Eyre International – Bringing You The News No One Else Wants To Bring You

The Hidden Truth Behind The News

Posts Tagged ‘MoD

New World Order ready to carry out an attack on Syria – Could this lead to WW3?

with one comment

Are we looking down the barrel at a potential  WW3?

Could this be the final straw by the New World Order (NATO) to entice Lebanon, Palestine and Iran into conflict?

Israel and the New World Order Cabal have now revealed their true colours in putting out misinformation on the true situation that exists within Syria. There is no threat from Chemical and Biological Weapons , as was the case prior to the Iraq War.

558368_344492715638123_1436146868_n

The Zionist Octopus has taken over the White House and Congress

20121105_121105a-003_rdax_276x184

The Military Arm of the New World Order

425808_10151062693116336_1708303472_n

The imbecile responsible for the current Islamaphobia

USS-Eisenhower-Arrives-Near-Syria

USS Eisenhower on Standby off the coast of Syria

Iwo Jima Best Photo

USS Iwo Jima off Syria

I sincerely believed that we would avoid possible conflict with Syria but as we now see this country will follow in the footsteps of Libya if the Zionist controlled United States Government is allow to yet again breach the protocol of the United Nations (which is also controlled by the New World Order) and do exactly whatever it so chooses i.e. with or without the approval of the UN……..as was the case of the Iraq War.

When will the sheep of this world fully understand what is going on here and that this conflict has nothing to do with humanitarian issues, democracy or the well being of the country concerned……..this is the master plan that was planned over 20 years ago by Paul Wolfowitz  and his cabal at the Project for the New America. This was also confirmed by General Wesley Clarke, the ex Supreme Commander of NATO Europe, when he visited the Pentagon (soon after the false flag called 9/11) when he was given information that the US was going to take out at least 7 Islamic countries over the next 10 years….on that list were Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Iran, Yemen, Somalia and needless to say possibly Sudan.

Latest news state the following:

The arrival of the USS Eisenhower is likely a show of power by the country as a way of warning Assad against any major moves, such as using chemical weapons. The aircraft carrier joins the USS Iwo Jima Amphibious Ready Group, which holds about 2,000 Marines and is already sitting off the coast of Syria.

Should the US decide to intervene in the bloody conflict, which has taken the lives of at least 40,000 people since it began in March 2011, they will have at their disposal about 10,000 troops, 17 warships, 70 bombers, and 10 destroyers.

Then we have the same cabal in London  headed by David Cameron and his partner in crime William Hague pushing this along in conjunction with the French and their Zionist President with Germany sitting in the side lines……….exactly the same “Hunter Killer Pack” we saw in Libya.

New Thermo Nuclear Weapon used in Libya

NATO version of humanitarian aid – Massive WMD exploding  – a  blend of Depleted Uranium and Tactical  Low Yield Nuclear Weapons as used on Libya and resulting in the potential geonocide of over one million people!!!

The Israeli Government is playing a major role in this stirring up and believe me this could well spark of the inevitable World War Three that has been sitting on the horizon now for some considerable time.

Wolfowitz

The author of wars and conflicts – Paul Wolfowitz

I again repeat that any further conflict in the Middle East could bring about a major war, that if unleashed will be the most catastrophic event in our planets history with devastating radioactive fallout and depleted uranium nano particles being distributed to all four corners of the globe as my chart below clearly shows………add to this the graph below it and one can see that radioactive particles do arrive on our respective shores which is in clear violation of the Geneva Convention…….needless to say it also fits in with the UN Agenda 21 which is to remove up to 90% of the world’s population by whatever means!!

Solution

Air flow chart

Tomorrow the world

Air filter graph

The above graph clearly show extremely high levels of radiation over the UK centred around Greater London compliments of the Iraq War and the Afghanistan War………the British Government hid this from the citizens of the United Kingdom

NWO plan

Some of the “Major War Criminals” all associated with the New World Order are all shown below……..the list of offender is too large to print but we all know who they are and their day will come!!

DU Victims

obama_wall_0725

mideast-israel-u-s-romne-008

clinton

220px-Paul_Wolfowitzslide_250206_1511509_free

_42453705_ap203bodyrice

Bush Clinton

article-1337509081510-132FA42A000005DC-769957_466x310

Al Gore

00226bfa16c896eb896eed46bbd4141e

Partners in conflict

William+Hague+Cameron+Sarkozy+Visit+Libya+DXO6_AP0dSbl

aa-Tony-Blair-war-criminal-poster

david_rothschild

Gordon%20Brown%20Prime%20Minister

Netanyahu phone

sarkozy cameron debit crisis

Cameron and Thatcher

Net and Obam

Dibujo-3

Dibujo 2

georgesoros-2

bb1

Dibujo-15

nuke-jv

war-criminals1

Big oil-1

nwo-child

The above mongrels are all responsible for millions of people who have become victims of their deadly WMD’s, their deeply flawed foreign policy and their respective “Geo Poltical Greed”……..here are just a few of those victims.

Another victimDU Child in the US

DU Baby 2

DU Baby

Palestinian DU Victime

the-kurdish-genocide

dibujo-6

Dibujo-1

thumbnail.aspx

Victims of greed

DU Children

False flags & Assasinations

So you may ask what would be the outcome of such a catosrophic event…….the answer is very simple:

Worldwide contamination, massive hike in cancers, still births, grossly disfigured babies at birth, permanent damage to the world’s DNA of all life as we now it and with many other medical issues as shown below:

DU Slide

radiation-effects

This is a government poster but in reality it does not cover the deadly depleted uranium effects

DU and the Body

Detective

cbw

Monsoon and Cyclone activity

The above chart that I made up some time ago shows how the contamination comes back to mother earth. The radioactive nano particles remain airborne until it rains or snows……..then it contaminates major rivers, soil, crops and drinking water……this is truly an act of genocide against all mankind in a very slow, extremely painful  and progressive way!

In my next article I will again cover the consequences of such a war in much greater detail.

Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant – 12/12/2012

Written by Peter Eyre

December 12, 2012 at 04:54

Posted in News

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Did Richard Goldstone hide more sinister crimes in Gaza? Part 4(Final) (Republished)

leave a comment »

Did Richard Goldstone hide more sinister crimes in Gaza? Part 4(Final) (Republished)

My own submission to the United Nations

undefined

undefined

 

Having much knowledge of the long term suffering of the people of Palestine and in particular that of Gaza I decided to lodge my own Human Rights Complaint directly with the UN in Geneva.

 I did not receive any acknowledgement from them and so I again addressed my complaint to all departments within the UN in Geneva and also to the Red Cross and Red Crescent pointing out that I had not received any confirmation for such an important document………this eventually forced them into sending me a formal acknowledgement

From: PETER EYRE

Subject: Call for Submissions

To: factfindinggaza@ohchr.org
Cc: palestine@un.int

Date: Wednesday, 10 June, 2009, 11:13 AM

To whom it may concern,

 

Please find attached my submission in regard to the Gaza Investigation by the United Nations.

 

Please acknowledge receipt of this communication

 

Yours Sincerely      Peter Eyre

 

Submission:  The United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict

The Secretariat of the Fact-Finding Mission

c/o OHCHR, G. Motta 48,

Geneva

Switzerland                                                                                            10th June 2009

factfindinggaza@ohchr.org

 

Re; Submission pursuant to Resolution S-9/1 of the United Nations      

         Human Rights Council (HRC), adopted on 12 January 2009.

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please find below a summary of my research in regard to events leading up to the Israeli – Gaza Conflict 2008 – 2009, including events that took place after the withdrawal of the IDF that all fall within the parameters of your inquiry

In the context of the above Resolution and pursuant to the term of the inquiry namely: International Independent Fact Finding Mission mandated “to investigate all violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law that might have been committed at any time in the context of the military operations that were conducted in Gaza during the period from 27 December 2008 and 18 January 2009 whether before during or after.

The submission covers many aspects of the build up to the conflict which in my opinion constitutes breaches of both International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law. It reveals many possible failings and weaknesses that occurred historically that were instrumental in the development of the conflict.

These possible failings and weaknesses involved the United Nations (UN), as the main overseer and The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The involvement of certain International Governments also played a major role in allowing the already strained relationship, between the parties involved in the conflict, to further deteriorate. This must therefore reflect on those governments, namely that of the United States, United Kingdom, Egypt and Israel including some of the countries that are signatory to NATO.

It is also evident that one of the main contributing factors in the build up to the conflict was the failings of those responsible for monitoring and implementing the guidelines of The Oslo Accord. One can clearly see that all the many issues that occurred on both sides relating to internal and external security may have been instrumental into one side or the other taking action.

In order for your team to truly evaluate what happened I think it would be beneficial to look into the possible root causes of the conflict and as to what is still keeping the fire burning. I sincerely hope that the information provided helps your team complete their task and in reaching a successful conclusion.    

The historically backdrop in the build up to this conflict goes back before the final Israeli withdrawal in 2005. The pride of Gaza was its new international airport that had been funded by Japan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Spain and Germany with the design by Moroccan Architects. The airport opened in 1998 at a total cost off $86 million and gave the people of Gaza access to the outside world.

However, the United States kept applying pressure on Israel to remove Israeli settlers from the strip and to eventually withdraw from Gaza. In 2001 the systematic destruction of this vital lifeline began followed by the final act of ripping up the runway and taxiways in 2002. The Israeli’s reason for doing this was because they felt that they would not be able to control the flow of possible weapons into and out of Gaza which at the time was under the control of The Palestinian Authority.

This totally unacceptable act of aggression resulted in condemnation from the United Nations and the International Air Transport Association (IATA) as well as other member countries. This act alone left the people of Gaza with a bitter taste. The final end to Israeli dwellers and the withdrawal of the IDF in 2005 supposedly signaled an end to the occupation.

I believe that in actual fact this was not the end of the occupation of Gaza but rather a new phase in its occupation and the start of an extensive blockade. When one looks at the time when the airport commenced operations it truly gave the people a ray of hope and gave them a certain level of freedom with borders open and trade taking place (with restrictions). However, we now see a total blockade and an indirect occupation of Gaza with many more restrictions and border closures.

Immediately prior to this pull out we saw the establishment of The Oslo Accord which was deeply flawed with Israel basically calling the shots. A fishing zone was declared which fell well short of normal international protocol. It created a marine buffer zone in both the North and South of the Gaza Marine Area and in doing so reduced both the breadth and width by a significant margin. This act alone was not in line with normal international borders and basically deprived the Palestinians of claiming it territorial waters, rights and EEZ that is so vital to their economy. The Israeli’s insisted that as part of the deal that they would be responsible for all security aspects and that the offshore area would come under their control. This further extended into total control of land, sea and air.

This was the first major mistake made by the mediators and would have serious consequences down the track. During this same period of time British Gas had found some interesting large reserves of natural gas in the offshore Gaza Marine Area and those finds resulted in two wells being named Gaza Marine 1 and 2.

One can clearly see that this issue would also back fire and create total mistrust.

When you look at a nautical based chart for the region and the optional plans for the subsea pipelines it is very easy to see why many were concerns.

Let’s just dwell on those two issues alone and focus in on the implications to the people of Gaza and Palestine. You know have a situation whereby the IDF do not accept the terms of the Oslo Accord and continue to kill, injure or intimidate the fishermen.   The IDF warships patrol the strip on a regular basis, open fire and also sometimes ram these harmless vessels. The Israeli naval vessels also severely restrict the fishermen to sometimes 6 nm or down to 3nm whenever it suits them. As a result of these actions The Gazan fishing industry has collapsed and the fishing stocks in the permitted area have been depleted to a dangerously unacceptable level. This industry was so vital the people of Palestinians in terms of fish for protein intake and for its economy.  Surely this constitutes a breach of International Human Rights Law, International Humanitarian Law.

