Eyre International – Bringing You The News No One Else Wants To Bring You

The Hidden Truth Behind The News

Posts Tagged ‘IAEA

Australian Government almost forcibly pushes the HPV vaccines on young boys as well as girls Part 1

with 7 comments

Australian Government almost forcibly pushes the HPV vaccines on young boys as well as girls Part 1

Are vaccines harming Australian children?

Are young Australians potentially being sterilized or made infertile




Hey Mum will this cause mental problems or make me infertile ?

We continue to see a sort of hysteria being fed into the minds of all Australian Mums and Dads (and indeed the world) to protect their children against the many viruses that our children could or could not encounter during their younger years and yet I continue to  ask the question – ” is our government or other governments well informed as to the authenticity of the data provided or as to the risks associated with those same vaccines?

It is fact that the world expert on the HPV vaccine, Dr. Harper, herself expressed grave concern as to the acceleration of this programme before normal protocol had been completed i.e. data being released over a long period of time to prove it was advantageous and that it had been tested on humans…….this normal protocol however was side-stepped when the HPV vaccine was rushed into production.


First World Countries

“Mom is it true that aluminum and other ingredients are contained in this vaccine and could make me very ill or infertile”

Third World Countries

“Mom is it true that  the vaccines contain mercury based ingredients and are extremely dangerous to my health, mind and body”

Over many many years I have been investigating the reasoning behind some rather rushed vaccines onto the market that has not only led me to many concerns as a parent but that of other parents around the world.

Those same concerns believe it or not have also come from the very organisations that not only design those vaccines but also the organisation that implement them including the UN, WHO and Disease and Control Agencies etc.

My conscience must therefore yet again repeat this article and also follow it up with factual evidence that I am sure will cause you as a parent or grandparent to become deeply concerned.

I am also repeating this amended article for the political sector within Australia, especially those that implemented this, yet to be proven programme.

Copies will be sent to the Australian Prime Minister, Julia Gillard – Leader of the Opposition, Tony Abboot – Minister for Health,  Tanya Plibersek and many others.

You will note that in the Australian Statistics that have been released it gives reference to what the government calls  the “Success of the Program” but I am sure you would agree that success is measured by the reduction off associated cancers or other sexual viruses that apply to the HPV Vaccine since it was first implemented rather than boasting as to how many have been vaccinated to date – “That is not evidence of its success or failure”

Before printing this article again I would like to place an emphasis on the following extracts from other experts who do not agree with the current trend of governments and the pharmaceutical industry and in doing so warn those concerned of the implications:

Governments Duty of Care

Our government has the responsibility to prove the safety of any vaccination being recommended for broad public health, as part of an overall vaccine program. Our current knowledge of science, the immune system, and the brain would make it unlikely that broad vaccine programs could ever be approved for use today if they hadn’t being going on for so long.

Is it possible that the general public could be calling for criminal penalties/charges for any government minister, department or agency that knew about the dangers of thimerosal /aluminium in vaccines and did nothing to protect our children?


The public are slowly becoming aware that the WHO, UNICEF and our governments are starting to use the media outlets to spread mass hysteria regarding certain potential risky flu outbreaks or the dangers of cervical cancer etc.

 The last one (which is still alive and kicking) was that of the so called pandemic “Swine Flu.” It became clear to most of use that this was certainly a ploy by the pharmaceutical industry to make much money. This particular flu didn’t have any significant impact on the world’s health than any other conventional flu outbreak. In actual fact there were fewer deaths from this pandemic than the norm.

Is it possible that our respective governments and the pharmaceutical industry are literally making a killing in the physical and financial context?

Is it possible that this is also their way of mass depopulation and mass sterilisation in order to comply with the New World Orders “Agenda 21”?

Maybe it would be an opportune time to mention that many vaccines contain not only mercury but also aluminum which is carcinogenic to humans and also has a direct link to autism in our children.

To investigate this dollar driven industry we have to look at some historical facts to prove that many vaccines that are produced to protect us are in actual fact causing us more harm than good. Many of these vaccines are produced in record time and remain untested over a long period of time. I guess the proof of this would be the fact that many doctors and those in the medical professional have not taken the vaccine themselves. Have you ever asked why? I certainly have many times and just get a smile in response to the question!

 There is one ingredient that is of great concern to many medical professionals and that is called Thimerosal which is mercury based. You will find this in many of today’s main line vaccines and has been banned in many western countries. However it is rife in third world countries where strict rules do not apply and has been abused by the WHO and UNICEF in these locations.

 One can clearly see that when certain vaccines must not be administered to pregnant women that this is one of the first clues as to its safety. As an example:

Exposure to mercury in utero and in children may cause mild to severe mental retardation and mild to severe motor coordination impairment.”

Therefore anything that contains Thimerosal fits into this category.

 It is also  believed that Aluminium enhances the toxicity of  Thimerosal and therefore trace elements of Aluminium can come from the fluoride used in our water supply which is the type of fluoride (sodium) added to municipal water to act as a floctuating agent (to settle particles in the water). Fluoride is a hazardous waste product of the aluminium industry! One should also add to this the regular usage of aluminium products used for cooking etc (especially in third world countries). A perfect example of this is when one tries to clean the inside of saucepans etc, wipe a white cloth on the inside it will turn grey or black..

 It is also interesting to note whilst on this topic that this toxic waste has been recommend for other uses  in Australia and other countries such as:

  • Use as a soil amendment to help retain nutrients and adjust soil pH.


  • Use as an additive to fertiliser to improve phosphorous retention in soils.


  • Use as an additive to compost to aid the retention of trace metals.


  • Use as a soil additive for the retention of water.

The main purpose of pointing such things out is the fact that those companies, who produce toxic waste, continue in their attempts to put that waste back into the food chain cycle.

 It should also be noted that the use of Thimerosal as a preservative has been banned in certain western countries:

 The US, Iowa and California passed legislation in favour of mercury-free vaccines.

 The Danish parliament, in 1992, banned the heavy metal from vaccines.  

 The UK passed a similar legislation. At the root of the problem was Thimerosal: this preservative with a 50 per cent mercury constituent is a key ingredient of multi-dose vaccines. These vials are about 10 times cheaper than single-dose vials, making it easier for international agencies to procure vaccines for programmes in developing countries including India. In 2000, for instance, about 80 per cent of vaccines administered globally were supplied in multi-dose vials.

International bodies such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF recommend this preservative. Even those vaccine manufacturers based in developed countries, who make mercury-free vaccines for domestic consumption, use this heavy metal in their products for developing countries.

Most vaccines used for country’s Universal Immunisation Programme (UIP) have a Thimerosal content of 25 µg per five millilitres. Half of that, 12.5 µg, is mercury. A six-week old infant in many parts of the country is administered two vaccines, DPT ( Diphtheria, Pertussis and Tetanus ) and Hepatitis b. This exposes the child to 25 µg of mercury. Infants getting vaccinated at a private clinic are also administered the Haemophilus Influenza Type B Vaccine, as per the Indian Academy of Pediatricians’ protocol. This results in a total exposure of 37.5 µg.

According to the US Environment Protection Agency, the human body can, in a day, safely tolerate 0.1 µg of mercury for every kg of its body weight. So, an average six-week infant, weighing 7 kg, can tolerate an exposure of 0.7 µg of mercury. A child is exposed to mercury levels much higher than this recommended amount on their inoculation day.

The risk of mercury is even higher for the undernourished — and underweight — Indian children. At a WHO meeting of the Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety in 2003, it was pointed out that little is known of susceptibility to Thimerosal in infants who weigh less than 2.5 kg. Moreover, children are less equipped to handle the toxic load because they do not produce sufficient levels of bile, needed to remove it.

Thimerosal was developed in the 1930s by US based vaccine major, Lilly. For years the company has manipulated studies to demonstrate the safety of this mercury-based preservative. In fact, when Thimerosal was introduced, the company did have it tested, but only on 22 patients with terminal meningitis. Quite conveniently meningitis was blamed for the death of all those injected with the preservative. 

Lilly used the US government’s paranoia against bio-terrorism to its advantage. Along with other vaccine companies, it persuaded the US government to introduce a clause in the Homeland Security Act — brought in response to the 9/11 attacks — stipulating that these companies can be challenged only in vaccine courts, and not in civil courts. Anxious to ensure vaccine supplies against any anthrax or smallpox attacks, the US government complied.

The clause substantially reduces Lilly’s — and other vaccines companies’ — liability if it were to lose a Thimerosal-related litigation. In such an event, the company would have to pay us $5 billion in damages, six times less than what it would be liable for if the case was fought in a civil court.

While many US experts approve of Thimerosal, cases of autism increased in the country. In the early 1980s, only one among 10,000 children in the US was autistic. By the late 1990s, one in 500 children had the disease; currently there is one autistic child per 166 newborns in the US. Experts who incriminate Thimerosal for this rise point out that mercury in vaccines more than doubled between 1988 and 1992. They also cite the contrasting example of Denmark, where autism afflicts one in 13,000 children — the country banned Thimerosal in vaccines in 1992.

Thimerosal has also been implicated in other nerve disorders. For instance in 2003, David Baskin of the Department of Neuro Surgery at Baylor College of Medicine demonstrated that this preservative can cause membrane and DNA damage, and kill nerve cells, even when administered in small amounts.

The main purpose of this article is to draw attention to the latest mass hysteria being created by governments and the pharmaceutical industry in relation to the current Human Papilloma Virus (HPV).

I am sure we have all read so much about the new vaccine which according to the experts guards our young female generation against cervical cancer at a later date. However it is my belief, that yet again, we are being conned into allowing the government to vaccinate our young ladies in mass with the HPV Vaccine.

So what are the facts about this controversial vaccine, what are the potential dangers and what is the commercial name for these products:

The HPV vaccine normally comes under the name of Gardasil or Cervarix. There are some grave concerns regarding these vaccines which contain Polysorbate 80 which is believed to cause infertility. There are also many concerns as to the side effects of this vaccine and in some cases death. I will now try to explain this questionable vaccine.

The HPV vaccine is administered to girls around the age of 12 – 13 years during their first year at High School. It requires a top up again between the ages of 13 – 18 with another top up from time to time up to the age of around 26 years. Many experts again question the testing time for this vaccine and also are concerned that the safety data has been manipulated.  

I would therefore ask the question is this another New World Order ploy via the respective governments to reduce the populations of the world by creating mass infertility in young women, as well as, in some cases, death?

Dr. Harper is one of the world’s top experts on the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) and one of  the leading scientists the pharmaceutical industries turned to for help to conduct clinical trials – including those that led to approval by the US Food and Drug Administration of Gardasil.

Dr Harper has made some startling admissions, some of which have been retracted or removed from the media. Here are some of her comments:

She started off by saying “This is a real danger zone,”

Dr. Harper expresses concerns over what she considers a rush to recommend and mandate the vaccination of very young girls with the vaccine. “It went too fast, it went too fast without any breaks,” says Harper, who devoted nearly two decades of her career to research on HPV.

Dr Harper went on to say “Time is needed to study potential side effects in larger numbers of young girls before any consideration should be given to mandating such a vaccine.”  “The vaccine has not been out long enough for us to have post marketing surveillance to really understand what all the potential side effects are going to be. We feel it is very safe.” However, she adds, “We don’t know yet what’s going to happen when millions of doses of the vaccine have been given and to put in process a place that says you must have this vaccine, it means you must be part of a big public experiment. So we can’t do that until we have more data.”

Barbara Low Fisher agrees. She took to the streets a grass roots fight credited with derailing many efforts around the country to mandate the vaccine. “It was the quickest effort I have ever seen in 25 years for a vaccine to be mandated,” says Fisher. A mother of a son who she say was left with learning disabilities following a routine vaccination in the 1980’s, Fisher is President and Co Founder of the National Vaccine Information Center. It is a non-profit independent clearinghouse for information on vaccines and disease.

Fisher says her organization has been contacted by nearly 100 parents claiming their daughters have suffered some type of adverse reaction following a Gardasil shot – at times given in combination with other vaccines. She says many parents are frustrated in their search for answers and that they don’t know where to turn. She tells Gillen “the National Vaccine Information Center is getting reports every week, mostly mothers, of what is happening to their 11-year old girls after receiving Gardasil.”

Harper says parents need to be armed with as much information as possible. She believes the vaccine should be an educated choice. She explained that many parents do not realize or are not being told by physicians, that their daughters might end up needing a booster shot. She says what can be considered key study trials lasted at most 5 years and that there is no way to know exactly how long the vaccine will be effective.

I think the thought is that there probably will be efficacy for longer than 5 years but it’s probably not going to be lifetime efficacy. There probably will be some need for a booster. There will be some need for understanding when we going to need to be able to revaccinate those women. Those are all open questions,” “I can’t stress enough the need for pap tests throughout a woman’s lifetime, even if she has received an HPV vaccine.”

Dr Harper also believed that to give this vaccine to young girls under 15 was also wrong and currently they are talking about giving this as early as 9 years. Dr Harper went on to express her disapproval for any potential effort to mandate a Cervex vaccine for young girls. As Dr. Harper explains “It’s still like-wise with Gardasil. They haven’t been out long enough, there isn’t enough information to have a mandate that you can’t go to school until you have this vaccine. It does not make any sense.”

For my part I cannot understand how anyone should be receiving this unproven vaccine when you calculate the risks associated with it. I believe that with regular “Pap Smear Tests” one can determine any unusual cell activity in good time before it becomes a problem. At the end of the day the HPV vaccine may only cure a very small amount of the 100 variants of HPV and as such does not offer 100% cure.

It is now time to show some historical aspects of the types of vaccines that have been carried out in many parts of the world to which I hold grave concerns. Could it be that this is a covert sterilisation programme using vaccines such as tetanus, rubella and now possibly the HPV vaccine (Gardasil and Cervarix)? Are they still using mercury in third world country vaccines (even though this additive has now been prohibited in most Western countries) as a means of mass a birth control?

Between 1963 and 1965 more than 400,000 Colombian women were sterilized in a program funded by the Rockefeller Foundation.

In the 1990`s the UN`s World Health Organization launched a campaign to vaccinate millions of women in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines between the ages of 15 and 45. The stated purpose was to protect against Tetanus or Lockjaw, a painful sometimes lethal infectious reaction to external wounds or cuts. However, the vaccine was not given to men or boys, who are more prone to wounds from cuts and rusty nails than the ladies.

Comite Pro Vida de Mexico, a Roman Catholic lay organization became suspicious and had the vaccine samples tested. The tests revealed that the WHO Tetanus vaccine used to inoculate women of child bearing age contained human Chorionic Gonadotrophin or hCG, a natural hormone that is secreted in the initial stages of pregnancy, but when combined with a tetanus toxoid carrier stimulated antibodies rendering a woman incapable of maintaining a pregnancy. None of the women vaccinated were told.

In 1995, the Catholic Women’s League of the Philippines won a court order halting a UNICEF anti-tetanus program because the vaccine had been laced with B-hCG. The Supreme Court of the Philippines found the surreptitious sterilization program had already vaccinated three million women, aged 12 to 45. B-hCG-laced vaccine was also found in at least four other developing countries.

A UNICEF campaign to vaccinate Nigeria’s youth against polio may have been a front for sterilizing the nation. Dr. Haruna Kaita, a pharmaceutical scientist and Dean of the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ahmadu Bello University in Zaria, took samples of the vaccine to labs in India for analysis.

Using WHO-recommended technologies like Gas Chromatography (GC) and Radio-Immuno assay, Dr. Kaita, upon analysis, found evidence of serious contamination. “Some of the things we discovered in the vaccines are harmful, toxic; some have direct effects on the human reproductive system,”  “I and some other professional colleagues who are Indians who were in the Lab could not believe the discovery,”

It is also interesting to note that patents exist in the US and many countries after the proposal, several years ago, to create a birth control vaccine which induces the formation of antibodies against the human pregnancy hormone, the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). These inventions are described in patents issued in India, U.S.A. and several other countries. (Ref. EP 204566, JP 62286928, CA 1239346, U.S. Pat. No. 4,780,312, CN 8603854). This research continued with another invention which generates antibody response of a long duration against hCG after a single or a limited number of injections etc.

Bill Gates also made a statement where he maintains “if we do a really great job on vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that [his initial 2050 global population projection of 9-billion] by perhaps about 10 to 15 percent.”

It must be emphasised that the existence of Polysorbate 80 in the HPV vaccine caused infertility in rats and mice. Don’t you find this astonishing that whenever they want to prove if any vaccine or chemical is safe they always test the product on rats and mice first before its usage on humans In this case the results where startling to say the least and yet this aspect of the HPV has been bypassed.

I found the following Irish headline really did hit the nail on the head:

  “Lock up your Daughters – Suspected Serial Killer Due for Release.”

 What accompanied these headlines was the following:

 After zealous crusading for mass HPV vaccination by media, special-interest groups, politicians and the medical establishment, the Irish Health Service last week commenced implementing an injection-by-Gardasil program for all 12 year old schoolgirls. Irish parents signed consent forms as media and medical experts glorified the  “terrific” vaccine. 

It seems Irish media etiquette forbids mentioning the flood of deaths and debilitating reactions reported in the US for Gardasil recipients.  As of Jun 2010 (4 years after it’s approval),   71 deaths of girls & young women, along with over 18,000 had been reported to the FDA via the “VAERS” system (these incidents are probably greatly under reported).  

In addition, five Gardasil related deaths in Germany have been reported (detailed in reporting system at Paul-Ehrlich-Institute in Germany). Two of these occurred among the first 1.5m recipients of the vaccine in Europe.   

 I would also like to add this article I found regarding Merck, the manufacturer of Gardasi: The recent  track record of Merck does not render it unlikely that they would deny for years the dangers of an unsafe product, before finally being forced to pull it from the market (and then pay out billions in settlements).  A record, incidentally, that does not exclude deceptive marketing tactics to play down a drug’s health risks. 

In Jun 2010 Research Physician Scott Reuben, MD, who pled guilty to falsifying research on the use of Vioxx (forecoxib; Merch) was sentenced in a Boston federal court to 6 months in prison for healthcare fraud and ordered to repay pharmaceutical companies that financed his research.  Merck voluntarily withdrew Vioxx ( Rofecoxib) from the market in 2004 after evidence showed the painkiller boosted the risk for heart attack, stroke, and other cardiovascular events.   Dr. Reuben admitted that he had not enrolled any patients in trials but, instead, had simply made up findings.

Another top research professor, funded by Merck to design and conduct the Gardasil Clinical Safety Trials, admitted it was not tested for effectiveness in younger girls under 16.  “Giving it to 11-year-olds is a great big public health experiment” said Dr. Diane M. Harper, “At 11, these girls don’t get cervical cancer – they won’t know for 25 years if they will get cervical cancer.  She also spoke about the need for “More complete warnings.”

 I was further shocked to find out that 70% of our High School girls have already received this unproven vaccination.

Here are the statistics from the UK’s  NHS for year 2008/9:

Seventy per cent of eligible 12 to 13-year-old girls were fully immunised against HPV – the virus that can lead to most cervical cancers – during 2008-09, a report from The NHS Information Centre shows today.

While 70 per cent of girls in school year eight received all three doses of the vaccine, just over 87 per cent in total received one dose, according to NHS Immunisations Statistics, England, 2008-09.

