences in autism,” says state Sen. Ken Veenstra, a Republican who oversaw the investigation. “The fact that Iowa’s 700 percent increase in autism began in the 1990s, right after more and more vaccines were added to the children’s vaccine schedules, is solid evidence alone.” Last year, Iowa became the first state to ban mercury in vaccines, followed by California. Similar bans are now under consideration in 32 other states.
But instead of following suit, the FDA continues to allow manufacturers to include thimerosal in scores of over-the-counter medications as well as steroids and injected collagen. Even more alarming, the government continues to ship vaccines preserved with thimerosal to developing countries – some of which are now experiencing a sudden explosion in autism rates. In China, where the disease was virtually unknown prior to the introduction of thimerosal by U.S. drug manufacturers in 1999, news reports indicate that there are now more than 1.8 million autistics. Although reliable numbers are hard to come by, autistic disorders also appear to be soaring in India, Argentina, Nicaragua and other developing countries that are now using thimerosal-laced vaccines. The World Health Organization continues to insist thimerosal is safe, but it promises to keep the possibility that it is linked to neurological disorders “under review.”
I devoted time to study this issue because I believe that this is a moral crisis that must be addressed. If, as the evidence suggests, our public-health authorities knowingly allowed the pharmaceutical industry to poison an entire generation of American children, their actions arguably constitute one of the biggest scandals in the annals of American medicine. “The CDC is guilty of incompetence and gross negligence,” says Mark Blaxill, vice president of Safe Minds, a nonprofit organization concerned about the role of mercury in medicines. “The damage caused by vaccine exposure is massive. It’s bigger than asbestos, bigger than tobacco, bigger than anything you’ve ever seen.” It’s hard to calculate the damage to our country – and to the international efforts to eradicate epidemic diseases – if Third World nations come to believe that America’s most heralded foreign-aid initiative is poisoning their children. It’s not difficult to predict how this scenario will be interpreted by America’s enemies abroad. The scientists and researchers – many of them sincere, even idealistic – who are participating in efforts to hide the science on thimerosal claim that they are trying to advance the lofty goal of protecting children in developing nations from disease pandemics. They are badly misguided. Their failure to come clean on thimerosal will come back horribly to haunt our country and the world’s poorest populations.
—————————————————
The whole purpose of printing the above background to vaccinations in general was to show how the industry not only violated its pledged protocol but also intentional persuaded the politicians to protect them and at the same time created a “Slush Fund” to fight any future court action against the manufacturer’s of the vaccinces!!
———————————————————–
In closing this Part 3 article I would like to publish an interview that took place that basically blew the lid on how governments play the vaccine game. What I found incredible about the interview that is shown below is the fact that I also interviewed another whistleblower who had held a senior research position in the pharmaceutical industry and told me exactly the same :
Vaccines- An interview between Jon Rappoport (investigative Journalist) and an ex vaccine researcher:
Q: You were once certain that vaccines were the hallmark of good medicine.
A: Yes I was. I helped develop a few vaccines. I won’t say which ones.
Q: Why not?
A: I want to preserve my privacy.
Q: So you think you could have problems if you came out into the open?
A: I believe I could lose my pension.
Q: On what grounds?
A: The grounds don’t matter. These people have ways of causing you problems, when you were once part of the Club. I know one or two people who were put under surveillance, who were harassed.
Q: Harassed by whom?
A: The FBI.
Q: Really?
A: Sure. The FBI used other pretexts. And the IRS can come calling too.
Q: So much for free speech.
A: I was “part of the inner circle.” If now I began to name names and make specific accusations against researchers, I could be in a world of trouble.
Q: What is at the bottom of these efforts at harassment?
A: Vaccines are the last defense of modern medicine. Vaccines are the ultimate justification for the overall “brilliance” of modern medicine.
Q: Do you believe that people should be allowed to choose whether they should get vaccines?
A: On a political level, yes. On a scientific level, people need information, so that they can choose well. It’s one thing to say choice is good. But if the atmosphere is full of lies, how can you choose? Also, if the FDA were run by honorable people, these vaccines would not be granted licenses. They would be investigated to within an inch of their lives.
Q: There are medical historians who state that the overall decline of illnesses was not due to vaccines.
A: I know. For a long time, I ignored their work.
Q: Why?
A: Because I was afraid of what I would find out. I was in the business of developing vaccines. My livelihood depended on continuing that work.
Q: And then?
A: I did my own investigation.
Q: What conclusions did you come to?
A: The decline of disease is due to improved living conditions.
Q: What conditions?
A: Cleaner water. Advanced sewage systems. Nutrition. Fresher food. A decrease in poverty. Germs may be everywhere, but when you are healthy, you don’t contract the diseases as easily.
Q: What did you feel when you completed your own investigation?
A: Despair. I realized I was working a sector based on a collection of lies.
Q: Are some vaccines more dangerous than others?
A: Yes. The DPT shot, for example. The MMR. But some lots of a vaccine are more dangerous than other lots of the same vaccine. As far as I’m concerned, all vaccines are dangerous.
Q: Why?
A: Several reasons. They involve the human immune system in a process that tends to compromise immunity. They can actually cause the disease they are supposed to prevent. They can cause other diseases than the ones they are supposed to prevent.
Q: Why are we quoted statistics which seem to prove that vaccines have been tremendously successful at wiping out diseases?
A: Why? To give the illusion that these vaccines are useful. If a vaccine suppresses visible symptoms of a disease like measles, everyone assumes that the vaccine is a success. But, under the surface, the vaccine can harm the immune system itself. And if it causes other diseases-say, meningitis-that fact is masked, because no one believes that the vaccine can do that. The connection is overlooked.
Q: It is said that the smallpox vaccine wiped out smallpox in England.
A: Yes. But when you study the available statistics, you get another picture.
Q: Which is?
A: There were cities in England where people who were not vaccinated did not get smallpox. There were places where people who were vaccinated experienced smallpox epidemics. And smallpox was already on the decline before the vaccine was introduced.
Q: So you’re saying that we have been treated to a false history.
A: Yes. That’s exactly what I’m saying. This is a history that has been cooked up to convince people that vaccines are invariably safe and effective.
Q: Now, you worked in labs. Where purity was an issue.
A: The public believes that these labs, these manufacturing facilities are the cleanest places in the world. That is not true. Contamination occurs all the time. You get all sorts of debris introduced into vaccines.
Q: For example, the SV40 monkey virus slips into the polio vaccine.
A: Well yes, that happened. But that’s not what I mean. The SV40 got into the polio vaccine because the vaccine was made by using monkey kidneys. But I’m talking about something else. The actual lab conditions. The mistakes. The careless errors. SV40, which was later found in cancer tumors–that was what I would call a structural problem. It was an accepted part of the manufacturing process. If you use monkey kidneys, you open the door to germs which you don’t know are in those kidneys.
Q: Okay, but let’s ignore that distinction between different types of contaminants for a moment. What contaminants did you find in your many years of work with vaccines?
A: All right. I’ll give you some of what I came across, and I’ll also give you what colleagues of mine found. Here’s a partial list. In the Rimavex measles vaccine, we found various chicken viruses. In polio
vaccine, we found acanthamoeba, which is a so-called “brain-eating” amoeba. Simian cytomegalovirus in polio vaccine. Simian foamy virus in the rotavirus vaccine. Bird-cancer viruses in the MMR vaccine. Various micro-organisms in the anthrax vaccine. I’ve found potentially dangerous enzyme inhibitors in several vaccines. Duck, dog, and rabbit viruses in the rubella vaccine. Avian leucosis virus in the flu vaccine. Pestivirus in the MMR vaccine.
Q: Let me get this straight. These are all contaminants which don’t belong in the vaccines.
A: That’s right. And if you try to calculate what damage these contaminants can cause, well, we don’t really know, because no testing has been done, or very little testing. It’s a game of roulette. You take your
chances. Also, most people don’t know that some polio vaccines, adenovirus vaccines, rubella and hep A and measles vaccines have been made with aborted human fetal tissue. I have found what I believed were bacterial fragments and poliovirus in these vaccines from time to time-which may have come from that fetal tissue. When you look for contaminants in vaccines, you can come up with material that IS puzzling. You know it shouldn’t be there, but you don’t know exactly what you’ve got. I have found what I believed was a very small “fragment” of human hair and also human mucus. I have found what can only be called “foreign protein,” which could mean almost anything. It could mean protein from viruses.
Q: Alarm bells are ringing all over the place.
A: How do you think I felt? Remember, this material is going into the bloodstream without passing through some of the ordinary immune defenses.
Q: How were your findings received?
A: Basically, it was, don’t worry, this can’t be helped. In making vaccines, you use various animals’ tissue, and that’s where this kind of contamination enters in. Of course, I’m not even mentioning the standard chemicals like formaldehyde, mercury, and aluminum which are purposely put into vaccines.
Q: This information is pretty staggering.
A: Yes. And I’m just mentioning some of the biological contaminants. Who knows how many others there are? Others we don’t find because we don’t think to look for them. If tissue from, say, a bird is used to make a vaccine, how many possible germs can be in that tissue? We have no idea. We have no idea what they might be, or what effects they could have on humans.
Q: And beyond the purity issue?
A: You are dealing with the basic faulty premise about vaccines. That they intricately stimulate the immune system to create the conditions for immunity from disease. That is the bad premise. It doesn’t work that way. A vaccine is supposed to “create” antibodies which, indirectly, offer protection against disease. However, the immune system is much larger and more involved than antibodies and their related “killer cells.”
Q: The immune system is?
A: The entire body, really. Plus the mind. It’s all immune system, you might say. That is why you can have, in the middle of an epidemic, those individuals who remain healthy.
Q: So the level of general health is important.
A: More than important. Vital.
Q: How are vaccine statistics falsely presented?
A: There are many ways. For example, suppose that 25 people who have received the hepatitis B vaccine come down with hepatitis. Well, hep B is a liver disease. But you can call liver disease many things. You can change the diagnosis. Then, you’ve concealed the root cause of the problem.
Q: And that happens?
A: All the time. It HAS to happen, if the doctors automatically assume that people who get vaccines DO NOT come down with the diseases they are now supposed to be protected from. And that is exactly what doctors assume. You see, it’s circular reasoning. It’s a closed system. It admits no fault. No possible fault. If a person who gets a vaccine against hepatitis gets hepatitis, or gets some other disease, the automatic assumption is, this had nothing to do with the disease.
Q: In your years working in the vaccine establishment, how many doctors did you encounter who admitted that vaccines were a problem?
A: None. There were a few who privately questioned what they were doing. But they would never go public, even within their companies.
Q: What was the turning point for you?
A: I had a friend whose baby died after a DPT shot.
Q: Did you investigate?
A: Yes, informally. I found that this baby was completely healthy before the vaccination. There was no reason for his death, except the vaccine. That started my doubts. Of course, I wanted to believe that the baby had gotten a bad shot from a bad lot. But as I looked into this further, I found that was not the case in this instance. I was being drawn into a spiral of doubt that increased over time. I continued to investigate. I found that, contrary to what I thought, vaccines are not tested in a scientific way.
Q: What do you mean?
A: For example, no long-term studies are done on any vaccines. Long-term follow-up is not done in any careful way. Why? Because, again, the assumption is made that vaccines do not cause problems. So why should anyone check? On top of that, a vaccine reaction is defined so that all bad reactions are said to occur very soon after the shot is given. But that does not make sense.
Q: Why doesn’t it make sense?
A: Because the vaccine obviously acts in the body for a long period of time after it is given. A reaction can be gradual. Deterioration can be gradual. Neurological problems can develop over time. They do in various conditions, even according to a conventional analysis. So why couldn’t that be the case with vaccines? If chemical poisoning can occur gradually, why couldn’t that be the case with a vaccine which contains mercury?
Q: And that is what you found?
A: Yes. You are dealing with correlations, most of the time. Correlations are not perfect. But if you get 500 parents whose children have suffered neurological damage during a one-year period after having a vaccine, this should be sufficient to spark off an intense investigation.
Q: Has it been enough?
A: No. Never. This tells you something right away.
Q: Which is?
A: The people doing the investigation are not really interested in looking at the facts. They assume that the vaccines are safe. So, when they do investigate, they invariably come up with exonerations of the vaccines. They say, “This vaccine is safe.” But what do they base those judgments on? They base them on definitions and ideas which automatically rule out a condemnation of the vaccine.
Q: There are numerous cases where a vaccine campaign has failed. Where people have come down with the disease against which they were vaccinated.
A: Yes, there are many such instances. And there the evidence is simply ignored. It’s discounted. The experts say, if they say anything at all, that this is just an isolated situation, but overall the vaccine has been shown to be safe. But if you add up all the vaccine campaigns where damage and disease have occurred, you realize that these are NOT isolated situations.
Q: Did you ever discuss what we are talking about here with colleagues, when you were still working in the vaccine establishment?
A: Yes I did.
Q: What happened?
A: Several times I was told to keep quiet. It was made clear that I should go back to work and forget my misgivings. On a few occasions, I encountered fear. Colleagues tried to avoid me. They felt they could be labeled with “guilt by association.” All in all, though, I behaved myself. I made sure I didn’t create problems for myself.
Q: If vaccines actually do harm, why are they given?
A: First of all, there is no “if.” They do harm. It becomes a more difficult question to decide whether they do harm in those people who seem to show no harm. Then you are dealing with the kind of research which should be done, but isn’t. Researchers should be probing to discover a kind of map, or flow chart, which shows exactly what vaccines do in the body from the moment they enter. This research has not been done. As to why they are given, we could sit here for two days and discuss all the reasons. As you’ve said many times, at different layers of the system people have their motives. Money, fear of losing a job, the desire to win brownie points, prestige, awards, promotion, misguided idealism, unthinking habit, and so on. But, at the highest levels of the medical cartel, vaccines are a top priority because they cause a weakening of the immune system. I know that may be hard to accept, but it’s true. The medical cartel, at the highest level, is not out to help people, it is out to harm them, to weaken them. To kill them. At one point in my career, I had a long conversation with a man who occupied a high government position in an African nation. He told me that he was well aware of this. He told me that WHO is a front for these depopulation interests. There is an underground, shall we say, in Africa, made up of various officials who are earnestly trying to change the lot of the poor. This network of people knows what is going on. They know that vaccines have been used, and are being used, to destroy their countries, to make them ripe for takeover by globalist powers. I have had the opportunity to speak with several of these people from this network.
Q: Is Thabo Mbeki, the president of South Africa, aware of the situation?
A: I would say he is partially aware. Perhaps he is not utterly convinced, but he is on the way to realizing the whole truth. He already knows that HIV is a hoax. He knows that the AIDS drugs are poisons which destroy the immune system. He also knows that if he speaks out, in any way, about the vaccine issue, he will be branded a lunatic. He has enough trouble after his stand on the AIDS issue.
Q: This network you speak of.
A: It has accumulated a huge amount of information about vaccines. The question is, how is a successful strategy going to be mounted? For these people, that is a difficult issue.
Q: And in the industrialized nations?
A: The medical cartel has a stranglehold, but it is diminishing. Mainly because people have the freedom to question medicines. However, if the choice issue [the right to take or reject any medicine]does not gather steam, these coming mandates about vaccines against biowarefare germs are going to win out. This is an important time.
Q: The furor over the hepatits B vaccine seems one good avenue.
A: I think so, yes. To say that babies must have the vaccine-and then in the next breath, admitting that a person gets hep B from sexual contacts and shared needles-is a ridiculous juxtaposition. Medical authorities try to cover themselves by saying that 20,000 or so children in the US get hep B every year from “unknown causes,” and that’s why every baby must have the vaccine. I dispute that 20,00 figure and the so-called studies that back it up.
Q: Andrew Wakefield, the British MD who uncovered the link between the MMR vaccine and autism, has just been fired from his job in a London hospital.
A: Yes. Wakefield performed a great service. His correlations between the vaccine and autism are stunning. Perhaps you know that Tony Blair’s wife is involved with alternative health. There is the possibility that their child has not been given the MMR. Blair recently side-stepped the question in press interviews, and made it seem that he was simply objecting to invasive questioning of his “personal and family life.” In any event, I believe his wife has been muzzled. I think, if given the chance, she would at least say she is sympathetic to all the families who have come forward and stated that their children were severely damaged by the MMR.
Q: British reporters should try to get through to her.
A: They have been trying. But I think she has made a deal with her husband to keep quiet, no matter what. She could do a great deal of good if she breaks her promise. I have been told she is under pressure, and not just from her husband. At the level she occupies, MI6 and British health authorities get into the act. It is thought of as a matter of national security.
Q: Well, it is national security, once you understand the medical cartel.
A: It is global security. The cartel operates in every nation. It zealously guards the sanctity of vaccines. Questioning these vaccines is on the same level as a Vatican bishop questioning the sanctity of the sacrament of the Eucharist in the Catholic Church.
Q: I know that a Hollywood celebrity stating publicly that he will not take a vaccine is committing career suicide.
A: Hollywood is linked very powerfully to the medical cartel. There are several reasons, but one of them is simply that an actor who is famous can draw a huge amount of publicity if he says ANYTHING. In 1992, I was present at your demonstration against the FDA in downtown Los Angeles. One or two actors spoke against the FDA. Since that time, you would be hard pressed to find an actor who has spoken out in any way against the medical cartel.
Q: Within the National Institutes of Health, what is the mood, what is the basic frame of mind?
A: People are competing for research monies. The last thing they think about is challenging the status quo. They are already in an intramural war for that money. They don’t need more trouble. This is a very insulated system. It depends on the idea that, by and large, modern medicine is very successful on every frontier. To admit systemic problems in any area is to cast doubt on the whole enterprise. You might therefore think that NIH is the last place one should think about holding demonstrations. But just the reverse is true. If five thousand people showed up there demanding an accounting of the actual benefits of that research system, demanding to know what real health benefits have been conferred on the public from the billions of wasted dollars funneled to that facility, something might start. A spark might go off. You might get, with further demonstrations, all sorts of fall-out. Researchers-a few-might start leaking information.
Q: A good idea.
A: People in suits standing as close to the buildings as the police will allow. People in business suits, in jogging suits, mothers and babies. Well-off people. Poor people. All sorts of people.
Q: What about the combined destructive power of a number of vaccines given to babies these days?
A: It is a travesty and a crime. There are no real studies of any depth which have been done on that. Again, the assumption is made that vaccines are safe, and therefore any number of vaccines given together are safe as well. But the truth is, vaccines are not safe. Therefore the potential damage increases when you give many of them in a short time period.
Q: Then we have the fall flu season.
A: Yes. As if only in the autumn do these germs float in to the US from Asia. The public swallows that premise. If it happens in April, it is a bad cold. If it happens in October, it is the flu.
Q: Do you regret having worked all those years in the vaccine field?
A: Yes. But after this interview, I’ll regret it a little less. And I work in other ways. I give out information to certain people, when I think they will use it well.
Q: What is one thing you want the public to understand?
A: That the burden of proof in establishing the safety and efficacy of vaccines is on the people who manufacture and license them for public use. Just that. The burden of proof is not on you or me. And for proof you need well-designed long-term studies. You need extensive follow-up. You need to interview mothers and pay attention to what mothers say about their babies and what happens to them after vaccination. You need all these things. The things that are not there.
Q: The things that are not there.
A: Yes.
Q: To avoid any confusion, I’d like you to review, once more, the disease problems that vaccines can cause. Which diseases, how that happens.
A: We are basically talking about two potential harmful outcomes. One, the person gets the disease from the vaccine. He gets the disease which the vaccine is supposed to protect him from. Because, some version of the disease is in the vaccine to begin with. Or two, he doesn’t get THAT disease, but at some later time, maybe right away, maybe not, he develops another condition which is caused by the vaccine. That condition could be autism, what’s called autism, or it could be some other disease like meningitis. He could become mentally disabled.
Q: Is there any way to compare the relative frequency of these different outcomes?
A: No. Because the follow-up is poor. We can only guess. If you ask, out of a population of a hundred thousand children who get a measles vaccine, how many get the measles, and how many develop other problems from the vaccine, there is a no reliable answer. That is what I’m saying. Vaccines are superstitions. And with superstitions, you don’t get facts you can use. You only get stories, most of which are designed to enforce the superstition. But, from many vaccine campaigns, we can piece together a narrative that does reveal some very disturbing things. People have been harmed. The harm is real, and it can be deep and it can mean death. The harm is NOT limited to a few cases, as we have been led to believe. In the US, there are groups of mothers who are testifying about autism and childhood vaccines. They are coming forward and standing up at meetings. They are essentially trying to fill in the gap that has been created by the researchers and doctors who turn their backs on the whole thing.
Q: Let me ask you this. If you took a child in, say, Boston and you raised that child with good nutritious food and he exercised every day and he was loved by his parents, and he didn’t get the measles vaccine, what would be his health status compared with the average child in Boston who eats poorly and watches five hours of TV a day and gets the measles vaccine?
A: Of course there are many factors involved, but I would bet on the better health status for the first child. If he gets measles, if he gets it when he is nine, the chances are it will be much lighter than the measles the second child might get. I would bet on the first child every time.
Q: How long did you work with vaccines?
A: A long time. Longer than ten years.
Q: Looking back now, can you recall any good reason to say that vaccines are successful?
A: No, I can’t. If I had a child now, the last thing I would allow is vaccination. I would move out of the state if I had to. I would change the family name. I would disappear. With my family. I’m not saying it would come to that. There are ways to sidestep the system with grace, if you know how to act. There are exemptions you can declare, in every state, based on religious and/or philosophic views. But if push came to shove, I would go on the move.