The second and most important issue is that of the huge reserves of natural gas in the Gaza Marine Area and their location in regard to international borders. One must also address the adjacent Israeli reserves that could in actual fact be jointly owned and if that is the case we could again see a violation of international law. The UN has already condemned Israel for exploiting Palestinian natural resources and this could prove to be an extension to that problem. Again we come back to the issue of possible violation of both International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law.

To put these two very important issues into perspective we have to visit Gaza and see the world’s largest outdoor prison and all of the associated poverty and hardship that has been forced upon them. We can very quickly carry out an analysis and realize that in actual fact apart from the urgent requirement of Medical Aid and Humanitarian Supplies the people of Gaza and West Bank do not need financial aid as they have all the wealth in the world sitting offshore, which belongs to Gaza and the people of Palestine. In that regard there is certainly a case to answer via UNCLOS and the ICJ.

Finally we come to the actual crimes associated with the conflict just before, during and after the event. What is absurd is the fact that in June 2008 Israel was debating a plan to attack Gaza whilst at the same time they were in discussions for a 6 month ceasefire with Hamas. Prior to this there Ex Chief of the IDF had quoted that Hamas had to be removed from Gaza before the gas could flow.

I can say with great authority there is certainly a link between the very lucrative offshore reserves and the attack on Gaza. Israel realized that there was a distinct possibility that the Gaza Gas from Marine 1 and 2 could well be directed to Egypt and then turned into LNG for onward export to UK, US or wherever. This prompted the involvement of the British PM Tony Blair to intervene in an attempt to get talks underway again. The initial contract with Egypt was therefore cancelled.

The Israeli desperately needed this gas deal and asked British Gas to again enter into urgent negotiations in order to strike a deal before such an attack was carried out. Had they gone in too early the Central Government (PA) would have gone against the Israeli’s as a protest and the contract would never have been signed. Again Talks with British Gas fell though and Israel decided to go in and remove Hamas and had they been successful the gas deal would have been back on track.  As we all know worldwide condemnation forced them to pull out.

Before detailing the violations within Gaza I would like to draw to the attention of the United Nations that Israel has ignored over 130 UN Resolutions with the total support of the United States.  In addition to this the UN Permanent Observer Mission for Palestine has sent over 339 letters to the UN Secretary General complaining of serious illegal Israeli actions and other matters between 2005 and early 2009. We have also seen other violations of the Geneva Convention that is already well documented.

The five year interim agreement has failed from its onset and relationships have become strained after many serious incursions by the IDF. In December 2008 we witnessed the totally disproportionate attack on Gaza. Since the conflict the crossings have been severely restricted to a point of stagnation. They close without warning despite the urgency of Medical/Humanitarian Aid and stop those with urgent medical conditions from seeking treatment.

We have seen high levels of intimidation in the offshore Gaza area and we continue to see regular bombings by the IDF at selected targets, most of which have been in the tunnel area of Southern Gaza. It is obvious that since the agreement between the US – Egypt – Israel and the continued financial/military support, the Rafah crossing is totally controlled by the US and Israel. When we add up all the violations – UN Resolutions, Geneva Conventions, Oslo Accord and the terrible consequences of the attack on Gaza we can see that the Palestinians have really been dealt a card from the bottom of the pack.

As an ex military man serving in the Middle East and having spent much time in the region as a consultant I find the current situation totally unacceptable. When the IDF first moved into Gaza, I, like most veterans, watched with horror as we first observed the parachute illumination flares being fired. This immediately was followed by White Phosphorus time and time again all of which were over highly populated areas which as we all know this is in violation of the Geneva Convention.

The use of White Phosphorus on densely populated areas is in violation of the Geneva Convention: Protocol on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Incendiary Weapons (Protocol III). Certain use of incendiary weapons, in particular the use of air delivered incendiary weapons against targets situated amongst concentrations of civilians (Protocol III to the Conventional Weapons Convention). WP was and has been used extensively

When WP rains down on areas of population it is impossible to avoid the fallout.  Sometimes they explode very close to the ground or at acute angles & the concentration of WP are intense and in this case the casualty level can be extremely high. When WP is released into the atmosphere it is vital that persons are not out in the street & families remain inside with windows & doors closed. Phosphorus can badly damage the lungs of babies and children. WP continues to burn for some time as long as it has oxygen. When it comes in contact with the skin it can burn right through to the bone and in such heavy concentrations will cause death by burning beyond recognition. Evidence of such injuries and deaths are available at the hospital and by the ambulance crews attending the scene.

Depleted Uranium (DU) weaponry was and are still being used in the Gaza Strip which again is in violation of the Geneva Convention.  The use of weaponry containing Depleted Uranium (DU) with indiscriminate effect or of a nature to cause superflouus injury or unnecessary suffering is in violation of Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions. Countries using such weaponry have an obligation to ascertain that new weapons do not violate the laws and customs of war or any other international law. The International Court of Justice considers this rule a binding customary humanitarian law. These US manufactured weapons are currently in us by the US, UK and other NATO forces as well as the IDF. They have been used in the Balkans, Kuwait, Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Gaza and now possible Pakistan

Chemical toxicity of DU is about a million times greater than its radiological hazard. Health effects of DU are determined by factors such as the extent of exposure & whether it was internal, external inhalation, Ingestion & Shrapnel. Causes Congenital Disorders, Immune System Damage, Increased Risk of Birth Defects & Brain Damage

There are also serious long-term effects of DU such as malignant cancers, ludicrously high leukemia rates, heart problems, 4 x increases in cancer among children. DU dust can also contaminate agricultural areas & water supply. In 2003 DU was used in the Iraq “Shock and Awe” campaign. Around 350 sites were contaminated resulting in around 140,000 cancer cases. It is estimated that this increased to between 7-8,000 new cases per annum. This would indicate that the future for Gaza is not good unless the UN investigate, locate, isolate and force the removal of such contamination without delay.

I would also add that these potential highly contaminated sites are currently used by locals, especially children, to forage around for recyclable items. The danger to children in particular is extremely high as there organs and immune system are not yet fully developed

A strong case may also exist in the use of DIME weaponry in the Gaza Strip based on the type of injuries observed and should form part of the investigation. Indications reveal the use of DIME weapons were experimentally carried out on Gaza.

These weapons consist of a Carbon Fibre case filled with mixture of explosive and a very dense powder of a Heavy Metal Tungsten Alloy (HMTA) composed of tungsten & other metals such as cobalt, nickel or iron. The casing disintegrates into extremely small particles, as opposed to shrapnel. Survivors close to the lethal zone may have their limbs amputated (as the micro shrapnel can slice through soft tissue and bone) and may subsequently contract cancer from the HMTA micro-shrapnel embedded in their body tissue. The carcinogenic effects of HMTA have been studied by the U.S. Armed Forces since at least 2000, along with DU and these alloys were found to cause a transformation in the victim’s cells.

I would also add that any surgeon, when operating on such victims, will only remove fragments that are safe to do so and many other fragments remain inside the body to carry out there own lethal progression.

Other terrible war crimes have been committed by the IDF whilst inside the Gaza Strip. Much of this activity is well documented and the team will gain knowledge of such violation by carrying out local interviews The ironic aspect of these crimes is the fact that it constitutes a violation of the IDF own Code of Conduct which clearly show the parameters in which they have to operate. Conclusive evidence exists locally on this aspect and I have details those rulings as per below:

Code of Conduct against militants and Palestinian civilians

Military action can only be taken against military targets.
The use of force must be proportional.
Soldiers may only use weaponry that was issued by the IDF.
Anyone who surrenders cannot be attacked.
Only those who are properly trained can interrogate prisoners.
Soldiers must accord dignity and respect to the Palestinian population and those arrested.
Soldiers must give appropriate medical care, when conditions allow, to oneself and one’s enemy.
Pillaging is absolutely and totally illegal.
Soldiers must show proper respect for religious and cultural sites and artefacts.
Soldiers must protect international aid workers, including their property and vehicles.
Soldiers must report all violations of this code.

We now come to the issue of “Who sold such weapons to Israel”?

It is evident that these weapons are illegal in the context by which they have or are being used. It is also believed that the sale of such weapons could constitute a violation of the US Department of Defense own rulings on the export and usage of these weapons that are manufactured primarily in the US. A member of Congress has already raised this issue with the US Secretary of State. It must also be noted that all weapons are passed through Congress for approval with the final signatory being the President. The sale of all the arms to Israel is well documented and normally one can see much activity just prior to conflict which was the case in Israel when 1,000 Smart Bombs were exported just prior to the attack.

 Finally as evidence, I add reference to the following list of some of the more recent letters sent to the UN Secretary General from the Permanent Representative for the UN in Palestine. These original letters are held at the United Nations for your perusal and I presume form part of any enquiry if relevant to the location:

2008

June 3, 18 and 25  – July 25  – August 1 – September Nil – October 20th – November 5, 17 – December 27, 29 and 30

2009

January 2, 5, 6, 9, 12, and 14 – February 2, 18 and 25 – March 6 and 25

April 8, 16 and 30 – May 22

On the question of Depleted Uranium we have seen flaws in the research and testing techniques especially on the effects of low level radiation as opposed to high dosage rates. The Balkans revealed many such flaws which did not bring the result most people were hoping for. It is fact that in forensic science one can now prosecute a person for carrying out the murder of another person, even when the victim has never been found. This is done by DNA evidence of both the victim and the offender and also other on site sampling and laboratory tests.

In the Balkans forensic evident was found in the use of DU but the outcome was not conclusive in that the Military denied its use. Why such evidence did not bring the expected result was indeed a major flaw in that enquiry. DU Penetrators were found and other DU weapons fragments with clear traces of yellow on the casings along with the appropriate radiation readings.

We saw the same happen during the Lebanon 2006 conflict when again Israel was accused of using DU weapons. Further independent laboratory tests on samples taken from craters revealed the presence of enriched uranium and much more. Additional tests further revealed the possible use of 4th Generation Weapons. All the appropriate readings were very well documented and are still retained. Again good evidence was recovered but the result was again flawed and the IDF denied it usage.

Kuwait and Iraq was the first time that DU truly came out into the open and all evidence was confirmed by the experts and the various armed forces. As a result of an unfortunate accident at a US depot in Kuwait, contamination from the DU spread in the area. This was conclusive evidence that the US and other NATO forces were using DU weaponry. The Kuwaiti Government then ordered the US to clean up the site and remove the contamination. This is normal policy and in this case the US had to remove around 7,500 kg of contaminated soil/sand and ship it back to the US for disposal. If one can relate to any such bomb site in Gaza then we can see the same problem on a much smaller scale.

Local independent sampling from Gaza has already taken place and currently under laboratory testing in both the UK and Sweden. The initial findings show some very interesting aspects with an apparent firm link to Depleted Uranium.  Further sampling is required from the Rafah border & tunnel area of Southern Gaza to conclude this private investigation.

Gaza is an extremely small enclave with a dense population. The world was truly shocked at the disproportionate attack by the IDF and the high rate of injuries and deaths, especially in women and children. One cannot imagine the on going casualties that may follow as a result of the many weapons used on Gaza, some of which appeared to be experimental. It is hoped that this independent research will reveal shocking evidence with good clear results.

DU as we know becomes an aerosol with a potentially lethal outcome. The DU Dust/Contamination can travel very long distances both in the adjacent area, region and further afield. It is possible that this contamination has since passed over the border to Israel, Lebanon, Jordan and Egypt. During the attack on Lebanon in 2006 the DU contamination moved into Northern Israel within one hour.  As a result of this contamination we may well see a dramatic rise in cancer related illnesses both in Palestine and the region. This, as we know may also cause still births and badly disfigured babies and reflects on the importance of keeping very accurate health records in Gaza and West Bank. It would also be advisable for adjacent countries to also carry out their own analysis.

To summarise we now have an opportunity to investigate in great detail the past failings of the many authorities involved in all past and current DU investigation. We can now carry out an assortment of different up to date tests on both victims and in the laboratory. These tests should take into account that methods used in the past, such as the ICRP Biokenetic Model, is not suitable for low level radiation. We must also focus on the uniqueness of Alpha particles once inhaled or ingested into the human body. Its capacity to start the cancer cycle, alter the genetics, cell structure and DNA and more importantly the passing on to the unborn child and indeed their siblings.