The statistics also show that in 2008-09,

  • Uptake of the Measles Mumps and Rubella (MMR) vaccine for children reaching their second birthday remained at around 85 per cent for the third year running. This is still lower than in the mid 1990s when just over 90 percent of children received the MMR vaccine, but higher than the uptake low of 80 per cent in 2003-04.
  • 78 per cent of children received first and second doses of the MMR vaccine between the ages of three and five. This is a four percentage point increase on the previous year. This is the highest level recorded since the COVER programme began evaluating the second dose of MMR at five years of age in 1998.
  • Uptake of vaccines against diphtheria, tetanus, polio, pertussis, haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) and meningitis C (MenC) for children reaching their second birthday was between 92 per cent and 94 per cent, a level that has remained broadly stable since 2004-05.
  • There were 239,241 BCG vaccinations in 2008-09, an increase of 10 per cent on the previous year (217,294) given to those in specified at risk categories. Although babies under the age of one, account for the nearly two thirds of the BCG vaccinations, most of this increase came from vaccination of those aged over one which increased by nearly 22 per cent from 73,978 in 2007-08 to 90,213 in 2008-09.
  • The proportion of people aged 65 and over immunised against seasonal influenza was 74 per cent in 2008-09, maintaining the level of recent years and very close to attaining the World Health Organisation target of 75 per cent.

Tim Straughan, Chief Executive of the NHS Information Centre said: “Our statistics show that in the first school year of the HPV vaccine being offered, 70 per cent of eligible girls completed the full course of all three doses.

“Our report also shows uptake of the MMR vaccine has remained at roughly 85 per cent since 2006-07. This remains lower than in the mid 1990s when just over 90 percent of children received the MMR vaccine, but higher than the uptake low of 80 per cent in 2003-04.”

The full immunisation statistics are online: www.ic.nhs.uk/pubs/immstats2008-2009

I am sure readers will now have the opportunity to understand the evil ways of the WHO, UNICEF, governments and pharmaceutical companies and be able to make a more informed decision as to what their babies, children and teenagers should or should not be given.

Rumour has it that the standard flue top up vaccine given to millions of people each year may well include (in disguise) the “Swine Flu Vaccine” that failed so miserably and cost our respective governments millions……all of which was to the advantage of the companies who made them.

Even as far back as 2009  warnings were issued that a new swine flu jab is linked to a deadly nerve disease and was sent by the Government to senior neurologists in a confidential letter…… bet you didn’t know that either!!!

One other very important point is the fact that scientists who advised the World Health Organization on its influenza policies and recommendations—including the decision to proclaim the so-called swine flue a “pandemic” had close ties to companies that manufacture vaccines and antiviral medicines like Tamiflu, a fact that WHO did not publicly disclose……why would they when it puts more money into their own pockets.

The Danish media in 2010 also again investigated the above aspects and hit the nail on the head when they stated in a rather humorous way :

World Health Organisation (WHO – World Homicide Organisation) disclosed that their staffs were linked to Pharmaceutical Companies!!

Another story that appeared out of Denmark was the following:

Police in Denmark investigating a case of fraud involving the scientist Poul Thorsen, a key author of a controversial study that appears to show mercury in vaccines are safe,  have been denied documents by US police authorities.

Danish police were told that they would have to make a request to the US Justice Department through the Danish Ministry of Justice before they could access documents on Thorsen, who was the recipient of research grants from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and who is believed to have defrauded the University of Aarhaus of 10 million Danish crowns.

Clearly this scientist had very little knowledge of the dangers associated with the highly toxic and highly corrosive mercury.

In Australia, the Federal Health Minister at the time, Nicola Roxon,  is reassuring parents the swine flu is no more dangerous than regular seasonal flu. “Most people, including children, will experience very mild symptoms and recover without any medical intervention,” she said……..I would tend to agree with this wise lady……we were all born with an immune system and unless the person has some overpowering health problem then let our natural system tackle it.

I would urge you not to allow this to continue and certainly think twice before having a swine flu vaccine or any vaccine that you are not comfortable with. Certainly safeguard your daughters against this HPV con and just maintain regular “Pap Smear Tests” and address any abnormal cell activity as and when they show up. Remember your daughter has the right to have a child and you have the right to share in the joy of having a grandchild.

I guess the final comment comes from this report which stated:

“Cure the Disease, Kill the Patient”

 Less than 100 children in the U.S. die each year from seasonal flu viruses. If we use Australia’s math, a very rough estimate would be another 100 children could potentially die of swine flu in the United States in the coming year.

If children are the first target group in the U.S.  that means we’re about to inject around 75 million children with a fast tracked vaccine containing novel adjuvants, including dangerous squalene or whatever, to prevent perhaps 100 deaths.

Last year we again saw another concern: A swine flu vaccine which has been given to thousands of children in Britain may cause the sleep disorder narcolepsy.

Symptoms include excessive daytime sleepiness and nodding off suddenly without warning.

All packets of the vaccine Pandemrix will have to carry a warning about the risk following a ruling by the EU regulator, the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

Finally we have the admission by the NHS that the swine flu vaccine is to be included in the winter flu jab for the first time in a bid to stop the virus from returning……..what virus and what danger does it present I would ask!!!

 Finally I must add to this horror the continued usage, by the world’s military, of weapons containing uranium components in all areas of conflict. The radiation contamination from these weapons has spread and continues to spread around the entire world resulting in mass genocide and infertility on a scale never seen before. This aspect was covered in my previous War Crimes Complaint that was filed in December 2009 with the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission in which I attempted to take our ex Prime Minister Tony Blair and the British Government to the KL War Crimes Tribunal on behalf of the people of Iraq and other people from other areas of conflict.

 As we have already discovered the Zionist led New World Order have declared that they must reduce the world’s population by a minimum of at least one third……who gave this evil satanic organisation the right to act as God?

It is also vital to mention  the past usage of  Squalene, especially in relation to the vaccination of our troops, which appears to have strong links with the “Gulf War Syndrome” …….here are some extracts from my article on this additive:

  Gulf War syndrome (GWS) with a banned substance used in experimental vaccines.

 The study, conducted by scientists at Tulane University Medical School, found that an overwhelming majority of sick veterans who had served in the Gulf War, and had received at least one vaccination, tested positive for antibodies to a naturally occurring substance called squalene. None of the healthy veterans in the study tested positive for squalene antibodies.

DoD officials originally dismissed the study as flawed and asserted that none of the vaccines administered during the Gulf War contained squalene. In response to pressure from Congress, however, the department has asked the Armed Forces Epidemiological Board (AFEB) to re-examine the study. The Institute of Medicine is also reviewing the research to see what role squalene may play in Gulf-related illnesses.

A naturally occurring molecule, squalene is produced by the human liver and plays a role in the metabolism of cholesterol. It is most commonly found in vegetable oils, shark liver oil,cosmetics and various health supplements.

Under normal circumstances, squalene is released into the blood to help combat physical injuries. However, people don’t usually have enough squalene in their blood to prompt the production of detectable levels of antibodies.

Since the late 1980s, squalene has been studied by the DoD and the National Institutes of Health as a possible adjuvant in vaccines. Because adjuvants boost the immune system’s response to foreign antibodies, the subtance has sparked the interest of researchers. Drug manufacturers, for their part, have incorporated adjuvants into vaccines in the belief that the substance will render the vaccine more effective.

Adjuvants, however, can sometimes trigger unwanted immune responses. While large-scale studies have yet to be conducted in humans, animal studies have shown that squalene adjuvants may generate autoimmune versions of arthritis and multiple sclerosis type-conditions that attack the body from within.2

Although they have been used in a number of vaccines worldwide, only one adjuvant – aluminum hydroxide – has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in vaccines in the United States. And although squalene-adjuvant vaccines have been used on laboratory animals and in experimental human tests, the FDA has not approved the general use of any vaccine containing squalene in the U.S.


You will note the admitance of aluminum hydroxide!!!!


I guess the final question would have to be “Did they spike the vaccine with squalene and use the troops as guinea pigs” ?

After years of repeated obfuscation, the US Federal Government finally admitted that a banned chemical additive linked to the Gulf War syndrome has been found in some of the vaccines developed to protect military personnel from biological attack. – FDA Tests Fins Squalene in Anthrax Vaccine.

The article also gave some of the other ingredients/problems associated with current vaccines:


Adjuvants (immune response boosters)



Vaccine Contaminants:

One could spend weeks investigating each of the above ingredients but time does not allow and so one can only leave it up to each individual War Vet or parent to read between the lines and reach their own conclusion.

For my part I feel sorry for all third world countries that are being almost forced to have these vaccinations at great risk to their babies and young children.

The world is now being subjected too or should I say conned into accepting the current HPV vaccine. The fact that this is now being  given to almost all high school females (and now males) around the world’s is simply deplorable……..this is indeed depopulation or genocide on a very big scale.

All I can do is attempt to tell the truth via such TV stations as Press TV or RT and try to educate all those in the world who simply do not know……you are literally “sheep to the slaughter.”

I would in closing now challenge the Australian Government, The Minister for Health, Leader of the Opposition and other political figures  to respond to this article and provide factual evidence of the success of the HPV vaccine since its launch in Australia along with appropriate statistics that prove it has decreased cancer/sexually transmitted viruses in those that have received the vaccine.

It may also be appropriate to discuss the hike in Autism amongst the world’s young and more importantly the massive hike in worldwide infertility!

Don’t you find it ironic that the Australian Government  launched a programme for couples to have more children and reward them financially and yet now under the terms of Agenda 21 they are seeking to mass depopulate by whatever means.

During one of my many broadcast in the US I received a phone in from an ex senior pharmaceutical scientist who told me that he had retired from the industry prematurely based on ethical and moral  grounds and agreed with most of what I had published and talked about.

He went on to say that many of those working in the industry, including himself, do not vaccinate their own children or any of their siblings……..I asked him why to which he responded ……”for the very same reason what you are writing about and talking about!!

This did not come as a shock to me as I had already ascertained this in the UK when I asked many doctors and staff in medical centres if they have received the annual flue jab or allowed their children to have certain vaccinations…….in some cases I never got an answer but simply a smile!!!

My next article will cover what the Australian Government are saying about the HPV vaccine along with their statistics etc and then later I will reveal some very sensitive and confidential leaks that have been exposed in the US when top level experts met up to discuss this very topic and how they themselves had some very serious concerns that they intentionally withheld from the public……..it will blow you away!!!

My final question would have to be who controls Australia………the Zionist controlled New World Order or the Australian Government? and why does this country allow it to happen.

That is another topic I will cover in a later articles and prove that Australia is controlled from outside the “Lucky Country”

Bless you all

Peter Eyre – 17/2/2013

Broadcaster – Investigative Journalist – Middle East Consultant – Political Analysis

Written by Peter Eyre

February 16, 2013 at 05:27

Posted in Corporate/Government Fraud and Corruption, News

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Hypocrisy of The New World Order and its Assault on Islamic Nations – Part 7 (final)

with 3 comments

The Hypocrisy of The New World Order and its Assault on Islamic Nations – Part 7 (final)


The Zionist controlled media portrays the west as being the moral and ethical guardians  when it comes to any other country wishing to embark on the research and development of nuclear or chemical and biological warfare weapons of mass destruction. However this is  far from the truth as we have observed from my previous articles.

We have seen the US and UK in-particular play a major role in not only supplying  nuclear and CBW technology (as was the case with Iraq) but also actually funding and building the CBW laboratories.

It is fact that the US and UK  were actually involved in not only promoting war but in making sure it lasts for as long as possible. The Iraq-Iran War (1980-1988) was a classic example of the two faced approach by our respective governments  who openly declared the fact that they wanted Saddam to win and accordingly provided him with the technology to enhance his chances.

You will recall that it was our governments who provided Iraq with WMD and CBW which were used in “Iraq’s Mass Genocide” of thousands of innocent Kurds in Halabja and also used against the Iranians with horrific consequences.





On September 22, 1980, Iraq staged an all-out war on Iran from ground, air, and sea and came to occupy a vast part of Iranian territory. But in the following months it was evident that the Iranian nation was determined to reclaim its occupied territories. Contrary to the Iraqis’ conception, the continued occupation of Iran required more effective weapons.

Saddam Hussein’s chemical warfare development and use can be divided into three phases:

  • Phase 1: January 1981 to June 1983, Iraq started testing chemical weapons.
  • Phase 2: August 1983 to December 1983, chemical weapons were used to a limited extent.
  • Phase 3: February 1984 to the end of the war, chemical weapons were used extensively.

Project 922 was the codename for Iraq’s third and most successful attempt to produce chemical and biological weapons. Within three years (1978–1981), Project 922 had gone from concept to production for first generation Iraqi chemical weapons (mustard agent0. By 1984 Iraq started producing its first nerve agents, Tabun and Sarin.In 1986, a five-year plan was drawn up that ultimately led to biological weapons production. By 1988 Iraq had produced VX Gas (the most deadlist of all). The program reached its zenith in the late 1980s during the Iran-Iraq war. From August 1983 to July 1988 Iran was subjected to extensive Iraqi chemical attacks. Between 1981 and 1991, Iraq produced over 3,857 tons of CW agents.

Again I repeat it was the west that assisted Saddam in his CBW programme and the key players were the US, UK, Germany, France, Italy with  other countries involved such as Austria, Singapore, Netherlands, Egypt, India, Luxembourg and Spain etc

Let’s now look how Britain’s Mail Online  first covered an article about Syria’s CBW potential  dated 16th January 2013 and how purely by accident that same newspaper published a second article dated Tuesday January 29th 2013 which revealed how the west was actually going to support a “CBW False Flag Attack in Syria” and blame it on the Assad Government.

The following extracts were taken from the UK’s Mail Online with the headlines :

Mail online

Syria used chemical weapons in Homs, US state department cables reveal

  • Evidence of Syrian army’s use of chemical weapons ‘compelling’
  • Leaked report suggests ‘Agent 15’ was used on Dec 23 in Homs

By Sean O’Hare 16 January 2013

A secret US government communication concludes that the Syrian army more than likely used chemical weapons during an attack in the city of Homs last month.

The document, leaked to The Cable, reveals the finding of an investigation by Scott Frederic Kilner, the U.S. consul general in Istanbul, into accusations that the Syrian army used chemical weapons in the December 23 attack.

An Obama administration official who had access to the document was reported as saying: ‘We can’t definitely say 100 per cent, but Syrian contacts made a compelling case that Agent 15 was used in Homs on Dec. 23.’


At this point there is no evidence that this Zionist media propoganda was authentic and we all know that had it been factual evidence the United Nations would have immediately approved military intervention.


The photograph the Mail used was of particular interest to me as this same photograph was later used in the other startling story as you will see later in this article……..this is that photograph:


This photograph contained the following explanation:

The Syrian city of Homs has seen some of the worst fighting in Syria, with a US cable now suggesting it came under chemical attack by Assad forces on December 23

The above article went on to say –

Mr Kilner’s investigation included interviews with civilians, doctors, and rebels present during the attack, as well as the former general and head of the Syrian WMD program, Mustafa al-Sheikh.

Dr. Nashwan Abu Abdo, a neurologist in Homs, is certain chemical weapons were used. He told The Cable: ‘It was a chemical weapon, we are sure of that, because tear gas can’t cause the death of people.’

Eye witness accounts from the investigations reveal that a tank launched chemical weapons had caused people exposed to them to suffer nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, delirium, seizures, and respiratory distress.

The symptoms suggest that the weaponised compound Agent-15 was responsible.


My own observation on the above is that if all of the civilians, doctors and rebels were present during the attack how come they did not succumb to the CBW used. The other issue I also have with this false flag story is that eye witness accounts state that these CBW agents were launched by tanks and yet the photograph used by the Mail is clearly a bomb and certainly does not show any characteristics of a CBW explosion which normally explodes in the atmosphere (air burst).

Now lets take a look at another recent Mail article Tuesday January 29th 2013  that exposed a totally different viewpoint using the same photograph and one can clearly assume that this story was authentic and thus now incriminates the US President and his government in a very big way:

The article concerned was pulled almost as soon as it was published but not before a gallant activist took a print screen shot of it on the day it appeared and released it on facebook……….as per below:


Because the text is not clear I will repeat it below:

Leaked emails prove Obama “backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad”

Tuesday, January 29, 2013 22:20

U.S. ‘backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad’s regime’ Daily Mail.

  • Leaked emails from defense contractor refers to chemical weapons saying ‘the idea is approved by Washington’
  • Obama issued warning to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that use of chemical warfare was ‘totally unacceptable’

PUBLISHED: 14:16 EST, 29 January 2013

Leaked emails have allegedly proved that the White House gave the green light to a chemical weapons attack in Syria that could be blamed on Assad’s regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country.

A report released on Monday contains an email exchange between two senior officials at British-based contractor Britam Defence where a scheme ‘approved by Washington’ is outlined explaining that Qatar would fund rebel forces in Syria to use chemical weapons.

Barack Obama made it clear to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that the U.S. would not tolerate Syria using chemical weapons against its own people.


I myself having read the original story also tried to recover it and actually found reference to it on my search engine but hey presto  when I selected it this is what appeared in its place:

Here is what first came up in the search engine

U.S. ‘planned to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame …

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2270219 · 2 days ago

… the U.S. would not tolerate Syria using chemical weapons against its … regarding a ‘Washington approvedchemical attack in Syria … Part of the Daily Mail, The Mail o

And then this!!!

Mail online


The page you have requested does not exist or is no longer available.


One can see that this article, although authentic,would have caused much embarrassment to Obama and the US Government and obviously resulted in swift action being taken by their PR man to have the original article pulled. However, as one would expect, many activist would have picked up on the article and republished it……as was the case below:

Infowars.com was very quick to publish this article immediately to give more details as to its origin etc:

U.S. ‘backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad’s regime’
U.S. ‘planned to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad’ | Mail Online

Leaked emails from defense contractor refers to chemical weapons saying ‘the idea is approved by Washington’

Obama issued warning to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that use of chemical warfare was ‘totally unacceptable’

Leaked emails have allegedly proved that the White House gave the green light to a chemical weapons attack in Syria that could be blamed on Assad’s regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country.

A report released on Monday contains an email exchange between two senior officials at British-based contractor Britam Defence where a scheme ‘approved by Washington’ is outlined explaining that Qatar would fund rebel forces in Syria to use chemical weapons.

Barack Obama made it clear to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that the U.S. would not tolerate Syria using chemical weapons against its own people.

According to Infowars.com, the December 25 email was sent from Britam’s Business Development Director David Goulding to company founder Philip Doughty.
It reads: ‘Phil… We’ve got a new offer. It’s about Syria again. Qataris propose an attractive deal and swear that the idea is approved by Washington.
‘We’ll have to deliver a CW to Homs, a Soviet origin g-shell from Libya similar to those that Assad should have.
‘They want us to deploy our Ukrainian personnel that should speak Russian and make a video record.
‘Frankly, I don’t think it’s a good idea but the sums proposed are enormous. Your opinion?
‘Kind regards, David.’

Britam Defence had not yet returned a request for comment to Mail Online.


Here is that leaked email:


The email was allegedly sent from a top official at a British defense contractor regarding a ‘Washington approved’ chemical attack in Syria which could be blamed on Assad’s regime

The emails were released by a Malaysian hacker who also obtained senior executives resumés and copies of passports via an unprotected company server, according to .

Dave Goulding’s Linkedin profile lists him as Business Development Director at Britam Defence Ltd in Security and Investigations. A business networking profile for Phil Doughty lists him as Chief Operationg Officer for Britam, United Arab Emirates, Security and Investigations.

The U.S. State Department had not returned a request for comment on the alleged emails to MailOnline today at time of publication.