Q: And yet there are children everywhere who do get vaccines and appear to be healthy.
A: The operative word is “appear.” What about all the children who can’t focus on their studies? What about the children who have tantrums from time to time? What about the children who are not quite in possession of all their mental faculties? I know there are many causes for these things, but vaccines are one cause. I would not take the chance. I see no reason to take the chance. And frankly, I see no reason to allow the government to have the last word. Government medicine is, from my experience, often a
contradiction in terms. You get one or the other, but not both.
Q: So we come to the level playing field.
A: Yes. Allow those who want the vaccines to take them. Allow the dissidents to decline to take them. But, as I said earlier, there is no level playing field if the field is strewn with lies. And when babies are involved, you have parents making all the decisions. Those parents need a heavy dose of truth. What about the child I spoke of who died from the DPT shot? What information did his parents act on? I can tell you it was heavily weighted. It was not real information
Q: Medical PR people, in concert with the press, scare the hell out of parents with dire scenarios about what will happen if their kids don’t get shots.
A: They make it seem a crime to refuse the vaccine. They equate it with bad parenting. You fight that with better information. It is always a challenge to buck the authorities. And only you can decide whether to do it. It is every person’s responsibility to make up his mind. The medical cartel likes that bet. It is betting that the fear will win.
JON RAPPOPORT
—————————————-
I am sure by now you are starting to get the picture but believe me we are only just scraping the surface with even more compelling evidence that will shock you to the core…………….Stay tuned for Part 4
Peter Eyre – 23/2/2013
Broadcaster – Investigative Journalist – Middle East Consultant – Political Analysis
Australian Government almost forcibly pushes the HPV vaccines on young boys as well as girls Part 2
Australian Government almost forcibly pushes the HPV vaccines on young boys as well as girls Part 2
Are vaccines harming Australian children?
Are young Australians potentially being sterilized or made infertile
Hey Mom could this be a clue towards autism or cause infertility?
Ever asked yourself that if all of these vaccines are so safe how come many of those that created them have not allowed themselves or younger members of their family to be vaccinated?
Would you be shocked to learn that many of the worlds top scientists who have either worked on these programmes or initiated them have themselves met many times in secret to discuss the very same concerns that we all have, namely are the vaccines or their ingredients safe?
Before we go down the road of exposing the truth lets just take a glimpse of the propoganda that surrounds those in power and how they do the hard sell on certain vaccinations programmes that have clearly not followed the full pharmaceutical/government protocol required before launching the product onto the general public.
We have all been whipped into a sort of mental hysteria by our governments when it comes to certain vaccines where fictional statements have been made in regard to pending pandemics, such as the swine flue none event or new, so called high tech vaccines, such as the current HPV really does gross the red line in putting our young at great risk into not being able to live a normal life and possibly miss out on having a family!!
It is also important for all those out there with children and grandchildren to fully understand the current “Agenda 21” that was created by the United Nations and accepted by this country and many others. Within this complex document are references to controlling the world population by whatever means are required.
You may find it hard to believe that the New World Order, who control the United Nations, UNICEF, UNESCO and the World Health Organisation etc, openly declare a need to reduce the current world population by at least 80%!!!!
Since this document was first published and accepted the New World Order and its cabal have launched a massive programme of depopulation using all sorts of high tech weaponry some of which includes Depleted Uranium, “Dirty Bombs”, Chemical and Biological Warfare Weaponry including “Gene Specific Warfare”, HAARP and a multitude of vaccination programmes etc.
One should also add to this list many man made agents that have been intentionally released into our respective environments, especially in third world countries such as Anthrax, HIV, Cholera, Swine Flu etc with the added ability to impregnate material for clothing as was the case in Africa where such things were used to contaminate people, land, water (including cattle water holes) etc.
We all appreciate to some degree that the world’s population is growing at an alarming rate but to curb this trend by unlawful/inhumane practices or to allow the New World Order (UN, WHO, UNICEF, UNESCO etc) to act as god in deciding our fate is certainly not acceptable.
Let’s now look at the “Hard Sell” by the Australian Government, which obviously has the full support of the Liberals and the Green Party and how they are pushing this unproven HPV vaccine onto all our boys and girls of high school age………here are some of the articles as well as what they call their graphs on the success of the programme:
Tanya Plibersek – What is she planting – The Infertility Tree?
Minister for Health Press release:
12 July 2012
In a world first, Australian schoolboys will be able to get the successful Gardasil® vaccine, which will protect them against developing a range of cancers and bolster the effectiveness of this vaccine in women.
Starting next school year, the Gillard Government will fund the vaccine for 12 and 13-year-old boys through school-based programs under the National Immunisation Program. Year 9 boys will also be able to get the vaccine at school under a catch-up program for the next two years.
Minister for Health Tanya Plibersek said providing the HPV vaccine to boys would protect them and increase the effectiveness of the vaccination program for girls.
“Every parent wants their child to be healthy and that is why the Australian Government is delivering the best protection we have against HPV related cancer through this vaccine,” said Ms Plibersek.
“By building on Australia’s world-class immunisation program, we’re stopping preventable HPV related disease and cancers, and that makes a difference to the quality of life of our families.
“Already the HPV vaccine has had an impact – significantly reducing the number of lesions that lead to cervical cancer amongst women in the vaccinated age group. It is estimated that a quarter of new infections will be avoided by extending the vaccine to boys,” said Ms Plibersek.
An Australian innovation, the vaccine protects against four important genotypes of the human papillomavirus (HPV).
The HPV vaccination program for boys is expected to cost $21.1 million over four years. This will include an information campaign, a vaccine register and monitoring of adverse reactions.
Ms Plibersek said the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee had recommended last year that the HPV vaccination program be extended to boys following a review of its cost effectiveness.
She said the Australian Government would work with all states and territories to implement the boys’ vaccination program in high schools.
————————————————–
I would add that there are 100 strains of the HPV vaccine and this vaccine only addresses four of them and despite any assurances they give you your child will still require to have regular “Pap Smears” to confirm its success and the world’s top specialist on HPV, Dr. Harper expressed her own deep concerns as to how this vaccine had been rushed into production without following normal government protocol:
Professor Diane Harper, who designed and conducted the clinical trials for the HPV “Gardasil” vaccine conveyed concerns with regard to immunity, in her interview on National Radio (August 01 2008). (www.radio.nz.co.nz) – Audio Search – Gardasil) Professor Harper said trials indicated that five years immunity was all that could be confirmed as immunity had been shown waning and it was highly likely that recipients would require booster shots in the future. She also stated that mothers and daughters are being told that by having this vaccine they are one less who will get cervical cancer and that this is simply not true. That this vaccine has never been proven, at this stage, to prevent cervical cancer. It has only been proven to protect women against two types of HPV virus with links to cervical cancer.
In another statement Dr. Harper said: “Even women who are vaccinated need to have regular Pap testing, as otherwise they are still at risk of developing cervical cancer. And women who decide not to have the vaccine can still protect themselves by undergoing Pap testing.”
Dr. Harper feels this message has not been made clear to the general public and that it has been overshadowed by what she considers to be aggressive and inappropriate promotion of Gardasil. As a gynecologist dealing with the general population, her advice on the HPV vaccine is that “if you are at all concerned, then don’t have the vaccine — have regular Pap smears and you will be equally protected from cervical cancer.”
She continued, “Whether or not to get vaccinated with Gardasil is a personal choice by each girl/woman and/or her parents.” Each individual must weigh her family health history and whether it may put her at any possible risk for an adverse event that Gardasil might trigger.
——————————-
Note:
Dr. Harper makes it very clear that having regular Pap smears will equally protect you from cervical cancer…….for those that do not fully understand the reason for having Pap smears………each time you have a Pap smear you are screened for any abnormal cell activity……..if abnormal cell activity is detected you are called back for further treatment. If this procedure is carried out correctly and on time you should not develop cervical cancer.
Her advice was if your daughter is in the 12-14 year bracket, it could be wise to wait four years until more data was gained on the effects of this vaccine. There is no advantage, in her view, to getting vaccinated at this young age versus 18 years. Prof. Harper has publicly stated that this vaccine is a great big public health experiment.
If one reads between the lines what Dr. Harper is actually saying is that you do not need the vaccine at all……….my concern is therefore why is the Australian Government continuing to push this onto young schoolboys as well as girls when its clearly not yet clinically proven to be of any benefit?
I would also add that during laboratory trials many rats became infertile
————————————
Lets now look at the governments other propaganda campaign in relation to this HPV vaccine when it comes to what they say about the “Success of the Program”…………..it is important for you as a parent to understand that “Success of the Programme” should not be measured by how many children have been vaccinated since the vaccine came on line but rather how many children have not succumbed to cancer or any other sexually transmitted disease………..that as we all know is what you can truly say is a successful programme and in this case not only has this vaccine side-stepped normal development protocol but the manufacturers or government currently do not have any data as to its success!!!!
————————-
Before continuing I will insert what the government says about HPV so that you have a clear understanding:
HPV stands for Human Papilloma virus, a common virus that affects both males and females, passed from person to person through sexual contact. HPV can stay in the body, causing changes to cells that can lead to HPV-related cancers and disease in males and females. Different types of HPV can affect different parts of the body, and some types are more harmful than others. HPV can cause genital warts, which can be distressing but do not cause cancer.
HPV can cause penile, anal, cervical, vulval and vaginal cancers, as well as genital warts. Four out of five people will have a HPV infection at some point in their lives. HPV doesn’t usually cause symptoms, so people infected with the virus may not know they have it. The vaccine is most effective when given before a person becomes sexually active.
The national school-based HPV Vaccination Program, provided through the National Immunisation Program, has been extended to include males. From February 2013, males aged 12-13 years will receive the HPV vaccine at school on an ongoing basis. Males aged 14-15 years will will also receive the vaccine as part of a catch-up program until the end of the 2014 school year. Females ages 12-13 years will continue to receive the vaccine at school.
This is one of the Australian Governments “Success of the Programme” graph for 2011 only……….one must therefore understand that this programme first started in 2009 and that a vast majority of the young females in this country have now been vaccinated:
From my perspective I think it would have been appropriate to show an Australian fertility graph prior to the commencement of this programme and then compare it to another fertility graph once the young girls and boys have reached womanhood and manhood.
I am sure you will agree that no statistics are yet avail as the girls that first started on the programme are still too young to get married so we are possible looking at a dramatic change in fertility rates around the year of 2017 onwards.
I found another article on the HPV Vaccine which listed the ingredients:
GARDASIL HPV INGREDIENTS:
Aluminum 225mcg
Animal and human studies have shown aluminum can cause nerve cell death and that vaccine aluminum adjuvants can allow aluminum to enter the brain, as well as cause inflammation at the injection site leading to chronic joint and muscle pain as well as fatigue.
Sodium Borate “Borax” 35mcg
This is the main ingredient in Boric Acid. Powdered Boric Acid is often used to kill cockroaches. Sodium Borate is now listed as a dangerous poison. Symptons of Sodium Borate poisoning are very similar to many of the side effects being reported with the Gardasil vaccine.
“Borax was added to the Substance of Very High Concern (SVHC) candidate list on 16 December 2010. The SVHC candidlate list is part of the EU Regulations on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals 2006 (REACH), and the addition was based on the revised classification of Borax as toxic for reproduction category 1B under the CLP Regulations. Substances and mixtures imported into the EU which contain Borax are now required to be labelled with the warnings “May damage fertility” and “May damage the unborn child”.
Polysorbate 80 50mcg
Although Polysorbate 80 is a food additive that enables solubility of flavouring oils with water, injection is quite different. Polysorbate 80 injected into prepubescent rats caused a rapid growth of reproductive organs, but growth was abnormal and the rats were sterile, unable to have children. When used intravenously with vitamins it has been known to cause anaphylactic shock. According to the Polysorbate 80 MSDS, it may be a carcinogenic, (cause cancer), as well as a mutagenic, (birth defects).
L-histidine 0.78mcg
L-histidine is an essential amino acid which is a precursor to allergic reactions. It stimulates the inflammatory response of skin and mucous membranes (one possible cause of the allergic reactions reported). It is also responsible for forming metal bearing enzymes (such as the toxic metal storage protein metallothionein). Metals such as zinc, copper, and nickel are transported by binding to L-histidine and the binding is essential for excretion of excess heavy metals. Many parents of autistic children are quite familiar with Metallothionein and MT deficiency.
Sodium Chloride 9.56mcg
Common salt
Yeast Protein 7mcg
This is a hidden form of MSG, as it creates synthetic free glutamic acid in the processing, which in simpler terms is MSG. Most vaccines contain some hidden form of MSG (eg hydrolysed gelatin) as this feeds the live virus.
REMEMBER TO TRIPLE THE FOLLOWING AMOUNTS DUE TO THE THREE SHOTS REQUIRED FOR THIS VACCINE
———————————–
I found this article that really does lay the cards on the table:
LETTER TO EDITOR – TIMARU HERALD – HPV VACCINE 2008-07-16
Being a mum and having a ten year old daughter I am interested in anything that will be of benefit to her now and in the future, so naturally I was curious about this HPV vaccine programme and the possible benefits for her.
Instead of just listening to all the “hype” over this vaccine I endeavoured to uncover actual facts. I started with Helen Clark’s speech notes on her announcement of the “$177 million programme” two months ago in May (www.beehive.govt.nz/speech) In her speech she states “About eight in every ten women who have been sexually active will have HPV at some stage of their life. Normally there are no symptoms, and in 98 per cent of cases it clears itself. But in those cases where it doesn’t and isn’t treated, it can lead to pre-cancerous cells which may develop into cervical cancer.”
Further delving revealed there are approximately 100 HPV ruses and that this “Gardasil” vaccine covers only four. Helen Clark’s speech notes state “two of these four, in the HPV vaccine, are responsible for around 70 per cent of all cervical cancers”. I was unable to find any substantiated evidence supporting this, however I did find scientific evidence that HPV is an unlikely cause of cancer as “no set of viral genes is consistently present or expressed in human cervical cancers. HPV does not replicate in the cancer cells”. All that has ever been shown is that HPV is sometimes present in cervical cancer tissue (www.rense.com/general78/hpv.htm). But as we know from Helen Clark’s speech three quarters of all other women also have or have had HPV present. There appears to be a total lack of evidence that cervical cancer appears in women with HPV more often than in women without it. Also of interest is the average age for cervical cancer is 50 years. The government is targeting 12 year old girls for this vaccine programme and yet Merck who markets “Gardasil” is claiming only five years immunity, surely this would make the vaccine worthless in the long run, because by the time most women need immunity, the vaccine will have long since worn off.
It would be wonderful if this vaccine prevented women from dying of cervical cancer however I just couldn’t find the facts to prove it. Will women and girl’s who have been vaccinated believe they are protected from cervical cancer and assume they don’t need regular smear tests. Pap smears have been medically proven, to reduce the number of deaths from cervical cancer, through early detection of abnormal pre-cancerous cells, and continue to do so in this country.
I’ve concluded this costly programme is needlessly vaccinating our girls and women for a miniscule “at risk” group, with a vaccine that only covers 4 out of the possible 100 HPV viruses out there, and offers only five years immunity. But most importantly hasn’t even been proven to prevent cervical cancer. This vaccine has raised far more questions than answers for me, however it has answered the question of whether to vaccinate my daughter and that’s a resounding NO.
J. SMITH
————————————
Mommy is this going to cause me problems in later life?
Another article revealed some terrible consequences of certain vaccines and although some ingredients have since changed many remain on the shelf in third world countries. It is also fact that the substituted ingredients in today’s vaccines are equally bad for our health :
Mercury on the Mind
Although they afflict widely different age groups, autism and Alzheimer’s disease share a common cause: mercury. Dr. Boyd Haley, professor and chair of the chemistry department at the University of Kentucky, and Dr. Bernard Rimland, founder of the Autism Research Institute, presented evidence at this year’s Doctors for Disaster Preparedness meeting that connects mercury with these diseases.
This heavy metal is highly poisonous. A Dartmouth professor studying the chemical characteristics of an organic form of mercury — dimethyl mercury — spilled two drops of it on her gloved hand. The first sign of mercury poisoning occurred four months later when her speech began to be slurred. This was followed by difficulty walking and loss of vision. She then fell into a coma and died. Another person, attempting to smelt the silver in dental amalgams he obtained (they are 35 percent silver, 50 percent mercury, and 15percent tin, zinc, and other metals), heated them in a frying pan. The mercury vapor thus generated killed him quickly. The two other family members in the house at the time also died.
Mercury is one proton (neutron and electron) heavier than gold — the atomic number of gold is 79; mercury, 80. It is distributed throughout the earth’s crust. Unlike other metals, mercury, in its elemental state, is liquid (molten) at room temperature. And it releases a steady stream of gaseous mercury atoms that linger in the atmosphere for months (eventually falling back to earth and its oceans in an inorganic form in rain drops). Even when in a solid state, combined with other metals as an alloy, mercury atoms continually escape into the atmosphere. Once added to latex paint, put in teething powder, used in making hats, as a fungicide on seeds, as an antiseptic (Merthiolate), and as a treatment for syphilis (the cure was worse than the disease), human exposure to mercury today comes principally from three sources: dental amalgams, vaccines, and fish.
Elemental mercury when released by a dental amalgam is inhaled and (80 percent of it) absorbed by the lungs and retained in the body. Vaccine makers add thimerosal (which is half ethyl mercury) to vaccines to prevent bacterial contamination. This injected organic form of mercury is readily taken up by brain and heart muscle cells. Fish harbor another organic form of mercury — methyl mercury, which is obtained from plankton that synthesize it from inorganic mercury extracted from the sea.
Currently the two most important sources of mercury exposure for Americans are dental amalgams and vaccinations. The Federal government’s Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA), for reasons not explained, have chosen to ignore this fact. These agencies and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) focus exclusively on mercury in seafood, to the extent that the NIH will not fund studies that address mercury in amalgams and vaccines.
In lockstep with the government, the American Dental Association (ADA) claims that amalgams are safe, and the mercury in them poses no problem. The (government-funded) Institute of Medicine (IOM) and various specialty societies, notably the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), and the American Medical Association (AMA), say the same thing about mercury in vaccines. There is growing evidence, however, that mercury in vaccines and amalgams cause both autism and Alzheimer’s disease. The CDC and the FDA and the medical establishment, led by its specialty societies, discount or ignore this evidence — evidence that includes privately funded epidemiological studies; research on how mercury damages brain cells grown in culture; animal studies in rodents, sheep, and primates; and clinical studies in children and adults.
Autism was discovered in 1943, in American children, twelve years after ethyl mercury (thimerosal) was added to the pertussis vaccine. (The disease was not seen in Europe until the 1950s, after thimerosal was added to vaccines used there.) In a typical case, shortly before his 2nd birthday a normally developing, healthy boy stops communicating with others and withdraws into himself. He avoids eye contact and becomes strange and aloof. His vision becomes blurred; and he develops various motor disturbances, such as involuntary jerking of the arms and legs and walking on his toes. In addition to these manifestations, Dr. Sallie Bernard and her colleagues, in a study titled, “Autism: A Unique Type of Mercury Poisoning,” describe the speech difficulties, unusual behavior (such as unprovoked crying spells and head banging), various degrees of cognitive impairment, gastrointestinal difficulties, and immune difficulties that these autistic children can have. Mercury is most likely a causative factor in other developmental disorders as well, such as delayed speech and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Investigators have shown that there is a direct relationship between increasing doses of mercury in vaccines and autism. In the 1950s, with an immunization schedule limited to four vaccines (against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, and smallpox), 1 in 10,000 children developed this disease. As vaccines for other diseases were added, health care providers began injecting increasingly larger doses of mercury into children. Those born in 1981 were given 135 micrograms of mercury (on average), and one case of autism occurred in every 2,600 children born that year. With the addition of hepatitis B vaccine (injected on the day of birth) and one for Haemophilus influenzae Type b, providers injected 246 micrograms of mercury into children born in 1996. Autism occurred in one out of every 350 of these children. Today, providers follow an immunization schedule, prepared by the CDC and approved by the AAP and AAFP, that includes 13 vaccines given, with variable numbers of booster shots, 33 times before a child reaches the age of 2 (when the development of the brain is completed). Autism now afflicts 1 in 100 boys and 1 in 400 girls, and physicians diagnose 100,000 new cases of this disease every year in the U.S (using diagnostic criteria, in the DSM-IV, that is more restrictive than the previous DSM-IIIR). Over the last 30 years more than one million children have come down with this disease, and currently one in every 68 families in America has an autistic child.
Mainstream medical journals, like Pediatrics and The New England Journal of Medicine, only publish studies that claim thimerosal is safe. And it turns out that these articles are written in large part by researchers in the pay of vaccine makers, as the Coalition for Safe Minds (Sensible Action For Ending Mercury-Induced Neurological Disorders), a private nonprofit organization, has shown. Editors of these journals will not publish studies that show a link between thimerosal and autism like “Thimerosal in Childhood Vaccines, Neurodevelopment Disorders, and Heart Disease in the United States” by Mark and David Geier, which documents a strong association between the amounts of mercury injected in vaccines and autism. Such articles can only find acceptance in alternative (i.e., “politically incorrect”) journals like the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, where this one was published.