I am sure that if the UN team were given more time they would find much more convincing evidence in and around Gaza. It is extremely sad to learn that your team has been given time constraints for such an important issue. As you know the situation in this region is extremely sensitive and one could only assume that if a stone remains unturned it will add more fuel to the existing problems.

We have all seen the incapacity of many organisations in attempting to avoid the onset of the attack on Gaza. The writing was on the wall some six months prior to the conflict when debates were taking place and weapons orders were being processed from the United States via Congress. We saw the shameful way the world’s governments observed the onslaught but did little about it. We saw their own brothers turn their backs in their hour of need. Finally we saw the disgraceful workings of the United Nations and the Security Council, when despite a majority vote against Israel they lacked the ability to stop the conflict in its early stages.

What we did see was the tremendous turnout around the world of the masses. We observed that people power can change events in this world and force governments to take notice or succumb to their demands.

Finally we have now seen the UN carry out their own investigation in relation to the attacks on UN facilities in such a slow painful way. We have seen the results of those enquires which proved conclusively that Israel were guilty on almost all counts. What we did not see was that despite the evidence no attempted action has been taken via the International Court of Justice in bringing those responsible to trial. What we did see was the UN accusing them of those crimes and demand compensation for the damage caused.

One could ask the question why was this not taken further and why did this very quick investigation only deal with UN breaches. It was obvious that those same incidents had been duplicated on the people of Gaza both in the indiscriminate attacks on it citizens and on their property.

This investigation in the true sense is relatively easy compared to such places as the Balkans. All the alleged violations were carried out in a very small enclave and all the evidence is concentrated in such a small area. I feel that the United Nations has a real opportunity here to show it true strength and credibility in bringing this investigation to a successful conclusion.

We already have sufficient support from many member states to ban DU weapons production and use. We see a very strong anti DU campaign talking place in Europe even to a point that some of those countries are now funding research into the DU problem. What we do not see is the same support coming from the United States and other NATO countries that are currently using such weapons. One can clearly see that war can be a very lucrative business despite the barbaric indiscriminate use of such weapons.

The US has re classified an array of such weapons as being conventional when in actual fact they have strong ties with nuclear weapons. One could even see a possible connection in DU Weaponry being added to the list of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD based on evidence that DU particles have been transmitted over the far reaches of the globe. We all know the tremendous pressures being applied to world government on the issues of Global Warming and that we all have to look at our own carbon footprint and may have to pay the price. However, we do not see those same nations showing concern at the contamination of the upper atmosphere as a result of the use of DU.

We can draw down on evidence in this particular case when we relate to the High Volume Air Sampler (HVAS) filter systems deployed by the Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) situation in Aldermaston, Berkshire UK. The monitoring of Uranium in the atmosphere has been carried out since the early 1990’s with more intense studies being carried since this time. After the “Shock and Awe” campaign in Iraq and the same activity in Afghanistan, the UK was subjected to extremely high levels of uranium causing alarm to the authorities. This is also very well documented and is not contained in my submission.

One does not have to be into rocket science to understand that this is a grave threat to the whole of mankind resulting in harm to possible many thousands if not millions of people. In this context I believe that the UN is in a very unique position whilst carrying out its investigations in Gaza to finally, not only prove that DU was used, but also to instigate action to stop the manufacturing of such weapons and to  remove such weapons from military stock piles. It is also important for the UN to force Israel to reveal its own nuclear activity in such areas.

Finally we come to what can be done to ensure peace be returned to this region.

I believe that the UN should send in their own peacekeeping troops (Blue Helmets not combat troops from NATO) to take up positions on all borders (both sides) and once in place lift the entire blockade of land, sea and air. One could then create a corridor between Gaza and West Bank to unite the two enclaves and at the same time create trade. From the Israeli perspective they could build an elevated highway to take traffic over the Palestinian strip in order for them to gain access between Central/Northern Israel and Southern Israel.

On the issue of re construction one would have to be extremely careful with the assumed presence of DU contamination. As we have already pointed out such sites have to be isolated/fenced/contained and finally de contaminated by the removal of the subsoil’s and debris etc. One would have to take the weather conditions into account when carrying out this activity based on prevailing winds and carefully make sure that resident were well clear during the operation.

Under normal protocol in the Nuclear Industry, any waste generated as a by product of the industry has to be safely stored. In the case of contamination it becomes the responsibility of the instigators to remove all traces of such contamination and return it to its place of origin. It would be Israel in this case with the involvement of the United States who exports DU weaponry to Israel knowing its final usage. It is obvious to say that with the size of Israel one could not stockpile such waste unless a suitable location was found in the Negev Desert and certainly not in or near Gaza or West Bank.

Finally when the clean up has been completed a reconstruction programme can commence especially in the building of a sea/container port and urgent re construction of the badly damaged international airport. During this period urgent action must be taken via UNCLOS and the ICJ to clarify/re define the true international borders between Egypt and Gaza, Gaza and Israel, West Bank and Israel, West Bank and Jordan. The establishment of legal offshore limits and the creation of an Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ).  

On the question of all offshore oil/gas reserves both within Gaza and Israeli waters. The UNCLOS and ICJ must clarify who legally own what. In the case where a reserve is jointly owned make sure that immediate activity is halted until the results on the enquiry is known.

 With all this underway the Palestinians can then be allowed (in conjunction with British Gas) to re negotiate the Joint Venture Agreement (JV) with all parties involved, including Hamas. It must be noted that these reserves belong to the country that own the coastline and that the share ratio should reflect a fair agreement which is not the current case.

It would be my recommendation for the oil/gas to then be piped directly to Gaza which would entail the construction of a large domestic gas plant and an adjacent Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) plant to process surplus gas for export.

This will not only bring high technology to Gaza and the Palestinians but will also create many jobs. Several power stations would have to be built or modified with industrial gas turbine engines and then the natural gas can be piped to those facilities to run Palestine’s energy requirements.

The spin off from the above will allow industry, public transport, commercial transport and domestic housing to all run on gas and the lucrative export of surplus gas. Any dealings with Israel would be entirely under the control of the Palestinians in conjunction with British Gas.

The future prosperity of both Gaza and West Bank (Palestine) looks extremely bright and I can say with great confidence that Gaza in particular can become the Mini Dubai of the Eastern Mediterranean. The international community must identify the terrible conditions and way of life that has been inflicted on the people of Palestine and remove this terrible blockade without delay. Palestine must be given its rightful sovereign statehood by the United Nations as a matter of priority and the UN investigation team should bring a successful conclusion to this investigation.

I have intentionally left out all the many references to the violation carried out in both Gaza and West Bank as I know that all of this is very well documented in the archives of the United Nations.

As a footnote to this submission it is my intention to place this in the public domain once you have received it.

I look forward to your preliminary response.

Yours Sincerely

Peter Eyre

Middle East Consultant  

 

 

Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant – 8/12/2012

Written by Peter Eyre

December 8, 2012 at 22:44

Posted in News

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Did Richard Goldstone hide more sinister crimes in Gaza? Part 3 (Republished)

with 2 comments

Did Richard Goldstone hide more sinister crimes in Gaza? – Part 3

 Members of Congress rejected the Goldstone Report

undefined

Israel guilty of a disproportionate attacks designed to punish, humiliate and terrorise a civilian population

Although we have seen some shortfalls in Goldstone’s report we can clearly see the true face of some Zionist members of the US Congress as they used their “Iron Fist” methods to stop this report moving forward.

It is evident that ever since this report was first tabled the powers that be have used almost every excuse to bin it. We were first led to believe that to delay it could help in a Middle East peace deal (wishful thinking). With the help of Obama, Clinton and Abbas, the three musketeers managed to convince Geneva to delay this process until the following year.

Within a very short period of time it was obvious that the world was starting to respond to this decision with disgust and further pressure was applied by many of the Arabic nations. Again we saw a reversal of this decision when it was again raised in the United Nations. Despite much criticism that this report did not go far enough at least we all started to see a ray of hope in bringing this to the International Court of Justice.

I have decided to print this document in its entirety so that we, the general public, can see the disgraceful attitude of those in power in the United States. Time and time again we see this power abused in the UN when the US vetoes any such proposal. The world cannot allow this US protectionism of Israel to continue. We have clearly seen the weakness of the Secretary General and the United Nations in the past and if this report is further delayed the consequences could lead to more acts of terrorism and the destabilisation of the Middle East. When one adds to this the intimidation by the Israelis at the Al-Aqsa Mosque we are starting to see clear unopposed aggression with total US support.  

The only way forward is for the entire Arab League to stand firm and demand that in the name of justice this case be re introduced through the court without further delay. The people of Gaza have been treated in the most terrible manner and this move by Congress only adds to their suffering. This was truly a test for Obama and would have given him his only chance to show which side of the fence he sits…….. unfortunately his promised change did not come and he succumbed to Zionist manipulation just like the rest of Congress !!!

Just some of the key Zionists

Here is ta copy of the proposed resolution before the House of Representatives as tabled on the 23rd of October 2009 and those that tabled it as per below:

Calling on the President and the Secretary of State to oppose unequivocally any endorsement or further consideration of the `Report of the United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the… (Introduced in House)

HRES 867 IH

111th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. RES. 867

Calling on the President and the Secretary of State to oppose unequivocally any endorsement or further consideration of the `Report of the United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict’ in multilateral fora.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

October 23, 2009

Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN (for herself, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, and Mr. ACKERMAN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs


RESOLUTION

Calling on the President and the Secretary of State to oppose unequivocally any endorsement or further consideration of the `Report of the United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict’ in multilateral fora.

Whereas, on January 12, 2009, the United Nations Human Rights Council passed Resolution A/HRC/S-9/L.1, which authorized a `fact-finding mission’ regarding Israel’s conduct of Operation Cast Lead against violent militants in the Gaza Strip between December 27, 2008, and January 18, 2009;

Whereas the resolution pre-judged the outcome of its investigation, by one-sidedly mandating the `fact-finding mission’ to `investigate all violations of international human rights law and International Humanitarian Law by . . . Israel, against the Palestinian people . . . particularly in the occupied Gaza Strip, due to the current aggression’;

Whereas the mandate of the `fact-finding mission’ makes no mention of the relentless rocket and mortar attacks, which numbered in the thousands and spanned a period of eight years, by Hamas and other violent militant groups in Gaza against civilian targets in Israel, that necessitated Israel’s defensive measures;

Whereas the `fact-finding mission’ included a member who, before joining the mission, had already declared Israel guilty of committing atrocities in Operation Cast Lead by signing a public letter on January 11, 2009, published in the Sunday Times, that called Israel’s actions `war crimes’;

Whereas the mission’s flawed and biased mandate gave serious concern to many United Nations Human Rights Council Member States which refused to support it, including Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cameroon, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, the Republic of Korea, Slovakia, Slovenia, Switzerland, Ukraine, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;

Whereas the mission’s flawed and biased mandate troubled many distinguished individuals who refused invitations to head the mission;

Whereas, on September 15, 2009, the `United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict’ released its report;

Whereas the report repeatedly made sweeping and unsubstantiated determinations that the Israeli military had deliberately attacked civilians during Operation Cast Lead;

Whereas the authors of the report, in the body of the report itself, admit that `we did not deal with the issues . . . regarding the problems of conducting military operations in civilian areas and second-guessing decisions made by soldiers and their commanding officers `in the fog of war.’;

Whereas in the October 16th edition of the Jewish Daily Forward, Richard Goldstone, the head of the `United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict’, is quoted as saying, with respect to the mission’s evidence-collection methods, `If this was a court of law, there would have been nothing proven.’;

Whereas the report, in effect, denied the State of Israel the right to self-defense, and never noted the fact that Israel had the right to defend its citizens from the repeated violent attacks committed against civilian targets in southern Israel by Hamas and other Foreign Terrorist Organizations operating from Gaza;