A second article confirmed the existence of the Mail Online article as follows:

Yahoo News

US ‘backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria, blame it on Assad govt’: Report

By ANI | ANI – 22 hrs ago

London, Jan 30 (ANI): The Obama administration gave green signal to a chemical weapons attack plan in Syria that could be blamed on President Bashar al Assad’s regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country, leaked documents have shown.

A new report, that contains an email exchange between two senior officials at British-based contractor Britam Defence, showed a scheme ‘approved by Washington’.

As per the scheme ‘Qatar would fund rebel forces in Syria to use chemical weapons,’ the Daily Mail reports.

Barack Obama made it clear to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that the U.S. would not tolerate Syria using chemical weapons against its own people.

According to Infowars.com, the December 25 email was sent from Britam’s Business Development Director David Goulding to company founder Philip Doughty.

The emails were released by a Malaysian hacker who also obtained senior executives resumes and copies of passports via an unprotected company server, according to Cyber War News.

According to the paper, the U.S. State Department has declined to comment on the matter. (ANI)


It is clear that the Mail Online did print this article and so once again we not only see the hypocrisy and two faced policy that exists in  the west but now also see how such a “News Flash” – “Hot of the Press” article can be very quickly censored and removed!!!!……….Shame on you  Mail Online.

In closing one must remember the speech made by President  Obama in reference to what action he would take in the event of Assad using CBW weapons on his own people:

This by CBC news

Obama warns Syria against chemical, biological weapon use

Some fear stockpiles could fall into hands of radical groups

The Associated Press

Posted: Aug 20, 2012 6:40 PM ET


The remarks by U.S. President Barack Obama on Monday offer one of the first insights into what his administration considers conditions under which it would be forced to intervene militarily in the Syrian conflict. (Kevin Lamarque/Reuters)

President Barack Obama said Monday the U.S. would reconsider its opposition to military involvement in the Syrian civil war if President Bashar al-Assad’s beleaguered regime deploys or uses chemical or biological weapons.

He called such action a “red line” for the United States.

Speaking to reporters at the White House, Obama said the use of such weapons of mass destruction would considerably widen a conflict that has already dragged on for 18 months and killed some 20,000 people, according to activists.

Syria possesses extensive chemical and biological weapons stockpiles and has threatened to use them if the country comes under foreign attack.

“That’s an issue that doesn’t just concern Syria. It concerns our close  allies in the region, including Israel. It concerns us,” Obama said, also acknowledging the possibility that militant groups might acquire some of those weapons. “We cannot have a situation where chemical or biological weapons are falling into the hands of the wrong people.”

The president noted that he hasn’t ordered any armed U.S. intervention yet, but said: “We have communicated in no uncertain terms with every player in the region, that that’s a red line for us, and that there would be enormous consequences if we start seeing movement on the chemical weapons front, or the use of chemical weapons. That would change my calculations significantly.”

The remarks outlined for the first time the point at which the administration could feel forced to intervene militarily in Syria’s increasingly messy war, even if Obama stopped short of saying the use of weapons of mass destruction would necessarily prompt an American military response.


As we know throughout history to take an action you have to create and incident (false flag) and then blame it on those you wish to go to war with or take out……..such was the case that lead to the Viet Nam War – Gulf of Tonkin Incident…………many thousands of troops died and thousands upon thousands of innocent Vietnamese civilians and for what?

The New World Order is now so arrogantly blatant they create false flags on almost a weekly basis by showing badly orchestrated incidents, hoping that the sheeples out there will get sucked in………9/11 in New York and 7/7 in London were such classic examples and still we go along with their concocted stories.

Now we have Obama and the US Government justifying their drone activity in any country they wish to target all in the name of protecting their own…………my question would be that if you are genuinely after potential threats to your country how come you have not deployed drones in Israel, who played a major role in 9/11, 7/7,   and many other false flag events….especially aviation related ones where Israeli Companies run airport security in such places as Amsterdam etc……….and why hasn’t Obama turned those same drones loose into finding the other cabal in the US that worked with MOSSAD in bringing down the Twin Towers?……..especially the four Israeli’s I actually named as being directly involved in 9/11 and who were arrested and held for some considerable time by the New Jersey Police and  who found evidence of explosives etc!!


There would  be many drones armed with hellfire missiles that clearly would have painted on their warheads those that took part in this terrible event:

George Bush Jnr – Donald Rumbsfeld – Dick Cheney and obviously Larry Silverstein etc………..too many to mention………I guess they could run short of missiles or chalk in naming all those devout American Patriots???  who participated in the biggest false flag event ever witnessed.


The President and Government have now clearly paved the way to spy and attack any country worldwide in pursuit of its imaginary CIA conceived Al Queda………….”To Hell with Sovereignty and Democracy”.


How would the US feel if some other country in the Middle East or Far East sent drones over the US to target the masterminds behind the many false flag attacks (western derived terrorism)  that have taken place in their countries………so hypocritical don’t you think?


Come on you sheeples……when are you going to wake up and bring these scumbags before the court and allow true justice to take place?…………….alas you have now allowed your congress to approve the usage of drones to overfly every major city in the US…….all in the name of “Homeland Security”…………..such is your fate!!!

Peter Eyre -14/2/2013

Broadcaster – Investigative Journalist – Middle East Consultant – Political Analysis

Written by Peter Eyre

February 14, 2013 at 03:16

Posted in Corporate/Government Fraud and Corruption, News

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Hypocrisy of The New World Order and its Assault on Islamic Nations – Part 6

with 2 comments

The Hypocrisy of The New World Order and its Assault on Islamic Nations – Part 6

How the west is  hell-bent on killing and maiming its own troops and millions of innocent civilians


Chinook 1

Hold your breath guys this dust is deadly!!

Chinook 2

Being ex military myself, we have all disembarked from helicopters amidst a cloud of dust but did we ever give thought to the fact that this secondary contamination was laced with millions of radioactive nano particles or other carcinogenic additives from our own allied “Dirty Weapons.”?

Were Coalition Forces exposed to Chemical and Biological Weapons supplied to Iraq by our own governments during the Gulf War?


Iraqi Scud Missile

It is fact that Saddam used CBW warheads in his Scud Missiles which resulted in 40 Scuds being launched against Israel and 46 against Saudi Arabia.

Patriot missile intercepting Iraqi Scud. Riyadh 1991.01.20

Patriot missile intercepting Iraqi Scud overhead Riyadh 1991.01.20

Did anyone give thought to the fact that in carrying out intercepts overhead such cities could/would cause its CBW contents to consume the city below?

Scud shot down

Another successful Scud intercept but was it? – The warhead is missing – Did it explode and if so was it CBW?



Were Coalition Forces injected with potentially fatal/harmful vaccines during the Gulf War?

You bet they were!!!

We have heard our respective governments give reference to “Gulf War Syndrome” and how it has been blamed on a combination of stress disorders and atmospheric pollution associated with oil field fires etc etc but never have they admitted to it being directly associated with their own extensive use of depleted uranium weapons, their own troop vaccination programme or the fact that many were exposed to Chemical and Biological Weapons that were delivered via Saddam’s Scud Missiles.

Although they tell us no CBW were ever found in Iraq it is fact that such munitions/stockpiles were destroyed by coalition air attacks or on the ground by controlled demolition resulting in their contents becoming airborne.

We have already covered the fact that the Chemical and Biological technology was supplied , funded and in some cases built by western governments with the US and UK playing a major role.

Don’t you find it most offensive and hypocritical to know that our governments supplied most of the above knowing that Saddam had used CBW on the Kurds in Halabja, the Iranians during the Iraq-Iran war and furthermore knew at the outbreak of the Gulf War that Saddam could and would use the technology that we in the west had supplied!!

Add to this the fact that the British Government and in particular the Ministry of Defence had intentionally withheld evidence that Saddam had used their CBW technology on Coalition Troops during the many Scud Missile raids………..it is also fact that the government and MoD had been pre warned about the severe risks associated with the vaccinations that were about to be injected into all the troops participating in the Gulf War.

When one now looks at the many deaths and severely debilitating illnesses that war vets around the globe have endured it is unspeakable that our respective governments refuse to accept that it is they that put the troops in harms way and directly caused many of the health problems that continue to kill or maim our war vets………that in itself is clearly in breach of the Geneva Convention and is  one of many war crimes our leaders and governments have committed.

Just think that every-time the troops entered the war zones they were immediately at risk from our own vaccinations, our own weapons and also were likely to succumb to the technology that our governments had given Saddam when they were trying to secure more crude oil and more contracts!!

I can recall someone recently asking me what was the purpose of all these articles…………..obviously it is to reveal just how hypocritical and two faced our governments are when it comes to their own imperialistic greed…………it is also obvious that our troops have no value whatsoever and are sent on these “Suicide Missions”……not in the name of democracy or some other humanitarian cause but purely to enforce their own “Geo Political Plan” into forcing a regime change or securing someone else’ s natural resources.

Lets now look at what some of the vets themselves were reporting, in their own words followed by evidence that the vaccination programme was not only deeply flawed but highly dangerous to those that received these multiple injections:

Below is extracted from Nexus Magazine, Volume 4. 5(August-September 1997).
PO Box 30, Mapleton Qld 4560 Australia


Biological Black Magic

Already, more than 10,000 are dead and 250,000 are sick from Gulf War syndrome. What secret is so terrible (or embarrassing) that necessitates a cover-up of the facts?


The air raid siren went off.” Former Royal Air Force Corporal Richie Turnbull wheezed and coughed as he spoke. He is one of tens of thousands of Gulf War veterans who have been diagnosed with a fistful of illnesses attributed to service in the Gulf War. These include emphysema, angina, asthma, arteriosclerosis, arthritis, short-term memory loss, muscle wasting, cough syncope and numerous other debilitating ailments. Before deployment to the Gulf, Turnbull was an accomplished and superbly fit sub-aqua diver. Today, he walks with the aid of canes, slowly.

With understandable pride he told me how he had “proved Soames to be a liar three times”. The reference was to the former Conservative Minister of State for the Armed Forces, the Honourable Nicholas Soames, MP. Many vets uncharitably call the former minister “Fatty Soames”, owing to his handsome girth. The appellation reflects the seething contempt of an individual whom vets regard as one of the principal architects of a monstrous transatlantic cover-up.

Turnbull was an RAF Senior Electrician in a Nuclear, Biological & Chemical (NBC) unit and an experienced instructor on NBC equipment. He was stationed at the giant military base located at Dhahran on the night of 20 January 1991, when air raid sirens began wailing madly. Incoming Scud missiles were detected and a nearby US Patriot battery fired off intercept missiles. One of the missiles downed the Scud which landed a mere 400 yards from Turnbull. The impact left an eight-foot-deep crater but, curiously, the giant ground-to-ground missile did not explode.

“All the nerve agent detectors sounded the alarm,” Turnbull recalls. As an NBC expert he ran three tests which confirmed the presence of “G agent”, otherwise known as Sarin-the deadly nerve agent developed by the Nazis in World War II. Turnbull ran a further three “residual vapour detector tests” which also showed the presence of nerve agents. In all, he says, “thirty-three items of equipment showed that chemical weapons had been detected”.1

“NBC Condition Black” was sounded and everyone on the base rushed to don their NBC “Noddy” suits. Incredibly, 20 minutes later an all-clear siren (“NBC Condition White”) sounded and troops removed their protective clothing accordingly. Twenty minutes later “NBC Condition Black” sounded again, and remained in force for a further eight hours.

Turnbull, who says he is “absolutely certain it was a chemical weapon attack”, is understandably angry. Sounding the all-clear when nerve agents were shown to be present was, he says, “the biggest cock-up in history”. Hundreds of troops were needlessly exposed to Sarin, he believes.2

Turnbull continues to be a thorn in the side of Britain’s Ministry of Defence (MoD) and the US Department of Defense (DoD). Both maintain that chemical weapons were not intentionally used by Iraq’s Saddam Hussein. A spokesman at the MoD had earlier told me that he was a Royal Navy officer and was “in theatre” during the Gulf War. He went on to assure me personally that had the Iraqis intentionally used chemical and biological (CB) weapons “we would have retaliated in kind”-an allusion to US President Bush’s threat to retaliate with a nuclear strike if Saddam Hussein unleashed his prodigious chemical armoury on coalition troops.

In the event, it was an empty threat-old-fashioned political rhetoric dished out for the folks at home.


Faced with mounting evidence of chemical weapons exposure by coalition troops, both the British and US governments belatedly acknowledge that chemical weapons dumps were bombed, or otherwise destroyed, by coalition forces. They even acknowledge that the resulting plume of toxic material, blown by the wind, is likely to have exposed many thousands of coalition troops to these deadly agents. In other words, it was an unforeseen accident. This admission is known in intelligence parlance as a “limited hangout”-a technique designed to show that they are now telling the truth. They are not.

Pat Eddington, a former CIA intelligence analyst, in his book, Gassed in the Gulf, scathingly uncovers the institutionalised dishonesty within the CIA and the DoD over Gulf War Syndrome (GWS).3 Reasonably, he argues that based on the increasing number of vets prepared to speak of their experiences, it is clear beyond all doubt that coalition forces came under a series of Iraqi chemical and biological weapons attacks.4 Like Admiral Nelson placing a telescope over his blind eye, then exclaiming he can “see no ships”, the Mandarins in Whitehall and Washington are willfully blind to what they don’t care to acknowledge. Yet, the evidence is overwhelming.

Ray Bristow had served 20 years with the Territorial Army. When not involved with his TA duties, Bristow was an operating theatre technician at his local hospital. He was mobilised on 27 December 1990, promoted to a Warrant Officer, and sent to the 32 Field Hospital located at Wadi al Batin, just a few kilometres away from the town of Hafar al Batin.5 On 19 January 1991 he and other personnel watched as a Scud missile roared overhead and exploded in an airburst. He could clearly see a cloud of vapour discharge from the Scud. The NBC alarms (known as NAIADS), scattered around the base, wailed loudly, alerting the troops of “NBC Condition Black”. “We were Scudded,” Bristow said, and the specialised equipment detected the presence of chemical agents.6

Also present at Wadi al Batin that evening was former Sergeant Shaun Rusling. Previously with 23 Para Regiment’s 5 Airborne Field Ambulance, Rusling was an experienced Special Forces medic. His duties were to attend to the sick and wounded of Britain’s One Armoured Brigade. This soon grew to encompass caring for other coalition forces and Iraqi casualties, too. He watched the Scud explosion and saw the cloud of vapour bloom overhead. He also believes the unit came under artillery attack with rounds containing chemical weapons.7

Numerous boxes of 155-mm chemical ammunition were secretly recovered by coalition troops in the Kuwait Theatre of Operations (KTO) during the ground war and subsequent mopping-up operations. Made in the USA, they had been supplied to Iraq via Jordan.

Nor were Scud and artillery bombardments isolated incidents. Terry Walker was a Corporal with the Royal Army Ordnance Corp and detached to a “Forward Repair Group” of an armoured workshop. He was present at Al Jubayl when two Scuds exploded above them.  No prior warning was sounded. This, he recalls, was “the worst morning with two almighty explosions above the Port”. Immediately chemical detectors madly sounded “NBC Condition Black”, and this was “followed by sheer panic with hundreds of guys running for cover”. Walker hid among the rocks of the Port “for about four five hours”. Later, “an officer came along saying we’ve been hit with chemical agents”. The next day he and the other personnel on the base were told the cloud vapour was nothing more than aircraft fuel leaking from a damaged plane-an explanation he and the others disbelieve. Aviation fuel does not trigger the NAIAD detectors. Today, Walker suffers from a number of illnesses and strongly believes there has been a massive cover-up. “My wife is ill and my little girl is ill, too,” he said during a telephone interview, then added that his “medical notes from the RAF hospital have gone missing”.

The Al Jubayl attack was also witnessed by Sergeant-Major Paul Grant who commanded a team of Royal Army Ordnance Corp specialists. In the early hours of 19 January 1991, Grant was awoken by a distinctive overhead explosion. He is in no doubt whatsoever that this was an airburst, not a ground explosion. NAIADS detectors began sounding “NBC Condition Black”. The first explosion was followed by a second airburst explosion. Around the base loudspeakers warned, “This is not a drill!” His story corroborates those of other vets I have interviewed. However, Scud chemical attacks were not limited to Al Jubayl.9


Yet despite this testimony, these and other vets continue to be treated with official contempt. As recently as January 1997, the Countess of Mar posed a parliamentary question in the House of Lords which asked if the MoD had any “documentary evidence of chemical warfare” in the Gulf conflict-a curious question which was limited only to chemical attack. Questions regarding the use of biological weapons remain unutterable. In his reply, the Earl Howe stated that research conducted by the MoD “does not indicate any confirmed use of chemical warfare agents during the conflict”-which is an even more curious answer.

Who, conceivably, could confirm the use of chemical weapons other than those trained soldiers present during a chemical attack? Likewise, the tens of thousands of “detections” triggered by chemical agent detectors throughout the conflict are simply categorised as “alleged detections” which were “uncorroborated at the time”. Again, a careful and deceitful choice of words.10,11

But behind the intentional use of chemical agents by Iraq lurks a far more sinister story which hitherto has not being told in any detail. Biological weapons, unlike chemical agents, don’t just kill on the battlefield: survivors returning home carry with them the potential seeds of destruction. These, in turn, can infect the families of Gulf War vets-a situation that is now occurring.

Importantly, the British and US governments were well aware of the potential use of both chemical and biological weapons by Saddam Hussein. They had, after all, supplied him with the wherewithal to develop his ferocious CB armoury. This included sophisticated equipment together with the necessary chemical precursors and biological cultures.

This knowledge led the British and US governments to vaccinate their troops with a ‘cocktail’ designed to protect them against both chemical and biological attack. Vaccines given to coalition troops included, amongst others, anthrax, botulism and bubonic plague. Cultures for all three were supplied to Iraq by the US Government during the middle/late 1980s for use in Iraq’s CB weapons program.12


“British personnel were infected with anthrax spores,” spoke Angus Parker with quiet certainty. I had interviewed a number of Gulf War veterans who recounted their experiences of coming under CB attack from the Iraqis. All are angry and frustrated at the stonewalling attitude of Britain’s Ministry of Defence regarding their numerous illnesses which fall under the catch-all banner of Gulf War Syndrome. Eventually, one vet gave me a telephone number, saying, “You should speak to Angus.”

Initially, Angus Parker was cautious, but after a few minutes he warmed to his story. Methodically, he first outlined for me the existing Soviet battlefield doctrine associated with Scud missiles armed with chemical and biological weapons. This is known, Parker said, as “a mixed load”. The Scud warhead would typically consist of a deathly combination of explosives and chemical and biological agents of mixed intensities. The quantity of explosives would be small, but sufficient to ensure that the CB mixture would form a wide vapour plume over the target.

A former soldier in the Territorial Army, Angus Parker operated for a top-secret British unit. He has never before gone on record with his story, but frustration mixed with growing anger has led him to “blow this wide open”.

Following the injection of 12 vaccines in one morning, Parker suffered an adverse reaction. As a result he was hospitalised and his deployment to the Gulf delayed. “I was left behind and got out on the last days of the ground war,” he said. This and his civilian occupation as a technician in a haematology lab resulted in his being attached to the 1st Field Laboratory Unit, known as “The Secret Team”. The unit “existed only once before in World War I, but was mothballed until the Gulf War,” Parker stated, adding that when he returned from the Gulf he was told that “I was not to disclose the nature or role of the team I was serving with”. So secret was the unit, he said, that “it does not appear in any listing”.13,14

What Angus Parker has revealed is extremely disturbing. The 1st Field Laboratory Unit was composed of 40 men working in eight teams of five. It was deployed from Porton Down, Britain’s biological warfare headquarters. Parker, ranked Sergeant, was second in command of one of the five-man teams. “As the biological warfare reconnaissance team, we were sampling the environment looking for biological weapons,” he said, adding that “this was difficult and hard to do. We could only identify four agents: plague, anthrax, botulism toxin A and B-that’s all.” The specialised equipment they had to work with to identify bio-weapons was not very sophisticated.