The amount of damage a given dose of mercury can do to the brain (and also the heart) depends on one’s age, sex, and genetically determined ability to excrete mercury. Young children with still developing brains are more susceptible, and males are more vulnerable to a given dose of mercury because testosterone enhances its neurotoxicity. Most important, however, is one’s genetically programmed ability to rid the body of mercury. The brain has a house-cleaning protein that removes dangerous waste products, which comes in three varieties: APO-E2, APO-E3, and APO-E4. The APO-E2 protein can carry 2 atoms of mercury out of the brain; APO-3, one; and AOP-E4, none. The genes we acquire from each parent determine which two we have. People with two APO-E4 proteins (and thus no APO-E2 or -E3) have an 80 percent chance of acquiring Alzheimer’s disease. And according to one study, autistic children have a huge preponderance of APO-E4 protein in their brains.
Alzheimer’s disease was discovered in 1906, again in America, where dentists used mercury-laden amalgams to fill cavities (dentists in Europe largely avoided them). Today, more than 4 million Americans now have Alzheimer’s disease. It afflicts half of people over the age of 85 and 20 percent aged 75 to 84.
The first symptoms of this disease are difficulty concentrating and variable degrees of memory loss, leading ultimately to devastating mental deterioration. The brains of people with Alzheimer’s disease shrink by 25 percent and have distinct pathologic hallmarks (neurofibillary tangles, amyloid plaques, and phosphorylation of tau protein). Brain cells grown in the laboratory develop the same three pathologic findings when exposed to nanomolar (3.6 × 10-10 molar) doses of mercury, an amount approximating that found in the brains of people who have a lot of amalgam fillings.
Dental amalgams are the main source of mercury in an adult’s brain. An average-sized amalgam filling contains 750,000 micrograms of mercury and releases around 10 micrograms a day. Researchers put radiolabelled mercury amalgams in the teeth of sheep and determined where escaped mercury went with a scanner. They showed that mercury atoms exhaled through the nose travel up filaments of the olfactory nerve to the hippocampus, which controls memory, and to other critical areas in the brain. In another study, rats given the same concentration of mercury that people inhale from their amalgams develop the pathologic markers of Alzheimer’s disease. People with Alzheimer’s disease have mercury levels in their brains that are 2 to 3 times higher than that seen in normal people.
The mercury in flu vaccines also plays a role in this disease. One investigator has found that people who received the flu vaccine each year for 3 to 5 years had a ten-fold greater chance of developing Alzheimer’s disease than people who had zero, 1, or 2 shots.
Another important factor with regard to mercury on the mind, which officials at the CDC, FDA and the professors in the IOM do not consider, is synergistic toxicity — mercury’s enhanced effect when other poisons are present. A small dose of mercury that kills 1 in 100 rats and a dose of aluminum that will kill 1 in 100 rats, when combined have a striking effect: all the rats die. Doses of mercury that have a 1 percent mortality will have a 100 percent mortality rate if some aluminum is there. Vaccines contain aluminum.
Why do officials at the CDC, FDA, and leaders of the medical and dental establishment discount or ignore all these important facts? Some of them being in the pay of vaccine makers is one reason. The specter of litigation for having sanctioned thimerosal and amalgams and, in the case of the FDA, not doing appropriate safety studies on them is another. But it is more complicated than that. The hypothesis that mercury causes autism and Alzheimer’s disease is a new truth. And as Schopenhauer points out (see my article on him), each new truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. And third, it is accepted as self-evident. The mercury truth is now in the second stage.
In the 1790s Edward Jenner observed that milk maids did not have pock marks on their faces, like people did who had contracted and survived smallpox. Milking cows with cowpox rendered them immune to smallpox. He took fluid from the pustules of infected cows, injected it into children, and found that it protected them, when exposed, from contracting smallpox. The medical establishment of the day dismissed the idea of vaccinating people with cow pus as nonsense; and Sir Joseph Banks, president of the British Royal Society (the IOM of the day), told Jenner that he would ruin his reputation if he tried to publish these findings, which were so much at variance with established knowledge. When other doctors and informed individuals like Thomas Jefferson recognized that “vaccination” did indeed work, its value was, in time, accepted as self-evident. Jenner’s vaccine saved millions of lives and eradicated a disfiguring disease that has a 30 percent mortality rate. (But laboratories in the U.S. and U.S.S.R. preserved the virus that causes smallpox, and we now know that Soviet microbiologists grew vast quantities of it in chicken eggs for use as a biological weapon of mass destruction.)
Today the medical establishment, led by the AAP, AAFP, AMA, CDC, and IOM, has gone to the other extreme. The accepted wisdom now is that vaccines are a panacea. Health care providers start injecting them in infants on the day of birth, and government officials seek to have them made mandatory for all Americans. But some little-discussed facts belie their value. Deaths from diphtheria, for example, declined 90 percent from 1900 to 1930, due to better sanitation and nutrition, before there was a vaccine for this disease. Likewise, the death rate for measles declined 95 percent (13.3 to 0.03 deaths per 100,000 population) between 1915 and 1958, before the vaccine for measles vaccine was introduced in 1963. Viewed from a risk/benefit perspective, providers and government officials downplay the deleterious effects that vaccines can have on one’s health and inflate their benefits. The top medical textbook on the subject is Vaccines, edited by Drs. Plotkin and Orenstein. In the 1999 3rd Edition that I reviewed (a slightly longer 4th Edition was published last year), its authors confine their discussion of mercury in vaccines to two short paragraphs in this 1,230-page book. They do not address concerns that have been raised about its neurotoxicity.
Vaccine manufacturers have started removing thimerosal from vaccines. And for the first time since the state began keeping records on this disease, California has had a decrease, of 6 percent, in the annual number of children over the age of 3 who have been diagnosed with autism. This occurred in children born in 2000, when the phase-out of thimerosal in vaccines began. Iowa has passed a law banning thimerosal in that state, and California has done the same thing for pregnant women and children under 3 (the bill awaits the governor’s signature). But pharmaceutical companies still add thimerosal in their Flu vaccines; and pediatricians are vaccinating children with their remaining supply of thimerosal-containing vaccines, which the FDA has chosen not to recall.
Taking mercury out of vaccines would substantially reduce the incidence of autism, but this alone will not eliminate the disease. Giving too many vaccines over too short a time to infants whose nervous system is not yet fully developed can also trigger autism and its spectrum of disorders. As Dr. Blaylock has shown (see Recommended Reading below), multiple vaccines given close together over-stimulate the brain’s immune system and, via the mechanism of “bystander injury,” destroy brain cells.
Avoiding flu shots that contain thimerosal, and having dentists stop implanting mercury amalgams in people’s mouths would lower the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease. If you have amalgam fillings, particularly if there is a family history of Alzheimer’s disease, you might consider having them removed. Be sure to have a dentist do it who follows the protocol established by The International Academy of Oral Medicine & Toxicology for safely removing them.
For the third source of mercury, follow the CDC’s advice and don’t eat mercury-contaminated fish, especially if you are pregnant because mercury in your bloodstream crosses the placenta and is concentrated in the fetus’ brain.
Recommended Reading — in addition to the online links provided above
An excellent review of thimerosal and autism, titled “Mercury in Medicine — Taking Unnecessary Risks,” is to be found, of all places, in the Congressional Record. Prepared by its Subcommittee on Human Rights and Wellness, this report was presented to the Committee on Government Reform, chaired by Congressman Dan Burton (who has an autistic grandson). Congressional Record, May 21, 2003, E1011—E1030.
SafeMinds president, Lyn Redwood, presented testimony at a Congressional hearing held on September 8, 2004 that exposes malfeasance by the CDC and FDA related to thimerosal. It is titled “Truth Revealed: New Scientific Discoveries Regarding Mercury in Medicine and Autism” and is posted on their website, safeminds.org. See also this organization’s 84-page Report to Congress titled, “A Brief Analysis of Recent Efforts in Medical Mercury Induced Neurological and Autism Spectrum Disorders” (September 8, 2004).
“The Three Modern Faces of Mercury” — in fish, vaccines, and dental amalgams — by Thomas Clarkson in Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 110 | Supplement 1 | February 2002 | pages 11—23. This study provides an current-day perspective on mercury exposure, post Calomel, Merthiolate, and Mad Hatters.
If your dentist parrots the American Dental Association stance on this subject and says that “silver” — i.e., mercury — amalgams are perfectly safe, insist that he or she read Dr. Boyd Haley’s response to the president of the ADA on his defense of dental amalgams. It is posted on this website. I sent it to my dentist who I had been going to for a number of years. When he chose to ignore it, I changed dentists — to a mercury-free one and had him remove all my amalgam fillings.
“Mercury: the Silent Killer,” Chapter 3 in Health and Nutrition Secrets That Can Save Your Life by Russell L. Blaylock, M.D. As a board-certified neurosurgeon, Dr. Blaylock, like me, is a member of the medical establishment. He now, however, studies and writes about wellness and complementary/alternative medicine on a full-time basis.
Are Vaccines Safe and Effective? by Neil Z. Miller (2002). This 78-page (paperback) book is well worth reading, especially if you have children or if you are being pressured to get a flu shot.
For a comprehensive review, with 167 scientific references, on how vaccines damage infants’ and soldiers’ brains (Gulf War Syndrome) when given too close together, see Dr. Blaylock’s “Interaction of Cytokines, Excitotoxins, Reactive Nitrogen and Oxygen Species in Autism Spectrum Disorders” in the Journal of the American Nutraceutical Association (JANA 2003;6[4]:21—35). See also his study, “Chronic Microglial Activation and Excitotoxicity Secondary to Excessive Immune Stimulation: Possible Factors in GulfWar Syndrome and Autism” in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons (JAPS 2004;9[2]:46—52). Dr. Blaylock has written a simplified version of these studies for the general public titled “Vaccines: the Hidden Dangers,” in his Blaylock Wellness Report (Vol. 1, No. 1), which is published monthly and can be purchased online.
September 29, 2004
Donald Miller is a cardiac surgeon and Professor of Surgery at the University of Washington in Seattle and a member of Doctors for Disaster Preparedness and writes articles on a variety of subjects for LewRockwell.com, including bioterrorism. His web site is www.donaldmiller.com.
———————————-
All of my articles are copied to the Prime Minister of Australia, Julia Gillard, The Leader of the Opposition, Tony Abbott, Kevin Rudd and key members of the Green Party for comment but to date no responses have been forthcoming.
Based on the nature of these articles and the very serious implications associated with their content one could consider a lack of reply as being that of criminal negligence.
I openly invite those addressed above to challenge the authenticity of my investigations/evidence whilst at the same time allow the citizens of Australia to make a decision that is best for their children and indeed their own well being.
As they say “if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear”
I would remind you all that you are civil servants and owe it to those who put you in office to be open and transparent and to legally follow your oath of office in serving your citizens, especially in responding to such vital issues…….the same applies to all leaders and governments worldwide.
The New World Order is currently being dismantled and a changing of the guard is taking place. The western controlled New World Order and its fraudulent/corrupt financial infrastructure is now giving way to an eastern derived control that hopefully will change things rather dramatically.
Just in case you have all failed to notice, many world leaders, ministers and senior bank/finance CEO’s around the globe are being removed from office without explanation with past offenders also being pursued……….in more recent times we have seen the Pope fall from office………ever wondered why?
I again remind you all:
Governments Duty of Care
Our government has the responsibility to prove the safety of any vaccination being recommended for broad public health, as part of an overall vaccine program. Our current knowledge of science, the immune system, and the brain would make it unlikely that broad vaccine programs could ever be approved for use today if they hadn’t being going on for so long.
Is it possible that the general public could be calling for criminal penalties/charges for any government minister, department or agency that knew about the dangers of thimerosal /aluminium in vaccines and did nothing to protect our children?
——————————-
It goes without saying that current third world countries will suffer the brunt of these highly dangerous vaccines
Part 3 of this series will continue with more authentic evidence that vaccines are not always what your government say they are and the ingredients continue to be of grave concern to me and believe it or not also grave concern to those that create them or promote them!!!
Peter Eyre – 19/2/2013
Broadcaster – Investigative Journalist – Middle East Consultant – Political Analysis
Australian Government almost forcibly pushes the HPV vaccines on young boys as well as girls Part 1
Australian Government almost forcibly pushes the HPV vaccines on young boys as well as girls Part 1
Are vaccines harming Australian children?
Are young Australians potentially being sterilized or made infertile
Hey Mum will this cause mental problems or make me infertile ?
We continue to see a sort of hysteria being fed into the minds of all Australian Mums and Dads (and indeed the world) to protect their children against the many viruses that our children could or could not encounter during their younger years and yet I continue to ask the question – ” is our government or other governments well informed as to the authenticity of the data provided or as to the risks associated with those same vaccines?
It is fact that the world expert on the HPV vaccine, Dr. Harper, herself expressed grave concern as to the acceleration of this programme before normal protocol had been completed i.e. data being released over a long period of time to prove it was advantageous and that it had been tested on humans…….this normal protocol however was side-stepped when the HPV vaccine was rushed into production.
First World Countries
“Mom is it true that aluminum and other ingredients are contained in this vaccine and could make me very ill or infertile”
Third World Countries
“Mom is it true that the vaccines contain mercury based ingredients and are extremely dangerous to my health, mind and body”
Over many many years I have been investigating the reasoning behind some rather rushed vaccines onto the market that has not only led me to many concerns as a parent but that of other parents around the world.
Those same concerns believe it or not have also come from the very organisations that not only design those vaccines but also the organisation that implement them including the UN, WHO and Disease and Control Agencies etc.
My conscience must therefore yet again repeat this article and also follow it up with factual evidence that I am sure will cause you as a parent or grandparent to become deeply concerned.
I am also repeating this amended article for the political sector within Australia, especially those that implemented this, yet to be proven programme.
Copies will be sent to the Australian Prime Minister, Julia Gillard – Leader of the Opposition, Tony Abboot – Minister for Health, Tanya Plibersek and many others.
You will note that in the Australian Statistics that have been released it gives reference to what the government calls the “Success of the Program” but I am sure you would agree that success is measured by the reduction off associated cancers or other sexual viruses that apply to the HPV Vaccine since it was first implemented rather than boasting as to how many have been vaccinated to date – “That is not evidence of its success or failure”
Before printing this article again I would like to place an emphasis on the following extracts from other experts who do not agree with the current trend of governments and the pharmaceutical industry and in doing so warn those concerned of the implications:
Governments Duty of Care
Our government has the responsibility to prove the safety of any vaccination being recommended for broad public health, as part of an overall vaccine program. Our current knowledge of science, the immune system, and the brain would make it unlikely that broad vaccine programs could ever be approved for use today if they hadn’t being going on for so long.
Is it possible that the general public could be calling for criminal penalties/charges for any government minister, department or agency that knew about the dangers of thimerosal /aluminium in vaccines and did nothing to protect our children?
————————–
The public are slowly becoming aware that the WHO, UNICEF and our governments are starting to use the media outlets to spread mass hysteria regarding certain potential risky flu outbreaks or the dangers of cervical cancer etc.
The last one (which is still alive and kicking) was that of the so called pandemic “Swine Flu.” It became clear to most of use that this was certainly a ploy by the pharmaceutical industry to make much money. This particular flu didn’t have any significant impact on the world’s health than any other conventional flu outbreak. In actual fact there were fewer deaths from this pandemic than the norm.
Is it possible that our respective governments and the pharmaceutical industry are literally making a killing in the physical and financial context?
Is it possible that this is also their way of mass depopulation and mass sterilisation in order to comply with the New World Orders “Agenda 21”?
Maybe it would be an opportune time to mention that many vaccines contain not only mercury but also aluminum which is carcinogenic to humans and also has a direct link to autism in our children.
To investigate this dollar driven industry we have to look at some historical facts to prove that many vaccines that are produced to protect us are in actual fact causing us more harm than good. Many of these vaccines are produced in record time and remain untested over a long period of time. I guess the proof of this would be the fact that many doctors and those in the medical professional have not taken the vaccine themselves. Have you ever asked why? I certainly have many times and just get a smile in response to the question!
There is one ingredient that is of great concern to many medical professionals and that is called Thimerosal which is mercury based. You will find this in many of today’s main line vaccines and has been banned in many western countries. However it is rife in third world countries where strict rules do not apply and has been abused by the WHO and UNICEF in these locations.
One can clearly see that when certain vaccines must not be administered to pregnant women that this is one of the first clues as to its safety. As an example:
“Exposure to mercury in utero and in children may cause mild to severe mental retardation and mild to severe motor coordination impairment.”
Therefore anything that contains Thimerosal fits into this category.
It is also believed that Aluminium enhances the toxicity of Thimerosal and therefore trace elements of Aluminium can come from the fluoride used in our water supply which is the type of fluoride (sodium) added to municipal water to act as a floctuating agent (to settle particles in the water). Fluoride is a hazardous waste product of the aluminium industry! One should also add to this the regular usage of aluminium products used for cooking etc (especially in third world countries). A perfect example of this is when one tries to clean the inside of saucepans etc, wipe a white cloth on the inside it will turn grey or black..
It is also interesting to note whilst on this topic that this toxic waste has been recommend for other uses in Australia and other countries such as:
- Use as a soil amendment to help retain nutrients and adjust soil pH.
- Use as an additive to fertiliser to improve phosphorous retention in soils.
- Use as an additive to compost to aid the retention of trace metals.
- Use as a soil additive for the retention of water.
The main purpose of pointing such things out is the fact that those companies, who produce toxic waste, continue in their attempts to put that waste back into the food chain cycle.
It should also be noted that the use of Thimerosal as a preservative has been banned in certain western countries:
The US, Iowa and California passed legislation in favour of mercury-free vaccines.
The Danish parliament, in 1992, banned the heavy metal from vaccines.
The UK passed a similar legislation. At the root of the problem was Thimerosal: this preservative with a 50 per cent mercury constituent is a key ingredient of multi-dose vaccines. These vials are about 10 times cheaper than single-dose vials, making it easier for international agencies to procure vaccines for programmes in developing countries including India. In 2000, for instance, about 80 per cent of vaccines administered globally were supplied in multi-dose vials.
International bodies such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF recommend this preservative. Even those vaccine manufacturers based in developed countries, who make mercury-free vaccines for domestic consumption, use this heavy metal in their products for developing countries.
Most vaccines used for country’s Universal Immunisation Programme (UIP) have a Thimerosal content of 25 µg per five millilitres. Half of that, 12.5 µg, is mercury. A six-week old infant in many parts of the country is administered two vaccines, DPT ( Diphtheria, Pertussis and Tetanus ) and Hepatitis b. This exposes the child to 25 µg of mercury. Infants getting vaccinated at a private clinic are also administered the Haemophilus Influenza Type B Vaccine, as per the Indian Academy of Pediatricians’ protocol. This results in a total exposure of 37.5 µg.
According to the US Environment Protection Agency, the human body can, in a day, safely tolerate 0.1 µg of mercury for every kg of its body weight. So, an average six-week infant, weighing 7 kg, can tolerate an exposure of 0.7 µg of mercury. A child is exposed to mercury levels much higher than this recommended amount on their inoculation day.
The risk of mercury is even higher for the undernourished — and underweight — Indian children. At a WHO meeting of the Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety in 2003, it was pointed out that little is known of susceptibility to Thimerosal in infants who weigh less than 2.5 kg. Moreover, children are less equipped to handle the toxic load because they do not produce sufficient levels of bile, needed to remove it.
Thimerosal was developed in the 1930s by US based vaccine major, Lilly. For years the company has manipulated studies to demonstrate the safety of this mercury-based preservative. In fact, when Thimerosal was introduced, the company did have it tested, but only on 22 patients with terminal meningitis. Quite conveniently meningitis was blamed for the death of all those injected with the preservative.
Lilly used the US government’s paranoia against bio-terrorism to its advantage. Along with other vaccine companies, it persuaded the US government to introduce a clause in the Homeland Security Act — brought in response to the 9/11 attacks — stipulating that these companies can be challenged only in vaccine courts, and not in civil courts. Anxious to ensure vaccine supplies against any anthrax or smallpox attacks, the US government complied.
The clause substantially reduces Lilly’s — and other vaccines companies’ — liability if it were to lose a Thimerosal-related litigation. In such an event, the company would have to pay us $5 billion in damages, six times less than what it would be liable for if the case was fought in a civil court.
While many US experts approve of Thimerosal, cases of autism increased in the country. In the early 1980s, only one among 10,000 children in the US was autistic. By the late 1990s, one in 500 children had the disease; currently there is one autistic child per 166 newborns in the US. Experts who incriminate Thimerosal for this rise point out that mercury in vaccines more than doubled between 1988 and 1992. They also cite the contrasting example of Denmark, where autism afflicts one in 13,000 children — the country banned Thimerosal in vaccines in 1992.
Thimerosal has also been implicated in other nerve disorders. For instance in 2003, David Baskin of the Department of Neuro Surgery at Baylor College of Medicine demonstrated that this preservative can cause membrane and DNA damage, and kill nerve cells, even when administered in small amounts.
The main purpose of this article is to draw attention to the latest mass hysteria being created by governments and the pharmaceutical industry in relation to the current Human Papilloma Virus (HPV).
I am sure we have all read so much about the new vaccine which according to the experts guards our young female generation against cervical cancer at a later date. However it is my belief, that yet again, we are being conned into allowing the government to vaccinate our young ladies in mass with the HPV Vaccine.
So what are the facts about this controversial vaccine, what are the potential dangers and what is the commercial name for these products:
The HPV vaccine normally comes under the name of Gardasil or Cervarix. There are some grave concerns regarding these vaccines which contain Polysorbate 80 which is believed to cause infertility. There are also many concerns as to the side effects of this vaccine and in some cases death. I will now try to explain this questionable vaccine.
The HPV vaccine is administered to girls around the age of 12 – 13 years during their first year at High School. It requires a top up again between the ages of 13 – 18 with another top up from time to time up to the age of around 26 years. Many experts again question the testing time for this vaccine and also are concerned that the safety data has been manipulated.