Whereas the report largely ignored the culpability of the Government of Iran and the Government of Syria, both of whom sponsor Hamas and other Foreign Terrorist Organizations;

Whereas the report usually considered public statements made by Israeli officials not to be credible, while frequently giving uncritical credence to statements taken from what it called the `Gaza authorities’, i.e. the Gaza leadership of Hamas;

Whereas, notwithstanding a great body of evidence that Hamas and other violent Islamist groups committed war crimes by using civilians and civilian institutions, such as mosques, schools, and hospitals, as shields, the report repeatedly downplayed or cast doubt upon that claim;

Whereas in one notable instance, the report stated that it did not consider the admission of a Hamas official that Hamas often `created a human shield of women, children, the elderly and the mujahideen, against [the Israeli military]‘ specifically to `constitute evidence that Hamas forced Palestinian civilians to shield military objectives against attack.’;

Whereas Hamas was able to significantly shape the findings of the investigation mission’s report by selecting and prescreening some of the witnesses and intimidating others, as the report acknowledges when it notes that `those interviewed in Gaza appeared reluctant to speak about the presence of or conduct of hostilities by the Palestinian armed groups . . . from a fear of reprisals’;

Whereas even though Israel is a vibrant democracy with a vigorous and free press, the report of the `fact-finding mission’ erroneously asserts that `actions of the Israeli government . . . have contributed significantly to a political climate in which dissent with the government and its actions . . . is not tolerated’;

Whereas the report recommended that the United Nations Human Rights Council endorse its recommendations, implement them, review their implementation, and refer the report to the United Nations Security Council, the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, and the United Nations General Assembly for further action;

Whereas the report recommended that the United Nations Security Council–

(1) require the Government of Israel to launch further investigations of its conduct during Operation Cast Lead and report back to the Security Council within six months;

(2) simultaneously appoint an `independent committee of experts’ to monitor and report on any domestic legal or other proceedings undertaken by the Government of Israel within that six-month period; and

(3) refer the case to the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court after that six-month period;

Whereas the report recommended that the United Nations General Assembly consider further action on the report and establish an escrow fund, to be funded entirely by the State of Israel, to `pay adequate compensation to Palestinians who have suffered loss and damage’ during Operation Cast Lead;

Whereas the report ignored the issue of compensation to Israelis who have been killed or wounded, or suffered other loss and damage, as a result of years of past and continuing rocket and mortar attacks by Hamas and other violent militant groups in Gaza against civilian targets in southern Israel;

Whereas the report recommended `that States Parties to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 start criminal investigations [of Operation Cast Lead] in national courts, using universal jurisdiction’ and that `following investigation, alleged perpetrators should be arrested and prosecuted’;

Whereas the concept of `universal jurisdiction’ has frequently been used in attempts to detain, charge, and prosecute Israeli and United States officials and former officials in connection with unfounded allegations of war crimes and has often unfairly impeded the travel of those individuals;

Whereas the State of Israel, like many other free democracies, has an independent judicial system with a robust investigatory capacity and has already launched numerous investigations, many of which remain ongoing, of Operation Cast Lead and individual incidents therein;

Whereas Libya and others have indicated that they intend to further pursue consideration of the report and implementation of its recommendations by the United Nations Security Council, the United Nations General Assembly, the United Nations Human Rights Council, and other multilateral fora;

Whereas the President instructed the United States Mission to the United Nations and other international organizations in Geneva to vote against resolution A-HRC-S-12-1, which endorsed the report and condemned Israel, at the special session of the Human Rights Council held on October 15-16, 2009;

Whereas, on September 30, 2009, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton described the mandate for the report as `one-sided’;

Whereas, on September 17, 2009, Ambassador Susan Rice, United States Permanent Representative to the United Nations, expressed the United States’ `very serious concern with the mandate’ and noted that the United States views the mandate `as unbalanced, one-sided and basically unacceptable’;

Whereas the `Report of the United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict’ reflects the longstanding, historic bias at the United Nations against the democratic, Jewish State of Israel;

Whereas the `Report of the United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict’ is being exploited by Israel’s enemies to excuse the actions of violent militant groups and their state sponsors, and to justify isolation of and punitive measures against the democratic, Jewish State of Israel;

Whereas, on October 16, 2009, the United Nations Human Rights Council voted 25-6 (with 11 states abstaining and 5 not voting) to adopt resolution A-HRC-S-12-1, which endorsed the `Report of the United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict’ and condemned Israel, without mentioning Hamas, other such violent militant groups, or their state sponsors; and

Whereas efforts to delegitimize the democratic State of Israel and deny it the right to defend its citizens and its existence can be used to delegitimize other democracies and deny them the same right: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives–

(1) considers the `Report of the United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict’ to be irredeemably biased and unworthy of further consideration or legitimacy;

(2) supports the Administration’s efforts to combat anti-Israel bias at the United Nations, its characterization of the `Report of the United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict’ as `unbalanced, one-sided and basically unacceptable’, and its opposition to the resolution on the report;

(3) calls on the President and the Secretary of State to continue to strongly and unequivocally oppose any endorsement of the `Report of the United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict’ in multilateral fora;

(4) calls on the President and the Secretary of State to strongly and unequivocally oppose any further consideration of the `Report of the United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict’ and any other measures stemming from this report in multilateral fora; and

(5) reaffirms its support for the democratic, Jewish State of Israel, for Israel’s security and right to self-defense, and, specifically, for Israel’s right to defend its citizens from violent militant groups and their state sponsors.                              

——————————

Well there you have it and I am sure you would all agree that this rather bias report was scuttled before it even started!!

I will write  my final part to this tragic story with my own submission to the United Nations that they were very reluctant to acknowledge.

What kind of sick person would kill children asleep in their beds? What sadistic, twisted logic would ever make someone think its ok to murder children? There is no justification, ever, for the killing of children.

Don’t you find it incredible that we were subjected to all the propaganda before the attack on Libya concerning a humanitarian crisis and the war crimes committed and again with the current Syrian propaganda and yet one of the longest ongoing crimes against humanity continues in the Gaza Strip and West Bank courtesy of the Israeli Government, MOSSAD and the IDF!!!

Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant – 5/12/2012

Written by Peter Eyre

December 4, 2012 at 22:47

Posted in News

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Did Richard Goldstone hide more sinister crimes in Gaza? Part 2 (Republished)

with 2 comments

Did Richard Goldstone hide more sinister crimes in Gaza? Part 2

Part 2 – DIME and Weapons Containing Uranium 

undefined

 Two  DU Bombs igniting and two more on the way in

For those observant reader you will not the sea conditions in the background indicate a strong sea breeze which means the photographer who took this photograph from within Israel would have succumbed to the down wind fallout…….this clearly shows that the IDF was in actual fact also nuking their own population as million of radioactive nano particles drifted over central and southern Israel.

Again we see a classic example of a UN investigation that only plays with the periphery of War Crimes committed by Israel whilst at the same time ignoring the more important horrific crimes carried out by the IDF. Goldstone brushed aside the use of White Phosphorus and Flechette weapons and only touched briefly on DIME weapons. He totally ignored weapons containing Uranium components such as the four weapons shown in this photograph.


4 GBU-39B Cancer Bombs

So let’s look at DIME (Dense Inert Metal Explosive) and how it works:

DIME bombs (also known as the Cancer Bomb) produce an unusually powerful blast within a relatively small area, spraying a superheated “micro-shrapnel” of powdered Heavy Metal Tungsten Alloy (HMTA). Scientific studies have found that HMTA is chemically toxic, damages the immune system, rapidly causes cancer, and attacks DNA. It cuts through victims with ease and for those lucky enough to survive such an attack the outlook is fairly grim. The fragments from such a weapon once embedded in the flesh of its victim will lead to cancer and can result in death as early as three months.

Two Norwegian doctors working in the Hospital in Gaza observed the unusual injuries of its victims like none other they had witnessed before. One of the doctors had worked in such war zones for almost 30 years.  This same statement was supported by Egyptian doctors who had also noticed the unusual injuries. Some of those doctors went into more detail with the following report: Norwegian doctor Mad Gilbert, the blast results in multiple amputations and “very severe fractures. The muscles are sort of split from the bones, hanging loose, and you also have quite severe burns.” Most of those who survive the initial blast quickly succumb to septicaemia and organ collapse. “Initially, everything seems in order…but it turns out on operation that dozens of miniature particles can be found in all their organs,” says Dr. Jam Brommundt, a German doctor working in Kham Younis, a city in southern Gaza. “It seems to be some sort of explosive or shell that disperses tiny particles…that penetrate all organs, these miniature injuries; you are not able to attack them surgically.” According to Brommundt, the particles cause multiple organ failures. A footnote to these comments is that such fragments lead to an aggressive form of cancer. 

 DIME victim – note the peppered face wounds  that are basically incurable 

In Goldstone’s report it stated the following in Paragraph 49: While the Mission is not in a position to state with certainty that so-called dense inert metal explosive (DIME) munitions were used by the Israeli armed forces, it did receive reports from Palestinian and foreign doctors who operated in Gaza during the military operations of a high percentage of patients with injuries compatible with their impact. DIME weapons and weapons armed with heavy metal are not prohibited under international law as it currently stands, but do raise specific health concerns. One can see the extensive perforations of embedded fragments in this ladies face in Gaza

One could ask the question why the investigation team didn’t collect samples from the hospital or from its victims for testing in the laboratory. I am sure that these types of weapon are also banned under the Geneva Convention in regard to its usage in densely populated areas and the fact such weapons are totally indiscriminate and lethal. Again we see such matters swept under the carpet.

Now the big one – the issue of weapons containing uranium components. It was to be expected that Richard Goldstone would give an extremely brief reference to depleted uranium when his report said the following in Paragraph 49: The Mission received allegations that depleted and no depleted uranium were used by Israeli forces in Gaza. These allegations were not further investigated by the Mission!……I ask the question “Why on earth not”?

Could one ever imagine that one of the most experienced war crime investigators had, in a flick of his pen, written off something so serious? How such extremely serious allegations could be pushed to one side is beyond imagination. I myself provided my own submission to the team whilst in Geneva and highlighted the pictorial evidence of such explosions. I also advised them of the samples that had been recovered from Gaza for Prof Chris Busby  and that had tested positive to both DU/EU with a clear indication of fourth generation dirty weapons.

We are already seeing the signs of such contamination in the birth defects of newly born babies in the Gaza Strip – Sound familiar? It is clear that Gaza will succumb to the same genetic damage as in the Balkans, Iraq and now Afghanistan. We can now expect significant changes in the health statistics in Gaza and when this occurs will anyone ask the question “What is causing this”?   

 

 Relative of prisoners held in Israeli goals…… many are returned to Palestine as corpses,  minus their organs!!!

Organ harvesting is very good business in Israel, especially when they are taken from Palestinian prisoners!!

Again we see the UN with it large broom either avoiding the issues or removing the evidence. They lied in the Balkans, Kuwait, Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon and now Gaza. We see a massive clearing of buildings bombed by the IDF and the rubble being taken away for crushing to re surface the roads and streets in the Gaza Strip. This is an indespicable act that violates the UN’s own policy in regard to possible contaminated sites. Instruction to their own staff clearly states the procedures required prior to any attempt to clear such sites. Now they have failed to address any possible DU investigation and totally disregarded their own safety regulations. The resultant aftermath of this blatant act will now cause secondary contamination to occur not only within the Gaza Strip but also in adjacent Israel, Egypt, Jordan and further afield.

We will now leave the weapons and look at other aspects of this deeply flawed report.  I note with interest a strong emphasis on the holding of Gilad Shalit and the comments raised in paragraph 77: “The Mission is of the opinion that, as a soldier who belongs to the Israeli armed forces and who was captured during an enemy incursion into Israel, Gilad Shalit meets the requirements for Prisoner-of-war status under the Third Geneva Convention. As such, he should be protected, treated humanely and be allowed external communication as appropriate according to that Convention. The ICRC should be allowed to visit him without delay. Information about his condition should also be provided promptly to his family”……….Gilad was released after some considerable time.