Parker has confirmed that his unit found numerous positive samples of biological organisms that couldn’t be analysed and identified on the battlefield. “Many, many more were present” than the four they could identify. Positive samples were collected and shipped in freezer units to Boscombe Down for analysis by the Porton Down CB specialists.

Significantly, in addition to confirming that his unit positively identified the presence of anthrax at Dhahran, Parker also revealed that another team of the 1st Field Laboratory Unit identified the presence of plague at Wadi al Batin.

Angus Parker has tried in vain to get other members of his unit to come forward and speak openly, but they are too scared to do so. “They’re not sick and still have their jobs,” he explained.

Parker is not alone in revealing the use of biological weapons in the Gulf War. US Marine Corps battlefield logs released under the Freedom of Information Act confirm the findings of Porton Down’s “Secret Team”. On 24 February 1991, the US Army’s 513th Military Intelligence Brigade confirmed the use of anthrax at King Khalid Military City.15

However, like events in Britain, important and potentially incriminating records have mysteriously gone “missing”. Two US Marines at Camp Pendleton, San Diego, have gone public to say they observed “hundreds of records from the Gulf War being destroyed”.16 This and numerous other accounts of records being “destroyed” and going “missing” can only lead to charges of a massive “Gulf-Wargate” cover-up.


A 1994 Senate Report, entitled “Arming Iraq: The Export of Biological Materials and the Health of Gulf War Veterans”, underscores the biological threat possessed by the Iraqis. More often referred to as “the Riegle Report”, named after its author, Donald J. Riegle, Jr, the Report itemises biological cultures supplied to Iraq by the US. Riegle and his team identified no less than 61 batches of biologically hazardous materials exported to Iraq. “Between the years 1985 and 1989, the United States Government approved the sales of quantities of potentially lethal biological agents that could have been cultured and grown in very large quantities in an Iraqi biological warfare program,” Riegle stated. These included pathogenic materials, “which means disease-producing items, and toxigenic, meaning poisonous items.”17 The Report added that “we were not able to get any records prior to 1985”. Riegle then included an extract from a Department of Defense summary report written in 1992:

“By the time of the invasion of Kuwait, Iraq had developed biological weapons. Its advanced and aggressive biological warfare program was the most advanced in the Arab world. The program probably began in the 1970s and concentrated on the development of two agents, botulinum toxin and anthrax bacteria… Delivery means for biological agents ranged from simple aerial bombs and artillery rockets to surface-to-surface missiles.”

Other biological agents provided by the US to Saddam Hussein’s biological warfare program included Histoplasma capsulatum, which can cause symptoms resembling tuberculosis and lead to the enlargement of the liver and spleen as well as anaemia and skin disease-symptoms that many veterans now exhibit. Another organism was Brucella melitensis, which, when ‘weaponised’, causes chronic fatigue, profuse sweating and loss of appetite, joint pains, insomnia and nausea, and can potentially result in major damage to the vital organs. Again, these symptoms reflect the conditions experienced by thousands of Gulf War veterans. In addition to the foregoing, shipments to Iraq also included “E. coli and genetic materials, human and bacterial DNA”.18

Furious at the way the Department of Defense has side-stepped these disgraceful issues, Riegle fired off a volley of letters to various officials. One letter identified that the “average cost” of each of the various biological specimens shipped to Iraq was “less than $60.00” and that they were “acquired from a not-for-profit organization”.19

Stories also circulating of a genetically engineered organism being used in the Gulf War are paralleled by stories from British veterans who also claim the use of a modified mycoplasma organism. These vets include Angus Parker who had earlier said it was “an infectious organism manufactured in the US”. Oddly enough, this is one of the enduring aspects of the “Octopus” story involving engineered bio-organisms supplied to Iraq by the Wackenhut Corporation, the giant US private-sector security company whose board of directors reads like a roll call of military and intelligence alumni. It is an allegation supported by US investigative journalist Carol Marshall in her manuscript, “The Last Circle”.20

Marshall has spent years investigating the allegations of Michael Riconosciuto-a former CIA scientific whiz-kid. Riconosciuto claimed that while working for the Wackenhut Corporation at its Cabazon Indian Reservation facility he developed advanced and genetically altered biological warfare agents. One such agent, he alleged, was a “race-specific” organism, genetically engineered to attack certain races or groups. Unleashed it could kill or render ill all those of a particular ethnic group, leaving others entirely unharmed.

Clearly, the possibility of genetically modified bio-weapons having been used in the Gulf War cannot be entirely ruled out.21

Significantly, in the US Army War College publication entitled “The Revolution in Military Affairs and Conflict Short of War” (dated July 25, 1994), authors Steven Metz and James Kievit also discuss this touchy subject. On page 16 they state: “Certain biotechnical weapons-considered by some to violate the biological warfare convention to which the United States is a signatory-also may transgress American values regarding appropriate means.” They go on to ask: “Could the government and military of this multi-ethnic republic face charges that it was developing or using a weapon targeting Africans, Jews Koreans, Hispanics, etc.?” The authors then conclude that, “Overcoming these constraints…would require fundamental changes in the United States-an ethical and political revolution may be necessary to make a military revolution.” This, the authors “hypothesise”, could be achieved by remodelling the way Americans think, and also via the effective control of news management using “advanced psychotechnology” and other techniques such a “morphing”.


If genetically engineered biological weapons are now available, it is certain that there will have been developed the necessary antidotes in the form of vaccines. All of the vets I interviewed for this article spoke of the large number of vaccines with which they were injected.

Shaun Rusling received 24 vaccinations over a four-week period. Two of these vaccinations were classified secret, and were “experimental”, he believes.

Richard Turnbull got a dose of 13 inoculations in just 10 minutes. Four of them were unidentified and classified secret. He also believes them to have been experimental.

Ray Bristow was informed in a letter from Brigadier McDermott of the MoD that some of his injections were also classified. Later he was informed by the Surgeon General, Admiral Revell, that this was not the case and that Brigadier McDermott’s statement was incorrect.

How many vaccines were classified secret? The Surgeon General, Vice Admiral Revell, during a “behind closed doors” meeting of Parliament’s Defence Committee, was asked, “How many vaccines do we not admit to?” He replied, saying, “I think probably about five or six.” 22

All previously classified vaccines were declassified on 10 December 1996, according to a letter dated 20 January 1997 from the Ministry of Defence. A spokesman at the MoD confirmed this in a telephone call on Friday 30 May 1997, adding that there were only three vaccines that had ever been classified. He told me these were: anthrax, pertussis and plague. This statement is confirmed in a letter to Shaun Rusling, dated 20 January 1997, in which the MoD confided that “the vaccines you were given against potential biological warfare threats were anthrax, pertussis (as an adjuvant) and plague. These are the only vaccinations which have ever been classified.” This is a far cry from the testimony of Surgeon General Revell in the closed-door hearings of the Defence Committee in which he said there were “five or six” vaccines which were “not admitted to”.

I posed this discrepancy to the Ministry of Defence. Surgeon General Revell’s testimony before the Defence Committee was “a misunderstanding”, the MoD spokesman said. Despite this “misunderstanding”, the medical records of Corporal Richard Turnbull clearly state that four vaccines-not three-were classified secret.

Turnbull is not alone in this respect. Ray Bristow’s list of shots, including anthrax (batch no. 0190), plague (batch no. 10H03A) and pertussis adjuvant (batch no. B1868a)-to name just those three that were officially classified-also detail two other vaccines labelled “biological”. These are still classified secret and their contents remain “unknown”. The story is identical for Shaun Rusling, even down to the same batch numbers of the vaccines he received.23

The Surgeon General, Vice Admiral Revell, stated in one letter that, “Unfortunately, medical record-keeping in the Gulf was not as thorough as it should have been…” and, as a consequence, details of certain vaccinations are now missing-a position that remains the government’s official line.

A number of veterans now believe they have been used as unwitting guinea pigs and are deeply concerned at what precisely may have been pumped into them. Once again, Porton Down’s Angus Parker dropped another bombshell. Patiently, he explained that “the MoD has not been totally honest about the vaccines used against us”. I couldn’t help but catch his use of the word “against” us instead of “on” us. Clearly, he now considers the Ministry of Defence and others in the Whitehall bureaucracy to be bitter enemies-and he is by no means alone in holding that view. A few vets repeatedly warned me that the “Security Services” are paying them close attention. Some have had their phones tapped and others experience peculiar mail delivery problems.

Meanwhile, Parker went on to reveal the chemical structure of one of the apparently ‘still not admitted to’ vaccines. “There is an experimental vaccine-an AIDS vaccine,” he said. This “has been around since approximately 1990.” He went on to explain that this vaccine contains two components. One component is known as a “cytokine” which, Parker said, is an “immune potentiator”. It works like a “chemical messenger sent between different cells in the body”. When it detects a foreign organism, “it actually stimulates a response by the human immune system” to fight and hopefully destroy the alien organism present.

Parker’s analysis of this component was confirmed by a spokesman for London’s Biochemical Society, who added that it was “feasible” that cytokines could be “purified and cloned” and used to fight “against any agent”. The spokesman added, moreover, that cytokines were very “hush-hush”, were “cutting-edge technology”, and “logically” would have been “adopted by the military”. They were, she added, “experimental”.

According to Parker, the second component consisted of experimental HIV gene envelopes. He went on to explain one of the basic problems with this experimental vaccine. Whereas cytokines readily drop out of the body after awhile, “fragments” of the HIV genes do not. Although there may have been “good operational reasons” for topping up the vaccine with HIV genes, Parker acknowledged that no one knows the long-term consequences. “It was experimental,” he emphasised, and had been originally developed by Porton Down as an AIDS vaccine.24,25

The question of HIV gene envelopes was put to the Biochemical Society’s spokesman, who stated that these envelopes “can be created to be specifically resistant to CBW”. The spokesman went on to explain that gene envelopes are effectively the “walls” that surround the nucleus of each cell and are thus the first line of defence against diseases-whether they be naturally acquired or as a result of CB weapons attack. HIV gene envelopes are among the most powerful and resistant known to science, she added.

Professor Beverley of the Edward Jenner Institute for Vaccine Research could think of no theoretical reason why HIV gene envelopes would be used other than to “stimulate a response against HIV”. He went on to speculate that had HIV gene envelopes been used in a vaccine, logically this would only have occurred as protection against a possible attack using HIV as a bio-weapon. There was, he felt, no other conceivable reason, but added that had such a vaccine been “given to Gulf War soldiers it would have been speculative”.

The picture that emerges is confusing. The use of cytokines does have a rational explanation, for cytokines trigger the body’s immune system. As such, they could be an ideal general vaccine for use in a CB warfare setting. However, the rationale behind using HIV gene envelopes is less certain and considerably more perplexing. Unfortunately, there is not enough detailed information available in regard to the HIV gene envelopes to reach anything but a speculative conclusion.

Some weeks prior to my interview with Professor Beverley, Angus Parker told me in a throwaway comment, “I don’t even want to get into AIDS as a weapon.” At that time, nor did I. Professor Beverley’s certitude that this is the only conceivable reason why HIV gene envelopes would have been used, leaves a sour taste in my mouth.

However, for clarity’s sake, I leave the last word with Angus Parker. Told of Professor Beverley’s theory, he remained adamant that there was another reason why HIV gene envelopes had been used. His information, he insisted, came directly from the horse’s mouth, and I am inclined to accept what he has revealed. At the outbreak of the Gulf War there were not enough stocks of cytokines to go around; thus, a decision was made to top them up with the HIV gene envelopes which, he assured me, act in a very similar fashion to cytokines in that they trigger the body’s immune system. Significantly, Professor Beverley confirmed this when he said that “they do indeed trigger and regulate the way the body relates to pathogens”.26

Clearly, Parker’s revelations-if proved true-are stunning.27 The secret use of an experimental vaccine on British military personnel may be one of the most significant reasons why the Ministry of Defence continues to stonewall vets about the vaccines they received. To admit to involuntary human testing on such a sensitive issue will lead to a public relations disaster of huge proportions. As one ill vet told me, “I was ordered to volunteer” for the shots. He now wishes he hadn’t. The second potential reason clearly opens a can of worms about the possible development of HIV as a biological weapon.28


But there are other equally powerful reasons to keep the lid on the Gulf War Syndrome story. Pat Eddington, the former CIA analyst, has no doubt that the principal reason for the US Government’s stonewalling tactic is to cover up the supply of CB weapons to Iraq prior to the Gulf War. For the US Government to admit to such cynical irresponsibility would result in public outrage, Eddington says.

Eddington also chastises the Senate whose members selfishly refuse to act against the wishes of the Pentagon. Their delinquency of duty has resulted in the side-lining of in excess of 100,000 Gulf War veterans who now exhibit a range of symptoms typical of chemical, and, in some cases, biological attack. In this ‘business as usual’ scenario, Eddington also reserves some powder and shot for the major media who are largely willing to accept, at face value, the cloying PR handouts from the Department of Defense.

Hopelessly abandoned by one and all, many thousands of vets have now died as a result of their chemically inspired battle injuries, adding even more incentive to the Pentagon to continue the cover-up.

But in the final analysis, the reasons surrounding the British and US governments’ disgraceful obfuscation are many. Certainly, the prior supply of CB weapons to Iraq is enough to make many government officials quake with the fear of disgrace. It is a similar rationale that continues to eclipse the illegal use of experimental, unlicensed and highly sensitive drugs. Not least, however, is the knowledge that defence against chemical and biological weapons attacks is utterly shambolic. Pat Eddington states that CBW protective suits and gas masks are: “…(a) notoriously defective, and (b) in very short supply-two problems that have yet to be corrected more than six years later.” He adds, “That’s not something the Pentagon wants to advertise to the likes of Hashemi-Rafsanjani, Kim Jong Il or Colonel Qadhafi.”29

Yet few can doubt that the intelligence services of Iran, North Korea or Libya are already aware of the published shortcomings of American and British CBW protective equipment. A more significant fear may be the realisation inside the Pentagon and the Ministry of Defence that their own troops will be less than willing to wade into a future CB battle zone virtually buck-naked.

Armed only with an uncertain dose of HIV but the certain knowledge that-thanks to the grace of greed and military commercialism-those chemical and biological organisms you are about to inhale and absorb have “made at home” stencilled all over them, would you volunteer for military service?

About the Author:
Born in England, David Guyatt is a freelance investigative journalist whose former career as an executive in international banking and finance provided the background that inspired his research into the shady world of international weapons financing, narcotics trafficking and money laundering.

He has worked with the International Committee of the Red Cross on weapons-related projects; the charity pressure-group World Development Movement on British arms financing; and the leading British TV documentary program, World in Action.

David Guyatt’s current research interests include military/ intelligence mind-control programs and non-lethal weapons systems, as well as the hidden influence of elitist groups around the globe.


1. The CB attack on Dhahran on 20 January 1991 is confirmed in US CENTCOM battlefield logs obtained under FOIA. Delivery was via a Scud missile.
2. Telephone interview with this writer, dated 12 May 1997.
3. Eddington, Pat, Gassed in the Gulf, Insignia Publishing Co., Washington, DC, USA, 1997 (http://www.InsigniaUSA.com)
4. Eddington convincingly argues&emdash;based on captured Iraqi documents&emdash;that chemical and bio-warfare agents were used in non-lethal doses. This explains why coalition troops did not keel over and die immediately. Iraqi CB doctrine was to use low but repetitive doses, which they calculated would produce greater long-term damage, Eddington says.
5. US CENTCOM logs confirmed a later Scud attack on Hafar al Batin on 14 February 1991.
6. Telephone interview with this writer, dated 13 May 1997.
7. Telephone interview with this writer, dated 13 May 1997.
8. The Al Jubayl incident is the most comprehensively documented case of CB attack by the Iraqis. Records obtained under FOIA indicate that Scuds were not used. Delivery of the CB weapon was almost certainly as a result of aircraft penetration, possibly a Russian-manufactured Sukhoi SU-22 Fitter fighter-bomber.
9. Telephone interview with this writer, dated 15 May 1997.
10. Parliamentary Q & As in this writer’s possession.
11. A total of 55 incidents have been recorded to date by US CENTCOM logs. CB attacks began on 17 January 1991 and continued throughout the ground war in all major sectors.
12. See Report by Senator Donald J. Riegle to the US Senate, titled “Arming Iraq: The Export of Biological Materials and the Health of Gulf War Veterans”, dated 9 February 1994. Bacillus anthracis cohn and Clostridium botulinum type A cultures were shipped on 2 May 1988. In all, Riegle was able to identify no less than 61 biological cultures supplied to Iraq between 1985-89. Some of these included human gene clones.
13. Telephone interviews with this writer, dated 13 and 14 May 1997.
14. I have been given a copy of an MoD written statement regarding the 1st Field Laboratory Unit which states: “We can confirm that this unit operated in the Gulf. Its primary task was related to the detection of biological warfare agents, of which there was a real and compelling threat. As part of their work they were monitoring the effectiveness of the biological immunisation programme.”
15. Bernstein, Dennis, “Gulf War Syndrome Covered Up”, Covert Action Quarterly, no. 43, Winter 1992/3.
16. ibid.
17. “Riegle Report”, p. 3.
18. op. cit., p. 5.
19. Donald J. Riegle’s letter to William Perry, US Defense Secretary, dated 9 February 1994.
20. Carol Marshall’s manuscript, “The Last Circle”, running to 140 pages, is a comprehensive investigation into the so-called “Octopus”.
21. Significantly, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) is concerned about the development of “genetic weapons” and fears that “the possibility exists for their misuse for political ends”. The ICRC warns that developments of gene/race-specific weapons may or could be taking place. See “Expert Meeting on Certain Weapon Systems and on Implementation Mechanisms in International War”, ICRC, Geneva, Switzerland, July 1994.
22. A copy of this memorandum is in my possession.
23. The only difference is that Rusling received a hepatitis B jab, whereas Bristow received hepatitis A. In all other respects their lists of vaccines are identical&emdash;including two that remain classified.
24. Parker states that he has received confirmation of the use of the HIV gene vaccine from a well-placed and extremely knowledgeable source, whom he is unable to identify.
25. I understand Porton Down denies any involvement in HIV research, but see notes below.
26. I couldn’t help but note the use of the plural&emdash;a usage that seems inconsistent with his otherwise firm statement. It had taken me two days and numerous phone calls before I was finally able to make contact with Professor Beverley. I had been given his number by an individual working in the field of immunology. Unbeknownst to me at the time, this individual had contacted Porton Down, revealing the interest and direction of my questions; a fact she revealed the following day when I phoned back with an additional question. Meanwhile, Angus Parker was told, via a circuitous route, that the MoD was very “displeased” with him for talking to me. A paranoid may well consider that two days “in the world of shadows” is a very long time indeed.
27. They also raise the question of why Britain’s top-secret bio-warfare lab is involved in developing an AIDS vaccine. The possibility that AIDS has been ‘weaponised’ (apparently a technical possibility) is an old and largely discounted story attributed to a Cold War disinformation campaign.
28. Perhaps a ‘red herring’?
29. Correspondence with this writer.