I would therefore ask the question is this another New World Order ploy via the respective governments to reduce the populations of the world by creating mass infertility in young women, as well as, in some cases, death?
Dr. Harper is one of the world’s top experts on the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) and one of the leading scientists the pharmaceutical industries turned to for help to conduct clinical trials – including those that led to approval by the US Food and Drug Administration of Gardasil.
Dr Harper has made some startling admissions, some of which have been retracted or removed from the media. Here are some of her comments:
She started off by saying “This is a real danger zone,”
Dr. Harper expresses concerns over what she considers a rush to recommend and mandate the vaccination of very young girls with the vaccine. “It went too fast, it went too fast without any breaks,” says Harper, who devoted nearly two decades of her career to research on HPV.
Dr Harper went on to say “Time is needed to study potential side effects in larger numbers of young girls before any consideration should be given to mandating such a vaccine.” “The vaccine has not been out long enough for us to have post marketing surveillance to really understand what all the potential side effects are going to be. We feel it is very safe.” However, she adds, “We don’t know yet what’s going to happen when millions of doses of the vaccine have been given and to put in process a place that says you must have this vaccine, it means you must be part of a big public experiment. So we can’t do that until we have more data.”
Barbara Low Fisher agrees. She took to the streets a grass roots fight credited with derailing many efforts around the country to mandate the vaccine. “It was the quickest effort I have ever seen in 25 years for a vaccine to be mandated,” says Fisher. A mother of a son who she say was left with learning disabilities following a routine vaccination in the 1980’s, Fisher is President and Co Founder of the National Vaccine Information Center. It is a non-profit independent clearinghouse for information on vaccines and disease.
Fisher says her organization has been contacted by nearly 100 parents claiming their daughters have suffered some type of adverse reaction following a Gardasil shot – at times given in combination with other vaccines. She says many parents are frustrated in their search for answers and that they don’t know where to turn. She tells Gillen “the National Vaccine Information Center is getting reports every week, mostly mothers, of what is happening to their 11-year old girls after receiving Gardasil.”
Harper says parents need to be armed with as much information as possible. She believes the vaccine should be an educated choice. She explained that many parents do not realize or are not being told by physicians, that their daughters might end up needing a booster shot. She says what can be considered key study trials lasted at most 5 years and that there is no way to know exactly how long the vaccine will be effective.
“I think the thought is that there probably will be efficacy for longer than 5 years but it’s probably not going to be lifetime efficacy. There probably will be some need for a booster. There will be some need for understanding when we going to need to be able to revaccinate those women. Those are all open questions,” “I can’t stress enough the need for pap tests throughout a woman’s lifetime, even if she has received an HPV vaccine.”
Dr Harper also believed that to give this vaccine to young girls under 15 was also wrong and currently they are talking about giving this as early as 9 years. Dr Harper went on to express her disapproval for any potential effort to mandate a Cervex vaccine for young girls. As Dr. Harper explains “It’s still like-wise with Gardasil. They haven’t been out long enough, there isn’t enough information to have a mandate that you can’t go to school until you have this vaccine. It does not make any sense.”
For my part I cannot understand how anyone should be receiving this unproven vaccine when you calculate the risks associated with it. I believe that with regular “Pap Smear Tests” one can determine any unusual cell activity in good time before it becomes a problem. At the end of the day the HPV vaccine may only cure a very small amount of the 100 variants of HPV and as such does not offer 100% cure.
It is now time to show some historical aspects of the types of vaccines that have been carried out in many parts of the world to which I hold grave concerns. Could it be that this is a covert sterilisation programme using vaccines such as tetanus, rubella and now possibly the HPV vaccine (Gardasil and Cervarix)? Are they still using mercury in third world country vaccines (even though this additive has now been prohibited in most Western countries) as a means of mass a birth control?
Between 1963 and 1965 more than 400,000 Colombian women were sterilized in a program funded by the Rockefeller Foundation.
In the 1990`s the UN`s World Health Organization launched a campaign to vaccinate millions of women in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines between the ages of 15 and 45. The stated purpose was to protect against Tetanus or Lockjaw, a painful sometimes lethal infectious reaction to external wounds or cuts. However, the vaccine was not given to men or boys, who are more prone to wounds from cuts and rusty nails than the ladies.
Comite Pro Vida de Mexico, a Roman Catholic lay organization became suspicious and had the vaccine samples tested. The tests revealed that the WHO Tetanus vaccine used to inoculate women of child bearing age contained human Chorionic Gonadotrophin or hCG, a natural hormone that is secreted in the initial stages of pregnancy, but when combined with a tetanus toxoid carrier stimulated antibodies rendering a woman incapable of maintaining a pregnancy. None of the women vaccinated were told.
In 1995, the Catholic Women’s League of the Philippines won a court order halting a UNICEF anti-tetanus program because the vaccine had been laced with B-hCG. The Supreme Court of the Philippines found the surreptitious sterilization program had already vaccinated three million women, aged 12 to 45. B-hCG-laced vaccine was also found in at least four other developing countries.
A UNICEF campaign to vaccinate Nigeria’s youth against polio may have been a front for sterilizing the nation. Dr. Haruna Kaita, a pharmaceutical scientist and Dean of the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ahmadu Bello University in Zaria, took samples of the vaccine to labs in India for analysis.
Using WHO-recommended technologies like Gas Chromatography (GC) and Radio-Immuno assay, Dr. Kaita, upon analysis, found evidence of serious contamination. “Some of the things we discovered in the vaccines are harmful, toxic; some have direct effects on the human reproductive system,” “I and some other professional colleagues who are Indians who were in the Lab could not believe the discovery,”
It is also interesting to note that patents exist in the US and many countries after the proposal, several years ago, to create a birth control vaccine which induces the formation of antibodies against the human pregnancy hormone, the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). These inventions are described in patents issued in India, U.S.A. and several other countries. (Ref. EP 204566, JP 62286928, CA 1239346, U.S. Pat. No. 4,780,312, CN 8603854). This research continued with another invention which generates antibody response of a long duration against hCG after a single or a limited number of injections etc.
Bill Gates also made a statement where he maintains “if we do a really great job on vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that [his initial 2050 global population projection of 9-billion] by perhaps about 10 to 15 percent.”
It must be emphasised that the existence of Polysorbate 80 in the HPV vaccine caused infertility in rats and mice. Don’t you find this astonishing that whenever they want to prove if any vaccine or chemical is safe they always test the product on rats and mice first before its usage on humans In this case the results where startling to say the least and yet this aspect of the HPV has been bypassed.
I found the following Irish headline really did hit the nail on the head:
“Lock up your Daughters – Suspected Serial Killer Due for Release.”
What accompanied these headlines was the following:
After zealous crusading for mass HPV vaccination by media, special-interest groups, politicians and the medical establishment, the Irish Health Service last week commenced implementing an injection-by-Gardasil program for all 12 year old schoolgirls. Irish parents signed consent forms as media and medical experts glorified the “terrific” vaccine.
It seems Irish media etiquette forbids mentioning the flood of deaths and debilitating reactions reported in the US for Gardasil recipients. As of Jun 2010 (4 years after it’s approval), 71 deaths of girls & young women, along with over 18,000 had been reported to the FDA via the “VAERS” system (these incidents are probably greatly under reported).
In addition, five Gardasil related deaths in Germany have been reported (detailed in reporting system at Paul-Ehrlich-Institute in Germany). Two of these occurred among the first 1.5m recipients of the vaccine in Europe.
I would also like to add this article I found regarding Merck, the manufacturer of Gardasi: The recent track record of Merck does not render it unlikely that they would deny for years the dangers of an unsafe product, before finally being forced to pull it from the market (and then pay out billions in settlements). A record, incidentally, that does not exclude deceptive marketing tactics to play down a drug’s health risks.
In Jun 2010 Research Physician Scott Reuben, MD, who pled guilty to falsifying research on the use of Vioxx (forecoxib; Merch) was sentenced in a Boston federal court to 6 months in prison for healthcare fraud and ordered to repay pharmaceutical companies that financed his research. Merck voluntarily withdrew Vioxx ( Rofecoxib) from the market in 2004 after evidence showed the painkiller boosted the risk for heart attack, stroke, and other cardiovascular events. Dr. Reuben admitted that he had not enrolled any patients in trials but, instead, had simply made up findings.
Another top research professor, funded by Merck to design and conduct the Gardasil Clinical Safety Trials, admitted it was not tested for effectiveness in younger girls under 16. “Giving it to 11-year-olds is a great big public health experiment” said Dr. Diane M. Harper, “At 11, these girls don’t get cervical cancer – they won’t know for 25 years if they will get cervical cancer. She also spoke about the need for “More complete warnings.”
I was further shocked to find out that 70% of our High School girls have already received this unproven vaccination.
Here are the statistics from the UK’s NHS for year 2008/9:
Seventy per cent of eligible 12 to 13-year-old girls were fully immunised against HPV – the virus that can lead to most cervical cancers – during 2008-09, a report from The NHS Information Centre shows today.
While 70 per cent of girls in school year eight received all three doses of the vaccine, just over 87 per cent in total received one dose, according to NHS Immunisations Statistics, England, 2008-09.
The statistics also show that in 2008-09,
- Uptake of the Measles Mumps and Rubella (MMR) vaccine for children reaching their second birthday remained at around 85 per cent for the third year running. This is still lower than in the mid 1990s when just over 90 percent of children received the MMR vaccine, but higher than the uptake low of 80 per cent in 2003-04.
- 78 per cent of children received first and second doses of the MMR vaccine between the ages of three and five. This is a four percentage point increase on the previous year. This is the highest level recorded since the COVER programme began evaluating the second dose of MMR at five years of age in 1998.
- Uptake of vaccines against diphtheria, tetanus, polio, pertussis, haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) and meningitis C (MenC) for children reaching their second birthday was between 92 per cent and 94 per cent, a level that has remained broadly stable since 2004-05.
- There were 239,241 BCG vaccinations in 2008-09, an increase of 10 per cent on the previous year (217,294) given to those in specified at risk categories. Although babies under the age of one, account for the nearly two thirds of the BCG vaccinations, most of this increase came from vaccination of those aged over one which increased by nearly 22 per cent from 73,978 in 2007-08 to 90,213 in 2008-09.
- The proportion of people aged 65 and over immunised against seasonal influenza was 74 per cent in 2008-09, maintaining the level of recent years and very close to attaining the World Health Organisation target of 75 per cent.
Tim Straughan, Chief Executive of the NHS Information Centre said: “Our statistics show that in the first school year of the HPV vaccine being offered, 70 per cent of eligible girls completed the full course of all three doses.
“Our report also shows uptake of the MMR vaccine has remained at roughly 85 per cent since 2006-07. This remains lower than in the mid 1990s when just over 90 percent of children received the MMR vaccine, but higher than the uptake low of 80 per cent in 2003-04.”
The full immunisation statistics are online: www.ic.nhs.uk/pubs/immstats2008-2009
I am sure readers will now have the opportunity to understand the evil ways of the WHO, UNICEF, governments and pharmaceutical companies and be able to make a more informed decision as to what their babies, children and teenagers should or should not be given.
Rumour has it that the standard flue top up vaccine given to millions of people each year may well include (in disguise) the “Swine Flu Vaccine” that failed so miserably and cost our respective governments millions……all of which was to the advantage of the companies who made them.
Even as far back as 2009 warnings were issued that a new swine flu jab is linked to a deadly nerve disease and was sent by the Government to senior neurologists in a confidential letter…… bet you didn’t know that either!!!
One other very important point is the fact that scientists who advised the World Health Organization on its influenza policies and recommendations—including the decision to proclaim the so-called swine flue a “pandemic” had close ties to companies that manufacture vaccines and antiviral medicines like Tamiflu, a fact that WHO did not publicly disclose……why would they when it puts more money into their own pockets.
The Danish media in 2010 also again investigated the above aspects and hit the nail on the head when they stated in a rather humorous way :
World Health Organisation (WHO – World Homicide Organisation) disclosed that their staffs were linked to Pharmaceutical Companies!!
Another story that appeared out of Denmark was the following:
Police in Denmark investigating a case of fraud involving the scientist Poul Thorsen, a key author of a controversial study that appears to show mercury in vaccines are safe, have been denied documents by US police authorities.
Danish police were told that they would have to make a request to the US Justice Department through the Danish Ministry of Justice before they could access documents on Thorsen, who was the recipient of research grants from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and who is believed to have defrauded the University of Aarhaus of 10 million Danish crowns.
Clearly this scientist had very little knowledge of the dangers associated with the highly toxic and highly corrosive mercury.
In Australia, the Federal Health Minister at the time, Nicola Roxon, is reassuring parents the swine flu is no more dangerous than regular seasonal flu. “Most people, including children, will experience very mild symptoms and recover without any medical intervention,” she said……..I would tend to agree with this wise lady……we were all born with an immune system and unless the person has some overpowering health problem then let our natural system tackle it.
I would urge you not to allow this to continue and certainly think twice before having a swine flu vaccine or any vaccine that you are not comfortable with. Certainly safeguard your daughters against this HPV con and just maintain regular “Pap Smear Tests” and address any abnormal cell activity as and when they show up. Remember your daughter has the right to have a child and you have the right to share in the joy of having a grandchild.
I guess the final comment comes from this report which stated:
“Cure the Disease, Kill the Patient”
Less than 100 children in the U.S. die each year from seasonal flu viruses. If we use Australia’s math, a very rough estimate would be another 100 children could potentially die of swine flu in the United States in the coming year.
If children are the first target group in the U.S. that means we’re about to inject around 75 million children with a fast tracked vaccine containing novel adjuvants, including dangerous squalene or whatever, to prevent perhaps 100 deaths.
Last year we again saw another concern: A swine flu vaccine which has been given to thousands of children in Britain may cause the sleep disorder narcolepsy.
Symptoms include excessive daytime sleepiness and nodding off suddenly without warning.
All packets of the vaccine Pandemrix will have to carry a warning about the risk following a ruling by the EU regulator, the European Medicines Agency (EMA).
Finally we have the admission by the NHS that the swine flu vaccine is to be included in the winter flu jab for the first time in a bid to stop the virus from returning……..what virus and what danger does it present I would ask!!!
Finally I must add to this horror the continued usage, by the world’s military, of weapons containing uranium components in all areas of conflict. The radiation contamination from these weapons has spread and continues to spread around the entire world resulting in mass genocide and infertility on a scale never seen before. This aspect was covered in my previous War Crimes Complaint that was filed in December 2009 with the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission in which I attempted to take our ex Prime Minister Tony Blair and the British Government to the KL War Crimes Tribunal on behalf of the people of Iraq and other people from other areas of conflict.
As we have already discovered the Zionist led New World Order have declared that they must reduce the world’s population by a minimum of at least one third……who gave this evil satanic organisation the right to act as God?
It is also vital to mention the past usage of Squalene, especially in relation to the vaccination of our troops, which appears to have strong links with the “Gulf War Syndrome” …….here are some extracts from my article on this additive:
Gulf War syndrome (GWS) with a banned substance used in experimental vaccines.
DoD officials originally dismissed the study as flawed and asserted that none of the vaccines administered during the Gulf War contained squalene. In response to pressure from Congress, however, the department has asked the Armed Forces Epidemiological Board (AFEB) to re-examine the study. The Institute of Medicine is also reviewing the research to see what role squalene may play in Gulf-related illnesses.
A naturally occurring molecule, squalene is produced by the human liver and plays a role in the metabolism of cholesterol. It is most commonly found in vegetable oils, shark liver oil,cosmetics and various health supplements.
Under normal circumstances, squalene is released into the blood to help combat physical injuries. However, people don’t usually have enough squalene in their blood to prompt the production of detectable levels of antibodies.
Since the late 1980s, squalene has been studied by the DoD and the National Institutes of Health as a possible adjuvant in vaccines. Because adjuvants boost the immune system’s response to foreign antibodies, the subtance has sparked the interest of researchers. Drug manufacturers, for their part, have incorporated adjuvants into vaccines in the belief that the substance will render the vaccine more effective.
Adjuvants, however, can sometimes trigger unwanted immune responses. While large-scale studies have yet to be conducted in humans, animal studies have shown that squalene adjuvants may generate autoimmune versions of arthritis and multiple sclerosis type-conditions that attack the body from within.2
Although they have been used in a number of vaccines worldwide, only one adjuvant – aluminum hydroxide – has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in vaccines in the United States. And although squalene-adjuvant vaccines have been used on laboratory animals and in experimental human tests, the FDA has not approved the general use of any vaccine containing squalene in the U.S.
———————–
You will note the admitance of aluminum hydroxide!!!!
————————–
I guess the final question would have to be “Did they spike the vaccine with squalene and use the troops as guinea pigs” ?
After years of repeated obfuscation, the US Federal Government finally admitted that a banned chemical additive linked to the Gulf War syndrome has been found in some of the vaccines developed to protect military personnel from biological attack. – FDA Tests Fins Squalene in Anthrax Vaccine.
The article also gave some of the other ingredients/problems associated with current vaccines:
VACCINE INGREDIENTS:
Adjuvants (immune response boosters)
Preservatives:
Stabilizer/solvent:
Vaccine Contaminants:
- Blood supply
- Hepatitis B vaccine & AIDS
- Polio vaccines (SV40 & aids)
- Acanthamoeba
- Bird viruses
- CJD, BSE
- DNA, RNA
- Mycoplasma
- Simian cytomegalovirus
- Nanobacteria
One could spend weeks investigating each of the above ingredients but time does not allow and so one can only leave it up to each individual War Vet or parent to read between the lines and reach their own conclusion.
For my part I feel sorry for all third world countries that are being almost forced to have these vaccinations at great risk to their babies and young children.
The world is now being subjected too or should I say conned into accepting the current HPV vaccine. The fact that this is now being given to almost all high school females (and now males) around the world’s is simply deplorable……..this is indeed depopulation or genocide on a very big scale.
All I can do is attempt to tell the truth via such TV stations as Press TV or RT and try to educate all those in the world who simply do not know……you are literally “sheep to the slaughter.”
I would in closing now challenge the Australian Government, The Minister for Health, Leader of the Opposition and other political figures to respond to this article and provide factual evidence of the success of the HPV vaccine since its launch in Australia along with appropriate statistics that prove it has decreased cancer/sexually transmitted viruses in those that have received the vaccine.
It may also be appropriate to discuss the hike in Autism amongst the world’s young and more importantly the massive hike in worldwide infertility!
Don’t you find it ironic that the Australian Government launched a programme for couples to have more children and reward them financially and yet now under the terms of Agenda 21 they are seeking to mass depopulate by whatever means.
During one of my many broadcast in the US I received a phone in from an ex senior pharmaceutical scientist who told me that he had retired from the industry prematurely based on ethical and moral grounds and agreed with most of what I had published and talked about.
He went on to say that many of those working in the industry, including himself, do not vaccinate their own children or any of their siblings……..I asked him why to which he responded ……”for the very same reason what you are writing about and talking about!!
This did not come as a shock to me as I had already ascertained this in the UK when I asked many doctors and staff in medical centres if they have received the annual flue jab or allowed their children to have certain vaccinations…….in some cases I never got an answer but simply a smile!!!
My next article will cover what the Australian Government are saying about the HPV vaccine along with their statistics etc and then later I will reveal some very sensitive and confidential leaks that have been exposed in the US when top level experts met up to discuss this very topic and how they themselves had some very serious concerns that they intentionally withheld from the public……..it will blow you away!!!
My final question would have to be who controls Australia………the Zionist controlled New World Order or the Australian Government? and why does this country allow it to happen.
That is another topic I will cover in a later articles and prove that Australia is controlled from outside the “Lucky Country”
Bless you all
Peter Eyre – 17/2/2013
Broadcaster – Investigative Journalist – Middle East Consultant – Political Analysis
The Hypocrisy of The New World Order and its Assault on Islamic Nations – Part 7 (final)
The Hypocrisy of The New World Order and its Assault on Islamic Nations – Part 7 (final)
The Zionist controlled media portrays the west as being the moral and ethical guardians when it comes to any other country wishing to embark on the research and development of nuclear or chemical and biological warfare weapons of mass destruction. However this is far from the truth as we have observed from my previous articles.
We have seen the US and UK in-particular play a major role in not only supplying nuclear and CBW technology (as was the case with Iraq) but also actually funding and building the CBW laboratories.
It is fact that the US and UK were actually involved in not only promoting war but in making sure it lasts for as long as possible. The Iraq-Iran War (1980-1988) was a classic example of the two faced approach by our respective governments who openly declared the fact that they wanted Saddam to win and accordingly provided him with the technology to enhance his chances.
You will recall that it was our governments who provided Iraq with WMD and CBW which were used in “Iraq’s Mass Genocide” of thousands of innocent Kurds in Halabja and also used against the Iranians with horrific consequences.
On September 22, 1980, Iraq staged an all-out war on Iran from ground, air, and sea and came to occupy a vast part of Iranian territory. But in the following months it was evident that the Iranian nation was determined to reclaim its occupied territories. Contrary to the Iraqis’ conception, the continued occupation of Iran required more effective weapons.
Saddam Hussein’s chemical warfare development and use can be divided into three phases:
- Phase 1: January 1981 to June 1983, Iraq started testing chemical weapons.
- Phase 2: August 1983 to December 1983, chemical weapons were used to a limited extent.
- Phase 3: February 1984 to the end of the war, chemical weapons were used extensively.