I am sure that many concerned parents and families in Palestine would appreciate the same concern and respect in regard to the many Palestinian male, female and juniors held indefinitely by the Israeli Government. We must all be aware of the weekly ritual carried out by the families of those held in captivity without charge or trial who with great passion continue to hold their own special vigil and ask the same questions. Their loved ones are certainly not given the same treatment as Shalit and therefore this aspect of the report is totally out of context. In paragraph 86 of the report it stated: It is estimated that since the beginning of the occupation, approximately 700,000 Palestinian men, women and children have been detained by Israel. According to estimates, as at 1st June

A/HRC/12/48 page 28 2009, there were approximately 8,100 Palestinian ‘political prisoners’ in detention in Israel, including 60 women and 390 children. Most of these detainees are charged or convicted by the Israeli Military Court System that operates for Palestinians in the West Bank and under which due process rights for Palestinians are severely limited. Many are held in administrative detention and some under the Israeli “Unlawful Combatants Law”. 

What is ironic here is the fact that the long running atrocities carried out by the Israelis on the people of Palestine has for many years been very well documented. It did not, in some respects, warrant such a mission to highlight some of those atrocities when the Permanent Observer Mission of Palestine to the United Nations had already done a magnificent job in reporting them over a long period of time. We can appreciate that this investigation was primarily for events just prior to Cast Lead and during the conflict. However, one must point out that this continued intimidation, oppression and humiliation as report by that Mission had so much to do with the retaliatory action taken by Palestinians.

Letters to the Secretary-General from The Permanent Observer of Palestine to the UN are described as follows: “Identical letters sent to the President of the Security Council and the President of the General Assembly.  The purpose of these letters is to constitute a basic record of the crimes perpetuated by Israel, the occupying Power, against the Palestinian people in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem”.

These letters are sent almost weekly and are very well documented on their webpage: http://www.un.int/palestine/letters09.shtml. They stem back to September 2000 up to the current time and one can almost feel the frustration of the author at continuously writing these very accurate reports to no avail. As you can see from the extract below they now number 342 and when you add to this the hundreds of UN Resolutions passed against Israel that have been totally ignored it is painfully obvious that the Secretary – General and the United Nations has no power whatsoever.

This letter is in follow-up to our previous 342 letters to you regarding the ongoing crisis in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, since 28 September 2000. These letters, dated from 29 September 2000 (A/55/432-S/2000/921) to 3 August 2009 (A/ES-10/459-S/2009/401), constitute a basic record of the crimes being committed by Israel, the occupying Power, against the Palestinian people since September 2000.  For all of these war crimes, acts of State terrorism and systematic human rights violations committed against the Palestinian people, Israel, the occupying Power, must be held accountable and the perpetrators must be brought to justice.

I should be grateful if you would arrange to have the text of the present letter distributed as a document of the tenth emergency special session of the General Assembly, under agenda item 5, and of the Security Council.

Please accept, Excellency, the assurances of my highest consideration.

Dr. Riyad Mansour

Ambassador, Permanent Observer            

of Palestine to the United Nations

 To be continued in Part 3

Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant – 30/11/2012 

 

Written by Peter Eyre

November 29, 2012 at 23:03

Posted in News

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Did Richard Goldstone hide more sinister crimes in Gaza? – Part 1 (Republished)

leave a comment »

Did Richard Goldstone hide more sinister crimes in Gaza?

 Part 1 – White Phosphorus and Flechette weapons

 

White Phosphorus (WP) – Gaza City

 

Jewish Judge Richard Goldstone

What better way to investigate war crimes than to hire your own kind !!

Because of Israel’s recent violent attack on the people of Gaza I feel duty bound to again release evidence that Israel and the IDF are in total violation of the Geneva Convention for the third time in using Weapons of Mass Destruction on not only the people of Gaza but also on their own citizens in Israel. The IDF is also in violation of its own rules of engagement!!

In one of my past article I gave reference to the UN inquiry into possible war crimes carried out by Israel against the people of Gaza and the massive cover-up that followed when Congress voted to dismiss its findings and the US Veto that finally sank any possibility of justice.

Here’s the mini series I did on the topic……..I am sure you will not only be distressed by what is written but also realise that once again the “Zionist Mafia” (New World Order) hi-jacked the entire inquiry and had it removed from the public domain:

There was much praise for the UN investigations into war crimes committed in Gaza, led by Richard Goldstone.  However, I feel that this report did not go far enough to investigate some other more serious allegations that were made. There is a sense of urgency to bring this investigation forward and to put those responsible on trial but one must understand that something much more sinister did not even get a mention and has since been swept under the carpet.

Let’s take a closer look at some aspects of this report which certainly showed a distinct weakness in the team’s ability to understand what constitutes a breach of the Geneva Convention.

Quote from item 46: the Mission finds that the conduct of the Israeli armed forces constitute grave breaches of the Fourth Geneva Convention in respect of wilful killings and wilfully causing great suffering to protected persons and as such give rise to individual criminal responsibility. It also finds that the direct targeting and arbitrary killing of Palestinian civilians is a violation of the right to life.

Quote from item 47: The last incident concerns the launch of a bomb on a house resulting in the killing of 22 family members. Israel’s position in this case is that there was an “operational error” and that the intended target was a neighbouring house storing weapons. On the basis of its investigation, the Mission expresses significant doubts about the Israeli authorities’ account of the incident. The Mission concludes that, if indeed a mistake was made, there could not be said to be a case of wilful killing. State responsibility of Israel for an internationally wrongful act, however, would remain.

Response to item 46 and 47: Even if an operational mistake was made it still constitutes wilful killing as such bombs were dropped in areas of dense population and thus had the correct target been hit the civilians in the adjacent target area would have died or been severely injured.

Quote from Item 48: Based on its investigation of incidents involving the use of certain weapons such as white phosphorous and flechette missiles, the Mission, while accepting that white phosphorous is not at this stage proscribed under international law, finds that the Israeli armed forces were systematically reckless in determining its use in built-up areas. Moreover, doctors who treated patients with white phosphorous wounds spoke about the severity and sometimes untreatable nature of the burns caused by the substance. The Mission believes that serious consideration should be given to banning the use of white phosphorous in built-up areas. As to flechettes, the Mission notes that they are an area weapon incapable of discriminating between objectives after detonation. They are; therefore, particularly unsuitable for use in urban settings where there is reason to believe civilians may be present.

Response to Item 48: First of all Mr Goldstone needs to understand that White Phosphorus is an Incendiary Weapon and therefore is covered under international law in its use of White Phosphorus on densely populated areas

It is in violation of the Geneva Convention: Protocol on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Incendiary Weapons (Protocol III) namely:

Certain use of incendiary weapons, in particular the use of air delivered incendiary weapons against targets situated amongst concentrations      of civilians (Protocol III to the Conventional Weapons Convention).

 

This used to be someone’s beautiful daughter until Israel used WP on the citizens of Lebanon in 2006

One should also draw attention to the fact that exactly the same treatment was handed out by the IDF in Southern Lebanon (2006). This picture shows the terrible lethal consequences on a child in Lebanon. Let’s now look at a case that was filed in Israel on the back of the Geneva Convention and the ICJ. As one would expect when dealing with the Israel court system the case failed. One could live in hope that such a case in the European Courts would carry a different result.

 

A Typical Flechette Shell

 

The “Flechette” shells (from the French “flêchette,” meaning “small arrow”) are known to contain thousands of small metal arrows, each some four centimeters long.  When the shell explodes in the air, at a height of approximately 30 m above the ground, the lethal arrows scatter over a cone-shaped area some 300 m in length and 94 m wide.  It should be noted that the Flechette was developed by the Americans in Vietnam, when they sought an effective weapon for attacking Viet Cong forces hiding among the trees in the jungles and dispersed over a large area.

It is worth noting that this weapon has been considered controversial since it was first introduced.  The arguments raised against the Flechette are based, inter alia, on the principles of international law in the field of the laws of war, according to which weapons causing “unnecessary suffering” are not to be used, and the indiscriminate use of weapons in population centers is prohibited. The Appellants will argue that the Flechette causes “unnecessary suffering” due to the enormous number of arrows, which injure the victim’s body (similarly to an explosive device containing nails), and that it is also considered an “indiscriminate” weapon, since it disperses over an enormous area, and is very difficult to use precisely.  Accordingly, the Appellants argue, its use is prohibited, particularly in civilian population centers.

 

These photographs show Flechettes as used in Gaza and an X-Ray of a boy’s shoulder clearly showing a Flechette deeply embedded. The prospects of survival are minimal!!

 

 

Factual Background

As mentioned above, the IDF has used this weapon for many years, particularly in the context of its operational activities in southern Lebanon, during which “dead areas” were declared along the border of the “Security Zone” – any person entering these areas was considered a “terrorist” to be eliminated.  As soon as movement was identified in these areas, the tanks fired Flechette shells.  It is worth mentioning that even during this period, arguments were raised against the IDF that the use of these shells caused the death and injury of dozens of Lebanese citizens, despite the fact that the use of Flechette shells was limited to sparsely-populated areas.

Among other publications, a special chapter was devoted to the IDF’s use of this weapon in Lebanon in a report of the organization B’Tselem entitled “The Violation of the Human Rights of Lebanese Citizens by Israel (January 2000).” 

Illegality in International Humanitarian Law – The Rules of War

It is a principle of international humanitarian law and the rules of war that means that cause indiscriminate injury or that are unable or incapable of distinguishing between civilians and combatants are prohibited.  In addition, means causing unnecessary suffering and superfluous injury are prohibited.

The obligation to protect the health and life of civilians who are not engaged in combat is mentioned in all the conventions constituting international humanitarian law; in some conventions, the obligation is mentioned several times.  The prohibition on the arbitrary taking of life outside the parameters of self-defense may be identified on several levels in international law.  The most basic level is that of the general rules of war, which establish the basic principle that civilian targets, including civilians, shall not be the targets of attacks.

Inter alia, Article 22 of the Convention (IV) respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land and its annex: Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land, The Hague, 18 October 1907 (hereinafter “the Hague Regulations”), which was revolutionary for its time, stated that “the right of belligerents to adopt means of injuring the enemy is not unlimited”.

Among other provisions, a specific regulation was established prohibiting the use of weapons that cause unnecessary suffering.  Article 23 states:

“Art. 23. In addition to the prohibitions provided by special Conventions, it is especially forbidden

(e) To employ arms, projectiles, or material calculated to cause unnecessary suffering;

The second level establishes the prohibition against inhuman treatment for those not, at that time, actively engaged in fighting; the center of this facet is the prohibition against the taking of life.

This obligation is established in Article 3, which is common to all four Geneva Conventions from 1949.  This applies to all armed conflicts, not only to occupied territories.  Among other provisions, sub-clause 1 states:

Persons taking no active part in hostilities, including members of armed forces who have laid down their arms and those placed hors de combat by sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause, shall in all circumstances be treated humanely, without any adverse distinction founded on race, color, religion or faith, sex, birth or wealth, or any other similar criteria.

To this end the following acts are and shall remain prohibited at any time and in any place whatsoever with respect to the above-mentioned persons:

Violence to life and person

A)     

The above-mentioned Article 3, which, as noted, is common to all four Geneva Conventions, is today considered international customary law binding all nations of the world; as such, it may be enforced by this Court.  In addition, the State of Israel signed and ratified the Geneva Conventions in 1951; accordingly, it is also legally bound to observe the conventions as a contracting party.

The third level of the rules of war comprises the rules for the control of occupied territory, which grant the occupied population special protection in addition to the rights and protections accruing from the general rules of law and to the rights and protections enjoyed by all citizens, whether or not living in an occupied territory.