End of article


Finally we now have the “icing on the cake” evidence to prove that not only did the British Government and Department of Defence  know of the dangers of the military vaccination programme this highly sensitive memo also clearly states that when Anthrax and Pertussis vaccines were tested alone they were not associated with an unusual degree of toxicity at single dose level. However,  when combined there was evidence of severe loss of condition and weight loss in animals .

Pay particular attention to the paragraph in the article above which admits to the vaccination of Anthrax and Pertussis amongst many others….here is that paragraph again:

All previously classified vaccines were declassified on 10 December 1996, according to a letter dated 20 January 1997 from the Ministry of Defence. A spokesman at the MoD confirmed this in a telephone call on Friday 30 May 1997, adding that there were only three vaccines that had ever been classified. He told me these were: anthrax, pertussis and plague. This statement is confirmed in a letter to Shaun Rusling, dated 20 January 1997, in which the MoD confided that “the vaccines you were given against potential biological warfare threats were anthrax, pertussis (as an adjuvant) and plague. These are the only vaccinations which have ever been classified.” This is a far cry from the testimony of Surgeon General Revell in the closed-door hearings of the Defence Committee in which he said there were “five or six” vaccines which were “not admitted to”.

Now read on and note the interest/concern:

To continue

I would emphasise that these findings are preliminary but they do suggest that if used on man as a combined preparation and enhanced degree of reactagenicity could occur. The users of the vaccines may with to take these findings in consideration

Signed Head of the Division of Bacteriology

It is also relevant to publish the reference to the above that was raised in Westminster under Hansard which clearly backs up the above memo but at the same time did not extend further:


Gulf War 1990–91: Vaccines

Lord Morris of Manchester asked Her Majesty’s Government:

Whether they will now publish in the Official Report the terms in which the then Deputy Chief Medical Officer, Dr Metters, advised the Ministry of Defence of his concerns, and those of the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, about combining the anthrax and pertussis vaccines in immunising troops deploying to the 1990–91 Gulf conflict.[HL40]

Lord Bach: I refer my noble friend to my Written Answer on 9 October (Official Report, cols. WA 67–WA 78), specifically, paragraphs 5 to 8 of Annex A reproduced therein. Dr Metter’s fax to the MoD said:

 “We have previously discussed the anxieties my experts have about the simultaneous administration of anthrax and pertussis vaccine.

18 Dec 2003 : Column WA177

 There are no such studies in humans that I am aware of, but you may wish to see the enclosed fax which I have just received from [name omitted] of the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control which reports on animal studies they have carried out.

 I think you [sic] Medical department needs to be aware of these preliminary results”. The “enclosed fax”, a letter from the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control to Dr Metters, said:

 “As you will know, we have recently carried out abnormal toxicity testing in laboratory animals on certain batches of B. anthracis and pertussis vaccine. When each of the two vaccines were tested alone they were not associated with an unusual degree of toxicity at single human dose level. However, when combined there was evidence of severe loss of condition and weight loss  in animals.

I would emphasise that these findings are preliminary but they do suggest that if used in man as a combined preparation, an enhanced degree of reactagenicity could occur. The users of these vaccines may wish to take these findings in [sic] consideration.” The texts above were published by the MoD in the paper: Background to the Use of Medical Countermeasures to Protect British forces during the Gulf War dated October 1997, a copy of which is in the Library of the House. This paper is also available on the Internet at: http://www.mod.uk/issues/gulfwar/info/medical/mcm.htm and in hard copy as set out in my Answer of 20 November 2003 (Official Report, col. WA 341).

End of Hansard

To continue:

The second part of this memo was hand written by Dr. J.S. Metters to the Sec (o) (c)   MoD

You can clearly see that the experts had many anxieties about the use of Anthrax and Pertussis and that this hand written memo suggested that the MoD medical department should be made aware of the findings etc etc

Here is the evidence of those two memo’s:

Memo 1

Memo 2

I also came across this article that not only links conventional vaccination programmes to Autism but also has the same links to vaccinations given to troops all of which had one particular ingredient called Squalene (shark liver oil):


At first glance, Squalene doesn’t seem too bad given that humans produce some Squalene, but the purpose of shark squalene is to boost the immune system (adjuvant) in sharks.  Sharks are known to have an incredible immune system.

Do you want to know if a shark or other animal derivative is injected into your body?  Are you going to trust government bureaucrats on what gets injected into your body or that of your child?

Squalene can also be extracted from vegetables, but the vaccine squalene is shark derived.  Squalene supplements are popular in some herbal circles to help boost the immune system.  Do we really have any clue as to how squalene impacts our own immune systems or how it interacts with the other junk found in our vaccines?


I will leave this extract just for one moment and add this interesting article that indicated that the Governments denied using squalene ………… this article tells a different story:

Vaccines May Be Linked to Gulf War Syndrome

DOD to Review Possible Use of Illegal Additive -By Michael Devitt

Less than four months after its publication, the Department of Defense (DOD) has agreed to review a controversial study that appears to link Gulf War syndrome (GWS) with a banned substance used in experimental vaccines.

 The study, conducted by scientists at Tulane University Medical School, found that an overwhelming majority of sick veterans who had served in the Gulf War, and had received at least one vaccination, tested positive for antibodies to a naturally occurring substance called squalene. None of the healthy veterans in the study tested positive for squalene antibodies.

DoD officials originally dismissed the study as flawed and asserted that none of the vaccines administered during the Gulf War contained squalene. In response to pressure from Congress, however, the department has asked the Armed Forces Epidemiological Board (AFEB) to re-examine the study. The Institute of Medicine is also reviewing the research to see what role squalene may play in Gulf-related illnesses.

A naturally occurring molecule, squalene is produced by the human liver and plays a role in the metabolism of cholesterol. It is most commonly found in vegetable oils, shark liver oil,cosmetics and various health supplements.

Under normal circumstances, squalene is released into the blood to help combat physical injuries. However, people don’t usually have enough squalene in their blood to prompt the production of detectable levels of antibodies.

Since the late 1980s, squalene has been studied by the DoD and the National Institutes of Health as a possible adjuvant in vaccines. Because adjuvants boost the immune system’s response to foreign antibodies, the subtance has sparked the interest of researchers. Drug manufacturers, for their part, have incorporated adjuvants into vaccines in the belief that the substance will render the vaccine more effective.

Adjuvants, however, can sometimes trigger unwanted immune responses. While large-scale studies have yet to be conducted in humans, animal studies have shown that squalene adjuvants may generate autoimmune versions of arthritis and multiple sclerosis type-conditions that attack the body from within.2

Although they have been used in a number of vaccines worldwide, only one adjuvant – aluminum hydroxide – has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in vaccines in the United States. And although squalene-adjuvant vaccines have been used on laboratory animals and in experimental human tests, the FDA has not approved the general use of any vaccine containing squalene in the U.S.

“We Never Used Squalene in Vaccines”

Military officials have said all along that no Gulf War vaccines contained squalene. In August 1997, spokespersons for the DoD claimed that squalene “was not an adjuvant that was in any of the vaccines that were used by the Department of Defense,”3 and that “we never used squalene in vaccines” during the Gulf War. However, in a report4issued in March 1999, the General Accounting Office (GAD) – the investigative arm of Congress – stated:

We cannot say definitively whether or not Gulf War-era veterans were given vaccines with adjuvant formulations containing squalene for a number of reasons. Although DoD officials told us they did not administer such vaccines, they stated they did not have documentation on the process and results of decision-making related to the administration of vaccines at the time of the Gulf War. Also, some officials involved in the decisions were no longer employed with DoD at the time of our review, and we were either unable to locate them, or they declined to be interviewed.

A month after the GAO issued its 1999 report, the first hint that squalene might be linked to Gulf War syndrome appeared in an article in New Scientist magazine.5 Robert Garry, a virologist at Tulane University, tested more than 400 Gulf War veterans for antibodies to squalene and found that 95 percent of those with GWS had high levels of squalene antibodies.

Garry also tested a pair of volunteers who had received experimental herpes vaccines containing squalene in trials conducted by the National Institutes of Health. Both had high levels of squalene antibodies and also suffered from GWS-type symptoms.

In February, the peer-reviewed journal Experimental and Molecular Pathology6 published a study written by Garry’s team at Tulane University and Dr. Pamela Asa, an immunologist from Tennessee. Dr. Asa was one of the first health professionals to advance the theory that Gulf War syndrome might be an autoimmune disorder caused by experimental vaccinations.

The research included blinded and unblinded studies. In the blinded study, 56 Gulf War-era veterans and military personnel who were on active service in 1990-91 were tested for squalene. Of those 56, 38 had been deployed to the Persian Gulf and had GWS-type symptoms; 12 had been deployed but were healthy; and six had not been deployed but were nevertheless ill.

The researchers found that among the 38 ill veterans who had been deployed, 36 (94.7 percent) tested positive for squalene antibodies. None of the deployed healthy individuals, however, tested positive.

Furthermore, all six subjects who were ill, but had not been sent to the Gulf, also had squalene antibodies. While they did not serve in the war, they had received the same type and number of vaccinations given to Gulf War troops.

Approximately 700,000 Americans served in the Gulf War between 1990-91. One hundred and forty-eight Americans were killed in action; 467 were wounded. The Department of Veterans Affairs estimates that as many as 100,000 veterans may be suffering from Gulf War syndrome or related symptoms, and that approximately 6,500 soldiers have died since the war’s conclusion, including more than 1,300 soldiers between the ages of 18-24.


To continue with the original article:

Squalene is most interesting to me related to the Anthrax vaccine.  It seems the government denied, denied, denied that this vaccine even had squalene in it.  (I am having Deja-vu again).  This changed in 2004.  They act bewildered at how squalene got in the vaccine.  Give me a break, it actually was in there, but we have no idea how it could have gotten in there?  That alone instills loads of confidence in me.  Seeing how our troops have been treated in government run Veterans Administration hospitals, I would not be surprised at anything the government does now days. 

Did they spike the vaccine with squalene and use the troops as guinea pigs?

After years of repeated obfuscation, the federal government finally admitted that a banned chemical additive linked to the Gulf War syndrome has been found in some of the vaccines developed to protect military personnel from biological attack. – FDA Tests Fins Squalene in Anthrax Vaccine.

The article also gave some of the other ingredients/problems associated with current vaccines:


Adjuvants (immune response boosters)



Vaccine Contaminants:

One could spend weeks investigating each of the above ingredients but time does not allow and so one can only leave it up to each individual War Vet or parent to read between the lines and reach their own conclusion.

I came across this banner during my investigations and thought it summed up everything in such a simple way:


I am sure you would all agree that all of this is pretty convincing stuff and I would also add that I believe the author of the original memo who’s details have been removed was Dr. M Corbel who was head at the National Institute of  Biological Standards and Control. Dr. M Corbel has and continues to do much work for the WHO which as we all know is the health/medical arm of the New World order


You may or may not have noticed that in the large article printed above there is reference to a specific genes programme using CBW to attack the genes of certain races such as Afro, Chinese etc………this CBW programme was first initiated in both the UK and Rhodesia and just before  Magabe took over the then British Prime Minister, Maggie Thatcher, panicked and moved everything (lock stock and barrel) down to South Africa (including research staff) where further developments were made into  the “Black Only Bomb.” It is clear that behind closed doors the evil cabal are still working on such projects!

My final article Part 7 will cover the hypocrisy of the world’s Zionist controlled media and how they themselves sometimes slip up in their publications and accidentally expose the mindset of some of our leaders to much embarrassment!!

It is my intention to distribute this article to certain Members of Parliament in both the UK and Australia and in particular to UK Prime Minister, David Cameron  and Leader of the Opposition Ed Miliband- Australian Prime Minister, Julia Gillard and Leader of the Opposition, Tony Abbott  and many others for their comments based on the facts and evidence that is now available.

Hopefully with elections on the horizon in both the UK and Australia someone may just decide to hang out some dirty washing and get much support from the many war vets that continue to suffer and also from all the mums and dads of those victims!!

This article will also be sent to the respective War Vets organisations around the world and the British Legion etc etc

Peter Eyre -8/2/2013

Broadcaster – Investigative Journalist – Middle East Consultant – Political Analysis

Written by Peter Eyre

February 8, 2013 at 06:09

Posted in Corporate/Government Fraud and Corruption, News

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Hypocrisy of The New World Order and its Assault on Islamic Nations – Part 5

with 2 comments

The Hypocrisy of The New World Order and its Assault on Islamic Nations – Part 5



The Kurdish Genocide compliments of Chemical and Biological technology supplied by the US, UK and many other western countries


Iranian war dead as a direct result of the US, UK and other western governments giving Saddam Chemical and Biological Warfare Weapons

I find it rather sad that the Kurdish Regional Government are seeking a special day in memory of this tragic event and yet continue to have very close ties with the nations that supplied and set up Saddams CBW programme……The US played a significant role leading up to this genocide and the good old Brits actually built and funded Saddam laboratories …….with both assisting in the supply of the deadly ingredients.

Let me remind you of both the Iranian and Kurdish attacks carried out by Saddam:

In July 1988 Iraqi airplanes dropped chemical cyanide bombs on the Iranian Kurdish village of Zardan (as they had done four months earlier on their own Kurdish village of Halabja). Hundreds were killed at once, and the survivors are still suffering from a variety of physical and mental disorders. It has since been proven that the agent used on the Kurds and later on Iran was the deadly VX Gas.

To continue with the story:

A  conclusion was draw up which gave a very accurate assessment as follows:

This paper rests its case on the following principal points:

1. That it is known that a range of pathogenic (disease producing) and toxigenic (poisonous) biological materials were exported to Iraq from the United States between 1985 and 1989, and that, among other warfare-related materials, these included a strain of anthrax utilized and tested over many years as a weapon, including during well documented WW2 and post-WW2 trials, to which the US was a party. 

2. That the US Government was fully aware of the dangers vested in the biological materials exported to Iraq by the American Type Culture Collection between 1985 and 1989, and was, at the least, grossly negligent in failing to prohibit these exports to a state which was known by the US Administration at that time to be actively utilizing chemical weapons of mass destruction, and suspected – if not known – to also be developing a biological weapons programme.

3. That with knowledge of the US biological exports, the British Government, being bound to act according to the law, and having stated as much in the UK Parliament in the name of Her Majesty the Queen, has a responsibility to formally report this matter to the UN Security Council for investigation. Furthermore, that failure to do so effectively renders the BTWC meaningless, and, thereby, compromises the very concept of international law.

Beyond the case made in this paper, the following appears to be the disturbing international political reality: The invasion of Iraq by the United States and Britain in 2003 was predicated upon Iraq’s possession of ‘weapons of mass destruction’ – the primary threat presented both to Parliament and the People being anthrax. This anthrax was exported to Iraq from the US, having previously been exported from Britain, where it had been tested as a biological weapon “because its capability to produce infection and death after the inhalation of spores had been demonstrated in the laboratory”. This information is well known to the US, Britain, and Canada, due to a trilateral agreement concerning biological research between the three nations. Meanwhile, more than 20% of Britain’s MP representing approximately 12 million people – have twice called for a UN investigation into the US exports, a call which has been dismissed by the British Government by means of flimsy responses and a refusal to answer questions properly. 

The United States with Great Britain blocked all Security Council resolutions condemning Iraq’s use of chemical weapons, and on March 21 the US becomes the only country refusing to sign a Security Council statement condemning Iraq’s use of these weapons

The US Department of Commerce licenses 70 biological exports to Iraq between May of 1985 and 1989, including at least 21 batches of lethal strains of anthrax

May, 1986. US Department of Commerce approves shipment of weapons grade botulin poison to Iraq.

 April, 1988. US Department of Commerce approves shipment of chemicals used in manufacture of mustard gas.

 September, 1988. US Department of Commerce approves shipment of weapons grade anthrax and botulinum to Iraq.

 It should also be noted that the MK-84 bomb that was stockpiled in Saudi Arabia also formed part of the support for Saddam when hundreds of these U.S.-made general-purpose “dumb bombs” were transferred to Iraq.

What was even more surprising was when Saddam’s elite troops received instruction in unconventional warfare at Fort Bragg , North Carolina USA. “The idea was that, in the event of an Iranian victory, the Iraqi soldiers would be able to wage a guerrilla struggle against the occupying Iranian force”

On May 25, 1994, the U.S. Senate Banking Committee released a report in which it was stated that “pathogenic (meaning ‘disease producing’), toxigenic (meaning ‘poisonous’), and other biological research materials were exported to Iraq pursuant to application and licensing by the U:S: Department of Commerce.” It added: “These exported biological materials were not attenuated or weakened and were capable of reproduction.”

The report then detailed 70 shipments (including Bacillus Anthracis) from the United States to Iraqi government agencies over three years, concluding “It was later learned that these microorganisms exported by the United States were identical to those the UN inspectors found and recovered from the Iraqi biological warfare program.”

Iraq purchased 8 strains of anthrax from the United States in 1985, according to British biological weapons expert David Kelly. The Iraqi military settled on the American Type Culture Collection strain 14578 as the exclusive strain for use as a biological weapon.

Donald Riegle, Chairman of the Senate Committee that authored the aforementioned Riegle Report. said: “U.N. inspectors had identified many United States manufactured items that had been exported from the United States to Iraq under licenses issued by the Department of Commerce, and [established] that these items were used to further Iraq’s chemical and nuclear weapons development and its missile delivery system development programs. … The executive branch of our government approved 771 different export licenses for sale of dual-use technology to Iraq. I think that is a devastating record.”

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control sent Iraq 14 separate agents “with biological warfare significance,” according to Riegle’s investigators.

It is now known that a vast network of companies, based in the U.S. and elsewhere, fed Iraq’s warring capabilities right up until August 1990, when Saddam invaded Kuwait.

Innocent victims of western supplied CBW to Iraq (namely US and UK)

On the military hardware front, MD 500 Defender helicopters were also part of the deal with the US when Iraq acquired 60 multi-role military helicopters directly from the United States in 1983. Additional helicopter sales prompted congressional opposition, forcing the Reagan administration to explore alternative ways of assisting Saddam.

Alan Friedman wrote that Sarkis Soghanalian, one of the most notorious arms dealers during the Cold War, procured Eastern Bloc and French origin weaponry, and brokered vast deals with Iraq, with the tacit approval of the Central Intelligence Agency.

This most prominent arms merchant, Sarkis Soghanalian, was a Miami-based former CIA contractor who brokered tens of billions of dollars’ worth of military hardware for Iraq during the 1980s, reporting many of his transactions to officials in Washington. Soghanalian was close to the Iraqi leadership and to intelligence officers and others in the Reagan administration. He played a vital role serving as a go between for the CIA and other US government operations.

In an interview with William Kistner, Soghanalian stated that he was “working closely with the U.S. government”. Soghanalian also helped the Iraqis obtain TOW Anti Tank Missile , for which he was later prosecuted by the United States Department of Justice.

What is so upsetting was the fact that almost 150 foreign companies supported Saddam Hussein’s WMD program. Twenty-four U.S. firms were involved in exporting materials to Baghdad. Add to this an even longer list of American companies, UK, many EU countries, South Africa, South East Asian countries, including Singapore and Japan.

The whole episode is rather sickening when one believes that one day those responsible would be put before the International Court System. Every inquiry to reveal this broad based corruption and illegal arms trading has failed…..The Matrix Churchill Inquiry, The Scott Inquiry and now the Chilcott Inquiry (Iraq Inquiry) all totally rigged.

Basically “business as usual prevails” whilst the unscrupulous offenders, Heads of State, Senior Politicians, Government Departments and Company Executives get away with murder. If one adds to this the massive fraud that exists we find ourselves living amongst a den of thieves……but do not worry our governments know how to rob the poor to feed the rich!