Project 922 was the codename for Iraq’s third and most successful attempt to produce chemical and biological weapons. Within three years (1978–1981), Project 922 had gone from concept to production for first generation Iraqi chemical weapons (mustard agent0. By 1984 Iraq started producing its first nerve agents, Tabun and Sarin.In 1986, a five-year plan was drawn up that ultimately led to biological weapons production. By 1988 Iraq had produced VX Gas (the most deadlist of all). The program reached its zenith in the late 1980s during the Iran-Iraq war. From August 1983 to July 1988 Iran was subjected to extensive Iraqi chemical attacks. Between 1981 and 1991, Iraq produced over 3,857 tons of CW agents.
Again I repeat it was the west that assisted Saddam in his CBW programme and the key players were the US, UK, Germany, France, Italy with other countries involved such as Austria, Singapore, Netherlands, Egypt, India, Luxembourg and Spain etc
Let’s now look how Britain’s Mail Online first covered an article about Syria’s CBW potential dated 16th January 2013 and how purely by accident that same newspaper published a second article dated Tuesday January 29th 2013 which revealed how the west was actually going to support a “CBW False Flag Attack in Syria” and blame it on the Assad Government.
The following extracts were taken from the UK’s Mail Online with the headlines :
Syria used chemical weapons in Homs, US state department cables reveal
- Evidence of Syrian army’s use of chemical weapons ‘compelling’
- Leaked report suggests ‘Agent 15’ was used on Dec 23 in Homs
By Sean O’Hare 16 January 2013
A secret US government communication concludes that the Syrian army more than likely used chemical weapons during an attack in the city of Homs last month.
The document, leaked to The Cable, reveals the finding of an investigation by Scott Frederic Kilner, the U.S. consul general in Istanbul, into accusations that the Syrian army used chemical weapons in the December 23 attack.
An Obama administration official who had access to the document was reported as saying: ‘We can’t definitely say 100 per cent, but Syrian contacts made a compelling case that Agent 15 was used in Homs on Dec. 23.’
—————————-
At this point there is no evidence that this Zionist media propoganda was authentic and we all know that had it been factual evidence the United Nations would have immediately approved military intervention.
—————————-
The photograph the Mail used was of particular interest to me as this same photograph was later used in the other startling story as you will see later in this article……..this is that photograph:
This photograph contained the following explanation:
The Syrian city of Homs has seen some of the worst fighting in Syria, with a US cable now suggesting it came under chemical attack by Assad forces on December 23
The above article went on to say –
Mr Kilner’s investigation included interviews with civilians, doctors, and rebels present during the attack, as well as the former general and head of the Syrian WMD program, Mustafa al-Sheikh.
Dr. Nashwan Abu Abdo, a neurologist in Homs, is certain chemical weapons were used. He told The Cable: ‘It was a chemical weapon, we are sure of that, because tear gas can’t cause the death of people.’
Eye witness accounts from the investigations reveal that a tank launched chemical weapons had caused people exposed to them to suffer nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, delirium, seizures, and respiratory distress.
The symptoms suggest that the weaponised compound Agent-15 was responsible.
———————-
My own observation on the above is that if all of the civilians, doctors and rebels were present during the attack how come they did not succumb to the CBW used. The other issue I also have with this false flag story is that eye witness accounts state that these CBW agents were launched by tanks and yet the photograph used by the Mail is clearly a bomb and certainly does not show any characteristics of a CBW explosion which normally explodes in the atmosphere (air burst).
Now lets take a look at another recent Mail article Tuesday January 29th 2013 that exposed a totally different viewpoint using the same photograph and one can clearly assume that this story was authentic and thus now incriminates the US President and his government in a very big way:
The article concerned was pulled almost as soon as it was published but not before a gallant activist took a print screen shot of it on the day it appeared and released it on facebook……….as per below:
Because the text is not clear I will repeat it below:
Leaked emails prove Obama “backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad”
Tuesday, January 29, 2013 22:20
U.S. ‘backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad’s regime’ Daily Mail.
- Leaked emails from defense contractor refers to chemical weapons saying ‘the idea is approved by Washington’
- Obama issued warning to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that use of chemical warfare was ‘totally unacceptable’
PUBLISHED: 14:16 EST, 29 January 2013
Leaked emails have allegedly proved that the White House gave the green light to a chemical weapons attack in Syria that could be blamed on Assad’s regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country.
A report released on Monday contains an email exchange between two senior officials at British-based contractor Britam Defence where a scheme ‘approved by Washington’ is outlined explaining that Qatar would fund rebel forces in Syria to use chemical weapons.
Barack Obama made it clear to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that the U.S. would not tolerate Syria using chemical weapons against its own people.
—————————–
I myself having read the original story also tried to recover it and actually found reference to it on my search engine but hey presto when I selected it this is what appeared in its place:
Here is what first came up in the search engine
U.S. ‘planned to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame …
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2270219 · 2 days ago
… the U.S. would not tolerate Syria using chemical weapons against its … regarding a ‘Washington approved‘ chemical attack in Syria … Part of the Daily Mail, The Mail o
And then this!!!
Sorry…
The page you have requested does not exist or is no longer available.
——————————–
One can see that this article, although authentic,would have caused much embarrassment to Obama and the US Government and obviously resulted in swift action being taken by their PR man to have the original article pulled. However, as one would expect, many activist would have picked up on the article and republished it……as was the case below:
Infowars.com was very quick to publish this article immediately to give more details as to its origin etc:
U.S. ‘backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad’s regime’
U.S. ‘planned to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad’ | Mail Online
Leaked emails from defense contractor refers to chemical weapons saying ‘the idea is approved by Washington’
Obama issued warning to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that use of chemical warfare was ‘totally unacceptable’
Leaked emails have allegedly proved that the White House gave the green light to a chemical weapons attack in Syria that could be blamed on Assad’s regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country.
A report released on Monday contains an email exchange between two senior officials at British-based contractor Britam Defence where a scheme ‘approved by Washington’ is outlined explaining that Qatar would fund rebel forces in Syria to use chemical weapons.
Barack Obama made it clear to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that the U.S. would not tolerate Syria using chemical weapons against its own people.
According to Infowars.com, the December 25 email was sent from Britam’s Business Development Director David Goulding to company founder Philip Doughty.
It reads: ‘Phil… We’ve got a new offer. It’s about Syria again. Qataris propose an attractive deal and swear that the idea is approved by Washington.
‘We’ll have to deliver a CW to Homs, a Soviet origin g-shell from Libya similar to those that Assad should have.
‘They want us to deploy our Ukrainian personnel that should speak Russian and make a video record.
‘Frankly, I don’t think it’s a good idea but the sums proposed are enormous. Your opinion?
‘Kind regards, David.’
Britam Defence had not yet returned a request for comment to Mail Online.
—————————–
Here is that leaked email:
The email was allegedly sent from a top official at a British defense contractor regarding a ‘Washington approved’ chemical attack in Syria which could be blamed on Assad’s regime
The emails were released by a Malaysian hacker who also obtained senior executives resumés and copies of passports via an unprotected company server, according to .
——————————————-
A second article confirmed the existence of the Mail Online article as follows:
Yahoo News
US ‘backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria, blame it on Assad govt’: Report
By ANI | ANI – 22 hrs ago
London, Jan 30 (ANI): The Obama administration gave green signal to a chemical weapons attack plan in Syria that could be blamed on President Bashar al Assad’s regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country, leaked documents have shown.
A new report, that contains an email exchange between two senior officials at British-based contractor Britam Defence, showed a scheme ‘approved by Washington’.
As per the scheme ‘Qatar would fund rebel forces in Syria to use chemical weapons,’ the Daily Mail reports.
Barack Obama made it clear to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that the U.S. would not tolerate Syria using chemical weapons against its own people.
According to Infowars.com, the December 25 email was sent from Britam’s Business Development Director David Goulding to company founder Philip Doughty.
The emails were released by a Malaysian hacker who also obtained senior executives resumes and copies of passports via an unprotected company server, according to Cyber War News.
According to the paper, the U.S. State Department has declined to comment on the matter. (ANI)
———————————
It is clear that the Mail Online did print this article and so once again we not only see the hypocrisy and two faced policy that exists in the west but now also see how such a “News Flash” – “Hot of the Press” article can be very quickly censored and removed!!!!……….Shame on you Mail Online.
In closing one must remember the speech made by President Obama in reference to what action he would take in the event of Assad using CBW weapons on his own people:
This by CBC news
Obama warns Syria against chemical, biological weapon use
Some fear stockpiles could fall into hands of radical groups
The Associated Press
Posted: Aug 20, 2012 6:40 PM ET
The remarks by U.S. President Barack Obama on Monday offer one of the first insights into what his administration considers conditions under which it would be forced to intervene militarily in the Syrian conflict. (Kevin Lamarque/Reuters)
President Barack Obama said Monday the U.S. would reconsider its opposition to military involvement in the Syrian civil war if President Bashar al-Assad’s beleaguered regime deploys or uses chemical or biological weapons.
He called such action a “red line” for the United States.
Speaking to reporters at the White House, Obama said the use of such weapons of mass destruction would considerably widen a conflict that has already dragged on for 18 months and killed some 20,000 people, according to activists.
Syria possesses extensive chemical and biological weapons stockpiles and has threatened to use them if the country comes under foreign attack.
“That’s an issue that doesn’t just concern Syria. It concerns our close allies in the region, including Israel. It concerns us,” Obama said, also acknowledging the possibility that militant groups might acquire some of those weapons. “We cannot have a situation where chemical or biological weapons are falling into the hands of the wrong people.”
The president noted that he hasn’t ordered any armed U.S. intervention yet, but said: “We have communicated in no uncertain terms with every player in the region, that that’s a red line for us, and that there would be enormous consequences if we start seeing movement on the chemical weapons front, or the use of chemical weapons. That would change my calculations significantly.”
The remarks outlined for the first time the point at which the administration could feel forced to intervene militarily in Syria’s increasingly messy war, even if Obama stopped short of saying the use of weapons of mass destruction would necessarily prompt an American military response.
———————–
As we know throughout history to take an action you have to create and incident (false flag) and then blame it on those you wish to go to war with or take out……..such was the case that lead to the Viet Nam War – Gulf of Tonkin Incident…………many thousands of troops died and thousands upon thousands of innocent Vietnamese civilians and for what?
The New World Order is now so arrogantly blatant they create false flags on almost a weekly basis by showing badly orchestrated incidents, hoping that the sheeples out there will get sucked in………9/11 in New York and 7/7 in London were such classic examples and still we go along with their concocted stories.
Now we have Obama and the US Government justifying their drone activity in any country they wish to target all in the name of protecting their own…………my question would be that if you are genuinely after potential threats to your country how come you have not deployed drones in Israel, who played a major role in 9/11, 7/7, and many other false flag events….especially aviation related ones where Israeli Companies run airport security in such places as Amsterdam etc……….and why hasn’t Obama turned those same drones loose into finding the other cabal in the US that worked with MOSSAD in bringing down the Twin Towers?……..especially the four Israeli’s I actually named as being directly involved in 9/11 and who were arrested and held for some considerable time by the New Jersey Police and who found evidence of explosives etc!!
There would be many drones armed with hellfire missiles that clearly would have painted on their warheads those that took part in this terrible event:
George Bush Jnr – Donald Rumbsfeld – Dick Cheney and obviously Larry Silverstein etc………..too many to mention………I guess they could run short of missiles or chalk in naming all those devout American Patriots??? who participated in the biggest false flag event ever witnessed.
The President and Government have now clearly paved the way to spy and attack any country worldwide in pursuit of its imaginary CIA conceived Al Queda………….”To Hell with Sovereignty and Democracy”.
How would the US feel if some other country in the Middle East or Far East sent drones over the US to target the masterminds behind the many false flag attacks (western derived terrorism) that have taken place in their countries………so hypocritical don’t you think?
Come on you sheeples……when are you going to wake up and bring these scumbags before the court and allow true justice to take place?…………….alas you have now allowed your congress to approve the usage of drones to overfly every major city in the US…….all in the name of “Homeland Security”…………..such is your fate!!!
Peter Eyre -14/2/2013
Broadcaster – Investigative Journalist – Middle East Consultant – Political Analysis
The Hypocrisy of The New World Order and its Assault on Islamic Nations – Part 6
The Hypocrisy of The New World Order and its Assault on Islamic Nations – Part 6
How the west is hell-bent on killing and maiming its own troops and millions of innocent civilians
Hold your breath guys this dust is deadly!!
Being ex military myself, we have all disembarked from helicopters amidst a cloud of dust but did we ever give thought to the fact that this secondary contamination was laced with millions of radioactive nano particles or other carcinogenic additives from our own allied “Dirty Weapons.”?
Were Coalition Forces exposed to Chemical and Biological Weapons supplied to Iraq by our own governments during the Gulf War?
Iraqi Scud Missile
It is fact that Saddam used CBW warheads in his Scud Missiles which resulted in 40 Scuds being launched against Israel and 46 against Saudi Arabia.
Patriot missile intercepting Iraqi Scud overhead Riyadh 1991.01.20
Did anyone give thought to the fact that in carrying out intercepts overhead such cities could/would cause its CBW contents to consume the city below?
Another successful Scud intercept but was it? – The warhead is missing – Did it explode and if so was it CBW?
Were Coalition Forces injected with potentially fatal/harmful vaccines during the Gulf War?
You bet they were!!!
We have heard our respective governments give reference to “Gulf War Syndrome” and how it has been blamed on a combination of stress disorders and atmospheric pollution associated with oil field fires etc etc but never have they admitted to it being directly associated with their own extensive use of depleted uranium weapons, their own troop vaccination programme or the fact that many were exposed to Chemical and Biological Weapons that were delivered via Saddam’s Scud Missiles.
Although they tell us no CBW were ever found in Iraq it is fact that such munitions/stockpiles were destroyed by coalition air attacks or on the ground by controlled demolition resulting in their contents becoming airborne.
We have already covered the fact that the Chemical and Biological technology was supplied , funded and in some cases built by western governments with the US and UK playing a major role.
Don’t you find it most offensive and hypocritical to know that our governments supplied most of the above knowing that Saddam had used CBW on the Kurds in Halabja, the Iranians during the Iraq-Iran war and furthermore knew at the outbreak of the Gulf War that Saddam could and would use the technology that we in the west had supplied!!
Add to this the fact that the British Government and in particular the Ministry of Defence had intentionally withheld evidence that Saddam had used their CBW technology on Coalition Troops during the many Scud Missile raids………..it is also fact that the government and MoD had been pre warned about the severe risks associated with the vaccinations that were about to be injected into all the troops participating in the Gulf War.
When one now looks at the many deaths and severely debilitating illnesses that war vets around the globe have endured it is unspeakable that our respective governments refuse to accept that it is they that put the troops in harms way and directly caused many of the health problems that continue to kill or maim our war vets………that in itself is clearly in breach of the Geneva Convention and is one of many war crimes our leaders and governments have committed.
Just think that every-time the troops entered the war zones they were immediately at risk from our own vaccinations, our own weapons and also were likely to succumb to the technology that our governments had given Saddam when they were trying to secure more crude oil and more contracts!!
I can recall someone recently asking me what was the purpose of all these articles…………..obviously it is to reveal just how hypocritical and two faced our governments are when it comes to their own imperialistic greed…………it is also obvious that our troops have no value whatsoever and are sent on these “Suicide Missions”……not in the name of democracy or some other humanitarian cause but purely to enforce their own “Geo Political Plan” into forcing a regime change or securing someone else’ s natural resources.
Lets now look at what some of the vets themselves were reporting, in their own words followed by evidence that the vaccination programme was not only deeply flawed but highly dangerous to those that received these multiple injections:
Below is extracted from Nexus Magazine, Volume 4. 5(August-September 1997).
PO Box 30, Mapleton Qld 4560 Australia
GULF WAR SYNDROME –
Biological Black Magic
Already, more than 10,000 are dead and 250,000 are sick from Gulf War syndrome. What secret is so terrible (or embarrassing) that necessitates a cover-up of the facts?
TRUTH IS THE FIRST CASUALTY OF WAR
The air raid siren went off.” Former Royal Air Force Corporal Richie Turnbull wheezed and coughed as he spoke. He is one of tens of thousands of Gulf War veterans who have been diagnosed with a fistful of illnesses attributed to service in the Gulf War. These include emphysema, angina, asthma, arteriosclerosis, arthritis, short-term memory loss, muscle wasting, cough syncope and numerous other debilitating ailments. Before deployment to the Gulf, Turnbull was an accomplished and superbly fit sub-aqua diver. Today, he walks with the aid of canes, slowly.
With understandable pride he told me how he had “proved Soames to be a liar three times”. The reference was to the former Conservative Minister of State for the Armed Forces, the Honourable Nicholas Soames, MP. Many vets uncharitably call the former minister “Fatty Soames”, owing to his handsome girth. The appellation reflects the seething contempt of an individual whom vets regard as one of the principal architects of a monstrous transatlantic cover-up.
Turnbull was an RAF Senior Electrician in a Nuclear, Biological & Chemical (NBC) unit and an experienced instructor on NBC equipment. He was stationed at the giant military base located at Dhahran on the night of 20 January 1991, when air raid sirens began wailing madly. Incoming Scud missiles were detected and a nearby US Patriot battery fired off intercept missiles. One of the missiles downed the Scud which landed a mere 400 yards from Turnbull. The impact left an eight-foot-deep crater but, curiously, the giant ground-to-ground missile did not explode.
“All the nerve agent detectors sounded the alarm,” Turnbull recalls. As an NBC expert he ran three tests which confirmed the presence of “G agent”, otherwise known as Sarin-the deadly nerve agent developed by the Nazis in World War II. Turnbull ran a further three “residual vapour detector tests” which also showed the presence of nerve agents. In all, he says, “thirty-three items of equipment showed that chemical weapons had been detected”.1
“NBC Condition Black” was sounded and everyone on the base rushed to don their NBC “Noddy” suits. Incredibly, 20 minutes later an all-clear siren (“NBC Condition White”) sounded and troops removed their protective clothing accordingly. Twenty minutes later “NBC Condition Black” sounded again, and remained in force for a further eight hours.
Turnbull, who says he is “absolutely certain it was a chemical weapon attack”, is understandably angry. Sounding the all-clear when nerve agents were shown to be present was, he says, “the biggest cock-up in history”. Hundreds of troops were needlessly exposed to Sarin, he believes.2
Turnbull continues to be a thorn in the side of Britain’s Ministry of Defence (MoD) and the US Department of Defense (DoD). Both maintain that chemical weapons were not intentionally used by Iraq’s Saddam Hussein. A spokesman at the MoD had earlier told me that he was a Royal Navy officer and was “in theatre” during the Gulf War. He went on to assure me personally that had the Iraqis intentionally used chemical and biological (CB) weapons “we would have retaliated in kind”-an allusion to US President Bush’s threat to retaliate with a nuclear strike if Saddam Hussein unleashed his prodigious chemical armoury on coalition troops.
In the event, it was an empty threat-old-fashioned political rhetoric dished out for the folks at home.
CHEMICAL ATTACK OR COCK-UP?
Faced with mounting evidence of chemical weapons exposure by coalition troops, both the British and US governments belatedly acknowledge that chemical weapons dumps were bombed, or otherwise destroyed, by coalition forces. They even acknowledge that the resulting plume of toxic material, blown by the wind, is likely to have exposed many thousands of coalition troops to these deadly agents. In other words, it was an unforeseen accident. This admission is known in intelligence parlance as a “limited hangout”-a technique designed to show that they are now telling the truth. They are not.
Pat Eddington, a former CIA intelligence analyst, in his book, Gassed in the Gulf, scathingly uncovers the institutionalised dishonesty within the CIA and the DoD over Gulf War Syndrome (GWS).3 Reasonably, he argues that based on the increasing number of vets prepared to speak of their experiences, it is clear beyond all doubt that coalition forces came under a series of Iraqi chemical and biological weapons attacks.4 Like Admiral Nelson placing a telescope over his blind eye, then exclaiming he can “see no ships”, the Mandarins in Whitehall and Washington are willfully blind to what they don’t care to acknowledge. Yet, the evidence is overwhelming.
Ray Bristow had served 20 years with the Territorial Army. When not involved with his TA duties, Bristow was an operating theatre technician at his local hospital. He was mobilised on 27 December 1990, promoted to a Warrant Officer, and sent to the 32 Field Hospital located at Wadi al Batin, just a few kilometres away from the town of Hafar al Batin.5 On 19 January 1991 he and other personnel watched as a Scud missile roared overhead and exploded in an airburst. He could clearly see a cloud of vapour discharge from the Scud. The NBC alarms (known as NAIADS), scattered around the base, wailed loudly, alerting the troops of “NBC Condition Black”. “We were Scudded,” Bristow said, and the specialised equipment detected the presence of chemical agents.6
Also present at Wadi al Batin that evening was former Sergeant Shaun Rusling. Previously with 23 Para Regiment’s 5 Airborne Field Ambulance, Rusling was an experienced Special Forces medic. His duties were to attend to the sick and wounded of Britain’s One Armoured Brigade. This soon grew to encompass caring for other coalition forces and Iraqi casualties, too. He watched the Scud explosion and saw the cloud of vapour bloom overhead. He also believes the unit came under artillery attack with rounds containing chemical weapons.7
Numerous boxes of 155-mm chemical ammunition were secretly recovered by coalition troops in the Kuwait Theatre of Operations (KTO) during the ground war and subsequent mopping-up operations. Made in the USA, they had been supplied to Iraq via Jordan.