These protections and rights are established both in the Hague Regulations and in many clauses scattered throughout the Fourth Geneva Convention regarding the Protection of Civilian Population, as well as in the two protocols to the conventions, signed in 1977.

Regulation 30 of the Hague Regulations relates to the protection of the residents of an occupied territory, stating as follows:

“Family honour and rights, the lives of persons and private property… must be protected”

No-one would deny that the general and special rules of law, as reflected in the Hague Regulations, now constitute international customary law binding all nations of the world, and enforceable in this Court (see, for example, the comments by then Justice Barak in HCJ 393/82, Jamayat Iskan Almu’alamoun v Commander of IDF Forces, Piskei Din 37(5) 785, in para. 11 of the ruling).

However, the principal protection is afforded to the citizens of an occupied territory in the Fourth Geneva Convention.  These citizens are “protected persons” as defined in Article 4 of the Convention.  The disagreements between the international community and Israel regarding the applicability of the definition in Article 4 to the Palestinian population in the Occupied Territories has already been resolved in a long series of petitions to this Court, in which the state has declared its commitment to observe the humanitarian provisions of the Convention as if they applied to the territory.

In order to complete the picture, we should note that additional protections on civilian lives are established in the two protocols to the Geneva Convention signed in 1977; these expanded the protection afforded to the civilian population to include disputes other than those between states.  The State of Israel has not signed these protocols, but some of their provisions constitute a part of international customary law, and as such bind Israel.

Prohibition on the Use of Weapons Causing “Unnecessary Suffering” and “Indiscriminate” Weapons – Customary Law

The Appellants shall argue that the use of Flechette shells by the IDF is incompatible with the principles of international customary law as noted above, which require the military echelon to consider, alongside military needs, the need to minimize unreasonable danger of injury to the local population.

Article 35(2) of the Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I) (hereinafter “the First Protocol”) establishes as follows:

Article 35.–Basic rules

1. In any armed conflict, the right of the Parties to the conflict to choose methods or means of warfare is not unlimited.

2. It is prohibited to employ weapons, projectiles and material and methods of warfare of a nature to cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering.

3. It is prohibited to employ methods or means of warfare which are intended, or may be expected, to cause widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment.

Article 51 establishes:

Article 51.–Protection of the civilian population

1. The civilian population and individual civilians shall enjoy general protection against dangers arising from military operations. To give effect to this protection, the following rules, which are additional to other applicable rules of international law, shall be observed in circumstances.

2. The civilian population as such, as well as individual civilians, shall not be the object of attack. Acts or threats of violence the primary purpose of which is to spread terror among the civilian population are prohibited.

3. Civilians shall enjoy the protection afforded by this Section, unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities.

4. Indiscriminate attacks are prohibited. Indiscriminate attacks are:

(a) Those which are not directed at a specific military objective;

(b) Those which employ a method or means of combat which cannot be directed at a specific military objective; or

(c) Those which employ a method or means of combat the effects of which cannot be limited as required by this Protocol; and consequently, in each such case, are of a nature to strike military objectives and civilians or civilian objects without distinction.

5. Among others, the following types of attacks are to be considered as indiscriminate:

(b) An attack which may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated.

Although the State of Israel is not committed to the provisions of the First Protocol, these articles are considered customary and binding in international law.  Proof of this may be found in the “Advisory Opinion” of the International Court of Justice dated July 8, 1996 on the subject of the “Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons.”

In the course of the above-mentioned opinion, the court was asked, inter alia, to address the subject of an indiscriminate weapon that causes unnecessary suffering.  Among other points, the court ruled as follows:

A large number of customary rules have been developed by the practice of States and are an integral part of the international law relevant to the question posed.

The cardinal principles contained in the texts constituting the fabric of humanitarian law are the following. The first is aimed at the protection of the civilian population and civilian objects and establishes the distinction between combatants and non-combatants; States must never make civilians the object of attack and must consequently never use weapons that are incapable of distinguishing between civilian and military targets. According to the second principle, it is prohibited to cause unnecessary suffering to combatants: it is accordingly prohibited to use weapons causing them such harm or uselessly aggravating their suffering.

 In application of that second principle, States do not have unlimited freedom of choice of means in the weapons they use.

In conformity with the aforementioned principles, humanitarian law, at a very early stage, prohibited certain types of weapons either because of their indiscriminate effect on combatants and civilians or because of the unnecessary suffering caused to combatants, that is to say, a harm greater than that unavoidable to achieve legitimate military objectives. If an envisaged use of weapons would not meet the requirements of humanitarian law, a threat to engage in such use would also be contrary to that law.

Nor is there any need for the Court elaborate on the question of the applicability of Additional Protocol I of 1977 to nuclear weapons. It need only observe that while, at the Diplomatic Conference of 1974-1977, there was no substantive debate on the nuclear issue and no specific solution concerning this question was put forward, Additional Protocol I in no way replaced the general customary rules applicable to all means and methods of combat including nuclear weapons. In particular, the Court recalls that all States are bound by those rules in Additional Protocol I which, when adopted, were merely the expression of the pre-existing customary law, such as the Martens Clause, reaffirmed in the first article of Additional Protocol I. The fact that certain types of weapons were not specifically dealt with by the 1974-1977 Conference does not permit the drawing of any legal conclusions relating to the substantive issues which the use of such weapons would raise.”…

The entire text as per above was taken from http://www.btselem.org with reference to Legal Documents/HC8990 02 Flachette Appeal

Israel Supreme Court – Sitting as the High Court of Justice – HCJ/02 in the case of Physicians for Human Rights – Israel and The Palestinian Centre for Human Right (The Appellants) V General of the Southern Command – Doron Almog and The State of Israel – Ministry of Defense (The Respondents)

Petition for an Interim Decree

A petition is hereby respectfully submitted to the Court requesting that the Respondents be ordered to come and give grounds why the use of “Flechette” type tank shells in the context of IDF operations in the Gaza Strip area should not be halted and prohibited.

Data listed within this article were taken from the Internet site of the International Court of Justice (www.icj-cij.org). 

As we would expect the case failed to achieve it goals and was kicked out of court as follows:

The appellants asked us to prohibit the army from using flechette shells. Since we have realized that the use of this ammunition is not prohibited by the laws of war, the petitioners’ request cannot be accepted. This court has ruled that “the choice of weapons, which the respondents use for the goal of preventing murderous terror attacks, is not one of the topics in which this court sees fit to intervene.” (HCJ 5872/ 01, Bracha v Prime Minister, PD 56 (3)1). Needless to say, the respondents have eased our minds that the scope of use of this ammunition is arranged by the IDF through rules that are binding on the commanders of forces acting in the field. The decision regarding the question as to whether the conditions in the arena of combat, in every given case, justify use of the flechette, is determined by the authorized commander, who in formulating his decision is commanded to act according to professional guidelines, that in principle were intended to prevent harming residents not involved in activities that endanger IDF soldiers or Israeli citizens.

The petition is rejected. Justice The Honourable Justice M. Heshin: I agree. Justice The Honourable Justice A. Hayout: I agree. Decided, as stated, in Justice E. Matza’s decision.

Rendered today, 25 Nissan 5763 (27 April 2003)

It must be noted that Goldstone’s report did not follow the same conclusion as per the case above but rather highlighted Flechette’s unsuitability in an urban environment when he quoted the following: “As to Flechettes, the Mission notes that they are an area weapon incapable of discriminating between objectives after detonation. They are, therefore, particularly unsuitable for use in urban settings where there is reason to believe civilians may be present”

Part 2 of this series will next cover the use of DIME weapons within Gaza. It will also focus on Goldstones disregard of the use of depleted uranium that had been raised in earlier submissions. This surely must head the top of the list of the Israeli War Crimes in that weapons that contain uranium components do not discriminate between military and civilian targets or respect international borders. Consequently these weapons contaminated the entire Gaza Strip and crossed over the border to contaminate most of Central and Southern Israel and beyond. What is ironic was this same situation developed during the Lebanon War in 2006 when the entire Southern part of Lebanon was contaminated and again the contamination crossed over the border to do the same to Northern Israel. In other words the IDF has “Nuked” its own people.  

We will cover how these two weapons were clearly left out of the inquiry despite the fact they were originally very much part of the initial submissions. One would also assume that accordingly the people of Israel would have a case against the Israeli Government and the IDF.

 

When will the world stop these Zionist imbeciles from carrying out such atrocious acts of war that can only  lead to the eventual genocide of not only the people of Palestine but also their own innocent civilians……..have they not learnt lessons from their own Holocaust?

 

I guess when you look at the above maps you can clearly see that the Zionist cancerous growth has almost achieved its goal all  thanks to the Rothchild’s who created the first colony and who’s methodolgy (The New World Order) is behind all the ongoing conflicts and wars around the globe!!

That little dot in the circle was the first Zionist settlement in Palestine  This laid the cornerstone for Jewish settlements in Palestine –  Most settlements met with financial difficulties and most of the settlers were not proficient in farming. Baron Edmond James de Rothschild took this and other settlements under his wing, which helped them survive until more settlers with farming experience arrived. That little dot has now become the cancerous growth that continues to spread to this day!! 

To be continued…………………….  

 

Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant –  25/11/2012

Written by Peter Eyre

November 24, 2012 at 21:50

Posted in News

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Israel’s rape of Gaza’s Natural Resources (Final Part)

with 3 comments

Israel’s rape of Gaza’s Natural Resources (Final Part) 

What the conflict was really about

As you would aspect it’s all about oil and gas…..just like all the other conflicts in the Balkans, Kuwait, Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya etc !!

Just ask the executives of Noble Energy – A joint venture between the Zionists of the US and Israel…..they have become experts at ripping off someone else’s oil and gas……especially when it comes to Gaza and the people of Palestine.

The Eastern part of the Mediterranean is prolific in natural gas with a very good change of oil being found much deeper. In many parts of the world we find sufficient reserves for everyone to share and benefit from. For some strange reason Israel does not agree with this principle and in actual fact wishes to take not only its own reserves but also those belonging to the Palestinians.

 

We will first look again at the offshore natural resources and see how Israel could or already have the ability to deprive Palestine of its own vital resource. Later in this article we will also look at the onshore possibilities in the West Bank and show that some of the areas taken by and under the control of Israel could well yield some interesting finds.

 

As I have previously pointed out Israel’s Mari B natural gas field sits on the border with Gaza and in surrounded by a cloak of secrecy. The area around the platform is totally off limits as one would normally expect but is there more to this gas field and could it extend into Gazan waters? Should this be the case then a grave injustice has taken place which basically is depriving the Palestinians of a shared resource and all the incredible wealth that goes with it.

 

The Mari B platform came on line in December 2003 and delivered around 100 million cubic feet per day (MMcfpd). Later in 2004 this increased to reach around   170 MMcfpd. The production facilities for the Mari B were expected to produce up to 600 MMcfpd.  The company estimates total recoverable reserves in the Mari-B field to exceed one trillion cubic feet of natural gas. Noble Energy also has an undeveloped discovery, Noa, which is estimated to contain over 200 billion cubic feet (Bcf) of natural gas. Noa is scheduled to be brought on line at a later date through a sub-sea tieback to the Mari-B platform.

 

Let’s look again at this issue and ask the question does the Mari B gas field extend over the border and if so then Israel is guilty of stealing a shared resource. Noa natural gas field (which sits further out to the West of Mari B) is expected to be commissioned in the near future. This field in actual fact is two fields consisting of Noa and the Noa South. My concern is the fact that they certainly do extend into the Gaza Marine Area and therefore are a shared resource. Finally we have Gaza’s own legal reserves in Marine 1 and Marine 2 all of which are totally in their own territory.

I have drawn up my own map of the current situation  (above) which  shows that the US Company Noble Energy and its Joint Venture Partners in Israel (Mari B and Noa gas fields) are clearly taking Palestinian Gas all under the watchful eye of the United Nations and the world…….we have another word in England for such an act – “Thieving Bastards”

Again I ask the question do the Palestinian know this and if so what is being done to investigate and stop this exploitation by the Israeli Government? It is absolutely disgraceful that the world just watches and says nothing whilst the people in Gaza live in absolute poverty. Where is the United Nations and where is our conscience?