We certainly live in a highly corrupt society with those that lead us leading the way!!

Maybe now you can better understand as to why people like David Kelly were assassinated and even possibly politicians such as Sir John Biggs Davison , Robin Cook and not forgetting Princess Diana.

Maybe you have never questioned as to why leaders of countries that have fallen victim to the greed of the west have never been tried in the Hague for war crimes etc………the answer is simple……the likes of Saddam, Mubarek and Ghadaffi all knew too much and if they were presented to the Hague they could well spill the beans of exactly what the US, UK and other EU countries  gave them……….you will see that Mubarek will end up the same way and no doubt the President of Yemen will follow……..such is the “Axis of Evil” that exists here in the west.

Part 6 and the final Part 7 will prove beyond a shadow of doubt just how hypocritical and two faced  the US and UK were in all of these unnecessary wars and how they having knowingly provided Chemical and Biological technology to harm innocent civilians in mass and how as a direct result of their illegal arms dealings have caused harm and injury to all the coalition forces.

Documentation will also be supplied to show how the government and MoD were pre warned of the dangers associated with the vaccination of troops prior to the Gulf War with accounts by experts (in the field) of  CBW attacks on their facilities by Saddam using Scud Missiles armed with CBW warheads………… the technology of which was supplied by the west!!!

Peter Eyre -6/2/2013

Broadcaster – Investigative Journalist – Middle East Consultant – Political Analysis

Written by Peter Eyre

February 6, 2013 at 03:08

Posted in Corporate/Government Fraud and Corruption, News

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Hypocrisy of The New World Order and its Assault on Islamic Nations – Part 4

leave a comment »


The Hypocrisy of The New World Order and its Assault on Islamic Nations – Part 4

We can now look into the illegal arms trade to Iraq which in itself became very sophisticated with its concealed web of distribution. The UK played a major role in support for Saddam Hussein with one company that really did stand out from the rest.

A  Scottish Company called Allivane was at the heart of this activity and did so over a period of six years during the Iraq-Iran War. Needless to say this also involved the US who used the backyard of Britain to promote this joint effort.

 It was back in 1976 when George Bush Snr, who was then Nixon’s Envoy in China, came across James Guerin, the founder of International Signal and Control (ISC), a US Defense Contractor. After a long discussion they decided that they could do business together.

Soon after this time there were many investigations carried out by US Congress regarding covert arms shipments and the workings of the CIA. A clean up of the CIA took place plus a complete shutdown of covert arms routes that involved many countries.

However, by this time George Bush Snr himself was running the CIA and realised that with the help of James Guerin, together they could re establish this covert business but not out of the USA. It became obvious that their ally Britain could now become the staging post for such an operation. Britain at the time was on an economical low and so the Prime Minister, James Callaghan, jumped at the idea. Callaghan was later to become an advisor to the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) who would soon have a track record of drugs and illegal arms running as their backbone……one could add many more major banks to this list.

The down side to the BCCI was the fact that when it was closed down on 5 July 1991, a million people throughout the world lost their deposits. Many of the losers were from the Third World; small businessmen who had struggled to make a living in countries other than their own, and who had been impressed by BCCI’s multilingual staff and its often-trumpeted concern for the starving millions……no doubt we have all heard this before….a sort of Pandora’s Box!

The formation of this covert Bush – Guerin – Callaghan led to the resurrection of  Allivance and the start of one of the biggest cover weapons supply and destabilization operations in the world………..nothing new hey?……..it goes on all the time with the same key players, Heads of State, CIA, MI5 and Mossad etc. The formation and working of this scam did not only involve the British Labour Party but also followed on with the Conservative Party. By this time it was well and truly out of control.

Back in the US meantime (In 1974) the ISC with the knowledge and assistance of US agencies, advanced radar-controlled anti-aircraft systems were shipped to South Africa. South Africa, together with ISC, also developed a sophisticated ground-to-air missiles for its own use and for export. All this equipment was restricted US technology requiring export licenses, which were not obtained. James Guerin claimed the company’s activities were sanctioned by the US government. Mr. Guerin set up a front company with the South African authorities for the US National Security Agency, , as part of a US covert in 1974. This involved shipping advanced electronic sensors, optics and related equipment to South Africa without licenses so as to set up listening posts to track Soviet submarines off the Cape of Good Hope. The company, Gamma Systems Associates, ordered restricted equipment from ISC, then shipped it on to South Africa on board airliners. The equipment was repackaged and the airline companies given false descriptions of the equipment. The operation ceased to have official sanction in 1977 and the activities were dismantled.

From 1984 to 1988, ISC sent South Africa more than $30 million in military-related equipment, including telemetry tracking antennae to collect data from missiles in flight, gyroscopes for guidance systems, and photo-imaging film readers, all of which would form the “backbone” of a medium-range missile system. Some of this technology was reportedly transferred to Iraq. Another link to Iraq was the supply of the specifications for the  MK-20 Rockeye cluster bomb through Chilean defence company Carlos Cardoen, which was able to build an almost identical weapon that was subsequently used against coalition forces in the Persian Gulf War of January-February 1991. These activities allegedly happened with the knowledge and assistance of U.S. intelligence agencies (including the CIA) and in violation of United States and United Nations sanctions.

Allivane’s contribution to Iraq certainly allowed both the US and UK to benefit from the exercise and to elongate the war effort between Iraq and Iran which was always paramount in the minds of our leaders. One has to remember that Geo-Politics does not possess any ethics or morality……just simply greed!

There were many other issues behind these covert arms shipments on the political front and none other than Donald Rumsfeld was right in the middle of it all. No doubt his partner in crime Dick Cheney was sitting in the sidelines. Perhaps this account throws more light of events:

Middle East envoy Donald Rumsfeld to Baghdad in 1983, stated: 

“While a Staff Member to the National Security Council, I was responsible for the Middle East and for Political-Military Affairs. During my five year tenure on the National Security Council, I had regular contact with both CIA Director William Casey and Deputy Director Robert Gates…CIA Director Casey personally spearheaded the effort to ensure that Iraq had sufficient military weapons, ammunition and vehicles to avoid losing the Iran-Iraq war. Pursuant to the secret NSDD (National Security Decision Directive), the United States actively supported the Iraqi war effort by supplying the Iraqis with billions of dollars of credits, by providing U.S. military intelligence and advice to the Iraqis, and by closely monitoring third country arms sales to Iraq to make sure that Iraq had the military weaponry required. The United States also provided strategic operational advice to the Iraqis to better use their assets in combat. For example, in 1986, President Reagan sent a secret message to Saddam Hussein telling him that Iraq should step up its air war and bombing of Iran. This message was delivered by Vice President Bush who communicated it to Egyptian President Mubarak, who in turn passed the message to Saddam Hussein. Similar strategic operational military advice was passed to Saddam Hussein throughvarious meetings with European and Middle Eastern heads of state. I authored Bush’s talking points for the 1986 meeting with Mubarak and personally attended numerous meetings with European and Middle East heads of state where the strategic operational advice was communicated.”

  President Reagan

One can clearly see the double standards that existed and the means of delivery a message from one country to another by way of a third party (Egypt). No doubt the CIA had their own stock of carrier pigeons to spread the word…..one would have to ask the question how did they manage to deliver the messages amidst all the nerve gas and mustard gas etc?   

The British origin of anthrax strain 14578 – “Vollum” strain

Anthrax strain 14578 may be found listed in past ATCC catalogues, in which the company’s ordering procedures explain that any request for it (and other pathogenic agents) “should be made on the institution’s official stationery (purchase order) and signed by the director of the institution, the chairman of the department concerned, or the scientist in charge of the project”. So, presumably, ATCC files will hold copies of Iraq’s original purchase orders. Such back-up documents do not appear to have been supplied to Senator Riegle in 1994, but should now be produced during a proper investigation under the auspices of the United Nations Security Council.

Each strain in the ATCC catalogue is listed together with its known history – or rather the individuals who have maintained the strain over the years are named in succession. Anthrax strain 14578 appears to have been deposited with ATCC after being held by P H A Sneath, H M Darlow, P Fildes, R L Vollum, and originally Dunkin. So, who are these people through whose hands this anthrax apparently passed en-route to the ATCC and thence to Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, from where it became the principal element in the widely trumpeted ‘forty-five minute threat’ which provided the pretext for the invasion of Iraq in 2003?

Prof P H A Sneath, now of Leicester University, has recently stated (by e-mail) that he was never in charge of the strain, or a collection that included it. Instead, he suggests that “it was probably sent to ATCC by the National Collection of Type Cultures, Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale Avenue, London”. However, the ATCC catalogue entry references a paper co-authored by Prof Sneath, which was published in 1964 in the Journal of General Microbiology. The article discusses the anthrax strain and notes that it was isolated from bovine anthrax, has retained its virulence, and was previously in the care of the Microbiological Research Establishment (MRE), Porton Down, Wiltshire. According to the article, Prof Sneath was then at the National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London NW7. 

Part 5 continues with much more detailed information on what was going on.

Peter Eyre -5/2/2013

Broadcaster – Investigative Journalist – Middle East Consultant – Political Analysis

Written by Peter Eyre

February 4, 2013 at 21:44

Posted in Corporate/Government Fraud and Corruption, News

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Hypocrisy of The New World Order and its Assault on Islamic Nations – Part 3

with one comment

The Hypocrisy of The New World Order and its Assault on Islamic Nations – Part 3



You kiss my A… and I’ll kiss yours

“Thanks for helping the US, our allies and  Saddam genocide the Kurds in Halabja”


The Kurdish Genocide at Halabja


Kurdish Genocide Victims

In this part we will  look at actually who moved what and where and how our respective hypocritical governments try to stem the spread of Nuclear and Chemical and Biological Warfare in other countries and yet secretly help them ………as was the case with Iraq!!

It would be relevant at this point to reveal a list of Iraq Purchased Weapons that was provided by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) for the period 1973-2002.

Country $MM USD 1990 % Total

































South Africa












Germany (FRG)















East Germany (GDR)















The next big issue to debate was who provided Iraq with Chemical and Biological Warfare (CBW) know how? The main players here were both the US, UK and Spain.

 One has to fully understand that what has been revealed does not give a true account as to the total supply of CBW or of the total supply of military hardware and software. Everything was so cleverly concealed via offshore front companies that it almost became impossible to know it original source. I am sure your imagination can run wild in this respect and realise that the trade in illegal arms is a very profitable business. The deceit and corruption that was linked to supply went right to the top of the political ladder. It is rather ironic that to this day the same policy prevails and war is good for business!

 So let’s just look at  one typical consignment as shown in the Riegle Report which was obtained under the freedom of information and you will see just how generous western government were with Iraq:

The list in Figure 1 is merely one extract from the invoice details supplied to Senator Riegle by the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). One item is particularly notable in this list, for it is the strain of anthrax which will be shown to be the exclusive strain of anthrax used in the Iraqi biological weapons programme. Before focusing on anthrax, however, consider the range of materials exported to Iraq. The Riegle Report confirms that from 1985: 

“Pathogenic (meaning ‘disease producing’), toxigenic (meaning ‘poisonous’), and other biological research materials were exported to Iraq pursuant to application and licensing by the U.S. Department of Commerce….These exported biological materials were not attenuated or weakened and were capable of reproduction. According to the Department of Defence’s own Report to Congress on the Conduct of the Persian Gulf War, released in April 1992: “By the time of the invasion of Kuwait, Iraq had developed biological weapons. It’s advanced and aggressive biological warfare program was the most advanced in the Arab world… The program probably began late in the 1970′s and concentrated on the development of two agents, botulinum toxin and anthrax bacteria… Large-scale production of these agents began in 1989 at four facilities near Baghdad. Delivery means for biological agents ranged from simple aerial bombs and artillery rockets to surface-to-surface missiles.”

t is at this point we can reveal the effects of these CBW the Report finds that among the US exports to Iraq were the following and it notes their associated disease symptoms:

Bacillus Anthracis: anthrax is a disease producing bacteria identified by the Department of Defense in the Conduct of the Persian Gulf War: Final Report to Congress, as being a major component in the Iraqi biological warfare program. Anthrax is an often-fatal infectious disease due to ingestion of spores. It begins abruptly with high fever, difficulty in breathing, and chest pain. The disease eventually results in septicaemia (blood poisoning), and the mortality is high. Once septicaemia is advanced, antibiotic therapy may prove useless, probably because the exotoxins remain, despite the death of the bacteria.  

Clostridium Botulinum: a bacterial source of botulinum toxin, which causes vomiting, constipation, thirst, general weakness, headache, fever, dizziness, double vision, dilation of the pupils and paralysis of the muscles involving swallowing. It is often fatal.  

Histoplasma Capsulatum: causes a disease superficially resembling tuberculosis that may cause pneumonia, enlargement of the liver and spleen, anemia, an influenza-like illness and an acute inflammatory skin disease marked by tender red nodules, usually on the shins. Reactivated infection usually involves the lungs, the brain, spinal membranes, heart, peritoneum, and the adrenals.  

Brucella Melitensis: a bacteria which can cause chronic fatigue, loss of appetite, profuse sweating when at rest, pain in joints and muscles, insomnia, nausea, and damage to major organs.  

Clostridium Perfringens: highly toxic bacteria, which cause gas gangrene. The bacteria produce toxins that move along muscle bundles in the body killing cells and producing necrotic tissue that is then favourable for further growth of the bacteria itself. Eventually, these toxins and bacteria enter the bloodstream and cause a systemic illness. 

Figure 1 provides details of a single shipment sent on 2 May 1986. Note the emboldened entry for Bacillus anthracis (ATCC 14578), which the Iraq Survey Group has since determined was the exclusive strain of anthrax used in the Iraqi biological weapons programme. This, then, is the source of the anthrax threat which was repeatedly promoted both inside Parliament and through the news media to the British People, prior to the decision being made for Britain to take part in the invasion of Iraq.    

 Because Iraq was removed from antiterrorism controls and because controls on missile technology and chemical and biological warfare were not in place until the late 1980s, few foreign policy controls were placed on exports to Iraq during the 1980s…this, along with the lack of national security controls, resulted in a long list of high technology items being sold to Iraq during the 1980s.

 Below is a list (Figure 1) of one such consignment sent from the US to Iraq. I would also like to point out that the UK also participated in such exports, which I will cover later.


 Bacillus Anthracis Cohn (ATCC 10)
Batch # 08-20-82 (2 each)
Class III pathogen.

Bacillus Subtitles (Ehrenberg) Con (ATCC 82)
Batch # 06-20-84 (2 each)

Clostridium botulinum Type A (ATCC 3502)
Batch# 07-07-81 (3 each)
Class III Pathogen

Clostridium perfringens (Weillon and Zuber)

Hauduroy, et al (ATCC 3624)
Batch# 10-85SV (2 each)

Bacillus subtilis (ATCC 6051)
Batch# 12-06-84 (2 each)

Francisella tularensis var. tularensis Olsufiev

(ATCC 6223)
Batch# 05-14-79 (2 each)
Avirulent; suitable for preparations of 
 diagnostic antigens.

Clostridium tetani (ATCC 9441)
Batch 03-94 (3 each)
Highly toxigenic.

 Clostridium botulinum Type E (ATCC

9564) Batch# 03-02-79 (2 each)
Class III pathogen

 Clostridium tetani (ATCC 10779)
Batch# 04-24-84S (3 each)

 Clostridium perfringens (ATCC 12916)
Batch# 08-14-80 (2 each)
Agglutinating Type 2.

Clostridium perfringens (ATCC 13124)
Batch# 08-14-80 (3 each)
Type A, alpha-toxigenic, produces 
 lecithinase C.J. Appl,

 Bacillus Anthracis (ATCC 14185)

Batch# 01-14-80 (3 each) G.G. Wright (Fort Detrick) V770-NPI-R.

Bovine anthrax, Class III pathogen

 Bacillus Anthracis (ATCC 14578)
Batch# 01-06-78 (2 each)
Class III pathogen.

Bacillus megaterium (ATCC 14581)
Batch# 04-18-85 (2 each)

Bacillus megaterium (ATCC 14945)
Batch# 06-21-81 (2 each)

Clostridium botulinum Type E (ATCC 17855)
Batch# 06-21-71
Class III pathogen.

Bacillus megaterium (ATCC 19213)
Batch# 3-84 (2 each)

Clostridium botulinum Type A (ATCC 19397)
Batch# 08-18-81 (2 each)
Class III pathogen

Brucella abortus Biotype 3 (ATCC 23450)
Batch# 08-02-84 (3 each)
Class III pathogen

Brucella abortus Biotype 9 (ATCC 23455)
Batch# 02-05-68 (3 each)
Class III pathogen

Brucella melitensis Biotype I (ATCC 23456)
Batch# 03-08-78 (2 each)
Class III pathogen

Brucella melitensis Biotype 3 (ATCC 23458)
Batch# 01-29-68 (2 each)
Class III pathogen

Clostridium botulinum Type A (ATCC 25763)
Batch# 8-83 (2 each)
Class III pathogen

Clostridium botulinum Type F (ATCC 35415)
Batch# 02-02-84 (2 each)
Class III pathogen

“The United States did not believe that they would be used for anything other than legitimate research purposes and therefore did not knowingly export the materials to assist a biological weapons programme”……………….How naive can you get?

The United States secretly supported Iraq in its eight-year war with Iran, and that in February 1982 the US Administration removed Iraq from its list of ‘terrorist states’ in order to do so. Furthermore, there is the astonishing fact that, among the various agencies of the Government of Iraq listed in the Riegle Report, one repeated recipient of these deadly materials was no less than the Iraqi nuclear weapons research facility, the Iraq Atomic Energy Commission. One could ask the US how could the conclusion possibly be reached that between 1985 and 1989 anthrax and other warfare-related biological materials were exported from the US to Iraq for “legitimate research purposes”?

One also needs to look at the fact that the UK supplied Biological and Chemical agents to Iraq, unfortunately documentation on this is well hidden but evidence does exist that the UK certainly did supply such agents.

Back in the 1970’s Iraq had approached the USSR to buy a plant to manufacture chemical weapons, but his request was refused. Saddam then began courting the West, and received a much more favourable response.

An American company, Pfaulder Corporation of Rochester, New York, supplied the Iraqis with a blueprint in 1975, enabling them to construct their first chemical warfare plant. The plant was purchased in sections from Italy, West Germany and East Germany and assembled in Iraq. It was located at Akhashat in north-western Iraq, and the cost was around $50 million for the plant and $30 million for the safety equipment.

In the late 1970′s, it was actually the German firm ‘Karl Kobe’ that sold Iraq the ingredients for its first chemical weapons. Karl Kobe and others sold Iraq over 1,027 tons of the chemicals needed to produce mustard gas, Sarin, Tabun, and various tear gasses including CS and CN. The chemical weapons program was operational by late 1983/early 1984. Iraq then bought botulin toxin and mycotoxin from a total of 5 other German firms to begin a germ/biological weapons program.

The United States CDC (Center for Disease Control) provided Iraq with biological samples up until 1989 for “Medical research and other purposes”. The US supplied anthrax, West Nile virus, botulism, and Brucella melitensis to Iraq for little or no charge. (that was very nice of them).

The United Kingdom paid, in full, for the Iraqi chlorine plant where mustard gas was manufactured.

Brazil provided around 100 tons of mustard gas in the early 80′s before the British funded plant was up and running.

Singapore and India provided the ingredients for VX nerve agent and yet still more Tabun.