Nor were Scud and artillery bombardments isolated incidents. Terry Walker was a Corporal with the Royal Army Ordnance Corp and detached to a “Forward Repair Group” of an armoured workshop. He was present at Al Jubayl when two Scuds exploded above them.8 No prior warning was sounded. This, he recalls, was “the worst morning with two almighty explosions above the Port”. Immediately chemical detectors madly sounded “NBC Condition Black”, and this was “followed by sheer panic with hundreds of guys running for cover”. Walker hid among the rocks of the Port “for about four five hours”. Later, “an officer came along saying we’ve been hit with chemical agents”. The next day he and the other personnel on the base were told the cloud vapour was nothing more than aircraft fuel leaking from a damaged plane-an explanation he and the others disbelieve. Aviation fuel does not trigger the NAIAD detectors. Today, Walker suffers from a number of illnesses and strongly believes there has been a massive cover-up. “My wife is ill and my little girl is ill, too,” he said during a telephone interview, then added that his “medical notes from the RAF hospital have gone missing”.
The Al Jubayl attack was also witnessed by Sergeant-Major Paul Grant who commanded a team of Royal Army Ordnance Corp specialists. In the early hours of 19 January 1991, Grant was awoken by a distinctive overhead explosion. He is in no doubt whatsoever that this was an airburst, not a ground explosion. NAIADS detectors began sounding “NBC Condition Black”. The first explosion was followed by a second airburst explosion. Around the base loudspeakers warned, “This is not a drill!” His story corroborates those of other vets I have interviewed. However, Scud chemical attacks were not limited to Al Jubayl.9
COALITION COMPLICITY
Yet despite this testimony, these and other vets continue to be treated with official contempt. As recently as January 1997, the Countess of Mar posed a parliamentary question in the House of Lords which asked if the MoD had any “documentary evidence of chemical warfare” in the Gulf conflict-a curious question which was limited only to chemical attack. Questions regarding the use of biological weapons remain unutterable. In his reply, the Earl Howe stated that research conducted by the MoD “does not indicate any confirmed use of chemical warfare agents during the conflict”-which is an even more curious answer.
Who, conceivably, could confirm the use of chemical weapons other than those trained soldiers present during a chemical attack? Likewise, the tens of thousands of “detections” triggered by chemical agent detectors throughout the conflict are simply categorised as “alleged detections” which were “uncorroborated at the time”. Again, a careful and deceitful choice of words.10,11
But behind the intentional use of chemical agents by Iraq lurks a far more sinister story which hitherto has not being told in any detail. Biological weapons, unlike chemical agents, don’t just kill on the battlefield: survivors returning home carry with them the potential seeds of destruction. These, in turn, can infect the families of Gulf War vets-a situation that is now occurring.
Importantly, the British and US governments were well aware of the potential use of both chemical and biological weapons by Saddam Hussein. They had, after all, supplied him with the wherewithal to develop his ferocious CB armoury. This included sophisticated equipment together with the necessary chemical precursors and biological cultures.
This knowledge led the British and US governments to vaccinate their troops with a ‘cocktail’ designed to protect them against both chemical and biological attack. Vaccines given to coalition troops included, amongst others, anthrax, botulism and bubonic plague. Cultures for all three were supplied to Iraq by the US Government during the middle/late 1980s for use in Iraq’s CB weapons program.12
BIO-WEAPONS AND “THE SECRET TEAM”
“British personnel were infected with anthrax spores,” spoke Angus Parker with quiet certainty. I had interviewed a number of Gulf War veterans who recounted their experiences of coming under CB attack from the Iraqis. All are angry and frustrated at the stonewalling attitude of Britain’s Ministry of Defence regarding their numerous illnesses which fall under the catch-all banner of Gulf War Syndrome. Eventually, one vet gave me a telephone number, saying, “You should speak to Angus.”
Initially, Angus Parker was cautious, but after a few minutes he warmed to his story. Methodically, he first outlined for me the existing Soviet battlefield doctrine associated with Scud missiles armed with chemical and biological weapons. This is known, Parker said, as “a mixed load”. The Scud warhead would typically consist of a deathly combination of explosives and chemical and biological agents of mixed intensities. The quantity of explosives would be small, but sufficient to ensure that the CB mixture would form a wide vapour plume over the target.
A former soldier in the Territorial Army, Angus Parker operated for a top-secret British unit. He has never before gone on record with his story, but frustration mixed with growing anger has led him to “blow this wide open”.
Following the injection of 12 vaccines in one morning, Parker suffered an adverse reaction. As a result he was hospitalised and his deployment to the Gulf delayed. “I was left behind and got out on the last days of the ground war,” he said. This and his civilian occupation as a technician in a haematology lab resulted in his being attached to the 1st Field Laboratory Unit, known as “The Secret Team”. The unit “existed only once before in World War I, but was mothballed until the Gulf War,” Parker stated, adding that when he returned from the Gulf he was told that “I was not to disclose the nature or role of the team I was serving with”. So secret was the unit, he said, that “it does not appear in any listing”.13,14
What Angus Parker has revealed is extremely disturbing. The 1st Field Laboratory Unit was composed of 40 men working in eight teams of five. It was deployed from Porton Down, Britain’s biological warfare headquarters. Parker, ranked Sergeant, was second in command of one of the five-man teams. “As the biological warfare reconnaissance team, we were sampling the environment looking for biological weapons,” he said, adding that “this was difficult and hard to do. We could only identify four agents: plague, anthrax, botulism toxin A and B-that’s all.” The specialised equipment they had to work with to identify bio-weapons was not very sophisticated.
Parker has confirmed that his unit found numerous positive samples of biological organisms that couldn’t be analysed and identified on the battlefield. “Many, many more were present” than the four they could identify. Positive samples were collected and shipped in freezer units to Boscombe Down for analysis by the Porton Down CB specialists.
Significantly, in addition to confirming that his unit positively identified the presence of anthrax at Dhahran, Parker also revealed that another team of the 1st Field Laboratory Unit identified the presence of plague at Wadi al Batin.
Angus Parker has tried in vain to get other members of his unit to come forward and speak openly, but they are too scared to do so. “They’re not sick and still have their jobs,” he explained.
Parker is not alone in revealing the use of biological weapons in the Gulf War. US Marine Corps battlefield logs released under the Freedom of Information Act confirm the findings of Porton Down’s “Secret Team”. On 24 February 1991, the US Army’s 513th Military Intelligence Brigade confirmed the use of anthrax at King Khalid Military City.15
However, like events in Britain, important and potentially incriminating records have mysteriously gone “missing”. Two US Marines at Camp Pendleton, San Diego, have gone public to say they observed “hundreds of records from the Gulf War being destroyed”.16 This and numerous other accounts of records being “destroyed” and going “missing” can only lead to charges of a massive “Gulf-Wargate” cover-up.
US BIOLOGICAL ARMS TO IRAQ
A 1994 Senate Report, entitled “Arming Iraq: The Export of Biological Materials and the Health of Gulf War Veterans”, underscores the biological threat possessed by the Iraqis. More often referred to as “the Riegle Report”, named after its author, Donald J. Riegle, Jr, the Report itemises biological cultures supplied to Iraq by the US. Riegle and his team identified no less than 61 batches of biologically hazardous materials exported to Iraq. “Between the years 1985 and 1989, the United States Government approved the sales of quantities of potentially lethal biological agents that could have been cultured and grown in very large quantities in an Iraqi biological warfare program,” Riegle stated. These included pathogenic materials, “which means disease-producing items, and toxigenic, meaning poisonous items.”17 The Report added that “we were not able to get any records prior to 1985”. Riegle then included an extract from a Department of Defense summary report written in 1992:
“By the time of the invasion of Kuwait, Iraq had developed biological weapons. Its advanced and aggressive biological warfare program was the most advanced in the Arab world. The program probably began in the 1970s and concentrated on the development of two agents, botulinum toxin and anthrax bacteria… Delivery means for biological agents ranged from simple aerial bombs and artillery rockets to surface-to-surface missiles.”
Other biological agents provided by the US to Saddam Hussein’s biological warfare program included Histoplasma capsulatum, which can cause symptoms resembling tuberculosis and lead to the enlargement of the liver and spleen as well as anaemia and skin disease-symptoms that many veterans now exhibit. Another organism was Brucella melitensis, which, when ‘weaponised’, causes chronic fatigue, profuse sweating and loss of appetite, joint pains, insomnia and nausea, and can potentially result in major damage to the vital organs. Again, these symptoms reflect the conditions experienced by thousands of Gulf War veterans. In addition to the foregoing, shipments to Iraq also included “E. coli and genetic materials, human and bacterial DNA”.18
Furious at the way the Department of Defense has side-stepped these disgraceful issues, Riegle fired off a volley of letters to various officials. One letter identified that the “average cost” of each of the various biological specimens shipped to Iraq was “less than $60.00” and that they were “acquired from a not-for-profit organization”.19
Stories also circulating of a genetically engineered organism being used in the Gulf War are paralleled by stories from British veterans who also claim the use of a modified mycoplasma organism. These vets include Angus Parker who had earlier said it was “an infectious organism manufactured in the US”. Oddly enough, this is one of the enduring aspects of the “Octopus” story involving engineered bio-organisms supplied to Iraq by the Wackenhut Corporation, the giant US private-sector security company whose board of directors reads like a roll call of military and intelligence alumni. It is an allegation supported by US investigative journalist Carol Marshall in her manuscript, “The Last Circle”.20
Marshall has spent years investigating the allegations of Michael Riconosciuto-a former CIA scientific whiz-kid. Riconosciuto claimed that while working for the Wackenhut Corporation at its Cabazon Indian Reservation facility he developed advanced and genetically altered biological warfare agents. One such agent, he alleged, was a “race-specific” organism, genetically engineered to attack certain races or groups. Unleashed it could kill or render ill all those of a particular ethnic group, leaving others entirely unharmed.
Clearly, the possibility of genetically modified bio-weapons having been used in the Gulf War cannot be entirely ruled out.21
Significantly, in the US Army War College publication entitled “The Revolution in Military Affairs and Conflict Short of War” (dated July 25, 1994), authors Steven Metz and James Kievit also discuss this touchy subject. On page 16 they state: “Certain biotechnical weapons-considered by some to violate the biological warfare convention to which the United States is a signatory-also may transgress American values regarding appropriate means.” They go on to ask: “Could the government and military of this multi-ethnic republic face charges that it was developing or using a weapon targeting Africans, Jews Koreans, Hispanics, etc.?” The authors then conclude that, “Overcoming these constraints…would require fundamental changes in the United States-an ethical and political revolution may be necessary to make a military revolution.” This, the authors “hypothesise”, could be achieved by remodelling the way Americans think, and also via the effective control of news management using “advanced psychotechnology” and other techniques such a “morphing”.
EXPERIMENTAL VACCINES COVER-UP
If genetically engineered biological weapons are now available, it is certain that there will have been developed the necessary antidotes in the form of vaccines. All of the vets I interviewed for this article spoke of the large number of vaccines with which they were injected.
Shaun Rusling received 24 vaccinations over a four-week period. Two of these vaccinations were classified secret, and were “experimental”, he believes.
Richard Turnbull got a dose of 13 inoculations in just 10 minutes. Four of them were unidentified and classified secret. He also believes them to have been experimental.
Ray Bristow was informed in a letter from Brigadier McDermott of the MoD that some of his injections were also classified. Later he was informed by the Surgeon General, Admiral Revell, that this was not the case and that Brigadier McDermott’s statement was incorrect.
How many vaccines were classified secret? The Surgeon General, Vice Admiral Revell, during a “behind closed doors” meeting of Parliament’s Defence Committee, was asked, “How many vaccines do we not admit to?” He replied, saying, “I think probably about five or six.” 22
All previously classified vaccines were declassified on 10 December 1996, according to a letter dated 20 January 1997 from the Ministry of Defence. A spokesman at the MoD confirmed this in a telephone call on Friday 30 May 1997, adding that there were only three vaccines that had ever been classified. He told me these were: anthrax, pertussis and plague. This statement is confirmed in a letter to Shaun Rusling, dated 20 January 1997, in which the MoD confided that “the vaccines you were given against potential biological warfare threats were anthrax, pertussis (as an adjuvant) and plague. These are the only vaccinations which have ever been classified.” This is a far cry from the testimony of Surgeon General Revell in the closed-door hearings of the Defence Committee in which he said there were “five or six” vaccines which were “not admitted to”.
I posed this discrepancy to the Ministry of Defence. Surgeon General Revell’s testimony before the Defence Committee was “a misunderstanding”, the MoD spokesman said. Despite this “misunderstanding”, the medical records of Corporal Richard Turnbull clearly state that four vaccines-not three-were classified secret.
Turnbull is not alone in this respect. Ray Bristow’s list of shots, including anthrax (batch no. 0190), plague (batch no. 10H03A) and pertussis adjuvant (batch no. B1868a)-to name just those three that were officially classified-also detail two other vaccines labelled “biological”. These are still classified secret and their contents remain “unknown”. The story is identical for Shaun Rusling, even down to the same batch numbers of the vaccines he received.23
The Surgeon General, Vice Admiral Revell, stated in one letter that, “Unfortunately, medical record-keeping in the Gulf was not as thorough as it should have been…” and, as a consequence, details of certain vaccinations are now missing-a position that remains the government’s official line.
A number of veterans now believe they have been used as unwitting guinea pigs and are deeply concerned at what precisely may have been pumped into them. Once again, Porton Down’s Angus Parker dropped another bombshell. Patiently, he explained that “the MoD has not been totally honest about the vaccines used against us”. I couldn’t help but catch his use of the word “against” us instead of “on” us. Clearly, he now considers the Ministry of Defence and others in the Whitehall bureaucracy to be bitter enemies-and he is by no means alone in holding that view. A few vets repeatedly warned me that the “Security Services” are paying them close attention. Some have had their phones tapped and others experience peculiar mail delivery problems.
Meanwhile, Parker went on to reveal the chemical structure of one of the apparently ‘still not admitted to’ vaccines. “There is an experimental vaccine-an AIDS vaccine,” he said. This “has been around since approximately 1990.” He went on to explain that this vaccine contains two components. One component is known as a “cytokine” which, Parker said, is an “immune potentiator”. It works like a “chemical messenger sent between different cells in the body”. When it detects a foreign organism, “it actually stimulates a response by the human immune system” to fight and hopefully destroy the alien organism present.
Parker’s analysis of this component was confirmed by a spokesman for London’s Biochemical Society, who added that it was “feasible” that cytokines could be “purified and cloned” and used to fight “against any agent”. The spokesman added, moreover, that cytokines were very “hush-hush”, were “cutting-edge technology”, and “logically” would have been “adopted by the military”. They were, she added, “experimental”.
According to Parker, the second component consisted of experimental HIV gene envelopes. He went on to explain one of the basic problems with this experimental vaccine. Whereas cytokines readily drop out of the body after awhile, “fragments” of the HIV genes do not. Although there may have been “good operational reasons” for topping up the vaccine with HIV genes, Parker acknowledged that no one knows the long-term consequences. “It was experimental,” he emphasised, and had been originally developed by Porton Down as an AIDS vaccine.24,25
The question of HIV gene envelopes was put to the Biochemical Society’s spokesman, who stated that these envelopes “can be created to be specifically resistant to CBW”. The spokesman went on to explain that gene envelopes are effectively the “walls” that surround the nucleus of each cell and are thus the first line of defence against diseases-whether they be naturally acquired or as a result of CB weapons attack. HIV gene envelopes are among the most powerful and resistant known to science, she added.
Professor Beverley of the Edward Jenner Institute for Vaccine Research could think of no theoretical reason why HIV gene envelopes would be used other than to “stimulate a response against HIV”. He went on to speculate that had HIV gene envelopes been used in a vaccine, logically this would only have occurred as protection against a possible attack using HIV as a bio-weapon. There was, he felt, no other conceivable reason, but added that had such a vaccine been “given to Gulf War soldiers it would have been speculative”.
The picture that emerges is confusing. The use of cytokines does have a rational explanation, for cytokines trigger the body’s immune system. As such, they could be an ideal general vaccine for use in a CB warfare setting. However, the rationale behind using HIV gene envelopes is less certain and considerably more perplexing. Unfortunately, there is not enough detailed information available in regard to the HIV gene envelopes to reach anything but a speculative conclusion.
Some weeks prior to my interview with Professor Beverley, Angus Parker told me in a throwaway comment, “I don’t even want to get into AIDS as a weapon.” At that time, nor did I. Professor Beverley’s certitude that this is the only conceivable reason why HIV gene envelopes would have been used, leaves a sour taste in my mouth.
However, for clarity’s sake, I leave the last word with Angus Parker. Told of Professor Beverley’s theory, he remained adamant that there was another reason why HIV gene envelopes had been used. His information, he insisted, came directly from the horse’s mouth, and I am inclined to accept what he has revealed. At the outbreak of the Gulf War there were not enough stocks of cytokines to go around; thus, a decision was made to top them up with the HIV gene envelopes which, he assured me, act in a very similar fashion to cytokines in that they trigger the body’s immune system. Significantly, Professor Beverley confirmed this when he said that “they do indeed trigger and regulate the way the body relates to pathogens”.26
Clearly, Parker’s revelations-if proved true-are stunning.27 The secret use of an experimental vaccine on British military personnel may be one of the most significant reasons why the Ministry of Defence continues to stonewall vets about the vaccines they received. To admit to involuntary human testing on such a sensitive issue will lead to a public relations disaster of huge proportions. As one ill vet told me, “I was ordered to volunteer” for the shots. He now wishes he hadn’t. The second potential reason clearly opens a can of worms about the possible development of HIV as a biological weapon.28
BUSINESS AS USUAL
But there are other equally powerful reasons to keep the lid on the Gulf War Syndrome story. Pat Eddington, the former CIA analyst, has no doubt that the principal reason for the US Government’s stonewalling tactic is to cover up the supply of CB weapons to Iraq prior to the Gulf War. For the US Government to admit to such cynical irresponsibility would result in public outrage, Eddington says.
Eddington also chastises the Senate whose members selfishly refuse to act against the wishes of the Pentagon. Their delinquency of duty has resulted in the side-lining of in excess of 100,000 Gulf War veterans who now exhibit a range of symptoms typical of chemical, and, in some cases, biological attack. In this ‘business as usual’ scenario, Eddington also reserves some powder and shot for the major media who are largely willing to accept, at face value, the cloying PR handouts from the Department of Defense.
Hopelessly abandoned by one and all, many thousands of vets have now died as a result of their chemically inspired battle injuries, adding even more incentive to the Pentagon to continue the cover-up.
But in the final analysis, the reasons surrounding the British and US governments’ disgraceful obfuscation are many. Certainly, the prior supply of CB weapons to Iraq is enough to make many government officials quake with the fear of disgrace. It is a similar rationale that continues to eclipse the illegal use of experimental, unlicensed and highly sensitive drugs. Not least, however, is the knowledge that defence against chemical and biological weapons attacks is utterly shambolic. Pat Eddington states that CBW protective suits and gas masks are: “…(a) notoriously defective, and (b) in very short supply-two problems that have yet to be corrected more than six years later.” He adds, “That’s not something the Pentagon wants to advertise to the likes of Hashemi-Rafsanjani, Kim Jong Il or Colonel Qadhafi.”29
Yet few can doubt that the intelligence services of Iran, North Korea or Libya are already aware of the published shortcomings of American and British CBW protective equipment. A more significant fear may be the realisation inside the Pentagon and the Ministry of Defence that their own troops will be less than willing to wade into a future CB battle zone virtually buck-naked.
Armed only with an uncertain dose of HIV but the certain knowledge that-thanks to the grace of greed and military commercialism-those chemical and biological organisms you are about to inhale and absorb have “made at home” stencilled all over them, would you volunteer for military service?
About the Author:
Born in England, David Guyatt is a freelance investigative journalist whose former career as an executive in international banking and finance provided the background that inspired his research into the shady world of international weapons financing, narcotics trafficking and money laundering.
He has worked with the International Committee of the Red Cross on weapons-related projects; the charity pressure-group World Development Movement on British arms financing; and the leading British TV documentary program, World in Action.
David Guyatt’s current research interests include military/ intelligence mind-control programs and non-lethal weapons systems, as well as the hidden influence of elitist groups around the globe.
Endnotes:
1. The CB attack on Dhahran on 20 January 1991 is confirmed in US CENTCOM battlefield logs obtained under FOIA. Delivery was via a Scud missile.
2. Telephone interview with this writer, dated 12 May 1997.
3. Eddington, Pat, Gassed in the Gulf, Insignia Publishing Co., Washington, DC, USA, 1997 (http://www.InsigniaUSA.com)
4. Eddington convincingly argues&emdash;based on captured Iraqi documents&emdash;that chemical and bio-warfare agents were used in non-lethal doses. This explains why coalition troops did not keel over and die immediately. Iraqi CB doctrine was to use low but repetitive doses, which they calculated would produce greater long-term damage, Eddington says.
5. US CENTCOM logs confirmed a later Scud attack on Hafar al Batin on 14 February 1991.
6. Telephone interview with this writer, dated 13 May 1997.
7. Telephone interview with this writer, dated 13 May 1997.
8. The Al Jubayl incident is the most comprehensively documented case of CB attack by the Iraqis. Records obtained under FOIA indicate that Scuds were not used. Delivery of the CB weapon was almost certainly as a result of aircraft penetration, possibly a Russian-manufactured Sukhoi SU-22 Fitter fighter-bomber.