 

 It is also important to note that the Oslo Accord (with manipulation by Israel) shows a buffer zone on both side of this area thus reducing the Gaza Marine Area and depriving them of their own legal territorial rights. The Israel gas platform (Mari B) actually sits barely one nautical mile from this border which again may indicate that something sinister is going on here. Gas platforms normally sit well inside the limits of their respective reserves which would again indicate that this field does extend beyond the Israeli border.

 

Let’s now take a look at the onshore oil and gas scene. In one of my earlier articles I talked about an onshore oil field that sits very close to the north-eastern corner of Gaza. This reserve is called the Heletz Field and has been producing crude oil over many years. Some wells were drilled within the Gaza Strip and have been abandoned for some considerable time; one can only assume that one day we will see a return to exploration in this area. I would assume that with the offshore reserves in the Gaza Marine Area and the crude oil sitting close to Gaza onshore that this area could bring is some exciting finds.  It is also interesting to note that such productive areas as Heletz once belonged to the Palestinians.

Having worked in the oil and gas industry for many years it is clear to me that  many oil companies use a technique known as slant drilling or diagonal drilling to take the natural resources from someone else’s territory and Noble Energy certainly have a very shady past.

This image clearly shows how oil companies can drill under borders and take the natural resources of another country without that country even knowing………this has happened in many locations around the world and the outbreak of  the Iraq War was no exception when oil rigs positioned on the Kuwait-Iraqi border started taking the resources of Iraq from the Kuwaiti side – hence one of the reasons for Iraq going into Kuwait………..ask that mongrel George W Bush how it is done because his family are experts at cheating the system!!!

“Hey George are you by any chance taking my oil from under the border” ? –  “No Sir  – we in Texas do not do such things”

The Israeli’s are experts at taking anything that does not belong to them as we can see from above map showing just how much Palestinian Territory is actually controlled by Israel and that US Stooge Abbas is a traitor to his own people and is currently illegally running the country since his term of office expired some years ago. 

Over in Gaza we can see a clear indication that gas and oil does exist. The main areas of interest has been declared as Israeli Military Restricted Areas and therefore are off limits to Palestinians. It is ironic that the West Bank is zoned as Palestinian territory and yet barely a third of it is available for their usage. Historically tar frequently popped up in the Dead Sea giving a clear indication that the underground geology had something to offer.

In more recent times oil has been found on the western shores of the Dead Sea which is controlled by the Israelis. The reserves were found in the Northern, Middle and Southern shores which clearly puts them in Palestinian – West Bank Territory. Because of the nature of the geology in the region I would say that oil/gas would also exist along the rift valley separating West Bank from Jordan. Exploration activity is also taking place on the other side of the border in Jordan.

So what lies ahead for the Palestinians? Will they ever see justice and have the opportunity to explore and recover their own natural resources? I have to say that Israel can do exactly what it wants, when it wants and the United Nations continues to be non effective. The United States likewise sits on the fence and says nothing and for a very good reason…..most of the oil/gas exploration programmes are Joint Ventures with US companies and such interference would be counter productive.

  Israeli washing his hands in Dead Sea Oil

 

One must also remember that the Dead Sea area brings other natural resources that Israel has been commercialising for many years. The region has been a worldwide producer of fertilizers, some of which are based on minerals extracted from the Dead Sea. The evaporating Dead Sea waters leave behind them a unique array of chloride salts magnesium, sodium, potassium, calcium and bromine etc. The other unique aspect in such an environment is that of Health Care and Body Products. As we have already discussed the Palestinians are totally deprived of their own resource and the commercialisation of its resources are stolen by Israeli companies.

Maybe you do not believe me – well folks just visit any Zionist run major shopping centre around the world – they are called “Westfield” – we have many here in Australia (the home base of the company) – this empire  is run by Frank Lowy, AC – an Australian — Israeli  businessman.

The Westfield Group has interests in and operates one of the world’s largest shopping centre portfolios. The global portfolio has 105 high quality regional shopping centres in Australia, New Zealand, the United States, the United Kingdom and Brazil valued in excess of $62.9 billion, with approximately 22,964 retailers in 9.6 million square metres of retail space.

Soap & Co UK

Take a stroll around any Westfield Shopping Centre and look out for a small store selling soap and other skin products…..in the UK one such store/kiosk is called Soap & Co and always employs young Zionist staff all of whom intercept its potential clients as they walk past in a very insistent way…….in the UK I have studied such stores and many times observed the staff talking to many Islamic women, holding their hands and charming them with their hand creams or face creams etc……….if only these women knew!!!……..around Christmas time many other small kiosks suddenly emerge which are all staffed by young  Zionist……..I can clearly remember one Palestinian male challenging the staff that these products belong to Palestinians……one of the Soap & Co staff really lost his mind and starting yelling at the Palestinian as hating his homeland and existence and denying the holocaust etc…..as you would expect the holocaust always manages to become the main theme in their defence and yet no ones says anything about the genocide that Israel itself has carried out via its secret service Mossad (9/11) and the use of depleted uranium weapons in both Lebanon and Gaza which has also nuked the citizens of its own country – Israel!!!

Dead Sea Salts

This brief below was recovered from an activist webpage and clearly explains what they feel about Westfield’s and these cosmetic company that are in all of their centres……especially in Australia and New Zealand:

If you visit a shopping centre, chances are that you’ll eventually come across a kiosk selling Dead Sea beauty products. These kiosks have attracted a lot of attention, not just for the origin of their natural resources, but also for their shady practices and coercive sales techniques that would make a snake oil salesman blush.  

Stop for just a few seconds to check the label and you’ll be approached by a young Israeli of the opposite sex, dressed in black and pawing at your hands to entice you to purchase an overpriced container of lotion. If you think they’re just being friendly, think again. Most of them work from scripts like this:

NAIL KIT SALE SPEECH
SPEECH
STEP
Excuse me mam, may I ask you a question?
Show me your hands please.
I want to show you something amazing.
Come with me.
APPROACHING
Mam, You see those lines on your nails – those lines called ridges, and it’s the main reason why nails splits and breaks.
Now, I’m going to show you a natural way to prevent it.
Challenge me with you worst nail.
This is the professional buffer. It has three sides. I will start with the black side to remove all your ridges – no ridges – no breaks, o.k?
You will use it once a month for only ten seconds.
Now, check your nail – you can feel its much smoother, right?
Now, I’m going to use the green side – it’s the most important side. It’s made out of cotton.
What I’m doing right now is stimulates your blood circulation. That streams oxygen into your nail, which make your nail stronger and healthier. Can you feel it getting warm?
Great that means you are still alive.
Now, the last side is the white side, made of pure silk.
When the silk touches your nail, there is an immediate reaction.
The nail releasing oil into the upper surface of your nail, and you are going to be amazed now. Mam, are you promise to behave yourself?
Now, this shine will make your nails stronger, healthier and more beautiful, it will never break and split, and do you know how long it will shine? for two weeks, even if you make the dishes, housework, gardening – this is guaranteed.
BUFFER
DEMO
SPEECH
STEP
Now, your nail is beautiful, but we have one problem left – your cuticles. Most people push them back, cut them, or chewing them – don’t do that, it’s just makes them grow faster. If you want to get rid of them, just put one drop of our cuticle oil around your nail, leave it for a few seconds, and wipe it of. It will nourish the area, and make your cuticles disappear, you see? No more cuticles, and the nail looks like a mirror.
CUTICLE
DEMO
Now, to complete the treatment, I’m going to take this lotion
Which is a very light one – based on minerals from the dead sea.
You will not feel it greasy or sticky, like other lotions, that based on water or oil, and it’s much healthier for your skin.
Now, I would like you to touch your hands, can you feel it?
HAND LOTION
It’s all come together in this beautiful set. You get inside the buffer, the cuticle
oil, hand and body lotion, nail file and instructions. It costs 29.99 and it going to last you for two years – it’s a full manicure and pedicure kit, and today we have a special offer – only 25 pounds.
ABOUT THE KIT
Now, choose your favorite smell
We have the vanilla, the ocean, the almond, and the passion fruit. What would you like the most?
Great choice, this is my favorite too.
THE SMELL
Mam, come into my office please.
Do you use cash or credit?
CLOSING
Thank you very much, mam. Don’t forget to save the receipt, it will give you 10 percent discount for all our products, and it’s a guarantee certificate for the buffer for one year. Mam, have a great day, and come back to visit us with shiny nails.
UP SALE

Or alternatively this:

Salt scrub and Body Butter sale speech
Stage
Description
Stopping
Excuse me mam/sir, may I ask you a question?
Show me your hands please.
(Gently put your hand under the costumer’s hand – don’t hold or pull)
I want to show you something amazing,
Come with me.
(At this point – turn and walk to the Island/Cart)
Creating first impression
(This stage begins when you arrived the Island/Cart)
Mam/sir, what do you use for your skin?
The presentation of the salt
(put a little amount of salt into the costumer’s hand)
This is the pure salt from the dead sea
Now I want you to scrub your hand (you may have to tell the costumer to scrub the back of the hand and in between the fingers)
This is working like an exfoliate. It removes all dry and dead skin, opens the pores and allows the dirt and toxic to come out. At the same time it is also enriching you skin with
the 27 unique minerals you can find in the dead sea.
(at this point you wash the costumers hand)
You have to do this only once a week from the neck down, you should give extra time for the elbows, knees and heels.
(give the costumer a paper towel to wipe the hands)
This is a very good treatment for a lot of skin problems such as exsema, psoriasis, acne, fungus, stretch marks (for the ladies) and also dry skin from bad weather.
How does it feel?
The presentation of the body butter
Now to close the pores you can use any lotion toy have in the house but I recommend this body butter.
It is very rich and thick but because it is based on the same 27 minerals you have in the salt and not based on water and oil, it will not feel sticky and greasy like other body butters. It will absorbed very quickly into the skin and make it soft and smooth. (Like the babies bum…)
Now when the last time was your hand were so soft? Imagine that all over your body…
Presenting the product
( at this point you take the costumer away from the sink and present the product)
The salt comes in two sizes.
The big one is 500 ml and will last you for 1 year treatment, the smaller one is 350 ml and will last you for six months (point at each product when you say the price) the
small one is 29.99 and the big one is 39.99
(take the body butter, open it and turn it up side down)
The body butter will last you for a long time because it is so thick and rich, you only need to use a small portion at a time. It is 29.99 but if you take it with the salt (any size) I will give you 10 £ discount and it will be only 19.99
We have 3 different smells you can choose from (like the kits lotion)
Closure
(After the costumer chose her favorite flavor, we take the relevant salt and body butter off the Shelf, and tell the costumer)
Mam, come into my office please.
(While saying that line, you go toward the cashier, assuming the costumer wants to buy. After you arrived to the cashier, you tell the costumer)
How do you want to pay? Cash or Credit?
UPSALE and stabilization of the purchase
(After the credit card or the cash are in your hand, you can UPSALE. You will learn to UPSALE separately after few days of work)
(After the costumer paid and received the product, we tell her)
Thank you very much, mam. Don’t forget to save the receipt; it will give you 10 percent discount for all our products the next time you come. Have a nice day.

Kiosks stocking Dead Sea beauty products can be found in many malls run by Israeli companies who employ almost exclusively Israelis.

These kiosks are legitimate targets, as every sale supports companies who in turn support the apparatus of oppression in the racist apartheid state. Dead Sea Premier kiosks were targeted in April and July 2011 at malls in Auckland, New Zealand and in June and November, Seacrest kiosks in Brisbane and Perth Australia were also targeted.

So there you have it folks and when one looks at the tourism potential available to the Palestinians we can see that if the international community stood firm and insisted that West Bank be returned to the people of Palestine we could well see a dramatic change in the prosperity of West Bank and Gaza. Only when each and every Israeli has left the region will stability return.