Egypt and Spain both provided the majority of Iraq’s munitions that were designed to carry and disperse the chemical weapons.

As you can clearly see it was truly a very international affair, a sort of United Nations!

It should also be made clear that the US. UK and other countries assisted Iraq in its development into nuclear research which did not reach a successful conclusion.

 Part 4 will bring you more details on actual arms shipments and other military support.

Peter Eyre -3/2/2013

Broadcaster – Investigative Journalist – Middle East Consultant – Political Analysis

Written by Peter Eyre

February 2, 2013 at 22:29

Posted in Corporate/Government Fraud and Corruption, News

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Hypocrisy of The New World Order and its Assault on Islamic Nations – Part 2

with 3 comments

Tomorrow the world

The Hypocrisy of The New World Order and its Assault on Islamic Nations – Part 2


In my last article I talked about how blatantly western government are prepared to go to war or create a conflict in order to stop other nations from obtaining what they themselves have designed and incorporated into their respective arsenals.

I find it so hypocritical to learn that many of those countries we have gone to war with were at one time our allies. During those good times our governments not only helped them achieve Nuclear Weapons/Chemical and Biological Warfare but indeed  also gave them the ingredients and in many cases funded and helped build the laboratories and testing facilities, as was the case with Iraq prior to the Gulf Wars.    


“Can you believe that these guys behind me actually help fund the Chemical and Biological Scuds that Saddam has just fired at us”

So let’s just delve into this area and see who sold what to whom and how much they helped those that later became our enemy and more importantly how they also allowed these programmes to harm our own troops…….two classic examples was when Saddam fired Scud Missiles at US/UK and Coalition bases in Saudi Arabia laden with CBW additives that the western governments had given to him……… also those same governments  gave  vaccinations to all coalition forces prior too and during the Gulf War’s knowing they could be potentially fatal or create long lasting medical problems to our troops……..this is now referred too as “Gulf War Syndrome”………..add to this the fact that again the governments knew that all troops in the field could succumb to contamination by our own weapons as a direct result of inhalation/absorption of radioactive nano particle from weapons that contained  Depleted Uranium…………I might add that most of today’s weapons contain DU in some form!!!

Illegal arms trading between the west and any nation that was prepared to pay for them was rife and in particular money, hardware, nuclear components and chemical and biological ingredients freely flowed between the west and Iraq prior to the attack on the Kurds, the Iraq – Iran War and prior to the Gulf War.

It was the wish of all the major player’s in the west to keep the war going for as long as possible which still stands true to this day.

Italy played an important role in arming Iraq through a US branch of the state owned largest bank in Italy. There were so many complex arrangements that allowed Iraq and its supporters to bypass the embargo. Moving land and sea mines production to Singapore was a typical example. Yugoslavia also sold weapons for the entire duration of the conflict as did Portugal. Spain sold 172 Million Euros of weapons. Spain also sold 4X4 vehicles, BO-105 helicopters, explosives and ammunition’s. It should also be noted that an unexploded chemical Iraqi warhead found in Iran was also manufactured in Spain. Turkey also supplied civilian help during the conflict. Turkey’s export jumped from $200 million in 1981 to $2 billion in 1985, which made up 25% of Turkey’s export. Turkish construction projects in Iraq totaled $2.5 billion between 1974 – 1990.

Iraq’s main financial backers were the oil-rich Persian Gulf states, mainly Saudi Arabia ($30.9 billion) Kuwait ($8.2 billion) and the United Arab Emirates ($8 billion).

The Iraqgate scandal revealed that an Atlanta branch of Italy’s largest bank, Banco Nazionale del Lavoro,relying partially on U.S. taxpayer-guaranteed loans, funneled $5 billion to Iraq from 1985 to 1989. These clandestine and illegal loans to Iraq were used to part fund the purchase of arms and weapons technology.

It also became clear that the US was funding Iraqi chemical and nuclear research programme. It was stated that during the 1980’s Iraq had received around $35 billion in loans from the west and between $30-40 billion from the Persian Gulf states.

In actual fact it was this huge Iraqi deficit that contributed towards the start of the war in the first place when some of the above nations started demanding payback on these huge loans…….. not forgetting the fact that some oil rigs on the Kuwaiti border were taking oil/gas from the Iraq fields by a technique known as diagonal or slant drilling. It was also common knowledge  that the then British PM Maggie Thatcher pleaded with Ronald Regan to intervene in Kuwait when Saddam attacked that country.

Many victims in Iran were innocent civilians and it is believed that more than 100,000 were victims of chemical weapons during the length of the war. The final figure is hard to calculate owing to the long term illnesses that followed the war. Reports show that Nerve Gas killed about 20,000 Iranian soldiers and many thousands continue to seek medical treatment on a regular basis with many more critical cases being hospitalised.

What is totally unacceptable to me is the fact that the UN knew of these breaches of the Geneva Convention and did nothing apart from condemning its usage. Needless to say that once again the US was right in there and refused to accept the condemnation. It was not until 1988 that the UN Security Council passed Resolution 612 condemning the use of chemicals. I guess you would ask “Well so what.”

It became apparent that President Reagan was certainly not too concerned as to what Weapons of Mass Destruction were being used as the US were more concerned that the Iraqi’s did not lose the war. Even after the Iraqi had used chemical weapons on the Kurds the US continued its support of Iraq

Maybe it is time to reflect on the bitter pill that Iran has had to swallow both during and after this terrible event. Perhaps we can all see now why Iran could never trust the US, UK and to some degree other EU countries with such a two faced policy. We have to understand that nothing that is done by the west is anything to do with democracy or because of peoples suffering. This is a power game that comes under the title of Geo – Politics. It is “Imperialism” at its best, an urge to take control of the world’s resources, their markets and the transit corridors that deliver them.

What we see is a western foreign policy that is extremely aggressive with the US as the instigator, a world full of almost daily “False Flags” that are well orchestrated in order to justify action or to point fingers at some innocent country they want to rape….such is the world of today. The US uses its relations with other countries like hot and cold taps….they turn them off and on whenever it suits them and certainly when this spoilt child doesn’t get its way it unleashes it so called “Shock and Awe” policy.

As with all wars the human cost was extremely high. The economic cost amounted to around $1.2 trillion and one could ask for what?  Iraq achieved absolutely nothing in their failed attempt to take over more territory and Iran’s natural resources.

What I did find out was the fact that the UN did to some extent support Iran when the Secretary – General made the following statement to the UN Security Council:

“Even if before the outbreak of the conflict there had been some encroachment by Iran on Iraqi territory, such encroachment did not justify Iraq’s aggression against Iran—which was followed by Iraq’s continuous occupation of Iranian territory during the conflict—in violation of the prohibition of the use of force, which is regarded as one of the rules of jus cogens (compelling law or of the highest law).” “On one occasion I had to note with deep regret the experts’ conclusion that “chemical weapons had been used against Iranian civilians in an area adjacent to an urban center lacking any protection against that kind of attack”

I will now continue with exactly what was supplied to Iraq during the war with Iran and by whom and to give some insight and meaning to the term “What goes around comes around.”

Firstly one has to look at the money trail and see which countries were propping up Iraq. The main contributors were: US, UK, France, Germany, Russia, Italy, Japan and in the Middle East were Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE and Jordan. Basically it all amounted to more than $130 billion debt for Iraq….the largest portion of this money came from the Gulf States.

As we have already discussed the Iraq’s also took advantage of the competition between the supply of military equipment from both the French and the Russian and tactfully used this to manipulate supply. Russia provided most of the equipment with France running a close second. The French military equipment was considered to be more high tech. Russia was sort of piggy in the middle during this conflict and they proffered Iran over Iraq and yet needed to maintain ties with both, such is the role that Geo-Politics plays in any conflict.

Part 3 and future articles will cover what was actually exported to Iraq and by whom as well as a detailed manifest of Chemical and Biological Weapons (CBW) that were shipped. It will also explain how they were used not only against Iran but also against their own people, the US and Coalition Forces and attempts to strike Israel.

Peter Eyre -28/1/2013

Broadcaster – Investigative Journalist – Middle East Consultant – Political Analysis

Written by Peter Eyre

February 1, 2013 at 00:07

Posted in Corporate/Government Fraud and Corruption, News

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Hypocrisy of The New World Order and its Assault on Islamic Nations – Part 1

with 4 comments

The Hypocrisy of The New World Order and its Assault on Islamic Nations

Part 1 


The leading question in today’s many conflicts is  “Who Supplied Chemical and Biological Weapons (CBW) to Iraq and many other countries who could have and did use them against those that supplied them” ?

I am sure you would all agree that those that did (and continue to) supply such WMD’s/CBW’s  are blatantly guilty of horrendous war crime  that has now resulted in the death of thousands upon thousands ( if not millions)  of innocent civilians including our own coalition forces.

One must also add to this the death of millions of people worldwide as a direct result of NATO/Coalition Forces usage of depleted uranium, low yield tactical nuclear weapons (such as the US B61 Bomb) and other current high tech “Dirty Bombs.”

Finally we have the military vaccination programmes that were used prior to troops going into battle………this aspect I will cover later in the series to prove that not only did they know the dangers associated with these vaccinations but still continued to give them to our troops. This has now resulted in either death or acute medical problems for the vets of these conflicts!!


The object of this current  series of article is to show how hypocritical NATO,  US, UK, France, Germany and many other Coalition Members have been in firstly designing and testing CBW and then selling these deadly agents to the highest bidder!!

In many cases the cabal assisted in  funding and building of the laboratories in countries with whom we later went to war i.e. Iraq (in which the US and UK were deeply involved ). When one compares all of this with the vaccination programme highlighted above one can see just how  “two faced – unethical – immoral”our respective governments have been.

I will now prove to you who supplied what and when and then show how CBW were actually used by Saddam.

My articles will reveal factual reports from troops on the ground with my final article on this topic clearly showing the connection between the weapons used, the vaccination programme and what in my opinion is the major cause of this so called “Gulf War Syndrome……. others may refer to it as being  “Battle Fatigue”  and some may say it is  “Chronic Fatigue Syndrome” what ever term they use it is certainly  a cover-up by the government to avoid massive claims by war vets in later years!!’

So let’s start with the story that first revealed the use of WMD/CBW  and how it was all connected with the west’s activity and support of  illegal arms dealing.:

In September 1980 Iraq carried out an unprovoked attack on Iran (Iraq-Iran War) and lasted for a period of over 7 years.

This war was supported by the US, UK and at least 10 countries with the former actually providing military hardware such as weapons, nuclear components that would allow Iraq to have the ability to build their own nuclear bomb and also Chemical and Biological technology which clearly gave Iraq WMD’s and CBW weapons.

The west (in particular the UK) actually paid for and built the CBW Laboratories for Saddam and provided Iraq with Cyanide, Mustard Gas and the deadly VX Gas which he used against the Kurds and Iran and later used in the Iraqi SCUD Missiles to fire into Israel and Saudi Arabia during the Gulf War and did in actual fact hit US/UK bases etc!!

In order to fully understand all the ins and outs of the terrible wars/conflicts we must first understand how the west manipulated and encourage these war ………..I am sure after reading my current series on this topic you will see that we in the west must surely hang our heads in shame and offer our sincere apologies to all the countries we have invaded and in particular to those that died in Iran and Kurdistan during those western derived, armed and funded wars between Iraq – Iran and the Genocide of the Kurds when Saddam used Chemical and Biological Weapons compliments of the US, UK and many others..

It is broadly known that the west frequently change sides as and when it suits their economic goals or foreign policy. One also has to understand that the build up to such a conflict starts well before the war begins and can be in the planning stages up to around twenty years or so beforehand. The other issue that frequently stops such action going ahead is the justification or the reasons for going to war, which we have all observed prior to the Gulf Wars and the war in Afghanistan…….this is normally fixed with the creation of a false flag event.

 The United States and Britain have become experts at this sort of activity as a direct result of their experience at “Empire Building.” Unfortunately it was Saddam Hussain who decided that he should also improve his status in the region and at the same time hopefully acquire more land that was rich in natural resources. His target became Iran and the war  had the full support of the west who played a major role in  its creation and its longevity. The west, in particular the US,were well aware of the financial returns in keeping the war effort going. So let’s now look into this unnecessary war, how greed played a major role, the aftermath and the heavy loss of life on both sides. The war in actual fact achieved absolutely nothing. Add to this the fact that with our help he also killed many Kurds with the Chemical and Biological Weapons supplied, paid for and built by mainly the US and UK.

 The war began on the 22ndof September 1980 when Iraq invaded Iran and carried out an air and land assault. There had, in the past, been many border disputes with additional concern by the Iraq’s of Shia insurgency. It was Saddam Hussain who hoped to replace Iran as the dominant Gulf State. The attack was a failure in many respects as the forward progress was somewhat limited and was repelled by the Iranians within several months, who had regained most of the lost territory by June of 1982. The war continue on until the UN intervened and then stopped on the 20th of August 1988.

One very important aspect of this war was who controlled the Shatt al-Arab waterway which to the Iranians is known as the Arvand Rud. This vital oil export channel in the far north of the Persian Gulf is so important to both countries.

The objectives of Iraq’s invasion of Iran were:

  1. The control of the Shatt al-Arad waterway by the Iraqis
  2. The acquisition of the three islands of Abu Musa and the Greater and Lesser Tunbs of behalf of the UAE
  3. Annexation of Khuzestan to Iraq
  4. To prevent the spread of the Islamic Revolution in the region in the region

The war cost many lives on both sides amounting to around half a million military personal and many civilians. The economic impact was also heavy on both sides. The Iranians sustained heavy losses, not as a result of conventional fighting, but as a direct result of the deployment of chemical weapons and mustard gas by the Iraqi’s. This included VX Gas one of the most deadly of all. It was ironic that the UN had stated that such weapons had been used but very carefully did not mention Iraq as the instigators.

The above conflict fitted in well with the New World Orders three main objectives:

  • To take control of the world’s natural resources
  • To control the markets for those resources and
  • To control the sea lanes, transit routes, pipeline routes etc for those resources

The world must understand that the provocation and propaganda currently underway (by the New World Orders Military – NATO and the US AFRICOM) is clearly intended to offend and disrupt the entire Middle East and now Africa.

 One can  clearly see how Geo Politics plays a major role in all conflicts and how governments become greedy in order to place themselves as major players in a given region. This can involve forced regime changes, disputes over borders, attempts to obtain the resources belonging to another country or by creating false flag incidents to encourage conflict etc.

What this war did reveal was the extensive use of chemical weapons including mustard gas against Iranian troops and civilians. We may also recall that Iraq also used chemical weapons on the Kurds. It was ironic that the UN had stated that such weapons had been used but very carefully did not mention Iraq as the instigators.



In July 1988 Iraqi airplanes dropped chemical cyanide bombs on the Iranian Kurdish village of Zardan (as they had done four months earlier on their own Kurdish village of Halabja). Hundreds were killed at once, and the survivors are still suffering from a variety of physical and mental disorders. It has since been proven that the agent used on the Kurds and later on Iran was the deadly VX Gas.


“Take my word for it Saddam……the US and UK will give you WMD’s & CBW’s”

Prior too and during the Iraq – Iran war many illegal arms shipments were made along with some very high profile visits. That notorious villain Donald Rumsfeld was the US special envoy to the Middle East and met with Saddam in December 1983. As we know he later became the US Defense Secretary during the 2003 Iraqi war when everything suddenly turned 180 degrees and the US wanted Saddam out.

The US and the UK in particular considered Iraq as an ally in stopping the Iranians from spreading their revolution. The US and the UK therefore supported Iraq with technology, intelligence and the sale of illegal arms, WMD´s and Chemical and Biological Warfare (CBW), military equipment and satellite support. It was also another powerful man, by the name of Henry Kissinger, who stated “It’s a pity they both can’t lose.” Iraq, in particular, had a complex clandestine procurement network to obtain munitions and critical materials, which, in some transactions, involved 10-12 countries.

Some rather startling news also emerged prior to this war when it was disclosed that the US Secretary of State, Alexander Haig Jnr wrote a secret memo to President Reagan about the Previous President Jimmy Carter approving Saddam Hussein’s attack on Iran with assistance from Saudi Arabia. British support for this war was also paramount, especially when the British allowed the Iraqi’s to purchase a British company to bypass the export control. This company was TMG engineering, later to be called Matrix Churchill who had operations in both the US and UK. The US Company with the same name was also purchased by the Iraqi’s. The Chairman of the group, which consisted of TDG, TMG, and Matrix Churchill was Safa al Habobi. Another member of the board was Fadel Jawad Khadhum. They were described as follows:

The Iraqi members of the boards of directors of companies in the group were in firm control of the companies’ day-to-day activities and sometimes authoritarian in their actions, one statement said.

The British government decided to allow most of Matrix Churchill’s sales to Iraq. As a result, a scandal erupted after the Persian Gulf War about the role of the British government in arming Iraq. Naturally much more had been going on before this event which never reached the public domain to any degree.

Iraq had a very strong tie with the US, UK and France  who were major suppliers of WMD’s/CBW’s and their ingredients.

Singapore also supported Iraq during the  Iran – Iraq War  in discussions for land mines assembled there, as well as chemical warfare precursors shipped from Singapore, possibly by an Iraqi front company.

Part 2 of this series will continue with who supported Iraq financially followed by other articles on exactly what was sold and how it was sold.

Written by Peter Eyre

January 30, 2013 at 04:23

Posted in Corporate/Government Fraud and Corruption, News

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The second Greatest Illusion Ever Performed – The Sandy Hook Massacre

with one comment

No Boeing Commercial Aircraft Hit Any Of The Towers  on 9/11 – No Boeing Commercial Aircraft Hit The Pentagon – No Boeing Commercial Aircraft Nose Dived Into The Field In Shanksville 


The First Greatest Illusion Ever Performed – 9/11

When is the world going to wake up to this continuous bombardment of Zionist controlled  propaganda and misinformation from all the world’s main media outlets such as the NEWS CORPORATION – BBC – CNN – ABC – CBS – NBC – SKY – REUTERS – ASSOCIATED PRESS – FOX  –  NEW YORK TIMES – WASHINGTON POST – WALL STREET JOURNAL – TIME MAGAZINE –  ITV – CHANNEL $ – CHANNEL 5 – THE TELEGRAPH – THE GUARDIAN  (the list is endless).

The Icing on the cake has to be CNN – The True Champions At Staging Illusions 

Take a look at the two pictures below the one on the left  has been made up with the CNN banner overlaid and I am sure that once you see the CNN logo immediately you are convinced that this picture is factual when in actual fact it is not………on the right is  the actual shot allegedly taken by CNN of the 9/11 attack and again you believed it but both are illusions  

I again repeat that “No Boeing Commercial Aircraft Hit Any Of The Towers  on 9/11 – No Boeing Commercial Aircraft Hit The Pentagon – No Boeing Commercial Aircraft No Dived Into The Field In Shanksville.” 

If you the public would take the time to become suspicious of any future major incident and carry out your own analysis from start to finish you will,  in the main,  prove to yourself that what is portrayed by the Zionist media is in actual fact totally fabricated.

When one has spent time working in association with intelligence gathering or reconnaissance (as I have done in the past) you will quickly pick up the error of their ways. It is essential that when such “False Flags” occur you must take note of every fine detail from the initial media reports to the reports that chop and change throughout the next 24 – 48 hours and over time you will see the massive loopholes and inaccuracies as and when they occur!!!