9. Telephone interview with this writer, dated 15 May 1997.
10. Parliamentary Q & As in this writer’s possession.
11. A total of 55 incidents have been recorded to date by US CENTCOM logs. CB attacks began on 17 January 1991 and continued throughout the ground war in all major sectors.
12. See Report by Senator Donald J. Riegle to the US Senate, titled “Arming Iraq: The Export of Biological Materials and the Health of Gulf War Veterans”, dated 9 February 1994. Bacillus anthracis cohn and Clostridium botulinum type A cultures were shipped on 2 May 1988. In all, Riegle was able to identify no less than 61 biological cultures supplied to Iraq between 1985-89. Some of these included human gene clones.
13. Telephone interviews with this writer, dated 13 and 14 May 1997.
14. I have been given a copy of an MoD written statement regarding the 1st Field Laboratory Unit which states: “We can confirm that this unit operated in the Gulf. Its primary task was related to the detection of biological warfare agents, of which there was a real and compelling threat. As part of their work they were monitoring the effectiveness of the biological immunisation programme.”
15. Bernstein, Dennis, “Gulf War Syndrome Covered Up”, Covert Action Quarterly, no. 43, Winter 1992/3.
16. ibid.
17. “Riegle Report”, p. 3.
18. op. cit., p. 5.
19. Donald J. Riegle’s letter to William Perry, US Defense Secretary, dated 9 February 1994.
20. Carol Marshall’s manuscript, “The Last Circle”, running to 140 pages, is a comprehensive investigation into the so-called “Octopus”.
21. Significantly, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) is concerned about the development of “genetic weapons” and fears that “the possibility exists for their misuse for political ends”. The ICRC warns that developments of gene/race-specific weapons may or could be taking place. See “Expert Meeting on Certain Weapon Systems and on Implementation Mechanisms in International War”, ICRC, Geneva, Switzerland, July 1994.
22. A copy of this memorandum is in my possession.
23. The only difference is that Rusling received a hepatitis B jab, whereas Bristow received hepatitis A. In all other respects their lists of vaccines are identical&emdash;including two that remain classified.
24. Parker states that he has received confirmation of the use of the HIV gene vaccine from a well-placed and extremely knowledgeable source, whom he is unable to identify.
25. I understand Porton Down denies any involvement in HIV research, but see notes below.
26. I couldn’t help but note the use of the plural&emdash;a usage that seems inconsistent with his otherwise firm statement. It had taken me two days and numerous phone calls before I was finally able to make contact with Professor Beverley. I had been given his number by an individual working in the field of immunology. Unbeknownst to me at the time, this individual had contacted Porton Down, revealing the interest and direction of my questions; a fact she revealed the following day when I phoned back with an additional question. Meanwhile, Angus Parker was told, via a circuitous route, that the MoD was very “displeased” with him for talking to me. A paranoid may well consider that two days “in the world of shadows” is a very long time indeed.
27. They also raise the question of why Britain’s top-secret bio-warfare lab is involved in developing an AIDS vaccine. The possibility that AIDS has been ‘weaponised’ (apparently a technical possibility) is an old and largely discounted story attributed to a Cold War disinformation campaign.
28. Perhaps a ‘red herring’?
29. Correspondence with this writer.
End of article
—————————–
Finally we now have the “icing on the cake” evidence to prove that not only did the British Government and Department of Defence know of the dangers of the military vaccination programme this highly sensitive memo also clearly states that when Anthrax and Pertussis vaccines were tested alone they were not associated with an unusual degree of toxicity at single dose level. However, when combined there was evidence of severe loss of condition and weight loss in animals .
Pay particular attention to the paragraph in the article above which admits to the vaccination of Anthrax and Pertussis amongst many others….here is that paragraph again:
All previously classified vaccines were declassified on 10 December 1996, according to a letter dated 20 January 1997 from the Ministry of Defence. A spokesman at the MoD confirmed this in a telephone call on Friday 30 May 1997, adding that there were only three vaccines that had ever been classified. He told me these were: anthrax, pertussis and plague. This statement is confirmed in a letter to Shaun Rusling, dated 20 January 1997, in which the MoD confided that “the vaccines you were given against potential biological warfare threats were anthrax, pertussis (as an adjuvant) and plague. These are the only vaccinations which have ever been classified.” This is a far cry from the testimony of Surgeon General Revell in the closed-door hearings of the Defence Committee in which he said there were “five or six” vaccines which were “not admitted to”.
Now read on and note the interest/concern:
To continue
I would emphasise that these findings are preliminary but they do suggest that if used on man as a combined preparation and enhanced degree of reactagenicity could occur. The users of the vaccines may with to take these findings in consideration
Signed Head of the Division of Bacteriology
It is also relevant to publish the reference to the above that was raised in Westminster under Hansard which clearly backs up the above memo but at the same time did not extend further:
Gulf War 1990–91: Vaccines
Lord Morris of Manchester asked Her Majesty’s Government:
Whether they will now publish in the Official Report the terms in which the then Deputy Chief Medical Officer, Dr Metters, advised the Ministry of Defence of his concerns, and those of the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, about combining the anthrax and pertussis vaccines in immunising troops deploying to the 1990–91 Gulf conflict.[HL40]
Lord Bach: I refer my noble friend to my Written Answer on 9 October (Official Report, cols. WA 67–WA 78), specifically, paragraphs 5 to 8 of Annex A reproduced therein. Dr Metter’s fax to the MoD said:
“We have previously discussed the anxieties my experts have about the simultaneous administration of anthrax and pertussis vaccine.
18 Dec 2003 : Column WA177
There are no such studies in humans that I am aware of, but you may wish to see the enclosed fax which I have just received from [name omitted] of the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control which reports on animal studies they have carried out.
I think you [sic] Medical department needs to be aware of these preliminary results”. The “enclosed fax”, a letter from the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control to Dr Metters, said:
“As you will know, we have recently carried out abnormal toxicity testing in laboratory animals on certain batches of B. anthracis and pertussis vaccine. When each of the two vaccines were tested alone they were not associated with an unusual degree of toxicity at single human dose level. However, when combined there was evidence of severe loss of condition and weight loss in animals.
I would emphasise that these findings are preliminary but they do suggest that if used in man as a combined preparation, an enhanced degree of reactagenicity could occur. The users of these vaccines may wish to take these findings in [sic] consideration.” The texts above were published by the MoD in the paper: Background to the Use of Medical Countermeasures to Protect British forces during the Gulf War dated October 1997, a copy of which is in the Library of the House. This paper is also available on the Internet at: http://www.mod.uk/issues/gulfwar/info/medical/mcm.htm and in hard copy as set out in my Answer of 20 November 2003 (Official Report, col. WA 341).
End of Hansard
To continue:
The second part of this memo was hand written by Dr. J.S. Metters to the Sec (o) (c) MoD
You can clearly see that the experts had many anxieties about the use of Anthrax and Pertussis and that this hand written memo suggested that the MoD medical department should be made aware of the findings etc etc
Here is the evidence of those two memo’s:
I also came across this article that not only links conventional vaccination programmes to Autism but also has the same links to vaccinations given to troops all of which had one particular ingredient called Squalene (shark liver oil):
At first glance, Squalene doesn’t seem too bad given that humans produce some Squalene, but the purpose of shark squalene is to boost the immune system (adjuvant) in sharks. Sharks are known to have an incredible immune system.
Do you want to know if a shark or other animal derivative is injected into your body? Are you going to trust government bureaucrats on what gets injected into your body or that of your child?
Squalene can also be extracted from vegetables, but the vaccine squalene is shark derived. Squalene supplements are popular in some herbal circles to help boost the immune system. Do we really have any clue as to how squalene impacts our own immune systems or how it interacts with the other junk found in our vaccines?
———-
I will leave this extract just for one moment and add this interesting article that indicated that the Governments denied using squalene ………… this article tells a different story:
Vaccines May Be Linked to Gulf War Syndrome
DOD to Review Possible Use of Illegal Additive -By Michael Devitt
Less than four months after its publication, the Department of Defense (DOD) has agreed to review a controversial study that appears to link Gulf War syndrome (GWS) with a banned substance used in experimental vaccines.
DoD officials originally dismissed the study as flawed and asserted that none of the vaccines administered during the Gulf War contained squalene. In response to pressure from Congress, however, the department has asked the Armed Forces Epidemiological Board (AFEB) to re-examine the study. The Institute of Medicine is also reviewing the research to see what role squalene may play in Gulf-related illnesses.
A naturally occurring molecule, squalene is produced by the human liver and plays a role in the metabolism of cholesterol. It is most commonly found in vegetable oils, shark liver oil,cosmetics and various health supplements.
Under normal circumstances, squalene is released into the blood to help combat physical injuries. However, people don’t usually have enough squalene in their blood to prompt the production of detectable levels of antibodies.
Since the late 1980s, squalene has been studied by the DoD and the National Institutes of Health as a possible adjuvant in vaccines. Because adjuvants boost the immune system’s response to foreign antibodies, the subtance has sparked the interest of researchers. Drug manufacturers, for their part, have incorporated adjuvants into vaccines in the belief that the substance will render the vaccine more effective.
Adjuvants, however, can sometimes trigger unwanted immune responses. While large-scale studies have yet to be conducted in humans, animal studies have shown that squalene adjuvants may generate autoimmune versions of arthritis and multiple sclerosis type-conditions that attack the body from within.2
Although they have been used in a number of vaccines worldwide, only one adjuvant – aluminum hydroxide – has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in vaccines in the United States. And although squalene-adjuvant vaccines have been used on laboratory animals and in experimental human tests, the FDA has not approved the general use of any vaccine containing squalene in the U.S.
“We Never Used Squalene in Vaccines”
Military officials have said all along that no Gulf War vaccines contained squalene. In August 1997, spokespersons for the DoD claimed that squalene “was not an adjuvant that was in any of the vaccines that were used by the Department of Defense,”3 and that “we never used squalene in vaccines” during the Gulf War. However, in a report4issued in March 1999, the General Accounting Office (GAD) – the investigative arm of Congress – stated:
We cannot say definitively whether or not Gulf War-era veterans were given vaccines with adjuvant formulations containing squalene for a number of reasons. Although DoD officials told us they did not administer such vaccines, they stated they did not have documentation on the process and results of decision-making related to the administration of vaccines at the time of the Gulf War. Also, some officials involved in the decisions were no longer employed with DoD at the time of our review, and we were either unable to locate them, or they declined to be interviewed.
A month after the GAO issued its 1999 report, the first hint that squalene might be linked to Gulf War syndrome appeared in an article in New Scientist magazine.5 Robert Garry, a virologist at Tulane University, tested more than 400 Gulf War veterans for antibodies to squalene and found that 95 percent of those with GWS had high levels of squalene antibodies.
Garry also tested a pair of volunteers who had received experimental herpes vaccines containing squalene in trials conducted by the National Institutes of Health. Both had high levels of squalene antibodies and also suffered from GWS-type symptoms.
In February, the peer-reviewed journal Experimental and Molecular Pathology6 published a study written by Garry’s team at Tulane University and Dr. Pamela Asa, an immunologist from Tennessee. Dr. Asa was one of the first health professionals to advance the theory that Gulf War syndrome might be an autoimmune disorder caused by experimental vaccinations.
The research included blinded and unblinded studies. In the blinded study, 56 Gulf War-era veterans and military personnel who were on active service in 1990-91 were tested for squalene. Of those 56, 38 had been deployed to the Persian Gulf and had GWS-type symptoms; 12 had been deployed but were healthy; and six had not been deployed but were nevertheless ill.
The researchers found that among the 38 ill veterans who had been deployed, 36 (94.7 percent) tested positive for squalene antibodies. None of the deployed healthy individuals, however, tested positive.
Furthermore, all six subjects who were ill, but had not been sent to the Gulf, also had squalene antibodies. While they did not serve in the war, they had received the same type and number of vaccinations given to Gulf War troops.
Approximately 700,000 Americans served in the Gulf War between 1990-91. One hundred and forty-eight Americans were killed in action; 467 were wounded. The Department of Veterans Affairs estimates that as many as 100,000 veterans may be suffering from Gulf War syndrome or related symptoms, and that approximately 6,500 soldiers have died since the war’s conclusion, including more than 1,300 soldiers between the ages of 18-24.
————————————
To continue with the original article:
Squalene is most interesting to me related to the Anthrax vaccine. It seems the government denied, denied, denied that this vaccine even had squalene in it. (I am having Deja-vu again). This changed in 2004. They act bewildered at how squalene got in the vaccine. Give me a break, it actually was in there, but we have no idea how it could have gotten in there? That alone instills loads of confidence in me. Seeing how our troops have been treated in government run Veterans Administration hospitals, I would not be surprised at anything the government does now days.
Did they spike the vaccine with squalene and use the troops as guinea pigs?
After years of repeated obfuscation, the federal government finally admitted that a banned chemical additive linked to the Gulf War syndrome has been found in some of the vaccines developed to protect military personnel from biological attack. – FDA Tests Fins Squalene in Anthrax Vaccine.
The article also gave some of the other ingredients/problems associated with current vaccines:
VACCINE INGREDIENTS:
Adjuvants (immune response boosters)
Preservatives:
Stabilizer/solvent:
Vaccine Contaminants:
- Blood supply
- Hepatitis B vaccine & AIDS
- Polio vaccines (SV40 & aids)
- Acanthamoeba
- Bird viruses
- CJD, BSE
- DNA, RNA
- Mycoplasma
- Simian cytomegalovirus
- Nanobacteria
One could spend weeks investigating each of the above ingredients but time does not allow and so one can only leave it up to each individual War Vet or parent to read between the lines and reach their own conclusion.
I came across this banner during my investigations and thought it summed up everything in such a simple way:
I am sure you would all agree that all of this is pretty convincing stuff and I would also add that I believe the author of the original memo who’s details have been removed was Dr. M Corbel who was head at the National Institute of Biological Standards and Control. Dr. M Corbel has and continues to do much work for the WHO which as we all know is the health/medical arm of the New World order
You may or may not have noticed that in the large article printed above there is reference to a specific genes programme using CBW to attack the genes of certain races such as Afro, Chinese etc………this CBW programme was first initiated in both the UK and Rhodesia and just before Magabe took over the then British Prime Minister, Maggie Thatcher, panicked and moved everything (lock stock and barrel) down to South Africa (including research staff) where further developments were made into the “Black Only Bomb.” It is clear that behind closed doors the evil cabal are still working on such projects!
My final article Part 7 will cover the hypocrisy of the world’s Zionist controlled media and how they themselves sometimes slip up in their publications and accidentally expose the mindset of some of our leaders to much embarrassment!!
It is my intention to distribute this article to certain Members of Parliament in both the UK and Australia and in particular to UK Prime Minister, David Cameron and Leader of the Opposition Ed Miliband- Australian Prime Minister, Julia Gillard and Leader of the Opposition, Tony Abbott and many others for their comments based on the facts and evidence that is now available.
Hopefully with elections on the horizon in both the UK and Australia someone may just decide to hang out some dirty washing and get much support from the many war vets that continue to suffer and also from all the mums and dads of those victims!!
This article will also be sent to the respective War Vets organisations around the world and the British Legion etc etc
Peter Eyre -8/2/2013
Broadcaster – Investigative Journalist – Middle East Consultant – Political Analysis
The Hypocrisy of The New World Order and its Assault on Islamic Nations – Part 5
The Hypocrisy of The New World Order and its Assault on Islamic Nations – Part 5
The Kurdish Genocide compliments of Chemical and Biological technology supplied by the US, UK and many other western countries
Iranian war dead as a direct result of the US, UK and other western governments giving Saddam Chemical and Biological Warfare Weapons
I find it rather sad that the Kurdish Regional Government are seeking a special day in memory of this tragic event and yet continue to have very close ties with the nations that supplied and set up Saddams CBW programme……The US played a significant role leading up to this genocide and the good old Brits actually built and funded Saddam laboratories …….with both assisting in the supply of the deadly ingredients.
Let me remind you of both the Iranian and Kurdish attacks carried out by Saddam:
In July 1988 Iraqi airplanes dropped chemical cyanide bombs on the Iranian Kurdish village of Zardan (as they had done four months earlier on their own Kurdish village of Halabja). Hundreds were killed at once, and the survivors are still suffering from a variety of physical and mental disorders. It has since been proven that the agent used on the Kurds and later on Iran was the deadly VX Gas.
To continue with the story:
A conclusion was draw up which gave a very accurate assessment as follows:
This paper rests its case on the following principal points:
1. That it is known that a range of pathogenic (disease producing) and toxigenic (poisonous) biological materials were exported to Iraq from the United States between 1985 and 1989, and that, among other warfare-related materials, these included a strain of anthrax utilized and tested over many years as a weapon, including during well documented WW2 and post-WW2 trials, to which the US was a party.
2. That the US Government was fully aware of the dangers vested in the biological materials exported to Iraq by the American Type Culture Collection between 1985 and 1989, and was, at the least, grossly negligent in failing to prohibit these exports to a state which was known by the US Administration at that time to be actively utilizing chemical weapons of mass destruction, and suspected – if not known – to also be developing a biological weapons programme.
3. That with knowledge of the US biological exports, the British Government, being bound to act according to the law, and having stated as much in the UK Parliament in the name of Her Majesty the Queen, has a responsibility to formally report this matter to the UN Security Council for investigation. Furthermore, that failure to do so effectively renders the BTWC meaningless, and, thereby, compromises the very concept of international law.
Beyond the case made in this paper, the following appears to be the disturbing international political reality: The invasion of Iraq by the United States and Britain in 2003 was predicated upon Iraq’s possession of ‘weapons of mass destruction’ – the primary threat presented both to Parliament and the People being anthrax. This anthrax was exported to Iraq from the US, having previously been exported from Britain, where it had been tested as a biological weapon “because its capability to produce infection and death after the inhalation of spores had been demonstrated in the laboratory”. This information is well known to the US, Britain, and Canada, due to a trilateral agreement concerning biological research between the three nations. Meanwhile, more than 20% of Britain’s MP representing approximately 12 million people – have twice called for a UN investigation into the US exports, a call which has been dismissed by the British Government by means of flimsy responses and a refusal to answer questions properly.
The United States with Great Britain blocked all Security Council resolutions condemning Iraq’s use of chemical weapons, and on March 21 the US becomes the only country refusing to sign a Security Council statement condemning Iraq’s use of these weapons
The US Department of Commerce licenses 70 biological exports to Iraq between May of 1985 and 1989, including at least 21 batches of lethal strains of anthrax
May, 1986. US Department of Commerce approves shipment of weapons grade botulin poison to Iraq.
April, 1988. US Department of Commerce approves shipment of chemicals used in manufacture of mustard gas.
September, 1988. US Department of Commerce approves shipment of weapons grade anthrax and botulinum to Iraq.
It should also be noted that the MK-84 bomb that was stockpiled in Saudi Arabia also formed part of the support for Saddam when hundreds of these U.S.-made general-purpose “dumb bombs” were transferred to Iraq.
What was even more surprising was when Saddam’s elite troops received instruction in unconventional warfare at Fort Bragg , North Carolina USA. “The idea was that, in the event of an Iranian victory, the Iraqi soldiers would be able to wage a guerrilla struggle against the occupying Iranian force”
On May 25, 1994, the U.S. Senate Banking Committee released a report in which it was stated that “pathogenic (meaning ‘disease producing’), toxigenic (meaning ‘poisonous’), and other biological research materials were exported to Iraq pursuant to application and licensing by the U:S: Department of Commerce.” It added: “These exported biological materials were not attenuated or weakened and were capable of reproduction.”
The report then detailed 70 shipments (including Bacillus Anthracis) from the United States to Iraqi government agencies over three years, concluding “It was later learned that these microorganisms exported by the United States were identical to those the UN inspectors found and recovered from the Iraqi biological warfare program.”
Iraq purchased 8 strains of anthrax from the United States in 1985, according to British biological weapons expert David Kelly. The Iraqi military settled on the American Type Culture Collection strain 14578 as the exclusive strain for use as a biological weapon.
Donald Riegle, Chairman of the Senate Committee that authored the aforementioned Riegle Report. said: “U.N. inspectors had identified many United States manufactured items that had been exported from the United States to Iraq under licenses issued by the Department of Commerce, and [established] that these items were used to further Iraq’s chemical and nuclear weapons development and its missile delivery system development programs. … The executive branch of our government approved 771 different export licenses for sale of dual-use technology to Iraq. I think that is a devastating record.”
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control sent Iraq 14 separate agents “with biological warfare significance,” according to Riegle’s investigators.
It is now known that a vast network of companies, based in the U.S. and elsewhere, fed Iraq’s warring capabilities right up until August 1990, when Saddam invaded Kuwait.
Innocent victims of western supplied CBW to Iraq (namely US and UK)
On the military hardware front, MD 500 Defender helicopters were also part of the deal with the US when Iraq acquired 60 multi-role military helicopters directly from the United States in 1983. Additional helicopter sales prompted congressional opposition, forcing the Reagan administration to explore alternative ways of assisting Saddam.
Alan Friedman wrote that Sarkis Soghanalian, one of the most notorious arms dealers during the Cold War, procured Eastern Bloc and French origin weaponry, and brokered vast deals with Iraq, with the tacit approval of the Central Intelligence Agency.
This most prominent arms merchant, Sarkis Soghanalian, was a Miami-based former CIA contractor who brokered tens of billions of dollars’ worth of military hardware for Iraq during the 1980s, reporting many of his transactions to officials in Washington. Soghanalian was close to the Iraqi leadership and to intelligence officers and others in the Reagan administration. He played a vital role serving as a go between for the CIA and other US government operations.