As I have said so many times before if the people of Gaza and West Bank were allowed to recover their own natural resources Palestine could become the Dubai of the Eastern Mediterranean within a very short period of time – with one exception – they have been nuked by the Israeli’s who have now basically killed the genetic code of all Palestinians by attacking their DNA with depleted uranium weapons and other illegal  WMD’s and “Dirty Bombs”.

The progressive mass genocide of the Palestinians using depleted uranium weapons on a daily basis

How the US, UK, France, Germany, Israel , NATO and the United Nations are secretly carrying out mass depopulation (of not only many Islamic Nations) but also the world in general via its Agenda 21 policy and its mass vacination programmes……….now that is what I call a real holocaust!!!

Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant – 22/11/2012

 


 

Written by Peter Eyre

November 22, 2012 at 00:12

Posted in News

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Israel’s rape of Gaza’s Natural Resources – The truth behind the conflicts

with 4 comments

Israel’s rape of Gaza’s Natural Resources 

 What the conflict is really about

 Israel is openly taking Palestinian gas from the Gaza offshore marine area

 Back in 2000 Gas was discovered close to shore off Gaza. The vast majority of this vital resource lies within the Gaza Marine Area. Israel from the onset decided it wanted the entire field for its own purposes having decided to changeover to Natural Gas as the main fuel for its power stations and industry. Two plans were originally drawn up.

 

  • Take the gas by sub-sea pipeline to El Arish (Egypt) and then by sub-sea pipeline to Ashkelon (making it look like Egyptian Gas)

 

  • Take the Gas directly to Ashekelon.

 

In December 2007, BG Group withdrew from negotiations with the Government of Israel for the sale of gas from the Gaza Marine field to Israel. In January 2008, BG Group closed its office in Israel and continued to evaluate options for commercialising the gas. In my own opinion I found the share ratio between all parties very unbalanced with Palestine only retaining 10%.

By mid 2008 BG had signed up with Egypt to pipe the entire supply to Egypt and then convert it to LNG for onward shipment to the US or EU. This was a potential disaster for Israel as they needed the gas desperately to fulfil their supply requirements having decided to convert to natural gas.

The other problem was that the Gaza Strip had, during these discussions, come under the control of Hamas and added even more complications to a possible deal. By June 2008 Israel was now on a war footing with Gaza with a clear intention of removing Hamas from the strip in order to try and get something salvaged from the failed deal.  It was during this time that the ex British Minister, Tony Blair became involved and tried to get BG and Israel to come back to the table and open up negotiations. BG responded and again returned to Israel for urgent talks and scrapped the deal with Egypt.

The Israeli Government then decided that the attack of Gaza would now have to be put back on hold as any activity could jeopardise talks between BG, Israel and the PA. Unfortunately yet again the talks failed and BG continued looking into other possibilities. By the end of the year Israel had made up its mind to go into Gaza and remove Hamas and in doing so would be in a good position to get their hands on these vast offshore reserves. 

 

The Ex IDF Chief stated “We have to remove Hamas in order to drill for oil and gas”

Now that’s what I call  true Israeli style democracy!!!

The attempted take over of the Gaza Strip failed as a direct result of the fortitude and spirit of Hamas and worldwide condemnation. We now have a situation whereby the people of Gaza/Palestine have this incredible offshore wealth but are unable to bring it ashore.

We read about all the financial aid that was promised by so many governments but where is this aid and do they really need it? The answer is simply no as they have all the wealth in the world in their offshore natural gas reserves.

Gaza does need urgent short term help in medical supplies and basic infrastructure support to get it up and running again. It needs significant help with its health infrastructure to cope with the ongoing sickness as a direct result of the Israelis bombardment and their use of weapons containing uranium components. There will now be a progressive rise in cancers, diabetes and birth complications which will put great pressure on their health system. Gaza also needs good quality water and basic food supplies and most of all it needs assistance to update and maintain its sewerage system which has totally collapsed.

Doesn’t it appear strange that raw sewerage now has to be dumped into the sea as a direct result of Israelis blockade? Would anyone in Israel imagine that to swim off their beautiful beaches is now a severe health risk? Can they even imagine the volume of sewerage from 1.5 million people…I think last year alone it somewhere in the region of 16 billion litres. This year the system is in total collapse and therefore the sea is the only answer. The tidal currents will take all the pollution North along Israel’s beautiful coastline. As they say what goes around comes around!

Now that we all fully understand what lies behind the Israeli – Gaza conflict we should be asking the question where are the United Nations and what are they doing about this? They were very quick to respond to Israel’s disproportionate attack on Gaza. They were very quick to place a war crimes team into Gaza but what about the long running issue of the exploitation of Gaza/Palestine natural resources and these so called disputed borders that they have known about for many years? Let’s just refresh their memories!

The EU and the UN Security Council have a prominent role to play in law enforcement and regulation in the region. Israel should be condemned internationally for its grave violations of international law regarding the exploitation of the Occupied Territory’s natural resources. The country’s       blatant disregard for the pronounced international regulations has done       nothing but increase Palestine’s dependency on Israeli oil supplies. Israel is also in violation of the Oslo Accord which it manipulated to its own advantage.

Resolution 1803 (XVII) 18 December 1962 declares the right of peoples/nations to permanent sovereignty over their natural wealth/resources,

UN resolution 3005 (XXVII) 15 December 1972 affirmed the principle of sovereignty of the population of occupied territories over their natural wealth and resources and called upon all States, international organizations and specialized agencies not to recognize or co-operate with, or assist in any manner in, any measures undertaken by the occupying Power to exploit the resources of the occupied territories or to effect any changes in the demographic composition or geographic character or institutional structure of those territories

Affirms the right of the Arab States and peoples whose territories are under foreign occupation to permanent sovereignty over all their natural resources,

Reaffirms that all measures undertaken by Israel to exploit the human and natural resources of the occupied Arab territories are illegal and calls upon Israel to halt such measures forthwith;

Affirms the right of the Arab States and peoples whose territories are under Israeli occupation to the restitution of and full compensation for the exploitation and looting of, and damages to, the natural resources

Resolution No. 3175 (XXVIII) 17 December 1973

Affirming the Right of the Arabs to Permanent Sovereignty over National Resources in the Occupied Arab Territories

 

The above map shows UN International Maritime Borders but doesn’t give any reference to Gaza/Palestinian Waters

 

 It is ironic however that the UN does acknowledge that a disputed international border exists (as the map below shows) so why doesn’t the UN do something about all the above violations or address this so called disputed international border?

 

The UN forms part of the New World Order so what chance do Palestinians have in the recovery of their own natural resources and for their future prosperity? Decades of false promises has left this enclave with no future!!

It is obvious that despite the UN condemnation of such issues it has no real strength in its ability to perform its duty. One would hope that the UN does not follow in the footsteps of its predecessor The League of Nations which failed dismally.

In the map below several natural gas fields sit within or stagger the Gaza/Israel disputed border which I have redrawn in white which is the 12 + 12 limits (that should apply to Gaza) and the extended red area which would be their EEZ. The area is prolific in Gas and I also believe that crude oil lies deeper under these fields. The map is not to scale but gives some idea of the proximity of the resources. As you can see considerably more offshore territory is available if it could rightfully claim its own EEZ (which is applicable to any other country).

 

My map showing not only the legal limits (White)  but also the extended legal EEZ (Red)

The areas in yellow are the current vast gas fields which Israel is taking under the watchful eye of the UN!! 

Now you can see what all the fuss is about. How can we, as an international community or how can the UN just sit on our hands and allow Israel to rape the natural resources of Gaza/Palestine. It is obvious that one of the above fields is Gazan owned and sits totally in the middle of their zone (Gaza Marine 1 & 2). The one to the North (staggering the border) is jointly owned even though Israel claim it as their own (Noa & Noa South) and then we have the production platform called Mari B that may also be jointly owned sitting right on the border. We will discuss these fields in more detail in Part 2 of this series.

It is obvious that if Gaza/Palestine were allowed to claim what is rightfully theirs and if the United Nations stood firm in supporting them we would see a transformation in Gaza and West Bank that is beyond imagination.

Why does this simple problem become a major headache for them all to resolve? Why cant the UN Peacekeepers move into Gaza and take over the border control and once in place lift the entire blockade of Palestine by land, sea and air?

I think I already know the answer which caused the same problem in the Balkans and in Lebanon. All locations had been bombarded with new tech weapons which contained components of depleted or enriched uranium. All locations were used as a test bed for US manufactured weapons. What peacekeeper, in their right mind, would subject themselves to such contamination?

As we have already know the UN peacekeepers in the Balkans fell victim to DU contamination and many of those have since died. In Lebanon we saw a similar situation but this time the IDF did not reveal it had used such weapons even though samples recovered since the 2006 attack have tested positive to DU/EU weapons usage. The Lebanese and the UN suppressed this information in order to put in place the peacekeeping forces. It is obvious that had such troops found out the truth no troops would have gone into such a contaminated environment.

The writing is on the wall that we are unlikely to see UN Peacekeepers in Gaza or West Bank. To add insult to injury the UN through its agencies the UNEP and the UNDP have now commenced the clearing of all bombed structures and will over the next year remove and crush the rubble. This highly toxic residue will then be spread around the Gaza Strip for new roads.

As I have previously pointed out this is against the normal policy of the UNEP and UNDP in dealing with potentially contaminated sites so why has this been allowed to happen. Why are both these authorities allowed to create a vast secondary contamination of aerosols to drift over the entire strip once again and also spread into adjacent countries such as Israel, Egypt, Jordan and Lebanon etc?  It is extremely hard to ascertain what the final death toll will be from the initial action by Israel (Cast Lead) and how this secondary contamination (by the UNEP/UNDP) will affect the entire region and beyond.   

Gaza/Palestine does not need any handouts or run of the mill aid when it has such vast reserves. It can have whatever it wants if it were given the same chance like any other country to reap in its own resources….rather than let Israel rape it of its future. When we look at all the aid that is sent by boat or by convoy it’s easy to understand that in most cases it doesn’t get through….why? Because Israel doesn’t allow it to get through? They control all borders (even the so called Egyptian controlled border) and have been handed control of the offshore waters by President Abbas.

WE should stop wasting these vast sums of money in aid, which incidentally frequently gets dumped in vast stockpiles out in the desert, because it has either expired or that the authorities don’t allow it to be kept in good storage and it perishes. Is this the right way to treat compassionate donations from around the world?

So what is the simple solution….”Allow Gaza/Palestine to bring their own natural gas onshore to the Gaza Strip. Allow the wealth of these resources to fund major projects such as a large Domestic Gas Plant, a large Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) plant, build new Industrial Gas Turbine power stations (that run on natural gas), promote new Joint Venture industrial entities that run on natural gas and then create a public transport system that also runs on gas.

As you can see Gaza/Palestine could have a very prosperous future but will we, the world, allow this to happen and what price will the people of Palestine have to pay? One thing for sure the United Nations must accept that it failed Palestine miserably. As for the Oslo accord we can also look at this extremely flawed agreement in the next part and show how Israeli manipulated this agreement and then totally disregarded it.

 

IDF for the second time on standby around the border with Gaza

Depleted Uranium Weapon exploding in Gaza in total violation of the Geneva Convention

In closing we now have a second conflict on the horizon with Israel on full alert for yet another genocidal attack on the Gaza strip and as you may have guessed using the same illegal weapons of mass destruction against these innocent people.

What the people of Israel do not know is that their government and the IDF are “Nuking” their own country as a result of using depleted uranium in all of their weaponry…………millions upon millions of radioactive nano particles are now drifting over the border into Israel from this ongoing conflict causing a major hike in many forms of cancer and infertility within their own country!!

 

Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant – 17/11/2012

Written by Peter Eyre

November 16, 2012 at 23:58

Posted in News

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 375 other followers