With all of the above in mind lets again revisit the “Sandy Hook False Flag”  (in a very basic way) and prove that what CNN and many other media outlets showed you was bogus………….hopefully you will all agree that this massacre fell well within the same criteria as the Australian Port Arthur Massacre and the Norwegian Massacre as being a total fabrication as to what actually occurred!! 

The Second Greatest Illusion Ever Performed – The Sandy Hook Massacre

As they say a picture paints a thousand words and so if you see it you believe it….right?

Here is the actual layout of the Sandy Nook Elementary School as shown on Google Earth below:

Sandy Nook

It is vital for you all to pay particular attention to the layout of the carkpark and the main entrance to the school which is at the top left corner of the building…….it was this entrance which the CNN helicopter filmed when the police swooped in……I have expanded this car park entrance to the school and rotated it  to show it more clearly (as per below) and also so that you can compare the actual footage with the entrance to the school.


The police assault is allegedly have taken place via the pedestrian crossing from the car park  and then diagonally to the entrance to the school as shown within the black circle above

Now lets just pan out and look at the surrounding  district and in particular one other school called the St Rose of Lima School which is shown WSW of Sandy Hook School both are shown in the google image below surround by the black circle…..it is important that you pay particular attention to the detail of the other school and the actual footage as shown by CNN when the police stormed the building…….here is the area again:

St Rose of Lima  School 1


Now lets again zoom in on the location where the police stormed the so called Sandy Hook School…….I have again rotated the map so that when you compare the actual CNN image you will see that the actual police assault on the school as portrayed by  CNN was not on Sandy Hook but on the other school called St Rose of Lima School.

Below is an exploded shot of the St Rose of Lima pedestrian crossing which clearly shows that the CNN footage was not shot from a helicopter overhead Sandy Nook as we are led to believe but was taken overhead St Rose Of Lima School…….here is a close up of the crossing and the front of the school:

St Rose of Lima  School 2

Now that you have both images clearly in mind now take a look at a couple of still shots taken from the CNN video coverage as taken by their helicopter live during the police storming of the apparent Sandy Hook School:

SR 3

Police storm the school via the pedestrian crossing from the car park


Note the bollards and the layout of the landscaping and trees that Sandy Hook does not have


Police now move from the crossing to transit diagonally across the front of the building to underneath the sun shield at the entrance to the school – Sandy Hook School does not have this shield


The total facade of the front of the School at shown by CNN does not show any resemblance to the front of Sandy Hook

Now you can compare the two schools together and one can clearly see this was yet again another “False Flag” with only one thing in mind…….to create a situation to justify the disarming of the citizens of the US……….just as they did in Port Arthur Australia!!


It will now be almost impossible to initiate yet another inquiry into this massive illusion or the other two false flags in Australia and Norway but one thing for sure is the fact that so many things simply do not add up and you,  the sheeples,  have accepted what your respective leaders and governments have told you and what your media has led you to believe……….one day maybe someone will wake up and take these evil satanic New World Order criminals to court.

Peter Eyre -28/1/2013

Broadcaster – Investigative Journalist – Middle East Consultant – Political Analysis


Written by Peter Eyre

January 28, 2013 at 10:55

Posted in Corporate/Government Fraud and Corruption, News

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Do Australian politicians listen or respond to those that put them in office? – Part 2

leave a comment »

How do the political parties and their hierarchy  respond when facts are put before them?

Part 2



logo Labor

In my last article I discussed the emails sent to Australian political parties and their responses and I have to say that so far their response has been pretty good with the exception of the Greens who have not passed comments on any of the emails sent to date, some of which I must add border on matters dealing with but not isolated too Australian National Security Massive Fraud & Corrupt within Australia, Paedophilia and Matters of National Importance i.e. Who actually owns Australia and Pull the Strings etc.

I am sure you would all agree that with all of the above issues at stake all the above parties should and must respond accordingly. We must all be mindful of the fact that we put them all  in office to serve us under the terms and protocol of being “Civil Servants”, to safeguard our constitution and to represent and respect us in all matters concerning our well being and that of the nation.

It is also fact that the other very powerful body known as the Judiciary and in particular Members of the Bar all swear an Oath of Office under Common Law to respect our rights under that most powerful law (Common Law) which to this day still remains above all laws, including Statute Law.

Technically speaking if Statute Law does not compliment or enhance Common Law then it could be deemed illegal!!!!

It is also fact that every person who may be charged or arrested is entitled to an “Open Court – Fair Trial with a Full Jury in attendance and the Media”

In one of my previous articles I covered the Port Arthur Massacre and the sentencing of Martin Bryant ,who in my opinion was not guilty as charged and details of this cover-up were also forwarded to all of the above three parties……….alas still no reply……I wonder why?

The purpose of this article is on a more positive note to show that although the Prime Minister, Julia Gillard did respond she  passed it on to the Royal Commission who in-turn replied (as per below) along with the terms and conditions of the inquiry:

— Forwarded Message —–
From: Royal Commission Secretariat <royalcommissionsecretariat@pmc.gov.au>
To: “petereyreoz@yahoo.com” <petereyreoz@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 8:56 AM
Subject: RE: Ministerial Correspondence Referral from PM&C. C12/82429 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Dear Mr Eyre,
Thank you for your email regarding the Royal Commission into Institutional Childhood Sexual Abuse in Australia.  The Prime Minister has referred your email to the Secretariat for response.
The Royal Commission is being established because of the overwhelming intensity of the stories that have come to light.  Child sexual abuse is a crime that can damage young lives and haunt adults.
The Government has asked all stakeholders, including organisations that represent survivors of child sexual abuse and people formerly in institutional care, community and legal leaders, law enforcement, governments and religious organisations to help shape the development of the Royal Commission.
All suggestions made by these organisations and concerned members of the public are currently being considered by the Government and will help inform the establishment of the Commission.  The Commission is expected to begin its public work in early 2013.
The Royal Commission is an important step in ensuring what happened in the past does not happen again and we thank you for your interest.

Yours sincerely
Royal Commission Secretariat

For the latest information on the Royal Commission, you may wish to visit: childabuseroyalcommission.dpmc.gov.au/home or call 1800 099 340
If you require immediate or crisis support, please call Lifeline on 13 11 14

Announcement of the Royal Commission [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]



Julia Gillard

Prime Minister of Australia


Nicola Roxon



Jenny Macklin

Minister for Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs


Good afternoon

We are very pleased to announce that on our advice the Governor-General has now appointed six Commissioners for the Royal Commission into institutional responses to child sexual abuse. We have also today released the Terms of Reference that will guide their inquiry.

The Commissioners have been selected because of their broad skills, knowledge and expertise.

o   The Royal Commission will be led by Justice Peter McClellan AM, a Supreme Court Judge from New South Wales who brings a wealth of experience as a Judge and as an inquirer. Justice McClellan has been the Chief Judge at Common Law of the Supreme Court of New South Wales since 2005.  He has also been Chief Judge of the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales, Chairman of the Sydney Water Inquiry and Assistant Commissioner at the Independent Commission Against Corruption.

o   Bob Atkinson, the former Queensland Police Commissioner, brings over 40 years of policing experience to the Royal Commission, including 12 years as Police Commissioner.

o   Justice Jennifer Coate has served for twenty years as a magistrate and county court judge in Victoria, including five years as President of the Children’s Court and five years as the Victorian Coroner. Justice Coate has also now been appointed to the Family Court of Australia.

o   Robert Fitzgerald has served as a Commissioner in the Productivity Commission since 2004.  He has experience in commerce, law, public policy and community services, including as Community and Disability Services Commissioner and Deputy Ombudsman in New South Wales.

o   Professor Helen Milroy is a Director of the Centre for Aboriginal Medical and Dental Health at the University of Western Australia and a Consultant Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist with the Specialist Aboriginal Mental Health Service. She brings extensive experience in child and adolescent mental health and Aboriginal health and mental health.

o   Former Senator for Western Australia Andrew Murray brings a tremendous background as a legislator and as a campaigner for those who have spent time in institutional care as children.  

We have asked the Commissioners to submit an initial report by June 2014, so that we can start acting on early recommendations as quickly as possible. We have asked the Commissioners to aim to finish their inquiry by the end of 2015, but this date will be subject to advice from the Commissioners in their interim report.

The Commissioners will now work on setting up processes for hearing and collecting evidence, including arrangements for people who have special needs. They will also consider what services are needed to support witnesses to the Commission.  And in doing so, they will be informed by the experiences of survivors.

An investigative unit within the Royal Commission will ensure the timely referral and criminal investigation of allegations of child sexual abuse that come before the Commission, should victims seek such action.

We received input from more than 800 individuals and organisations on the terms of reference, which has been invaluable in helping shape the scope of the Royal Commission and in selecting Commissioners.

We also worked closely with the state and territory governments in developing the Terms of Reference, and we are pleased that they all support this inquiry.

The Government is committed to do everything we can to make sure that we fix the system for the future. We also want to help survivors of past abuse receive support and justice.

You will find attached an explanation of the Terms of Reference, a general fact sheet on royal commissions and their powers, and a list of support services.

The full Terms of Reference are contained in Letters Patent, which are the formal instructions from the Governor-General to the Commissioners.

For more information, including a copy of the full Letters Patent go to www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au. Or you can call 1800 099 340.


Warm regards


Julia Gillard                                                                         Nicola Roxon                                      Jenny Macklin

Prime Minister of Australia                                          Attorney-General                            Minister for Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs

End of email

I thought that it would be a much better idea to publish the term of reference for the Royal Commission so that all those who have fallen victim to paedophilia or those that may have vital evidence can follow the guidelines and report accordingly……here are the attachments they sent me:



Fact sheet

Powers of a Royal Commission

Commonwealth Royal Commissions are public inquiries that are established under Royal Commissions Act1902 (Cth)by appointing Commissioners to conduct an inquiry in accordance with Terms of Reference approved by the Governor-General.In this case the Royal Commission is also expected to be established under relevant State legislation in several jurisdictions.  This will allow the Royal Commissioners to act in multiple capacities, performing functions under Commonwealth and State laws. 


A Royal Commission can take evidence in a number of ways for different purposes, including conducting formal hearings. Hearings may either be open or closed, or restricted to a certain class of persons.  Evidence given in a closed hearing will not be made publically available and will be used in a way that protects an individual’s identity. 

Royal Commission can refer information about suspected or alleged crimes to relevant law enforcement authorities or share relevant information with other ongoing inquiries.

Information about hearings and how individuals can participate in the Royal Commission will be made available on its websitewww.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au.

Coercive powers

The Royal Commission has broad powers to gather information and assist with its investigations and inquiries.  These are sometimes called coercive powers because they can compel an individual to participate in the inquiry. 

The Royal Commission has the power to:

  • summons witnesses to appear before it and require them to answer questions under oath or affirmation, and
  • summons witnesses to produce a document or other material piece of evidence. 

If summoned, there are very few grounds on which a person can refuse to give evidence to a Royal Commission. 

Failure to comply with a summons issued by a Royal Commission may result in an individual receiving a fine or in some circumstances imprisonment. 

In some circumstances a search warrant and/or arrest warrant might be issued if a person fails to comply with a summons. 

It is an offence to intentionally provide false or misleading evidence to a Royal Commission or by intentionally insulting or disturbing it.  




Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse

Explaining theLetters Patent and Terms of Reference


This document explains the Letters Patentand Terms of Reference for the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse.

The ‘Letters Patent’ is the legal document from the Governor-General that gives instructions to the Commissioners about the scope of the inquiry and what the Commissioners should investigate and make recommendations on. The Letters Patent also formally appoint the Commissioners.

The full Letters Patent document is available at www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au

This explanation document should not be taken to in any way replace the Letters Patent document, or to have any legal standing.


Why the Royal Commission has been set up

Child sexual abuse is a crime, and a terrible breach of the right of every child to grow up safe and happy.

Child sexual abuse is oftenassociated with other forms of abuseincluding physical abuse, exploitation, and neglect.

All have long-term effects on survivors and their families. There are also costs to the economy and society as a whole.

Australia has committed at an international level to do everything it can to protect children from all forms of abuse. This includes taking action to help prevent child abuse from happening and, when child abuse does happen, to help ensure that cases are identified, reported, investigated, and followed up.

It is recognised that public, non-government and private organisations provide important services and support to help children and their families.

These include childcare, cultural, educational, religious, sporting and other organisations, which play an important role in helping children to grow up safe and happy.

But it is important that laws, rules and practices are in place toensure organisations protect children against the risk of sexual abuseand that claims of abuse and the impacts of abuse are appropriately responded to.

It is important that this inquiry explore claims of systemic failures by institutions to protect children from sexual abuse and related matters.

The inquiry should identify what can be done in the future to better prevent and respond to child sexual abuse, including holding perpetrators to account and providing justice to victims.

People who have been affected by child sexual abuse will be able to share their experiences with the inquiry if they want to, to assist with healing and to inform the Commissioners’ recommendations.

The Australian and State and Territory Governments have committed at the most recent Council of Australian Governments meeting to support this inquiry, and giving it their full cooperation.


What the Royal Commissionwill investigate

The Commissioners will examine past and current child sexual abuse in organisations and may make findings and recommendations on:

  • how organisations with a responsibility for childrenhave managed and responded to claims of sexual abuse and other forms of abuse and neglectassociated with child sexual abuse
  • whether organisations have done enough to respond to child sexual abuse when it has happened
  • what organisations can do to better protect children under their care
  • what organisations should do to identify  child sexual abuse and encourage people to report it
  • how organisations should respond when they find out information that suggests that sexual abuse of children under their responsibility is happening, or has happened in the past
  • what the barriers and failures have been to reporting, investigating and dealing with cases of child sexual abuse in organisations, and how these barriers can be removed in the future
  • what organisationsshould do to support survivors where child sexual abuse does occur
  • what organisations should do to ensure victims receive justice, including through redress by organisations, and investigation and prosecution of perpetrators.


The Commissioners can make any recommendations that they think will help improve the way things are done in the future or help existing survivors.

This includeslooking at laws, as well as the policies, rules and structure of organisations.  


What the Royal Commissionwill cover

The Royal Commission is focused on child sexual abuse within organisations and institutions.

The Commission will also look at matters related to child sexual abuse. This means any unlawful or improper treatment of children that is connected or associated with child sexual abuse generally, or in a particular case.

This recognises that other forms of abuse including physical abuse and neglect often happen with sexual abuse, and if connected they can be examined by the Commission.  

The Commissioners can look at any public or private organisation that is, or was in the past, involved with children, including non-government organisations and government agencies (including police and justice), schools, sporting clubs, orphanages, foster care, and religious organisations.

This includes where they consider an organisationcaring for a child is responsible for the abuse or for not responding appropriately, regardless of where or when the abuse took place.

The Commission will not specifically examine child sexual abuse outside organisations, such as in the family. However, any recommendations made by the Commissioners are likely to improve the response to child sexual abuse wherever it happens.



How the Commissioners will conduct their inquiry

To carry out the inquiry, the Commissioners will:

  • considerthe experiencesof people affected by child sexual abuse in organisations
  • look at archives, records and documentsand consider submissions andstatements from public, non-government and private organisations
  • look at the laws, as well as policies and practices of institutions, organisations and governments to prevent and respond to child sexual abuse
  • takeinto account the findings, recommendations, and information from past and existing inquiries, where appropriate. This can include drawing on the stories of witnesses from other inquiries (with their consent).

The Commissioners will make sure that people telling their stories have appropriate supportin dealing with any trauma that might come up from discussing their abuse.

The Commissioners will also make sure that people with special needs can participate fully in the inquiry. For example, this could include interpreters for people who speak a language other than English, assistance for people with disabilities, and help preparing submissions for people who need assistance with reading and writing. 

The Commission will make sure thatorganisations are given enough time to search and respond to requests for documents and records.


Handling of individual cases

The Royal Commission cannot prosecute individuals.

The Commission can refer individual cases to relevant law enforcement bodies, such as police, for investigation and, where appropriate, prosecution in a timely fashion.

The Commissioners will consider appropriate mechanisms for how the Commission might inquire into and investigate particular cases, including past cases, as appropriate. 

Mechanisms might include examining archives and records and working with relevant law enforcement bodies such as police.

This includes establishing investigative units to support their inquiry.

In handling evidence about specific cases, the Commissioners will take care not to do anything that could disrupt a current or future criminal prosecution or compensation case.


Timing and reporting

The Commissioners will begin their inquiry as soon as possible.

The Commission will prepare an interim report by 30 June 2014 so thatgovernments and organisations can start taking action on the Commission’s early findings and recommendations.

In this interim report, the Commissioners will identify when their final report will be completed. The Terms of Reference will set an end date for the Royal Commission of 2015, but this date will be subject to the advice of the Commissioners in their interim report. 

The Prime Minister can extend the final reporting date which has happened in previous Commissions.

The Commissioners will also be able to provide other interim reports throughout the life of the Royal Commission as appropriate.



Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse

The Royal Commission will soon start its work.If you need support or advice, a list of services you can contact is below.

Support services

National help lines

1800 RESPECT (24-hour sexual assault and domestic violence support)                           1800 737 732

Mensline (relationship support for men)                                                                                 1300 789 978

Lifeline (24-hour crisis support and suicide prevention)                                                         13 11 14

Suicide Call Back Service (24-hour crisis support and suicide prevention)                          1300 659 467

beyondblue (mental health support)                                                                                       1300 22 4636

SANE Australia Helpline (mental health support)                                                                   1800 187 263

Specialist national counselling services

Adults Surviving Child Abuse (counselling and support for survivors)                                   1300 657 380

Find and Connect (Forgotten Australians and Former Child Migrants)                                 1800 161 109

Bravehearts (counselling for survivors and child protection advocacy)                                1800 272 831

Care Leavers Australia Network (support and advocacy for Forgotten Australians)            1800 008 774

State and Territory sexual assault services

NSW Rape Crisis Centre                                                                                                        1800 424 017

Victoria Sexual Assault Crisis Line                                                                                         1800 806 292

South Australia Yarrow Place                                                                                                 1800 817 421

Western Australia Sexual Assault Resource Centre                                                              1800 199 888

Northern Territory Crisis Line                                                                                                 1800 019 116

Brisbane Rape and Incest Survivors Support Centre                                                            1800 010 120

Canberra Rape Crisis Centre                                                                                                 (02) 6247 2525

Tasmania Laurel House                                                                                                          (03) 6334 2740

Reporting child sexual abuse to authorities

Child abuse is a crime. If you have been a victim of abuse, or are concerned about a child being abused, this should be reported to police. The Royal Commission cannot prosecute individuals.

Getting involved in the Royal Commission

People wanting to provide evidence or find out more information about the Royal Commission can provide their contact details on 1800 099 340. Staff from the Royal Commission will make contact once the Commissioners begin their work.

For more information

For more information on the Royal Commissiongo to www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au.


In closing I would  urge anyone who has had their lives changed forever by these mongrels to come forward and take this last opportunity to blow the lid off Paedophilia in Australia. Likewise anyone with credible evidence or information should also do the right think and make the appropriate report.

I know that for many of the victims this is opening up a past they would rather forget but I also know that in doing so will enhance their chances of recovery and at the same time encourage many other victims to come forward and bring those responsible to justice.

I would be more than happy to  receive such evidence/information. should you feel so inclined, and  can assure you that it will get to those at the top and to the members of the Royal Commission.

You can contact me initially via the comment section and then if required we can exchange communications directly.

Peter Eyre -28/1/2013

Broadcaster – Investigative Journalist – Middle East Consultant – Political Analysis


Written by Peter Eyre

January 27, 2013 at 23:41

Posted in Corporate/Government Fraud and Corruption, News, Paedophilia

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,