In an interview with William Kistner, Soghanalian stated that he was “working closely with the U.S. government”. Soghanalian also helped the Iraqis obtain TOW Anti Tank Missile , for which he was later prosecuted by the United States Department of Justice.
What is so upsetting was the fact that almost 150 foreign companies supported Saddam Hussein’s WMD program. Twenty-four U.S. firms were involved in exporting materials to Baghdad. Add to this an even longer list of American companies, UK, many EU countries, South Africa, South East Asian countries, including Singapore and Japan.
The whole episode is rather sickening when one believes that one day those responsible would be put before the International Court System. Every inquiry to reveal this broad based corruption and illegal arms trading has failed…..The Matrix Churchill Inquiry, The Scott Inquiry and now the Chilcott Inquiry (Iraq Inquiry) all totally rigged.
Basically “business as usual prevails” whilst the unscrupulous offenders, Heads of State, Senior Politicians, Government Departments and Company Executives get away with murder. If one adds to this the massive fraud that exists we find ourselves living amongst a den of thieves……but do not worry our governments know how to rob the poor to feed the rich!
We certainly live in a highly corrupt society with those that lead us leading the way!!
Maybe now you can better understand as to why people like David Kelly were assassinated and even possibly politicians such as Sir John Biggs Davison , Robin Cook and not forgetting Princess Diana.
Maybe you have never questioned as to why leaders of countries that have fallen victim to the greed of the west have never been tried in the Hague for war crimes etc………the answer is simple……the likes of Saddam, Mubarek and Ghadaffi all knew too much and if they were presented to the Hague they could well spill the beans of exactly what the US, UK and other EU countries gave them……….you will see that Mubarek will end up the same way and no doubt the President of Yemen will follow……..such is the “Axis of Evil” that exists here in the west.
Part 6 and the final Part 7 will prove beyond a shadow of doubt just how hypocritical and two faced the US and UK were in all of these unnecessary wars and how they having knowingly provided Chemical and Biological technology to harm innocent civilians in mass and how as a direct result of their illegal arms dealings have caused harm and injury to all the coalition forces.
Documentation will also be supplied to show how the government and MoD were pre warned of the dangers associated with the vaccination of troops prior to the Gulf War with accounts by experts (in the field) of CBW attacks on their facilities by Saddam using Scud Missiles armed with CBW warheads………… the technology of which was supplied by the west!!!
Peter Eyre -6/2/2013
Broadcaster – Investigative Journalist – Middle East Consultant – Political Analysis
The Hypocrisy of The New World Order and its Assault on Islamic Nations – Part 4
The Hypocrisy of The New World Order and its Assault on Islamic Nations – Part 4
We can now look into the illegal arms trade to Iraq which in itself became very sophisticated with its concealed web of distribution. The UK played a major role in support for Saddam Hussein with one company that really did stand out from the rest.
A Scottish Company called Allivane was at the heart of this activity and did so over a period of six years during the Iraq-Iran War. Needless to say this also involved the US who used the backyard of Britain to promote this joint effort.
It was back in 1976 when George Bush Snr, who was then Nixon’s Envoy in China, came across James Guerin, the founder of International Signal and Control (ISC), a US Defense Contractor. After a long discussion they decided that they could do business together.
Soon after this time there were many investigations carried out by US Congress regarding covert arms shipments and the workings of the CIA. A clean up of the CIA took place plus a complete shutdown of covert arms routes that involved many countries.
However, by this time George Bush Snr himself was running the CIA and realised that with the help of James Guerin, together they could re establish this covert business but not out of the USA. It became obvious that their ally Britain could now become the staging post for such an operation. Britain at the time was on an economical low and so the Prime Minister, James Callaghan, jumped at the idea. Callaghan was later to become an advisor to the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) who would soon have a track record of drugs and illegal arms running as their backbone……one could add many more major banks to this list.
The down side to the BCCI was the fact that when it was closed down on 5 July 1991, a million people throughout the world lost their deposits. Many of the losers were from the Third World; small businessmen who had struggled to make a living in countries other than their own, and who had been impressed by BCCI’s multilingual staff and its often-trumpeted concern for the starving millions……no doubt we have all heard this before….a sort of Pandora’s Box!
The formation of this covert Bush – Guerin – Callaghan led to the resurrection of Allivance and the start of one of the biggest cover weapons supply and destabilization operations in the world………..nothing new hey?……..it goes on all the time with the same key players, Heads of State, CIA, MI5 and Mossad etc. The formation and working of this scam did not only involve the British Labour Party but also followed on with the Conservative Party. By this time it was well and truly out of control.
Back in the US meantime (In 1974) the ISC with the knowledge and assistance of US agencies, advanced radar-controlled anti-aircraft systems were shipped to South Africa. South Africa, together with ISC, also developed a sophisticated ground-to-air missiles for its own use and for export. All this equipment was restricted US technology requiring export licenses, which were not obtained. James Guerin claimed the company’s activities were sanctioned by the US government. Mr. Guerin set up a front company with the South African authorities for the US National Security Agency, , as part of a US covert in 1974. This involved shipping advanced electronic sensors, optics and related equipment to South Africa without licenses so as to set up listening posts to track Soviet submarines off the Cape of Good Hope. The company, Gamma Systems Associates, ordered restricted equipment from ISC, then shipped it on to South Africa on board airliners. The equipment was repackaged and the airline companies given false descriptions of the equipment. The operation ceased to have official sanction in 1977 and the activities were dismantled.
From 1984 to 1988, ISC sent South Africa more than $30 million in military-related equipment, including telemetry tracking antennae to collect data from missiles in flight, gyroscopes for guidance systems, and photo-imaging film readers, all of which would form the “backbone” of a medium-range missile system. Some of this technology was reportedly transferred to Iraq. Another link to Iraq was the supply of the specifications for the MK-20 Rockeye cluster bomb through Chilean defence company Carlos Cardoen, which was able to build an almost identical weapon that was subsequently used against coalition forces in the Persian Gulf War of January-February 1991. These activities allegedly happened with the knowledge and assistance of U.S. intelligence agencies (including the CIA) and in violation of United States and United Nations sanctions.
Allivane’s contribution to Iraq certainly allowed both the US and UK to benefit from the exercise and to elongate the war effort between Iraq and Iran which was always paramount in the minds of our leaders. One has to remember that Geo-Politics does not possess any ethics or morality……just simply greed!
There were many other issues behind these covert arms shipments on the political front and none other than Donald Rumsfeld was right in the middle of it all. No doubt his partner in crime Dick Cheney was sitting in the sidelines. Perhaps this account throws more light of events:
Middle East envoy Donald Rumsfeld to Baghdad in 1983, stated:
“While a Staff Member to the National Security Council, I was responsible for the Middle East and for Political-Military Affairs. During my five year tenure on the National Security Council, I had regular contact with both CIA Director William Casey and Deputy Director Robert Gates…CIA Director Casey personally spearheaded the effort to ensure that Iraq had sufficient military weapons, ammunition and vehicles to avoid losing the Iran-Iraq war. Pursuant to the secret NSDD (National Security Decision Directive), the United States actively supported the Iraqi war effort by supplying the Iraqis with billions of dollars of credits, by providing U.S. military intelligence and advice to the Iraqis, and by closely monitoring third country arms sales to Iraq to make sure that Iraq had the military weaponry required. The United States also provided strategic operational advice to the Iraqis to better use their assets in combat. For example, in 1986, President Reagan sent a secret message to Saddam Hussein telling him that Iraq should step up its air war and bombing of Iran. This message was delivered by Vice President Bush who communicated it to Egyptian President Mubarak, who in turn passed the message to Saddam Hussein. Similar strategic operational military advice was passed to Saddam Hussein throughvarious meetings with European and Middle Eastern heads of state. I authored Bush’s talking points for the 1986 meeting with Mubarak and personally attended numerous meetings with European and Middle East heads of state where the strategic operational advice was communicated.”
President Reagan
One can clearly see the double standards that existed and the means of delivery a message from one country to another by way of a third party (Egypt). No doubt the CIA had their own stock of carrier pigeons to spread the word…..one would have to ask the question how did they manage to deliver the messages amidst all the nerve gas and mustard gas etc?
The British origin of anthrax strain 14578 – “Vollum” strain
Anthrax strain 14578 may be found listed in past ATCC catalogues, in which the company’s ordering procedures explain that any request for it (and other pathogenic agents) “should be made on the institution’s official stationery (purchase order) and signed by the director of the institution, the chairman of the department concerned, or the scientist in charge of the project”. So, presumably, ATCC files will hold copies of Iraq’s original purchase orders. Such back-up documents do not appear to have been supplied to Senator Riegle in 1994, but should now be produced during a proper investigation under the auspices of the United Nations Security Council.
Each strain in the ATCC catalogue is listed together with its known history – or rather the individuals who have maintained the strain over the years are named in succession. Anthrax strain 14578 appears to have been deposited with ATCC after being held by P H A Sneath, H M Darlow, P Fildes, R L Vollum, and originally Dunkin. So, who are these people through whose hands this anthrax apparently passed en-route to the ATCC and thence to Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, from where it became the principal element in the widely trumpeted ‘forty-five minute threat’ which provided the pretext for the invasion of Iraq in 2003?
Prof P H A Sneath, now of Leicester University, has recently stated (by e-mail) that he was never in charge of the strain, or a collection that included it. Instead, he suggests that “it was probably sent to ATCC by the National Collection of Type Cultures, Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale Avenue, London”. However, the ATCC catalogue entry references a paper co-authored by Prof Sneath, which was published in 1964 in the Journal of General Microbiology. The article discusses the anthrax strain and notes that it was isolated from bovine anthrax, has retained its virulence, and was previously in the care of the Microbiological Research Establishment (MRE), Porton Down, Wiltshire. According to the article, Prof Sneath was then at the National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London NW7.
Part 5 continues with much more detailed information on what was going on.
Peter Eyre -5/2/2013
Broadcaster – Investigative Journalist – Middle East Consultant – Political Analysis
The Hypocrisy of The New World Order and its Assault on Islamic Nations – Part 3
The Hypocrisy of The New World Order and its Assault on Islamic Nations – Part 3
You kiss my A… and I’ll kiss yours
“Thanks for helping the US, our allies and Saddam genocide the Kurds in Halabja”
The Kurdish Genocide at Halabja
Kurdish Genocide Victims
In this part we will look at actually who moved what and where and how our respective hypocritical governments try to stem the spread of Nuclear and Chemical and Biological Warfare in other countries and yet secretly help them ………as was the case with Iraq!!
It would be relevant at this point to reveal a list of Iraq Purchased Weapons that was provided by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) for the period 1973-2002.
| Country | $MM USD 1990 | % Total |
| USSR |
25145 |
57.26 |
| France |
5595 |
12.74 |
| China |
5192 |
11.82 |
| Czechoslovakia |
2880 |
6.56 |
| Poland |
1681 |
3.83 |
| Brazil |
724 |
1.65 |
| Egypt |
568 |
1.29 |
| Romania |
524 |
1.19 |
| Denmark |
226 |
0.51 |
| Libya |
200 |
0.46 |
| USA |
200 |
0.46 |
| South Africa |
192 |
0.44 |
| Austria |
190 |
0.43 |
| Switzerland |
151 |
0.34 |
| Yugoslavia |
107 |
0.24 |
| Germany (FRG) |
84 |
0.19 |
| Italy |
84 |
0.19 |
| UK |
79 |
0.18 |
| Hungary |
30 |
0.07 |
| Spain |
29 |
0.07 |
| East Germany (GDR) |
25 |
0.06 |
| Canada |
7 |
0.02 |
| Jordan |
2 |
0.005 |
| Total |
43915 |
100.0 |
|
|
|
The next big issue to debate was who provided Iraq with Chemical and Biological Warfare (CBW) know how? The main players here were both the US, UK and Spain.
One has to fully understand that what has been revealed does not give a true account as to the total supply of CBW or of the total supply of military hardware and software. Everything was so cleverly concealed via offshore front companies that it almost became impossible to know it original source. I am sure your imagination can run wild in this respect and realise that the trade in illegal arms is a very profitable business. The deceit and corruption that was linked to supply went right to the top of the political ladder. It is rather ironic that to this day the same policy prevails and war is good for business!
So let’s just look at one typical consignment as shown in the Riegle Report which was obtained under the freedom of information and you will see just how generous western government were with Iraq:
The list in Figure 1 is merely one extract from the invoice details supplied to Senator Riegle by the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). One item is particularly notable in this list, for it is the strain of anthrax which will be shown to be the exclusive strain of anthrax used in the Iraqi biological weapons programme. Before focusing on anthrax, however, consider the range of materials exported to Iraq. The Riegle Report confirms that from 1985:
“Pathogenic (meaning ‘disease producing’), toxigenic (meaning ‘poisonous’), and other biological research materials were exported to Iraq pursuant to application and licensing by the U.S. Department of Commerce….These exported biological materials were not attenuated or weakened and were capable of reproduction. According to the Department of Defence’s own Report to Congress on the Conduct of the Persian Gulf War, released in April 1992: “By the time of the invasion of Kuwait, Iraq had developed biological weapons. It’s advanced and aggressive biological warfare program was the most advanced in the Arab world… The program probably began late in the 1970′s and concentrated on the development of two agents, botulinum toxin and anthrax bacteria… Large-scale production of these agents began in 1989 at four facilities near Baghdad. Delivery means for biological agents ranged from simple aerial bombs and artillery rockets to surface-to-surface missiles.”
t is at this point we can reveal the effects of these CBW the Report finds that among the US exports to Iraq were the following and it notes their associated disease symptoms:
Bacillus Anthracis: anthrax is a disease producing bacteria identified by the Department of Defense in the Conduct of the Persian Gulf War: Final Report to Congress, as being a major component in the Iraqi biological warfare program. Anthrax is an often-fatal infectious disease due to ingestion of spores. It begins abruptly with high fever, difficulty in breathing, and chest pain. The disease eventually results in septicaemia (blood poisoning), and the mortality is high. Once septicaemia is advanced, antibiotic therapy may prove useless, probably because the exotoxins remain, despite the death of the bacteria.
Clostridium Botulinum: a bacterial source of botulinum toxin, which causes vomiting, constipation, thirst, general weakness, headache, fever, dizziness, double vision, dilation of the pupils and paralysis of the muscles involving swallowing. It is often fatal.
Histoplasma Capsulatum: causes a disease superficially resembling tuberculosis that may cause pneumonia, enlargement of the liver and spleen, anemia, an influenza-like illness and an acute inflammatory skin disease marked by tender red nodules, usually on the shins. Reactivated infection usually involves the lungs, the brain, spinal membranes, heart, peritoneum, and the adrenals.
Brucella Melitensis: a bacteria which can cause chronic fatigue, loss of appetite, profuse sweating when at rest, pain in joints and muscles, insomnia, nausea, and damage to major organs.
Clostridium Perfringens: highly toxic bacteria, which cause gas gangrene. The bacteria produce toxins that move along muscle bundles in the body killing cells and producing necrotic tissue that is then favourable for further growth of the bacteria itself. Eventually, these toxins and bacteria enter the bloodstream and cause a systemic illness.
Figure 1 provides details of a single shipment sent on 2 May 1986. Note the emboldened entry for Bacillus anthracis (ATCC 14578), which the Iraq Survey Group has since determined was the exclusive strain of anthrax used in the Iraqi biological weapons programme. This, then, is the source of the anthrax threat which was repeatedly promoted both inside Parliament and through the news media to the British People, prior to the decision being made for Britain to take part in the invasion of Iraq.
Because Iraq was removed from antiterrorism controls and because controls on missile technology and chemical and biological warfare were not in place until the late 1980s, few foreign policy controls were placed on exports to Iraq during the 1980s…this, along with the lack of national security controls, resulted in a long list of high technology items being sold to Iraq during the 1980s.
Below is a list (Figure 1) of one such consignment sent from the US to Iraq. I would also like to point out that the UK also participated in such exports, which I will cover later.
Bacillus Anthracis Cohn (ATCC 10)
Batch # 08-20-82 (2 each)
Class III pathogen.
Bacillus Subtitles (Ehrenberg) Con (ATCC 82)
Batch # 06-20-84 (2 each)
Clostridium botulinum Type A (ATCC 3502)
Batch# 07-07-81 (3 each)
Class III Pathogen
Clostridium perfringens (Weillon and Zuber)
Hauduroy, et al (ATCC 3624)
Batch# 10-85SV (2 each)
Bacillus subtilis (ATCC 6051)
Batch# 12-06-84 (2 each)
Francisella tularensis var. tularensis Olsufiev
(ATCC 6223)
Batch# 05-14-79 (2 each)
Avirulent; suitable for preparations of diagnostic antigens.
Clostridium tetani (ATCC 9441)
Batch 03-94 (3 each)
Highly toxigenic.
Clostridium botulinum Type E (ATCC
9564) Batch# 03-02-79 (2 each)
Class III pathogen
Clostridium tetani (ATCC 10779)
Batch# 04-24-84S (3 each)
Clostridium perfringens (ATCC 12916)
Batch# 08-14-80 (2 each)
Agglutinating Type 2.
Clostridium perfringens (ATCC 13124)
Batch# 08-14-80 (3 each)
Type A, alpha-toxigenic, produces lecithinase C.J. Appl,
Bacillus Anthracis (ATCC 14185)
Batch# 01-14-80 (3 each) G.G. Wright (Fort Detrick) V770-NPI-R.
Bovine anthrax, Class III pathogen
Bacillus Anthracis (ATCC 14578)
Batch# 01-06-78 (2 each)
Class III pathogen.
Bacillus megaterium (ATCC 14581)
Batch# 04-18-85 (2 each)
Bacillus megaterium (ATCC 14945)
Batch# 06-21-81 (2 each)
Clostridium botulinum Type E (ATCC 17855)
Batch# 06-21-71
Class III pathogen.
Bacillus megaterium (ATCC 19213)
Batch# 3-84 (2 each)
Clostridium botulinum Type A (ATCC 19397)
Batch# 08-18-81 (2 each)
Class III pathogen
Brucella abortus Biotype 3 (ATCC 23450)
Batch# 08-02-84 (3 each)
Class III pathogen
Brucella abortus Biotype 9 (ATCC 23455)
Batch# 02-05-68 (3 each)
Class III pathogen
Brucella melitensis Biotype I (ATCC 23456)
Batch# 03-08-78 (2 each)
Class III pathogen
Brucella melitensis Biotype 3 (ATCC 23458)
Batch# 01-29-68 (2 each)
Class III pathogen
Clostridium botulinum Type A (ATCC 25763)
Batch# 8-83 (2 each)
Class III pathogen
Clostridium botulinum Type F (ATCC 35415)
Batch# 02-02-84 (2 each)
Class III pathogen
“The United States did not believe that they would be used for anything other than legitimate research purposes and therefore did not knowingly export the materials to assist a biological weapons programme”……………….How naive can you get?
The United States secretly supported Iraq in its eight-year war with Iran, and that in February 1982 the US Administration removed Iraq from its list of ‘terrorist states’ in order to do so. Furthermore, there is the astonishing fact that, among the various agencies of the Government of Iraq listed in the Riegle Report, one repeated recipient of these deadly materials was no less than the Iraqi nuclear weapons research facility, the Iraq Atomic Energy Commission. One could ask the US how could the conclusion possibly be reached that between 1985 and 1989 anthrax and other warfare-related biological materials were exported from the US to Iraq for “legitimate research purposes”?
One also needs to look at the fact that the UK supplied Biological and Chemical agents to Iraq, unfortunately documentation on this is well hidden but evidence does exist that the UK certainly did supply such agents.
Back in the 1970’s Iraq had approached the USSR to buy a plant to manufacture chemical weapons, but his request was refused. Saddam then began courting the West, and received a much more favourable response.
An American company, Pfaulder Corporation of Rochester, New York, supplied the Iraqis with a blueprint in 1975, enabling them to construct their first chemical warfare plant. The plant was purchased in sections from Italy, West Germany and East Germany and assembled in Iraq. It was located at Akhashat in north-western Iraq, and the cost was around $50 million for the plant and $30 million for the safety equipment.
In the late 1970′s, it was actually the German firm ‘Karl Kobe’ that sold Iraq the ingredients for its first chemical weapons. Karl Kobe and others sold Iraq over 1,027 tons of the chemicals needed to produce mustard gas, Sarin, Tabun, and various tear gasses including CS and CN. The chemical weapons program was operational by late 1983/early 1984. Iraq then bought botulin toxin and mycotoxin from a total of 5 other German firms to begin a germ/biological weapons program.
The United States CDC (Center for Disease Control) provided Iraq with biological samples up until 1989 for “Medical research and other purposes”. The US supplied anthrax, West Nile virus, botulism, and Brucella melitensis to Iraq for little or no charge. (that was very nice of them).
The United Kingdom paid, in full, for the Iraqi chlorine plant where mustard gas was manufactured.
Brazil provided around 100 tons of mustard gas in the early 80′s before the British funded plant was up and running.
Singapore and India provided the ingredients for VX nerve agent and yet still more Tabun.
Egypt and Spain both provided the majority of Iraq’s munitions that were designed to carry and disperse the chemical weapons.
As you can clearly see it was truly a very international affair, a sort of United Nations!
It should also be made clear that the US. UK and other countries assisted Iraq in its development into nuclear research which did not reach a successful conclusion.
Part 4 will bring you more details on actual arms shipments and other military support.
Peter Eyre -3/2/2013
Broadcaster – Investigative Journalist – Middle East Consultant – Political Analysis
Eyre International - Bringing You The News No One Else Wants To Bring You 